General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Remy Lebeau
Colion Noir
comments
Comments by "Remy Lebeau" (@remyllebeau77) on "Colion Noir" channel.
It's disgrace that we need insurance just in case we actually have to defend ourselves. Especially in supposedly pro 2A states.
59
Why are you pretending that this SJW nonsense is valid? If anything, she has female privilege, but it looks like she thinks it is white privilege. If you want to decriminalize drugs, then I'm all for it, but like so many others have said, you need PERSONAL responsibility!
23
Violent crime goes up when there is no 2A rights.
17
Of course they illegally searched his vehicle, they desperately needed an excuse to make him the bad guy.
15
Dude: "It's Hammer time!" Store Owner: "Lol nope."
8
Open carry activists are necessary so the public are use to seeing people exercise their rights, and more importantly cops don't get trigger happy when they see someone that is armed.
8
@flintymcduff5417 Pink shirt guy and the hero of Kenosha beg to differ.
7
@paultaylor9498 Didn't you watch the video? Colion just said it would be great for home defense. But regardless, it's the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs. We don't have to prove to anybody that we need it. It's okay to ask why someone would want it over other weapons.
4
Victims or the families should sue the business for not providing any protection while demanding that they remain defenseless.
4
I'll thank you for your service when veterans and active military actually honor your oath and remove domestic enemies of the constitution from power by force. There are tyrant cops handing out tickets to people watching sunsets from their car, and others have been arresting people that are even following the absurd and unconstitutional mandates in the name of the virus. There are the tyrant politicians actively destroying 2A rights and they are still in office in Virginia and other states. Take your pick. Obviously the "good" cops aren't going to do anything about it, they are good little order followers, and I haven't heard a peep from any supposed patriots or militia. I've never been more ashamed of America and our supposed Patriots for allowing such grievous trampling of our rights to this very day.
3
@ACommenterOnYouTube No it isn't. You are the one that needs an education. It is the bill of rights that restricts what the gov't can do. It does not allow gov't to offer the right to carry arms. Our rights do NOT come from gov't.
3
What privilege? Don't my taxes pay for the roads? Is the gov't going to pay for my vehicle? Then that would be a privilege.
3
+sniper244 Until they send in the police to take your guns by force like they did in the video. It HAS happened in America. So either you submit, or fight it out with the monsters (tyrants, disgrace to American values and freedoms, i.e. criminals) in blue. Edit: I just saw your post elsewhere about how it wasn't "local police", and while that offers a small amount of comfort, it doesn't change the fact that armed men have come from the "government" to take away guns. The founding fathers are spinning in their graves.
2
+DGK201 So killing a criminal breaking into your house is the answer, but killing a criminal that breaks in to take your guns by force isn't the answer because he is dressed in blue? Double standard much? I have great respect for police that follow their oath, ones that don't blindly follow policy or orders and are willing to take down police that do abuse power. All the signs I have seen point to those type of police being few and far between. Just here in my state some retards arrested a man for FIXING A BRIDGE after one of his children died because of it. To my knowledge NOBODY, NOT ONE REAL POLICE OFFICER has gone after those monsters and put a stop to the insanity.
2
5k is really pricey though.
2
I was thinking about it before he even mentioned it. :D
2
+Simon Palmer 'I guess SMH stands for 'stupid moron here' Says the guy that thinks it would be good to take away the right of people to defend themselves with guns, just because mathematically you will have less gun violence and accidents if there are less guns. (Which would be magically taken away from citizens with no violence at all.) You ignore the fact that criminals don't obey gun laws, violent crime goes up in the absence of guns, and it won't fix the underlying cause of mass shootings which is mental illness or psychoactive drugs. You also ignore that violent crimes have gone down, while gun ownership has gone up, and the major source of our gun crime is overwhelmingly linked to large cities and drugs. factcheck DOT org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/ washingtontimes DOT com/news/2012/jun/18/gun-ownership-up-crime-down/
1
+sniper244 The "monsters in blue" are the same ones "knocking down doors". If you are fighting or will fight for the people and their constitutional rights, then you are not a traitor like the ones "knocking down doors", and you have my thanks.
1
+Simon Palmer Did you say "Reduce the guns you'll reduce the gun violence. It's basic math"? Yes or no. How am I making assumptions by responding directly to your statement? crimeresearch DOT org/2013/12/murder-and-homicide-rates-before-and-after-gun-bans/ There is my source, which you can now dismiss as "unreliable" while not dealing with any points or evidence presented. "violent crimes have gone down, while gun ownership has gone up' So what?" So what? So 2 + 2 = 4. Clearly it is you that has trouble doing "basic math". It means that reality is contradicting all the anti-gun nutters.
1
+Simon Palmer Stop using an appeal to emotion fallacy. Deal with the points and evidence presented, or STFU.
1
+Simon Palmer You are the waste of time. You have refused all logic and common sense. You refuse to deal with all points, questions, and evidence. Furthermore, you keep using an appeal to emotion fallacy like a complete moron.
1
+Simon Palmer Welcome to my block list, you deserve it.
1
+Robert Manning So I guess "Universal background checks" doesn't include the victims of domestic violence. Good to know.
1
How about a top of the class weapons? Top pistol, top shotgun, top rifle, etc.
1
Oh I'm sure his crime bills got plenty of black people locked up. Not unlike Kamala keeping prisoners past their sentence. Of course he has spent the rest of his career apologizing for locking up criminals.
1
I hear that the police don't want to protect their event either. >:)
1
Lost me at "it's expensive"
1
The news media have no shame and no honor. May God judge them swiftly and harshly for their lies.
1
It's propaganda, heavily biased towards spreading leftist lies and the official narrative which is also usually a lie.
1
They can track your online orders, and track your cell phone when you drive to the pew pew store. Facial recognition is the least of our problems when the ATF can do early morning raids for selling too many things and end your life with impunity.
1
@PatrickKingJr The laws are null and void because they directly contradict the constitution. That won't stop criminal democrats from trying to throw the book at you if you a caught.
1
I don't regret that it happened. Should I mourn the loss of communist rioters that are known criminals and at least one was a pedo? My only regret is that patriots don't descend on the area and demand that the absurd charges be dropped immediately or else.
1
He certainly is smooth. Knows exactly what to say. Can't say I agree with all that "unify" America stuff. The time for that was long ago. I have no interest in unifying with monsters that sacrifice babies in the womb, and then whine about conservatives not wanting to pay out the nose for gov't welfare programs when we already give more to charity.
1
@dwaynebrinson7270 Haha
1
@R-Lee- Had to look it up, but you appear to be correct. Hard to believe though. It does make it easier to disown her though.
1
One time they found an empty magazine in my brothers luggage, and those disgraceful people wanted to act like it was a big deal. Our rights may as well mean nothing if this is how we have to act in front the most incompetent farce of security aka security theater.
1
Wait tax cattle! Don't go away!
1
For a moment there, I thought you were flexin on all your YT subscribers. :)
1
Most martial arts are a scam. When faced with real fights, even supposed masters got beat down.
1
Looks like a beautiful and practical weapon. Do you have any other options that are cheaper or better in some way?
1
@pyroman19 Wrong what? If I pay taxes for the roads why is it still a privilege? That makes no sense. The right of travel should not be compromised by any law against citizens.
1
@RacingSnails64 Says the constitution. There is nothing about being safe as a requirement to bear arms, only the suggestion to be well provisioned and trained to help secure the state. It's not the bill of needs, it is the bill of RIGHTS.
1
Please talk about Jemel Roberson, the black security guard hero who stopped a shooting only to be shot by trigger happy [or maybe racist] police. The inability of cops to deal with the fact that good people carry weapons, is abhorrent to me, and it doesn't matter what race they happen to be.
1
Shouldn't be that hard to get armor for the seats, the two front doors, and the dash. Then at least you could duck down and have a little cover, even if the glass wasn't stopping anything.
1
These hitmen aren't sending their best. 😆
1
Normalize open carry, yes, even with scary rifles.
1
@papimaximus95 You mean that without the video to justify him, he would have been completely F*cked because it would have been his word against a bunch of lying democrat anti-fa 💩 heads. Thereby demonstrating the need for insurance even more. And I reject your version of events in Kenosha. It couldn't have been more clean. One was striking him with a skateboard, so it was clearly being used as a weapon. And the evil intent was blatantly clear against Kyle. You don't get to chase someone armed while screaming threats like the first lunatic without consequences.
1
@papimaximus95 You don't even have the right story. Kenosha was in the streets.
1
@alexanderslemp4855 They are revenue agents for the gov't. They serve the paycheck and the people giving them orders. They do NOT serve the public.
1
:)
1
Come on man! It's a holster desert out there!
1
No reason to remove the weapon. There was no probable cause or justification to deprive of property. Clear violation of 4th Amendment.
1
@JaysRandomnessChannel Really? What do you think happens when the majority of abortions are from minorities? How do you even manage to do that in a majority white nation? Are people really so ignorant about the racist and eugenics history of planned parenthood and abortion? Gill Bates father was a eugenicist, and "Gill" openly talks about reducing the world population.
1
I thought maybe it was hidden in a briefcase and can fire out of the briefcase like a Bond gadget, or a weapon made to fit inside a briefcase.
1
Your first mistake was expecting a woman and a liberal to respond to logic. Your tactic must be emotional. Like shaming her for wanting women to be defenseless in the event of grape, and then explain the horrible racist beginnings of gun control. Your possible second mistake would be "winning the argument" with someone that can hold something over you, like if she could pull strings to get you fired, or if she is your boss.
1