Comments by "John Beerschoten" (@JohnBeerschoten) on "Hindustan Times" channel.

  1.  @seaker9206  There is a huge difference in the legal position between freedom fighters and terrorists. The definition is: “Terrorism (from the Latin word terror, panic) is the commission of serious violence, or serious threat thereof, WITHOUT LAWFUL GROUNDS, for a political or religious purpose. In most understandings of what terrorism is, it must involve illegal violence, usually linked to civilians and victims. This means that Hamas is not a terrorist organization but a resistance movement that even has the right to use violence. Israël, together with the US are the terrorists because the occupation is not a legal ground.
    5
  2. At the same time Israel must lose statehood.
    5
  3. Whny now "seriously concerned" because this is an Palestinian-American teenager? How is it different from the other intentional killings?
    5
  4. Next time I will buy the wine from South Africa. I don’t drink wine but I can give it way.
    5
  5. Yes, he is welcome, we can handle him here just like we did with Milosevich. He died in prison.
    5
  6. Israel always breaks any agreement. Watch Sabra and Shatila 1982.
    5
  7.  @zacthegamer6145  There is no good understanding of terrroristm. The definition is: “Terrorism (from the Latin word terror, panic) is the commission of serious violence, or serious threat thereof, WITHOUT LAWFUL GROUNDS, for a political or religious purpose. In most understandings of what terrorism is, it must involve illegal violence, usually linked to civilians and victims. This means that Hamas is not a terrorist organization but a resistance movement that even has the right to use violence. Israël, together with the US are the terrorists because the occupation is not a legal ground.
    5
  8.  @robjohnson9270  Israel has no right to exist on other people's land. This follows from the November 2nd 1917 Balfour Declartation. When you read the one page carefully. It states the conditions by the British Crown under which the refugee jews were allowed to live in Palestine. One of the conditions is “‘that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-jewish communities in Palestine”. Consistently violated.
    5
  9.  @Moonlight_At_Sight  Are you always negative? What is your contribution?
    5
  10.  @Marcelo.1927  There is no good understanding of terrroristm. The definition is: “Terrorism (from the Latin word terror, panic) is the commission of serious violence, or serious threat thereof, WITHOUT LAWFUL GROUNDS, for a political or religious purpose. In most understandings of what terrorism is, it must involve illegal violence, usually linked to civilians and victims. This means that Hamas is not a terrorist organization but a resistance movement that even has the right to use violence. Israël, together with the US are the terrorists because the occupation is not a legal ground.
    5
  11. Albert Einstein, letter to Hugo Bergmann, June 19, 1930: "Only direct cooperation with the Arabs can create a dignified and safe life... What saddens me is less the fact that the jews are not smart enough to understand this, but rather, that they are not just enough to want it." Mister Einstein was ashamed of the jewish people. (source: Shlomo Sand: The Invention of the land of Israel, page 255.)
    5
  12.  @Shengsocute5604  I will think it over.
    4
  13. The only one page Balfour Declaration November 2nd 1917 explains a lot when you read it carefully. It states the conditions by the British Crown under which the refugee jews were allowed to live in Palestine. Let me tell you a secret that most people do not know. The word 'Israel' is a pseudonym for 'US military base in the Middle East'. That's why these huge amounts of money go to such a tiny little place
    4
  14.  @DuncanSlaterIdiot  Not the Israeli immigrants but the Palestinian people or Palestinians are the descendants of the inhabitants of the area known as 'Historic Palestine'. The Palestinians have a fascinating Arab culture.
    4
  15. What does that mean when you say: "I am a jew""?
    4
  16.  @symbioticedifice237  No, you have to motivate your statement with your sources. The Bible is a religous source and not a lawful source, so not valid in court. By the way, my Bible shows on the first page the territory from the river to the see in the Arab Middle East and it says: "Palestine at the time of the Old Testament." You think I have the wrong Bible?
    4
  17.  @airfhussain5317  Yes, because we can study and think.
    4
  18. I'm sure all this is observed by the judges in the International Court of Justice in The Hague who will decide this month Januari 2024 in the case brought by South Africa.
    4
  19.  @itshakgordin5145  Nonsense. Analysts: Jeffrey Sachs - Ralph Wilde - Rami Khouri - Dr. Gilbert Doctorow - Colin Clark - Ilan Pappe - Norman Finkelstein - Col. Lawrence Wilkerson - Larry Johnson ex. CIA - Richard Wolff - Dmitry Orlov - Col. Jacques Baud - Amb. Chas Freeman - Prof. Mohammad Marandi - Andrei Martyanov - Pepe Escobar -Theodore Postol - Mark Sleboda - Dee Knight - Tariq Ali - Andrei Martyanov - Rami Khouri - Charles Freeman - Phil Giraldi - Ehsan Safarnejad - Michael Hudson -Richard Falk - Daniel Patrick Welch, and others.
    4
  20.  @batman-zy2hp  Why not batman? Do you have a reason for that?
    4
  21.  @bradrichards8122  Wrong. There is a huge difference in the legal position between freedom fighters and terrorists. The definition is: “Terrorism (from the Latin word terror, panic) is the commission of serious violence, or serious threat thereof, WITHOUT LAWFUL GROUNDS, for a political or religious purpose. In most understandings of what terrorism is, it must involve illegal violence, usually linked to civilians and victims. This means that Hamas is not a terrorist organization but a resistance movement that even has the right to use violence. Israël, together with the US are the terrorists because the occupation is not a legal ground.
    4
  22. And it's possible, all the territory back to a free Palestine.
    4
  23.  @ismaelluna3267  yes miss ignorant.
    4
  24.  @samueladler9752  Samuel, Samuel, very disoppointing intellectual capacities. Think and study harder boy.
    4
  25.  @ring-tone278  There is a huge difference in the legal position between freedom fighters and terrorists. The definition is: “Terrorism (from the Latin word terror, panic) is the commission of serious violence, or serious threat thereof, WITHOUT LAWFUL GROUNDS, for a political or religious purpose. In most understandings of what terrorism is, it must involve illegal violence, usually linked to civilians and victims. This means that Hamas is not a terrorist organization but a resistance movement that even has the right to use violence. Israël, together with the US are the terrorists because the occupation is not a legal ground.
    4
  26.  @kaizen_monk  Israel has no right to exist on other people's land. This follows from the November 2nd 1917 Balfour Declartation. When you read it carefully. It states the conditions by the British Crown under which the refugee jews were allowed to live in Palestine. One of the conditions is “‘that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religeous rights of existing non-jewish communities in Palestine”. Consistently violated.
    4
  27.  @kaizen_monk  The International Community (UN) does not have the right to constitute a new state (Israel) on other peoples land (Palestine). This follows from the one page November 2nd 1917 Balfour Declaration on behalf of the British Crown. Look it up. Don't believe people say that it is complicated. It's not with a clear mind.
    4
  28.  @Sp3ll633  Did you ever read a history book, or only religious nonsense? Read Jimmy Carter: Palestine Peace not Apartheid; Shlomo Sand: The Invention of The jewish People and: How I Stopped Being a Jew; Rashid: The Hundred Year's War on Palestine; Ilan Pappe: The History of Modern Palestine.
    4
  29.  @madhulikanegi319  Absolutely nonsense.
    4
  30. The West Bank must be part of the deal.
    4
  31. The International Community (UN) does not have the right to constitute a new state (Israel) on other peoples land (Palestine), without their consent. This follows from the one page November 2nd 1917 Balfour Declaration on behalf of the British Crown. The same thing happened at the Berlin Colonial Conference 1884-1885. Africa was divided among the European powers. Not a single African was present, so no consent. There is no legalization for that, it is unlawful, just like in the Palestine case.
    4
  32.  @froh1froh777  Who cares if you do not believe that?
    4
  33.  @oloruntobistanislaus1132  Because it is not Israel but the US that fights Israels wars.
    4
  34.  @nabuyabrenner5584  Who is us? What about a non-believer. Is it new to you that not everybody in this world believes the religious stories. Look at the facts.
    4
  35.  @Mr_Negrodamus  Your sources are religious. A religious argument does not hold in court, at least you have to come up with lawful arguments. Did you already read the Application to the ICJ by South Africa?
    4
  36. Wrong, you need to become a better observer.
    4
  37.  @HR45Indri  Many agree with that even many jews.
    4
  38.  @landyrover4589  There is no good understanding of terrroristm. The definition is: “Terrorism (from the Latin word terror, panic) is the commission of serious violence, or serious threat thereof, WITHOUT LAWFUL GROUNDS, for a political or religious purpose. In most understandings of what terrorism is, it must involve illegal violence, usually linked to civilians and victims. This means that Hamas is not a terrorist organization but a resistance movement that even has the right to use violence. Israël, together with the US are the terrorists because the occupation is not a legal ground.
    4
  39. nothing. you pay for nothing
    4
  40.  @robjohnson9270  There is no good understanding of terrroristm. The definition is: “Terrorism (from the Latin word terror, panic) is the commission of serious violence, or serious threat thereof, WITHOUT LAWFUL GROUNDS, for a political or religious purpose. In most understandings of what terrorism is, it must involve illegal violence, usually linked to civilians and victims. This means that Hamas is not a terrorist organization but a resistance movement that even has the right to use violence. Israël, together with the US are the terrorists because the occupation is not a legal ground.
    4
  41.  @Arnsteel634  agree
    4
  42.  @Jesus_SOG_  Grow up and start to study and think, you talk like a baby.
    4
  43. Israel has no right to exist on other people's land. This follows from the November 2nd 1917 Balfour Declartation. When you read the one page carefully. It states the conditions by the British Crown under which the refugee jews were allowed to live in Palestine. One of the conditions is “‘that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-jewish communities in Palestine”. Consistently violated.
    4
  44.  @10Chocolatefingers  The BRICS will correct these mistakes, mistakes based on power, not justice.
    4
  45.  @sukhatoyepthomi605  Is'nt that what all Americans do? Foolishly calling the Bible that's written by the jews, the Word of God.
    4
  46. The occupation has to end.
    3
  47. Did you study much to become a parrot?
    3
  48.  @oscaralison  YouTube sucks.
    3
  49.  @robpalac1603  The Berlin Conference took place from November 15, 1884 to February 26, 1885, in which Africa was divided among the European powers. Without one African present and without consuling the African people. Thus without their consent. This is called colonization. The same goes for other people to decide over the territory of Palestine without the consent of the people, as in 1917 by the British Crown, is called colonization. The International Community (UN) does not have the right to constitute a new state (Israel) on other peoples land (Palestine). This follows from the one page November 2nd 1917 Balfour Declaration on behalf of the British Crown.
    3
  50.  @radio9730  Are you a zionist? We will meet.
    3