Comments by "N Marbletoe" (@nmarbletoe8210) on "International Update" video.

  1.  @jwarmstrong  I suspect your post is fake since you didn't give your real name or what type of shampoo you use.
    10
  2.  @theprophetez1357  no you don't, you spam. begone
    4
  3. put them in a hot drier for 20 minutes :)
    4
  4. I wonder how a wave is defined
    2
  5.  @tovahromanov7414  Ok. So... do the #s have to go UP first and then DOWN and then UP again, to be a second wave? Or would you say CA is in it's second wave, even though it's graph shows a simple monotonic increase (always increasing, not up and down)? I have not heard one person define "wave" so I'm honestly asking, not trying to set up a trap or something.
    2
  6. cite source of that Aussie study?
    1
  7. Crucial correction: 3:40 is false. SMELL LOSS IS NOT DIAGNOSTIC of Covid-19. This is a classic 'paradox' in testing statistics. Your 3/4 figure is not correct. The odds that you have Covid-19, given that you have a loss of smell, depends on the population prevalence. Your odds can be extremely low or extremely high. Likewise, fever and coughs etc. are not diagnostic. Most coughs are not covid, except in high outbreak areas. . Should people who lose smell self-isolate? Perhaps, but that does not mean they have a 3/4 chance of having Covid!!!!
    1
  8. They say they are making it IN CASE it works. That's not standard practice. If it doesn't work that's a ton of wasted vaccine. I think it or one of the others will work, at least partly. Also there will be more and more treatments, so people won't die so much.
    1
  9. A retrospective random sample. Brilliant! Could be done for pennies too.
    1
  10.  @SillyGrandma99  Higher math? Higher than 10? So... basically nobody can understand it lol. The #1 gap I see is lack of randomized studies. If the researchers need some dice, I have some they can borrow. Without them we're flying blind.
    1
  11. @The new normal isn't normal For general knowledge I would not ask for a specific citation. It's a good time to try out that great search engine https://duckduckgo.com/ it's so much better than google. It got me right to the Mayo: https://www.mayoclinic.org/symptoms/loss-of-smell/basics/causes/sym-20050804
    1
  12. citation?
    1
  13. They didn't say that.
    1
  14. Well thankfully the Tulsa rally went off fine, no incidents. Not a ton of people, which is good. btw this is a great site for county by county maps! Johns Hopkins: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/us-map
    1
  15. The number of recorded US Daily New Cases was not rising, certainly not "increasing dramatically!" (Not until approximately today...) https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
    1
  16. Yes! Loss of smell is HIGHLY UNLIKELY TO BE FROM COVID. (Unless most of the people around you are getting it, in which case, it is likely). This is one of the most classic "paradoxes" of testing. My dad and I have been practicing it with various games from Scientific American issues.
    1
  17. for sure any cooking will kill it
    1
  18.  @jwarmstrong  You have been invited to join SOW, Smartasses Of the World. Andrew Ongais and I hope you will! There's only the two of us so far, three with you. ;)
    1
  19. citation? sorry but I'm not going to search cleavage site lol
    1
  20. Bigotry does not help. It clouds the mind and leads to wrong conclusions. Your facts are wrong and your anger misplaced.
    1
  21. No, but they did however ban Coca Cola and the Automobile. That's why all Americans now live on Mars drinking Pepsi out of a muffler from a 1972 BMW. Please pass me the tencent. Thanks!
    1
  22. Interesting. Although it is extremely difficult to prove scientifically, I have expected the virus to evolve towards lesser virulence due to the isolation policies of humans. Evolutionary medicine is a strong but very small field.
    1
  23.  @brianwild4640  Here's direct link to sewage news report -- with that detail discussed -- "part of a regular round of testing on environmental virology that’s been carried out since 2007 by the ISS’s environment and health department. Overall, 40 samples were analyzed from October 2019 to February 2020 with an additional 24 from September 2018 through June 2019 used as controls." https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-19/italy-had-coronavirus-in-sewage-as-early-as-december-study-says?srnd=premium
    1
  24.  Andrew Ongais  Nevertheless, climate won't kill it.
    1
  25. on the topic of data dashboards Johns Hopkins has county by county #s for the whole country https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/us-map
    1
  26. Assume that the number of cases doubles each 5 days. Start with 1 case.
    1
  27. amazing site w. county by county maps, Johns Hopkins: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/new-cases-50-states https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/us-map
    1
  28. It can't live in food like salmonella can. But it can survive being frozen indefinitely.
    1
  29. Actually they haven't fallen, they've been steady.
    1
  30.  Andrew Ongais  They are right at times (JFK for example). However, in other cases evidence (or at least, citation of such) is severely lacking.
    1
  31. yes, it certainly is good. it's a shield, but shields aren't shields; the medieval bodkin etc.
    1
  32. The WHO got the Who right but missed the What, When, Where, and Why.
    1
  33. what was the name of your antibody test? did it have a company name for example? Or barring that, what state? I think there are multiple types but they should be searchable somehow.
    1
  34. not possible. 5g might be awful but it isn't installed in Ecuador
    1
  35.  @hcox1111  True. I find that most evangelicals agree "microevolution" or genetic adaptation does occur. That's all the evolution you need for most practical purposes.
    1
  36. States with massive spikes early are now very low in cases. So it depends on the time span you are looking at. In any case, CA is not similar to NY or NJ. It's cases never spiked high, which is good, but have grown and grown, which is not.
    1
  37. disagree. Correct: "There are X new cases of Covid-19." Incorrect: "There are X new cases of corona virus." Partly correct: "There are X new cases of corona virus infection." Correct: "There are X new cases of infection with SARS CoV-2." According to wikipedia, COVID-19 is "an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).[10]"
    1
  38.  @terrymoore861  I am sorry, but you seem to be responding to a different comment. I was not addressing anything more than the terminology of COVID-19 vs Coronavirus vs SARS-Covid-2.
    1
  39. Ten $ says he never said that, lol. Mutations are a constant fact of life for EVERY organism. Every. single. one. He may have said unlikely the virus mutates into a new more deadly strain... but I don't recall him saying that... what date?
    1
  40.  @akanecortich8197  Shikes, glad you made it! Scent is a curious sense. On rare random occasions I smell almond cookies. I stop and close my eyes when it happens, it's like heaven's bakery spilled a bottle of essence. My gf in college had no sense of smell from birth or least by the age she could remember.
    1
  41. Jains have worn masks for centuries
    1