Comments by "Remy Lebeau" (@remyllebeau77) on "Should we create a solar shade to cool the earth? | Danny Hillis" video.

  1. 1. Because the gov't is terrible at fixing things. See the war on drugs and war on poverty. 2. Because they are using pseudo-science to say too much heat is bad and humans are the cause of it.
    2
  2. Dimeadozen 1. It is irrelevant that you think nobody is good at fixing things, nor is that remotely true because you don't know everyone or what they can or can't do. Also it is a Red Herring and Tu Quoque to distract from the fact that the gov't has declared war on those things and has failed miserably. 2. The private sector or capitalism has done more than anything else worldwide to bring more people out of poverty. All while never declaring a war on poverty. 3. You know nothing of science or facts if you think gov't funded scientists are not biased. It is not possible to have real science if you lose funding if you discover and publish anything that contradicts the climate change pseudo-science. You probably don't even know that the same so called scientists were caught fudging the numbers on their data.
    2
  3. Dimetropteryx "it doesn't change the facts" Why don't you present some instead of the usual insults and name calling that I've come to expect from leftists? "It's neither." Then perhaps you should state your definition of Tu Quoque and Red Herring? Saying "nobody's good at fixing things" is a form of Tu Quoque, because instead of addressing the argument about gov't, you brush it off by saying everyone has the same problem. Similarly, bringing up the private sector is a Red Herring to avoid talking about the problems of gov't. "That's the reality you're going to have to deal with." You are only admitting to delusion when you ignore the millions brought out of poverty in China after economic reforms in 1978. "I understand and can employ science and facts" Large claims for someone who has yet to demonstrate anything but insolence and doesn't understand bias or refuses to acknowledge it. Someone who has an "education" should know better than to repeat back claims like a parrot while avoiding the argument. I'll bet your education doesn't come close to a PHD in Ecology, like the former founder of Greenpeace, Dr Patrick Moore. "ignoring reality" God forbid anyone disagrees with leftist dogma, science is about fanatical devotion to approved dictates. No wait, that isn't science at all. Real science should be objective, test the hypothesis, and welcome debate. It should not stand on a debunked myth of a 97% consensus. "they weren't" How would you know? You are either blissfully ignorant, or deliberately lying. "Virtually all of the USHCN warming since 1973 appears to be the result of adjustments NOAA has made to the data." - climatologist and NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer. He isn't the only one. 300 scientists have asked the gov't to investigate NOAA. Furthermore, climate alarmists consistently produce faulty predictions. See Hansen's 1988 predictions vs NASA satellite data global air temperature, and 90 CMIP5 Climate models vs. observations. +JBeags I don't deny that the climate changes, it changes all the time.
    2