Comments by "N Marbletoe" (@nmarbletoe8210) on "Surgeon General Jerome Adams cites antibody treatment for Trump's delay in getting vaccine" video.

  1. holy smacks that is a bad tweet
    2
  2. he puts a neutral spin on the new strain. . just the facts, is what I heard. Unlike the BBC which was half hype.
    1
  3. and he's immune
    1
  4. Yes, that is logical. D is known to help with Covid from many studies. Most people are slightly deficient since we are a typing, not farming species now. . D supplements are cheap and help with many things. I personally get enough sun, usually. Good stuff though!
    1
  5. Yes, there are now three major randomized controlled studies, all showing good results for Iver. The results are dramatic in magnitude, and consistent across the studies.
    1
  6. yes, and his information was balanced and accurate
    1
  7. contagious and deadly are two different things. . he said exactly what the scientists said, but what the BBC and others do not report very well.
    1
  8. FLCCC, and also Dr. Mobeen is an amazing resource for details of treatments.
    1
  9. he didn't delay it
    1
  10.  @tomyboyle5302  The actual mortality rate is about 0.3%. Getting the vaccine would lower that to 0.085%. It would save about 95 out of 100 lives lost to the virus. . Most people (and the news!) either underestimate or overestimate the mortality by a factor of 10 or more. It's not Ebola, and it's not a cold.
    1
  11. Correction: use of a weakened strain is called "inoculation." Some vaccines are inoculations, some not.
    1
  12. cool. thanks for the report! are you in health care?
    1
  13. Liberals like to use science only when it benefits the cause. . Same with conservatives. (to be clear, I mean liberal/ conservative politicians and the press, not regular people)
    1
  14. it lowers spread though, surely
    1
  15.  @tulipsontheorgan  If that were the case then we could find the truth by taking the opposite. So they mix in a lot of truth with the lies. . Most lies are actually true facts used to point us in the wrong direction. "There's a bird!" Yes, there is a bird. And yes, when I looked at it, he took my wallet.
    1
  16.  @mdmurray17  Thank you. Almost all published peer-reviewed estimates put it between 0.1% and 1%.
    1
  17.  Dusty  what's wrong with freedom? people can't choose their spouse? sounds like communism
    1
  18.  Dusty  You asked me to think about it. I thunk. . I agree that they are faking it. Most conservative and most liberal polticians do whatever to get elected. There are exceptions, some good folks out there too. . So what's wrong with freedom that both parties hate it? Rhetorical question. Just basically agreeing with you but taking it further.
    1
  19.  @mdmurray17  There is no evidence that immunity wanes for Sars-2. . It very well might, but there are also diseases for which lifelong immunity is the rule.
    1
  20.  @mdmurray17  True! Of course, there's enough time yet for that to show up if it happens. . There is good evidence that immunity usually does not go away in 8 or so months. . Thus, if vaccines are limited in supply, people who had the disease may defer to someone who didn't. This could save lives. It should be a choice, of course, but delaying would be an act of compassion, just as getting it is an act of compassion. Good stuff! Kind people.
    1
  21.  @mdmurray17  Valid point! . However, the press should be clear on that reason. They should not imply that he should take it to avoid getting and spreading the virus. That is anti-science.
    1
  22.  @mdmurray17  Yeah Trump's not any better than the mainstream media, sad to say.
    1