Comments by "N Marbletoe" (@nmarbletoe8210) on "US, UK, SA and Aus Updates" video.

  1. Press: Riots and Rallies! Doom and gloom! Facts: How you shop matters more than that by 1000 times.
    4
  2. You do not live in TN lol but are human or a bot that's the question
    3
  3.  @anecdotal_evidence8960  To be fair, we're still waiting for scientific prevalence numbers, which requires random invitation surveys. . To be clear, I'm not waiting to wear a mask, but without these cheap and effective surveys, we don't know the risk.
    3
  4. @bean Antibodies are only one of many defenses
    3
  5. Have they done any random studies to see what the prevalence is in Phx or AZ?
    2
  6.  @LondonSteveLee  Apart from this virus we can examine zoonotic diseases in general, which is what the OP was about. . Some zoonotics are from domestic animals, some from wild animals we hunt, and some from animals that just happen to be out and about. How can we treat animals such that we reduce the zoonotic risks? . Your information about this virus being engineered is for a different thread. Focus, team! Ok on three everyone, WIn WIn wiN!
    2
  7.  @Defeft  For every disease, antibodies ALWAYS decrease after an illness. That's how the system is designed to work. Immunity is preserved by a combination of T-cells and other components. . Don't fall for the headlines equating antibodies with "resistance" or "immunity." They are only ONE part of our body's defense.
    2
  8. That's fine :) I bring a mask with me on walks in my small town. Occasionally someone walks on the same block and I can put it on. . Being outdoors is so healthy
    2
  9.  @UForgotUrMarriedLOL  It's been like that for months. (idk about the Corporate rules, but in my town it has)
    1
  10. We need random invitation surveys. Then we wouldn't have to guess, we'd have prevalence +/- a confidence interval.
    1
  11.  @johnfish3159  Interesting, thank you for the information! Small town NM here, a couple cases a week... everyone has masks in shops... at least we can walk around and go to the mountains! .
    1
  12. 1. Don't trust the Guardian. They said plants grow without light or water. . 2. Don't trust headlines. This one says "Immunity could be lost in months" but the ACTUAL PAPER that the article cites does not say anything of the sort. . 3. The actual scientific paper emphasizes antibodies are only one of many defenses the body has. T-cells appear to be very important, and they don't show up in antibody tests.
    1
  13. ​ @esecallum  Vitamin C is not dangerous. It's water soluble, so excess is rapidly flushed by the body in urine. . However, don't take too much of the fat-soluble vitamins. Those can be harmful in extreme amounts.
    1
  14. I think "rt" = "real time" so maybe it is very fast, like you get results in 15 minutes... ?
    1
  15. source?
    1
  16.  @jfryer485  Not everyone can wear a mask medically, and not everyone needs to (not if they are immune.) . Do your part and mind your business, I say.
    1
  17.  @smartin8247  I'm doing mine, you do your job too there. . Antibodies are not the same as immunity. Don't read the Guardian. . Peace :)
    1
  18.  Andrew Ongais  Y'all on this thread 0 for 2 lol. How can everyone be wrong at once? lmao!!! . It's not "down" and it's not "skyrocketing" either. Don't look at the data though ya might be exposed to information . https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ .
    1
  19. Any random survey studies to estimate prevalence? . If not I'll give it a skip, thanks. Forest for the trees :) Thanks for your time in any case good Doc.
    1
  20.  @vietnam1978  All those reporting issues are trivial. Only random sample testing can show the true prevalence. . Two nations have done it right; Thailand (20%) and Iceland (0.6%). .
    1
  21. fake outrage is still fake
    1
  22. Thank you that is wonderful news! The virus is far less deadly, and we are far closer to herd immunity, than previously thought (assuming it's correct of course). . Almost as wonderful, a nation has embraced science by doing a randomized survey. . As a biologist I'm not joking. The willingness of governments to use basic science cannot be underrated. . Good job Thailand (and Iceland which reported a 0.6% prevalence via a random invitation study)
    1
  23. If only the world governments were as smart as Dr. Campbell... or even his hamster... we would be doing ok.
    1
  24.  @1ACL  Last year: POverty kills! This year: Poverty Saves! lmao
    1
  25. Also, the smartest are failing us. If not we would have random invite testing, the only way to estimate prevalence.
    1