Comments by "Ronin Kraut" (@roninkraut6873) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. Because it’s a leftist admin and it goes against the program
    1
  2.  @edjames9849  Not true
    1
  3. You want to lower costs? Get government out of it and suddenly costs go down
    1
  4. There was a shift in our future culture and the majority of us had zero say in it. I despise this administration and the DNC. They have doomed our children and grandchildren
    1
  5.  @candace5258  Yeah, it’s really scary. I can’t believe that they went after everyone they could find for Jan 6th and locked them up in solitary. There is no fighting it at that point. It’s honestly disheartening
    1
  6.  @ccdogpark  I was going to insult you because of your ignorant comment about the south but the. I read your reply to Pamela. And now I respect your humor, sir.
    1
  7.  @bradleymcavoy3432  You realize that the COVID Vax isn’t FDA approved, right? It’s only for emergency use. And show me all the studies and double blind studies done on the vax. While I don’t agree with the anti vax crowd, I still think we should be 100% honest about the COVID vax. This has been one cluster fuck of a mess because the gov decided to play games and lie in the beginning to the public.
    1
  8. The FBI has been caught bolstering the numbers so that 2/3rds figure is horseshit. And that’s why they did it. To minimize left wing violence. The only REAL example they had was the OK bombing. 1994. It’s insane
    1
  9. Hilarious when the Dems, especially Plaskett, crying about not needing to be educated. Then whining about being demeaned because they have never said anything demeaning or untruthful about the right.
    1
  10. He was chosen to be here for that exact reason. He is willing to disgrace himself for “the greater good.”
    1
  11.  @MrHAPPYHAWAIIAN  I really hope you’re joking but even then that’s a disgusting thought. Almost half of the voting public wanted Trump. You don’t have an overwhelming majority on either side. And to suggest that the government should be watching your political opponents is demented and dangerous.
    1
  12. The Dems just want to add anti 2nd propaganda. Scary how many members of congress don’t recognize all of our 2nd amendment rights
    1
  13. Always make it about brown people
    1
  14.  @royaldeasis6910  It doesn’t matter. But the second you make it about oppression then the left has no choice but to listen.
    1
  15. Undermining the American people by importing millions of “new voters” who are at odds with American culture and values. Something drastic must occur or it’s over
    1
  16.  @thomasabrahamthomas2500  Do you work in child welfare? Do you actually understand what you are talking about? Who do you think pays the foster parents/agencies, therapist, counselors, medical, clothing, etc?? Each state runs their child welfare program differently. Look at California, they run it by county and it’s different each county. This is why eduction is important. You have way too many abusers out their lying about what happened with their children…
    1
  17. He did what HIAS required
    1
  18. I wonder if HIAS had anything to do with this??
    1
  19. So are the progressives now saying that only women can have babies?
    1
  20. Those are the “radicalized” persons Garland mentioned in his opening. That’s what’s truly frightening. When you view half the country as radicals this is what you get..
    1
  21. The difference is Biden was NEVER president. Trump has a reason to have those docs. It is still being litigated.
    1
  22. When did we turn into a Marxist shitshow?
    1
  23.  Lacey Face2020  How is Mike Lee a Rino? I know Romney is but haven’t heard that about Lee
    1
  24.  Lacey Face2020  Man, I must be lost because I didn’t see him vote for gun control. When was this?
    1
  25.  Lacey Face2020  K. I was going to keep asking but I’ll just look it up. Thanks
    1
  26.  Lacey Face2020  I just didn’t want to keep bothering you but yeah. If it was Crenshaw (who had a terrible record on the 2nd anyway) it must have been red flag laws.
    1
  27.  Lacey Face2020  Crenshaw is the new McCain…
    1
  28. And a dog is anyone who says they are…???
    1
  29. As they have been caught boosting the numbers so right wing and “white domestic terrorists” seem like a bigger problem than it is
    1
  30.  @confidentalconfindental4376  The Mormons had to give up polygamy to become a state. It’s illegal in the state of UT to practice polygamy. They have an interesting history, though, if you care to look it up
    1
  31. Now we just need to get him away from his AIPAC babysitter…
    1
  32. We e had federal law enforcement forever. It just seems to keep growing and growing and growing. Do we really need this many federal cops??
    1
  33. He’s the breathing definition of a Fudd. All those laws on the books he’s speaking of are unconstitutional
    1
  34. He’s shifty
    1
  35.  @LuciferArc1  Money buys a better defense team but the process SHOULD be the same. But the numbers are skewed because crime rates are higher in poorer communities. Some people will take those stats and say rates are higher because those areas are targeted by the police. Confirming their bias. But if you are aware or familiar with CJ then you’d understand why that is.
    1
  36.  @LuciferArc1  Are you saying that our criminal justice system was set up with fines/penalties/retribution in mind ONLY to punish the poor? I’d suggest researching the root causes and justifications of these rules and policies instead of assuming what they mean based on your understanding of oppressed vs oppressor.
    1
  37.  @LuciferArc1  You mean the two tiered justice system? Elite and rich are very different. Do you remember the Mckluskeys? They were a rich couple in MO who tried to defend their property from the BLM rioters. The DA said she was going to try everything she could to prosecute them because of historic racism. This is not how our justice system is set up or how it should work. Same with Rittenhouse. Clearly it was self defense but he is still being tried. He shot some poor people. That just happened to be on the right side of politics. The HRC thing is a little different because the evidence wasn’t there (maybe because the FBI didn’t actually give a good god damn about prosecuting her). But the system is not set up to allow those people off. They bad actors within the system allowed it. There is a big difference. Same with how they tried to railroad DJT. But again, that’s not how the system is supposed to work. We can come up with example after example on how it didn’t work (mostly due to the bad actors and not the system) but those will always be outweighed by the times the system did work.
    1
  38.  @LuciferArc1  Yes. The people stop trusting the institutions and then change must come before revolt. It also doesn’t help when the people are lied to about their faith in institutions. When the lies become so thick that truth is indiscernible from fiction then how do you instill trust back into the system? Look what just happened. Half the country thinks the previous president was a criminal who got away with everything and the other half see it as a witch hunt. How do you restore faith in that instance? The lies are so many that people still think he was a Russian agent. They see the continued witch hunt as an act of righteousness. And either outcome will further their distrust of the system. Same on the right. We really are in dangerous territory.
    1
  39.  @Censoredbyfscists  Based on what info? From his own testimony he didn’t. Something that these hearings kind of hide from the public is that the members of congress are briefed on all of this and know before hand what’s happened. Some senators/reps put on a show for their constituents but it’s not honest. According to Milley (not Woodard) what he sis wasn’t treason. He did what he was supposed to do. He also got approval form it through the chain of command. We just went through 4 years of Dems lying and putting on a show, we don’t have to lie or make things up to discredit Biden or the Dems.
    1
  40. If it’s a “terrible thing” then stop it! It’s like trying to plug holes in a dam while the water is power over the top
    1
  41. Obama received the Nobel prize. Forever invalidating it
    1
  42. I think something’s damaging Raskin’s brain. He decries the right for blaming Biden for everything but not surprisingly bashes Trump. That’s all he has.
    1
  43. And it wasn’t so much Bush as it was Cheney and company
    1
  44.  @BobM.-to9ji  Most of Biden’s cabinet is from that tribe. Kinda odd…
    1
  45. Is he saying the republicans were against the COVID relief bill? Instead of helping out families it paid a whole lot of special interests. Maybe that’s what they were arguing against. Lying politicians
    1
  46.  @treelady4760  I agree. The mandates are in the process of being finalized. They are for the executive branch and some other federal contracted companies. It’s kind of tricky because we have OSHA and through them they can say it’s a public health concern. But he cannot mandate for every American to be vaccinated, that would be unconstitutional. I got vaccinated but I won’t stand for authoritarianism. Every time there is a crisis the government takes away more of our rights.
    1
  47.  @gdaddy5193  Maybe. There are cases of felons not being repeat offenders and then we can look at some causes as to why they are repeat offenders. If they are habitually in and out of jail then they most likely won’t have time to vote. You can expunge your record but you still have been convicted in a criminal court so I’m not sure if you can still vote (I think that’s the question that’s asked). Isn’t the consequence of breaking the law the time/fine served? If the issue is lax sentencing then shouldn’t we address that instead of blanket policies of not allowing people to vote? Putting someone in prison is taking away rights. I don’t think we should have people voting from prison but I think we can do better.
    1
  48.  @gdaddy5193  I understand as you continue to break the law the consequences get more severe. I also understand that even though it’s a law it doesn’t make it right. There are cases of 18-21 year olds that have a felony conviction and they lose their rights for life. Non violent offenders too. Some of them are in the 30-40’s and haven’t broken the law since. I think those people should be able to vote. If there has been enough time that has gone by then maybe they are not the same person they were 10, 15 or even 25 years before. It’s shouldn’t be a lifetime punishment. Of course not everyone’s story is the same and some people deserve their rights being taken.
    1
  49.  @gdaddy5193  No, the Trump prison reform bill doesn’t ring a bell. I’m familiar with the First step act which you are grossly mischaracterizing. The aim of the bill was to help prisoners take classes that would reduce recidivism, reduce stacking of charges, allow inmates to be imprisoned closer to their communities, allow senior inmates to be housed outside of prison in a more old folks style of home or released on medical (again if they meet certain age requirements) there was also a provision for correction officer training and gun storage. I think you’re talking about what some liberal Dems did in CA and NY when they tried releasing a bunch of inmates during COVID and claimed the bill allowed them to do so. NY also had tried to reform their justice system and allowed violent offenders to be on home release with disastrous results. That’s not what I’m trying to get at. But you do raise a very important point about expungement. I don’t think you can get a felony conviction expunged to get your voting rights back. Driving is considered legally to be a privilege and not a right so that may be how you were able to do it. Is there any room to you about this subject how you could see maybe there could be improvements? Or are we just at an impasse and will just simply have to agree to disagree?
    1
  50.  @gdaddy5193  Yeah, that’s the first steps act. When you read the actual language it’s not about letting mass amounts of inmates out except during COVID they (and I mean democrats) used the act to justify letting a ton of inmates out. The DOJ tried fighting them on it. I didn’t realize it was called the Trump crime bill since I’ve never heard anyone refer to it that way. The bail reform was a huge problem and caused more crime. I think we are on the same page as far as crime and punishment goes. I’m just not a supporter of taking someone’s rights away in certain instances like when an 18 year old gets busted at a party where drugs are found and he gets a felony charge. That’s an entire lifetime of not being allowed to vote for a mistake. Of course that doesn’t always happen but sometimes it does and I’m saying we need to address those examples. Again, I don’t want prisoners to be voting.
    1