Comments by "N Marbletoe" (@nmarbletoe8210) on "Kamala Harris' Tweets Designed To Trick Progressives" video.

  1. Tulsi is short on ideology and long on integrity. If you want someone to check all your boxes, she's not the one. If you want someone who isn't going to lie to you, who has guts to stand up to the establishment when it is full of shit, Tulsi is awesome. Not a robot though.
    5
  2. The Hindu cult smear is bullshit. Smear campaign, started years ago, I've looked into it, zero credence. You might as well go back to 'more likely' stories such as "Bernie is Commissar of Venezuela."
    4
  3. Why do you say I'm defending her "blindly"???????? That is my VERY POINT! I'm saying to y'all, that she won't have a progressive stance on every issue. Personally I think her other attributes far outweigh that fact.
    4
  4. "Without a people's army... oh shit I starved all the people." -Mao
    3
  5. <I have yet to find one person that's actually getting into what I've shown. > I don't think you're really listening to what people are saying. I for one agreed with you in part, that she won't be progressive on every issue. What am I, chopped liver? I believe she's quality people - and that counts more than being progressive on every issue. Far far far far more. For example, choosing positions based on logic and the good of the country, not based on a party platform. Maybe she's wrong about some issues but she is honest, so we know what we're getting. And she is actually very strong in standing up to the corporate establishment when she thinks they are wrong, e.g. in regime change. But she agrees when she thinks they are right, like drones are a valuable tool (which even Bernie believes). The worst type of politician is the one who uses the party platform as a shield from personal responsibility. They are robots and are throttling the country. Tulsi is the opposite.
    1
  6. But we CAN'T have a purity test because nobody is pure. Kamala Harris is way too hard line for me, but she is right on that point. The only pure candidate would be a robotic ideologue and that's almost worse than a fake. We DO need people who will be straight with us and not pat our lil heads and tell us stories to put us to sleep. That's honesty, not purity.
    1