Comments by "Henning Bartels" (@henningbartels6245) on "Haussmann" channel.

  1. the argumentation is a bit twisted - asking tourist about a non-existent title. How should they know about if the title don't exist right now and therefore is not part of a current marketing concept for the city.
    5
  2. it is not a beauty in my opion - which also a result of the Unesco discussion: the arch of the bridge is weirdly shallow, which was probably done to reduce its visual impact. Even weirder is the fact that the bridge ends up in a tunnel on the northern bank, which really leads to the question why they didn't extend the a tunnel underneath the river and solved the bridge problem this way.
    5
  3. really?
    3