Comments by "Remy Lebeau" (@remyllebeau77) on "The Real News Network" channel.

@VelhaGuardaTricolor Interesting that you didn't say whether you supported the lockdowns and stuff. We are not on the same side. I am anarchist -capitalist. I would like nothing better than seeing this evil government destroyed and criminal democrats and their buddies the war mongering rino republicans brought to justice. You want to increase gov't, you want gov't theft by taxes to continue and be much worse. The new deal was a terrible choice and served to prolong the great depression.
6
Says the leftist that probably supported the unconstitutional mask, lockdowns, and injection mandates, which caused the greatest wealth transfer we've ever seen and hurt so many small business. News flash bub, your constant demands for more and bigger government will ALWAYS help big business and hurt the little guy.
5
@breakupgoogle4584 Not an argument.
3
This is pure evil. Twisting the truth for your own evil leftist agenda. May God judge you harshly and swiftly. You are nothing close to real news.
2
@drewm9903 His diet isn't helping. He needs to give up all the foods he loves. All the carbs, all the sugar. Eat KETO or carnivore. Beef, Butter, Bacon, and Eggs. And eventually get all the meals down to one large meal per day.
2
@GanzGanz-e3o Let's get one thing straight. Capitalism aka the free market is NOT THEFT. Or do you not understand the concept of two parties willingly and voluntarily engaging in trade? Who is being stolen from if you are selling a candy bar, and I buy it from you because the price is acceptable? And even changing the example to a giant corporation selling me a candy bar, that is still both parties happy to participate in the transaction.
2
@VelhaGuardaTricolor That is not an argument. Theft is any physical property taken that isn't yours, and it isn't given willingly. How do you define it? The free market and capitalism I have already explained. How do you define them?
2
@VelhaGuardaTricolor I already gave you my definitions. If you can't or won't explain why they are wrong and why your definitions (that you haven't given yet) are right, we are at an impasse. And it isn't an argument to make unfounded claims. Otherwise I can say "the sky is green and grass is blue, so you are wrong because you don't understand the sky and the grass." It's nonsense declarations that you and I haven't even begun to prove, much less how they might prove the other to be wrong. Why do I have to explain something so basic? It's like you've been going to public school for a long time and they taught you a bunch of lies that you didn't bother to question at all.
2
@chuletaization Nonsense. The free market happens ANY time there is open and free trade. Nobody is forced to sell or buy until they are happy with the price. One could argue it isn't free anymore once gov't taxes and regulation are involved, but even to say that has never happened is lunacy. How can you even mention Christianity and be so against the basic principles of freedom?
2
@SusanBloodgood-o5s And who here is claiming we are living in a free market? Not me. I was just defining it.
2
It was rejected because as always, the democrats were hypocritical pieces of excrement. They only wanted it forced on the radio and not the TV where they had control of EVERY channel outside of Fox. They were angry that conservatives finally had a voice and an impact.
1
The fact that everyone knows the name George Floyd but barely anyone knows the name Tony Timpa, shows how corrupt the media is, and how biased "The Real News Network" is. Keep crying about muh poorest communities and communities of color.
1
wtf is he talking about? There is nothing wrong with privatization. As if gov't isn't wasteful beyond measure. Is this a clueless democrat channel that think they are still on the side of free speech? You aren't even good people, you are desperate to keep murdering babies, silence free speech, and destroy the human right of self-defense.
1
I have little desire to communicate with evil leftists. Forsake your evil, be grounded in reality for once in your life, and then we can come to the table.
1
@baigandinel7956 We are not equal, and that is just fine. You can not have freedom of choice and still have the same outcome for everybody. The only equality people deserve is for their right to life to be honored (which includes unborn babies), and a certain equality under the law. Women were not created to be equal with men, and the constant attempt to be so will only lead to more of the same misery. Feminism was always a lie, a false premise that women could be and should be equal.
1
@GanzGanz-e3o Sounds like a condemnation of leftist indoctrination centers aka public schooling. They also want good little workers for the state. Just as much as any corporate conniving.
1
@GanzGanz-e3o And it is CRONY capitalism that pairs with big gov't that has created the system we have now. It is NOT the free market. Industries are constantly putting up roadblocks for the competition. That is NOT the free market.
1
@GanzGanz-e3o And you are delusional if you think gaining your socialist "Utopia" won't end up sending and forcing people into work camps. Your ideology ALWAYS ends in starvation and democide.
1
@GanzGanz-e3o That isn't true. Even the smallest transaction of you selling me a candy bar, IS the free market. It IS capitalism, especially when you start a small business out of it. Don't come crying to me when the big gov't that you always support breaks the free market. Then what do you know? Then the gov't forces regulation on everyone that you can't afford to comply with, and the big candy bar company can. And don't give me that "social inequalities" BS. When everyone is given freedom to do what they want, THERE WILL BE inequality! Not everyone wants to work 40 or more hours a week. Just like the female wage gap that has been debunked over and over.
1
@melelconquistador You mean the fake anarchists that don't understand the concept of having "no rulers" means they would and should be against ANY centralization, no matter how much you call it "by the people"? There are whole channels dedicated to explaining this ideology in detail.
1
@VelhaGuardaTricolor For all the good it will do of talking to a brick wall, yes I will reply. The 2008 bailout was from the gov't to the banks. The 2020 debacle and crimes by the gov't included shutting down small business and allowing big businesses like Walmart and Amazon to stay open. See the difference? One is screwing over everyone by theft of taxation and giving to people that did not deserve a bailout regardless of the will of the people. AKA taxation without representation. And privatized profits, socialized losses. The other is forcing people out of business and out of their jobs and directly benefiting the rich. The lockdowns caused untold damage to society. If you don't care about it, and don't want those responsible thrown in prison, you are morally bankrupt.
1
@VelhaGuardaTricolor How do you not understand that wealth inequality is inevitable, and it would be a crime to force everyone to have the same outcome? Or the tyranny of forcing everyone to work the same hours? An-Cap is the best moral position. Everything is voluntary. There is no gov't by the people and for the people. They are for enriching themselves and keeping power as nearly all leaders do. Taxation is theft. If it is not right for you to go door to door and force your neighbors to give you money to pay for what you want done for society, when is it any more morally correct for you to vote and get others to do the same thing? The questions of how to run society, have been answered over and over in response to questions like "but who will build the roads". But the best way to explain it, is to point out obvious things like grocery stores. Who will build the grocery stores, how will we get groceries if the gov't didn't bring all the food to one convenient area? /s
1
@@RiotBot I have no responsibility to provide an argument against a non-argument that was often made against my points and arguments.
1
@@RiotBot I can and I will, because that's not how logic works, and I'm not here to obey some nutter's opinion that is a lulcow at best. Learn to make real arguments instead of responding with non-arguments, then you can whine about how I do things.
1