Comments by "Ronin Kraut" (@roninkraut6873) on "" video.

  1. Connor Hendricks You’re confused. It’s less efficient and more costly but it would be more powerful. The other factor we are not looking at but manufacturers have to is MPG. I’d prefer an ecoboost 5.0 but to mass produce a twin turbo charged 5.0 is impractical especially from a fuel efficiency standpoint not to mention the other parts that would have to be overbuilt to keep that engine reliable from a mass production standpoint. It’s a cost/regulation game and not just a pure power one. If the only measurement was power then absolutely displacement, in any application, wins.
    2
  2. Connor Hendricks The replacement for displacement IS forced induction. It always has been.
    1