Comments by "" (@benghazi4216) on "Battle Of SNAKE ISLAND: Explained By A Defense Analyst" video.

I voted on the poll, went to bed, and woke up with a new video to watch?! The turn around time is amazing, it's almost like you were a Swedish Gripen in human form
10
"When Russia captures Odessa" Hahaha, yeah keep dreaming. Like a Russian said, the Russian successes are so granular compared to the stated goals that one can make porridge out of them.
4
They are immensely more accurate since the rockets are GPS/INS guided. Both the US and UK are sending the M31 rockets, since the only unguided ones are cluster munitions, which isn't optimal against Russian armor. And the Ceasar can outrange the Pion with the right shells. And a shot that hits does more damage to the enemy than a larger one that misses slightly.
4
And Kiev was a feint, and Russia has 12000 tanks in storage, right?..
3
@Alex-cw3rz I will put it like this. If their Kalibr priced at 6,5 million dollars can't hit a massive building but explodes next to it, I give very little for the immensely cheaper rockets for their artillery. There is little equivalence between inertial guidance from the Soviet times and modern GPS guidance. And Pion has accuracy problems at max range, that is pretty well known. It does much better at regular 155mm ranges, but that negates many of the advantages with it. But the Russians don't care about accuracy, half of their sorties are just dumping unguided rockets in ballistic trajectories. Quantity has a quality of its own so to speak.
3
@operator9858 Yes it is. Ancient Greece called it Achilles. The Romans, the white island The Ottomans, snake island The Greeks, snake island The Ukrainians, snake island
3
@cartrips9263 RIA Novosti accidentally published a victory article on 8AM February 26th. So you are lying. It was the Russian plan. And that was clear from Lukashenko's map he showed too. And the leaked ones to the German media, etc etc.
2
@operator9858 I'm getting at that this is blatant pro-Russian stupidity like usual. Kiev was the not a feint. Regime change was the goal. You don't sacrifice your VDV for a feint. https://youtu.be/6x0O_oObJBU?t=1755
2
@wellwell7950 What on earth are you talking about. Post an actual argument. Now you are just looking like a pro-Kremlin nutcase rejecting reality. In short, you looked up nothing.
2
@jhdsfalsjhdfjashdkhvjfldld8301 Says the person with the unreadable alias. Make an argument. But hey, I have written no more than Igor Girkin has, so stop calling your own side crazy now.
1
@rightiswrongrightiswrong806 "There is no blockade of Ukrainian ports" Pure BS. This video even has a segment on the Russian blockade. That you Russian trolls even have the energy to write stupid sh*t like this.
1
@Alex-cw3rz 1) Come on, Tomahawks flew through windows decades ago. It isn't really an option for Kalibr. If you want to look up the strike I mention you can search for Kharkiv's Freedom Square. 2) Please post any source that Russia is using GPS guided artillery in Ukraine. I will definitely not hold my breath. This is akin to saying Russia has 5th gen fighters, T-14's or hypersonic weapons. 3) Sure, but how long is a string? The lack of accuracy at max range in the Pion has been a factor to consider in planning. That isn't the same with 155mm NATO. And definitely isn't with the Excalibur shells, which outrange everything Pion can fire, and hits a car at that max range. Very expensive though. Very. 4) No, western countries do definitely Not fire volleys of unguided rockets in ballistic trajectories from their planes and helicopters. That is just mental to say.
1
@Alex-cw3rz 1) Yes the strike on Freedom square was a Kalibr. Russia even claimed it themselves. Tomahawks can fly through a window, Kalibr can't even hit a massive building but strikes the parking lot outside. There is no equivalence in accuracy. 2) Hah, touting laser guidance as better. Are you joking? To hit something with a laser guided bomb, you need to illuminate the target with a laser. Picking out a position on a map, and hitting it with GPS, is much much more effective. 3) Canada has sent Excalibur. The US has promised them. So it has been used, and will be used in the future. The point with the Pion is that it stands out in losing accuracy at max range. Just like the F35 stands out in its incapability to sustain its top speed. Get it? And do look at the latest Excalibur versions, which can hit a moving car at range. 4) Clearly you can't read. Western countries do have unguided rockets on both helicopters and aircraft. But in no way would they fire volleys in ballistic trajectories. That is mentally deranged to even contemplate of doing. And Russia is doing it, again and again.
1
@HISuttonCovertShores But I think his point was the ability to do it. Just like installing early warning radars looking deeper into NATO than they can now. In peacetime, with civilians willing to go near the island, they could land an S300/S400 on it. Now they don't have the heroes to do it so to speak.
1
@normal_norm2627 And now you instead have deluded yourself with stupidity. What a great progression..
1