Comments by "MU MU" (@mumu9690) on ""Quran Burning Crime in Russia": Putin's Veiled Dig at Sweden as Muslim Nations Warn | Watch" video.
-
Psalm 91 is about Jesus, he is mentioned by name in the original language, so we cant deny its about Jesus. This prophecy that Jesus would be protected, and be lifted with no crucifixion matches what the Qur'an says about Jesus PBUH
GOD Almighty will hear his cries (Psalm 91:15) and will save him (Psalm 91:3).
GOD Almighty will cover him with His Protection (Psalm 91:4).
Christ will then not have any fear in him (Psalm 91:5).
Christ will then observe with his own eyes the punishment of the crucified ones (Psalm 91:8).
No harm (this includes crucifixion!) or disaster will even come near Christ (Psalm 91:10....this even contradicts him getting beaten up before crucifixion).
GOD Almighty will send down the Angels to protect him and lift him (Psalm 91:11-12, 14, Isaiah 52:13). Not even his foot will strike the ground from his enemies pushing, grappling and punishment.
Christ's call will be HEARD, and he will be delivered and honored (Psalm 91:15, Isaiah 52:13). No way would these verses be valid if Christ got crucified.
His life will be prolonged (extended) and he will live to even see his offspring (Isaiah 53:10 and Psalm 91:16, which by the way contradict Jesus never got married and had children. In Islam's Noble Quran's 13:38, however, it is quite possible that Jesus Christ had wives and children).
His life will overpower death (Isaiah 53:12).
"Death" in Isaiah 53:9 is proven to be symbolic using the Hebrew Lexicon and several English translations, and it never meant a literal death.
Psalm 91 is speaking as a number of Prophecies that WILL take place. Notice how the verses are speak of future events that WILL TAKE PLACE. Never once throughout the entire New Testament were the Angels sent to save Jesus from striking his foot against a rock. This, again, clearly proves that the NT is indeed false and corrupt.
Jesus and his mother thanked GOD Almighty for saving Jesus from death.đŽ
4
-
Any brave christian can explain why Jesus in the Bible says woman and children who don't accept the Lord of Israel should be stoned to death.
Why does it say not to greet or invite non believers to your home
Why does it say that woman should obey their husband as they obey their Lord.
Why does it say woman should cover their hair, else shave their heads?
Why does it say woman shouldn't teach, and be silent
Why does Jesus say that children who insult their parents should be put to death
If Jesus is all love then why when he returns will he kill all non believers?
Why are nuns praised for their commitment to God whilst muslim woman who cover their hair are called oppressed?
Do Not Marry a Divorced Woman:Â Matthew 5:32Â NASB
Whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.
Women: Donât Dress Up, Fix Your Hair, or Wear Jewelry:Â 1st Peter 3:3Â The Good News Translation
You should not use outward aids to make yourselves beautiful, such as the way you fix your hair, or the jewelry you put on, or the dresses you wear.
Women Should Shut Up in Church:Â 1st Corinthians 14:34Â NASB
The women are to keep silent in the churches; for they are not permitted to speak.
Jesus strongly approves of the law and the prophets. He hasn't the slightest objection to the cruelties of the Old Testament. 5:17
Jesus sends some devils into a herd of pigs, causing them to run off a cliff and drown in the waters below. 8:32
Jesus condemns entire cities to dreadful deaths and to the eternal torment of hell because they didn't care for his preaching. 11:20-24
Jesus is criticized by the Pharisees for not washing his hands before eating. He defends himself by attacking them for not killing disobedient children according to the commandment: "He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death." (See Ex 21:15, Lev 20:9, Dt 21:18-21) So, does Jesus think that children who curse their parents should be killed? It sure sounds like it. 15:4-7
Mark
Jesus explains why he speaks in parables: to confuse people so they will go to hell. 4:11-12
Jesus criticizes the Jews for not killing their disobedient children as required by Old Testament law. (See Ex 21:15, Lev 20:9, Dt 21:18-21) 7:9-10
Jesus says that entire cities will be violently destroyed and the inhabitants "thrust down to hell" for not "receiving" his disciples. 10:10-15
John. Jesus believes people are crippled by God as a punishment for sin. He tells a crippled man, after healing him, to "sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee." 5:14
Acts
Peter claims that Dt 18:18-19 refers to Jesus, saying that those who refuse to follow him (all non-Christians) must be killed. 3:23
God will cause us to believe lies so that he can damn our souls to hell. 2:11-12 thessalonians
3
-
if you thought Islam invented the fact Jesus wasn't crucified, think again.
In his Trallians, Ignatius, the bishop ofAntioch (who died around 110
CE, and who wrote during the first decade of the second century CE), was
quite eloquent in his attack against the early Christians who denied that
the crucifixion of Jesus was anything more than an illusion. The following quotation from Ignatius (italics added for emphasis by the present
author) is directly to the point:
But if, as some say.. .his suffering was only an appearance, then
why am I a prisoner, and why do I long to fight with the wild beasts?
In that case, I am dying in vain."
80 The Cross & The Crescent
One cannot attack as heresy a belief or doctrine that does not yet
exist. The theology of Ignatius not withstanding, his attack against those
early Christians who believed that Jesus' crucifixion was only illusory,
demonstrates the existence of that belief among the early Christians.
Further, the fact that Ignatius even bothered to attack this doctrine suggests that the belief in the illusory nature of the crucifixion was quite
widespread by 110 CEo Clearly, the doctrine of or belief in the illusory
nature of the crucifixion was perceived by Ignatius to be a threat to what
would much later become the orthodox position of the Christian church
regarding the crucifixion. As it would take some years for such a belief
to become widespread across the vastness of the Roman Empire, it can
be deduced that the origin of the doctrine of the illusory nature of the
crucifixion must be dated well back into the first century CE, and quite
possibly right back to the time of the crucifixion itself.
When considering the above, it must be remembered that Ignatius
was attacking Christians, not non-Christians, although the particular
Christians being attacked shared a specific belief system at odds with
that of Ignatius when it came to the particulars of the doctrine of the
crucifixion. To millions of Christians raised with a Sunday School interpretation of Christianity, the above may come as something of a shock.
However, for those Christians, the shocks are only just the beginning.
Indeed, the shocks dramatically increase in voltage when one considers
the early Christian scriptures, both apocryphal and canonical.
3
-
Muslims say Jesus is a prophet and messiah. What do those close to Jesus say?
If this man was GOD, he would never have been called a prophet.
Matthew 21:11
And the crowds were saying, âThis is the prophet Jesus, from Nazareth in Galilee.â
Luke 7:16
Fear gripped them all, and they began glorifying God, saying, âA great prophet has arisen among us!â and, âGod has visited His people!â
John 4:19
The woman *said to Him, âSir, I perceive that You are a prophet.
Matthew 21:46
When they sought to seize Him, they feared the people, because they considered Him to be a prophet.
John 6:14
Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, âThis is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world.â
John 7:40
Some of the people therefore, when they heard these words, were saying, âThis certainly is the Prophet.â
John 9:17
So they *said to the blind man again, âWhat do you say about Him, since He opened your eyes?â And he said, âHe is a prophet.â
Luke 24:19
And He said to them, âWhat things?â And they said to Him, âThe things about Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word in the sight of God and all the people,
Mark 6:15
But others were saying, âHe is Elijah.â And others were saying, âHe is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.â
Mark 8:28
They told Him, saying, âJohn the Baptist; and others say Elijah; but others, one of the prophets.â
Luke 9:8
and by some that Elijah had appeared, and by others that one of the prophets of old had risen again.
OK, so Jesus doesnt refute anybody calling him a Prophet, he reaffirms itđ
Luke 13:33 . . . . I must proceed on my way. For it wouldnât do for a prophet of God to be killed except in Jerusalem.
Mark 6:3-4 Then they scoffed . . . . They were deeply offended and refused to believe in him. Then Jesus told them, âA prophet is honored everywhere except in his own hometown and among his relatives and his own familyâ.
In the above two verses, Jesus called himself a prophet. There are also many verses indicating that during his lifetime on earth the people in Judea and Galilee regarded him as a prophet.
Regarding the verses in which Jesus says that he is equal to God (mainly in the Gospel of John) most scholars believe that Jesus never said that. It was what people started saying about him after his death and put on his lips in the Gospels written at least 4 decades later.,.\,.\â¤
3
-
So did Jesus' earliest followers consider him to be God?
EHRMAN: Well, what I argue in the book is that during his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God and that none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. The way it works is that you do find Jesus calling himself God in the Gospel of John, our last Gospel. Jesus says things like: Before Abraham was, I am, and I and the father are one, and if you've seen me, you've see the father.
These are all statements that you find only in the Gospel of John, and that's striking because we have earlier Gospels, and we have the writings of Paul, and in none of them is there any indication that Jesus said such things about him. I think it's completely implausible that Matthew, Mark and Luke would not mention that Jesus called himself God if that's what he was declaring about himself. That would be a rather important point to make.
So this is not an unusual view among scholars. It's simply the view that the Gospel of John is providing a theological understand of Jesus that is not what was historically accurate.
GROSS: Jesus was referred to as the king of the Jews. Did he call himself that, and what did that mean it is time? Do we know? Can we have any idea what that meant in its time?
EHRMAN: Yeah, we do know, and actually to be a king of the Jews simply meant literally, being the king over Israel. It is a very difficult question to get to, what Jesus taught about himself because of the nature of our gospels, but one thing is relatively certain, that that the reason the Romans crucified Jesus was precisely because he was calling himself the king of Israel.
Now, Jesus obviously was not the king. So what might he have meant by it? Well, what scholars have long thought is that Jesus was talking about not being put on the throne by means of some kind of political show of power, but that Jesus thought the world as he knew it was coming to an end and God was going to bring in a kingdom, a new kingdom in which there would be no more injustice or oppression or poverty or suffering of any kind.
And in this kingdom, Jesus appears to have thought that he himself would be the future king. And so Jesus meant this not in the regular political sense but in a kind of apocalyptic sense, that at the end of the age, this is what was going to happen: he was going to be installed as king.
GROSS: So Jesus saw himself as the messiah. What else did that mean in its time?
EHRMAN: Well, a lot of Christians today have a wrong idea about what the messiah was supposed to be. The word messiah is a Hebrew word that literally means the anointed one. This was used in reference to the kings of Israel. The ancient kings of Israel, when they became king during the coronation ceremony, would have oil poured on their head as a sign of divine favor.
And so the king of Israel was called God's anointed one, the messiah. There came a point at which there was no longer a king ruling Israel, and some Jewish thinkers began to maintain that there would be a future king of Israel, a future anointed one, and they called that one the messiah. And so the messiah for most Jews simply referred to the future king of Israel.
And so when Jesus told his disciples that he himself was the messiah, he was saying that in the future, when God establishes the kingdom once more, I myself will be the king of that kingdom. And so it's not that the messiah was supposed to be God. The messiah was not supposed to be God. The messiah was a human being who would be the future king, and that's probably what Jesus taught his disciples that he was..đ
3
-
Jesus Christ is a true human being. It is clear from the verses below that he was indeed a man.
John 17.3...jesus says to the father...that they may know you, THE ONLY TRUE GOD and Jesus whom you sent.
John 20.17 Jesus says....I am ascending to me father and your father, my God and your God.
Acts 2:22
âMen of Israel, listen to this: Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him, as you yourselves know.
Acts 2:23
This man was handed over to you by Godâs set purpose and foreknowledge; and you, with the help of wicked men, put him to death by nailing him to the cross.
Acts 17:31
For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to all men by raising him from the dead.â
1 Timothy 2:5
For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.
Romans 5:15
But the gift is not like the trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the one man (Adam) how much more did Godâs grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, overflow to the many!
The Greek word for âmanâ in these verses is anthropos.
The Greek word anthropos means âa human being, whether male or female, generically, to include all human individuals, to distinguish man from beings of a different race or order.â
Anthropos is used to describe Adam, the first man. In the same verse (Romans 5:15) it is used to describe Jesus Christ. If words mean anything, one must believe that Jesus Christ was a flesh and blood human being just like Adam.
On the other hand, Scripture says âGod is not a man.â
Numbers 23:19
God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of manâŚ
Numbers 23:19 (NRSV)
God is not a human being, that he should lie, or a mortalâŚ
Hosea 11:9
For I am God, and not manâ the Holy One among you..đŽ
3
-
3
-
There is only One religious text that commands the kiling of babies.
And that is the Christian Bible.
The medianites man woman and child, nursing baby and even tree and donkey was to be kild as revenge for a crime their forefathers did centuries before......HOWEVER, ANY VIRGIN GIRL was to be kept alive and distributed to the solders to do you know what đ¤Žđ¤Žđ¤Ž
In the Qurâan, we are commanded to fight ONLY in self defense vs persecution. And no non combatants, no woman, children, elderly, religious leaders or buildings are to be harmed. And if they cease, to show mercy
Not only, here, but also in the NT. See verses below
Ever wondered why devout christians like Blair and Bush lied to the world with a bogus war on terror, did 9oneone, then lied about wmd and kiled millions of innocent people to steal those countries resources?
Or why they overrepresent muslims crimes tenfold(look it up) in the media to wash peoples minds with lies and hate?
If we were like them, we could blame Christianity, because maybe the bible of Jesus tells you to behave this way?
Corinthians 6:14 ESV /
Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness?
2 John 1:9-11 ESV /
Everyone who goes on ahead and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God. Whoever abides in the teaching has both the Father and the Son. If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house or give him any greeting, for whoever greets him takes part in his wicked works.
2 Chronicles 15:12-13 ESV /
And they entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and with all their soul, but that whoever would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, should be put to death, whether young or old, man or woman.
2 Corinthians 4:4 ESV /
In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.
2 Corinthians 6:14-15 ESV /
Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever
Deuteronomy 17:1-20 ESV
âYou shall not sacrifice to the Lord your God an ox or a sheep in which is a blemish, any defect whatever, for that is an abomination to the Lord your God. âIf there is found among you, within any of your towns that the Lord your God is giving you, a man or woman who does what is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it, then you shall inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an abomination has been done in Israel, then you shall bring out to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you shall stone that man or woman to death with stones. ...
Luke 19:27 ESV /
But as for these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slaughter them before me.ââ
Exodus 22:19 ESV /
âWhoever lies with an animal shall be put to death.
Deuteronomy 7:3 ESV /
You shall not intermarry with them, giving your daughters to their sons or taking their daughters for your sons,
Leviticus 20:13 ESV /
If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.
Leviticus 20:27 ESV /
âA man or a woman who is a medium or a necromancer shall surely be put to death. They shall be stoned with stones; their blood shall be upon them.â
Leviticus 20:10 ESV /
âIf a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.
Leviticus 21:9 ESV /
And the daughter of any priest, if she profanes herself by whoring, profanes her father; she shall be burned with fire.
1
-
Sadly xtians throw these teachings of Jesus away for those of their false prophet Paul đ˘
đ Jesus: The only true God is The Father!
đŁ The Church: No! You're also a true god!
đ Jesus: By myself I can do nothing!
đŁ The Church: No! You can do everything!
đ Jesus: The Lord our God is ONE!
đŁ The Church: No! The lord our god is three in one!
đ Jesus: If you want eternal life then keep The Commandments!
đŁ The Church: No! If you want eternal life then believe that Jesus died for your sins!
đ Jesus: I cried and prayed to God PBTH to save me from the crucifixion and God heard my prayers!
đŁ The Church: No! God didn't save him so we can be saved by his blood!
đ Jesus: My Father is greater than I, my Father is greater than all!
đŁ The Church: No! The Father is not greater than you, you're both co-equal!
đ Jesus: I was sent ONLY to the lost sheep of Israel, not the gentiles!
đŁ The Church: No! You were sent to the entire world!
đ Jesus : Circumcise male children as God Commanded!
đŁ The Church: No! Circumcision is unnecessary and will profit us nothing. This is what Paul said, the one you came to in a dream!
đ Jesus: I didn't come to abolish the Laws!
đŁ The Church: No, you came to abolish it all! The law brings wrath, and where there is no law, there is no transgression! This is what Paul said!
đ Jesus: If you love me keep my commandments!
đŁ The Church: No, don't listen to him Christians! If you love him then keep the Church Commandments built by Paul, the early Christian persecutor!
đ Jesus: I never met Paul!
đŁ The Church: No! You came to him in a dream, can't you recall?
đ Jesus: I never ate ham and so you should as God Commanded!
đŁ The Church: No! Ham is good!
đ Jesus: I've finished all the work that God gave me before my departure!
đŁ The Church: No! You waited till you ascend to heaven and came in a dream to an early Christian persecutor to negate everything you've preached for 33 years!
đ Jesus: đ¤¨đ¤¨đ¤¨đ John 8:42-47
42 Jesus said to them, âIf God were your Father, you would love me, for I have come here from God. I have not come on my own; God sent me. 43 WHY IS MY LANGUAGE NOT CLEAR TO YOU? Because you are unable to hear what I say. 44 YOU BELONG TO YOUR FATHER, THE DEVIL, AND YOU WANT TO CARRY OUT YOUR FATHERâS DESIRES. HE WAS A MURDERER FROM THE BEGINNING, NOT HOLDING TO THE TRUTH, FOR THERE IS NO TRUTH IN HIM. WHEN HE LIES, HE SPEAKS HIS NATIVE LANGUAGE, FOR HE IS A LIAR AND THE FATHER OF LIES. 45 Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me! 46 Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why donât you believe me? 47 WHOEVER BELONGS TO GOD HEARS WHAT GOD SAYS! THE REASON YOU DON'T HEAR IS THAT YOU DON'T BELONG TO GOD!âđ
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Xtians favourite Gospel of John is an ancient fraud.
It has multiple anonymous authors, and has been contested by churchfathers from day 1. Look it up.That is why it's all over the place.
When we read Mathew Mark and Luke, Jesus is a prophet and the emphasis of Jesus is always on his God.
He elevates God and gives glory to the father.
In John, this is flipped. Now all of a sudden, Jesus is talking all about himself and how great he is.
Clear red flags.
There are four versions of the life of Jesus in the New Testament but, letâs face it, everyone has a favorite. For most people, that preferred version is the Gospel of John. Not only is the fourth Gospel the most poetic and âspiritualâ of Gospels, itâs also the most theologically weighty.
Itâs in John that Christians find the evidence for many of the dogmatic claims that form the bedrock of Christian belief. And itâs John that supplies the pithy quotes about faith, eternal life, and love that you find on coffee mugs and laminated bookmarks.
Now new research, which claims that the Gospel of John is an ancient forgery, is poised to overturn much of what we know about everyoneâs favorite biography of Jesus.
When it comes to the authorship of this story, Christian tradition attributes the Gospel to an apostle, known in the text as the disciple âwhom Jesus lovedâ and identified by early church writers as the disciple John.
It is this beloved disciple who keeps watch with Mary the mother of Jesus at the cross. As Jesus draws close to death, he sees his already-grieving mother and devoted follower standing together and says âwoman, here is your sonâ and, to the disciple, âhere is your mother.â Itâs a scene of great compassion in which Jesus encourages his mother and dearest friend to take solace in their relationship with one another. The supposed closeness of Jesus and the beloved disciple has meant that the beloved disciple (AKA John) is a central figure in Christian art. In Leonardo Da Vinciâs âLast Supper,â for example, it is the beloved disciple who sits beside Jesus.
The Gospel presents itself as the work of an eyewitness to the events of Jesusâ ministry and death. It doesnât say it was written by John but instead states that it is the work of a âdisciple whom Jesus loved,â who âtestifiesâ to what he has seen (1:14; 19:35; 21:24)..,
1
-
Unfortunately for xtians, we have 0 manuscripts from the first century, of the n.t. and there is no chain of narration.
For the o.t. the earliest manuscripts are a MILLENIA after Moses.
None of these books claim to be from God. The new testament are gospels according to....
And your own scholars are unanimous that the Gospel writers are anonymous. What a shame.
For example, the o.t. says God needed a rest, to be refreshed. Exodus 31.17
It shows God being regretful!
Also got forgets! God says He put a rainbow in the sky to REMIND HIM not to destroy the people!
I'm sure you would agree God does not forget, get tired, or regret.
Clearly whoever wrote these did not know God.
In the Qurâan, the verbatim word of God, you will not find such foolishness.
It is the only scripture that tells you it is from God, and promises it will be preserved. And your own scalars admit they envy the preservation of the Qurâan.
Jesus never saw, read or authorised any of your bible. It's the truth whether you like it or not.
And that's why we have confirmed fraud such as the below. And that's just the tip.
Alpha and omega
Its a fraud confirmed by scholars see below
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.
The authorship of the Gospel of John, the Fourth Gospel, is widely contested. Scholars have debated the authorship of Johannine literature since at least the third century, but especially since the Enlightenment.
the doctrine of Alpha and Omega is a sad and unfortunate example of mankindâs tampering with the Word of God. It shows how doctrine is contracted by men to justify false beliefs. The phrase âSaying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the lastâ (Revelation 1:11) which is found in the King James Version was not in the original Greek texts. Therefore, the Alpha Omega phrase is not found in virtually any ancient texts, nor is it mentioned, even as a footnote, in any modern translation.,
1
-
1
-
The Bible is full of contradictions and errors. However there are remnants of truth, and so God told us to use the Qurâan as a criterion to filter the truth from falsehood.
Look below at what true salvation is according to the Bible. This is Islam.
If God needed a human sacrifice to forgive, then why is the below in your bible?
He will not die for his fatherâs sin; he will surely live. 18But his father will die for his own sin, because he practiced extortion, robbed his brother and did what was wrong among his people.
19âYet you ask, âWhy does the son not share the guilt of his father?â Since the son has done what is just and right and has been careful to keep all my decrees, he will surely live. 20The one who sins is the one who will die. The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them.
21âBut if a wicked person turns away from all the sins they have committed and keeps all my decrees and does what is just and right, that person will surely live; they will not die. 22None of the offenses they have committed will be remembered against them. Because of the righteous things they have done, they will live. 23Do I take any pleasure in the death of the wicked? declares the Sovereign Lord. Rather, am I not pleased when they turn from their ways and live?
24âBut if a righteous person turns from their righteousness and commits sin and does the same detestable things the wicked person does, will they live? None of the righteous things that person has done will be remembered. Because of the unfaithfulness they are guilty of and because of the sins they have committed, they will die.
25âYet you say, âThe way of the Lord is not just.â Hear, you Israelites: Is my way unjust? Is it not your ways that are unjust? 26If a righteous person turns from their righteousness and commits sin, they will die for it; because of the sin they have committed they will die. 27But if a wicked person turns away from the wickedness they have committed and does what is just and right, they will save their life..,.
1
-
The evil original sin concept is unjust and a later fabrication found in the works of Paul and anonymous John. the o.t. makes it clear God does not punish the son for the crimes of the father, and vice verse. How can this suddenly change with Paul!
Any sane person would agree it is unjust to punish someone innocent for the sins of the guilty. Yet you attribute this evil to our Almighty God! Because Paul taught it!
Clear signs of the devil, where you wouldn't accept this form of justice on earth, yet you are happy to attribute it to God because Paul taught it.
Not only is it unjust, but the concept doesn't even make sense from the beginning.
Xtians say that by adam and eve eating the fruit, they gained a sinful nature, and because God can't be around sin, they were fallen. However, in order for them to sin in the first place, they had to already have a sinful nature. If they didn't already have a sinful nature, they wouldn't have committed the first sin. How clear it is that xtianity is a fabricated lie satan constructed long after Jesus departed. How can they see all these signs yet remain ignorant!
If we were to disclude the works of anonymous john, and false prophet paul, Bible says no such thing as original sin or the need for God to commit suicide for salvation. Repentence equals salvation
He will not die for his fatherâs sin; he will surely live. 18But his father will die for his own sin, because he practiced extortion, robbed his brother and did what was wrong among his people.
19âYet you ask, âWhy does the son not share the guilt of his father?â Since the son has done what is just and right and has been careful to keep all my decrees, he will surely live. 20The one who sins is the one who will die. The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them.
21âBut if a wicked person turns away from all the sins they have committed and keeps all my decrees and does what is just and right, that person will surely live; they will not die. 22None of the offenses they have committed will be remembered against them. Because of the righteous things they have done, they will live. 23Do I take any pleasure in the death of the wicked? declares the Sovereign Lord. Rather, am I not pleased when they turn from their ways and live?
24âBut if a righteous person turns from their righteousness and commits sin and does the same detestable things the wicked person does, will they live? None of the righteous things that person has done will be remembered. Because of the unfaithfulness they are guilty of and because of the sins they have committed, they will die.
25âYet you say, âThe way of the Lord is not just.â Hear, you Israelites: Is my way unjust? Is it not your ways that are unjust? 26If a righteous person turns from their righteousness and commits sin, they will die for it; because of the sin they have committed they will die. 27But if a wicked person turns away from the wickedness they have committed and does what is just and right, they will save their life..,.
1
-
We don't even need to look at scripture to disprove paulanity. Just look at the theology.
When your child is in danger, you would seek to protect your child. If there are stones falling from the sky, your first instinct would be to wrap yourself around your child so that you take the damage rather than your child.
In Christianity, the Father instead pushes his innocent son literally into the fire.
If God soo loved the world, why send his only begotten son to take the humiliation torture and hellfire that the Father was responsible for instead of himself?
If any parent on this earth put their child in danger rather than themselves, you would say these people don't deserve to have children.
This would never be accepted, yet the whole theology is built upon injustice.
If Jesus was paying the price for mankind's sins, and wages of sin are death, why did he only spend 3 days and nights in hell? Surely to pay for the crimes of humanity, you would need to spend longer than 3 days in hellfire.
Thank God for making me a Muslim
You ppl know none of this is right, but still you will twist and turn to remain upon this falsehood. Smh,
1
-
@@meeeethewhistleblower if you thought Islam invented the fact Jesus wasn't crucified, think again.
In his Trallians, Ignatius, the bishop ofAntioch (who died around 110
CE, and who wrote during the first decade of the second century CE), was
quite eloquent in his attack against the early Christians who denied that
the crucifixion of Jesus was anything more than an illusion. The following quotation from Ignatius (italics added for emphasis by the present
author) is directly to the point:
But if, as some say.. .his suffering was only an appearance, then
why am I a prisoner, and why do I long to fight with the wild beasts?
In that case, I am dying in vain."
80 The Cross & The Crescent
One cannot attack as heresy a belief or doctrine that does not yet
exist. The theology of Ignatius not withstanding, his attack against those
early Christians who believed that Jesus' crucifixion was only illusory,
demonstrates the existence of that belief among the early Christians.
Further, the fact that Ignatius even bothered to attack this doctrine suggests that the belief in the illusory nature of the crucifixion was quite
widespread by 110 CEo Clearly, the doctrine of or belief in the illusory
nature of the crucifixion was perceived by Ignatius to be a threat to what
would much later become the orthodox position of the Christian church
regarding the crucifixion. As it would take some years for such a belief
to become widespread across the vastness of the Roman Empire, it can
be deduced that the origin of the doctrine of the illusory nature of the
crucifixion must be dated well back into the first century CE, and quite
possibly right back to the time of the crucifixion itself.
When considering the above, it must be remembered that Ignatius
was attacking Christians, not non-Christians, although the particular
Christians being attacked shared a specific belief system at odds with
that of Ignatius when it came to the particulars of the doctrine of the
crucifixion. To millions of Christians raised with a Sunday School interpretation of Christianity, the above may come as something of a shock.
However, for those Christians, the shocks are only just the beginning.
Indeed, the shocks dramatically increase in voltage when one considers
the early Christian scriptures, both apocryphal and canonical
1