Comments by "" (@benghazi4216) on "What the Crimean Bridge Attack Means for the Russia-Ukraine War" video.

@ITS-FALCO Who are you talking to? It can't be the OP right? What is wrong with Andrea? It's a nice name
2
@oleopathic Because it's diesel. It's really hard to light that on fire. Which is why only two or three tanks burned.
2
@oleopathic And please end this talk of shape charges. You are literally seeing 10-30 TONS of explosives here. This is a truck bombing. And military experts agree.
2
@oleopathic Bo Janzon, a scientist semi famous here for his work with ballistics and armor, and former head of the Swedish forces research arm. Our DARPA so to speak. 99,5% sure that is was a truck carrying 10-30 tons of civilian explosives. With a higher probability for the lower side of that estimate. And yes he can see that it's civilian explosives just based on the explosion itself. I think the term he used was oxygen balanced, but that is a direct translation into English, so might be a bit wonky. Is that enough for Mr civil engineer? That you as a civil engineer look at this and thought controlled demolition is totally beyond me, as an engineer myself. And I thought every engineer knows that you connect the piers of a bridge to the span with expansion joints and bearings, so it can move. Not bolts and plates. That would make the bridge last like an hour. Come on man, attack this problem with the rationality of an engineer. Focus on what we know, what we can see, and leave the why for later. If you want my 2cents, it was either the FSB or the National Republican Army. Same suspects as for the Dugin bombing.
2
Amazing how people can just delude themselves to seeing what is not there, just because a preconceived opinion based on a feeling. We can see the blast marks on top of the road from freaking space. Yet you don't see it. Amazing.
1
@Useaname Those guys that did this were Russians. Ukraine is not getting 10-30 tons of civilian explosives together inside Russia, and then driving to Crimea.
1
@debbieclifford3693 Hahahaha stop being so deluded. It's was the Russians themselves, just like with Dugins bombing. It's either the FSB or the new National Republican Army.
1
@wolfwolfenangelo3650 "They do more war crimes than us" is not an winning argument. Civilian lives should always be respected. Can't understand how you can object to that.
1
@debbieclifford3693 So there is only the Russian state in your mind? Remember the FSB, or the new national republican army? Who did Dugin's daughter in your mind?
1
@debbieclifford3693 Stop being willfully stupid. Russia has an active insurgency and infighting between factions. It was either the FSB or the NRA. Just like with the Dugin bombing. And yes, Russia does shell the nuclear power plants they control. We even have a world famous meme from it, when the inspectors asked why an rocket sticking out of the ground was pointing to Russian held territory and the Russian official tried to BS them. All nicely captured on film for the world to see and laugh at.
1
Clearly? All we see is a wake. Like between other pillars, as it is a strait between two seas. Experts, actual scientists, from the west are sure it is a truck bomb filled with civilian explosives. Only Twitter is delusional to think up fantasies like a drone barge, timed with a train no less.
1
How can you, as a civil engineer call this a "controlled demolition"?! To an actual engineer, your whole post smells. What we see is 10-30 tons of civilian explosives going boom. Not something you carry into place with special forces.
1
@AndreLuis-gw5ox Why are you just making things up? Experts in the west are 99,5% sure it was a truck bomb with 10-30 tons of civilian explosives.
1
Why this ridiculous notion of a false flag? Remember Dugin? Russia is having internal problems, and symbols of the regime are getting blown up. Kerch bridge fits this like a glove. Much much more likely than Ukraine getting a hold of 10-30 tons of civilian explosives and putting it on a truck in Russia.
1