General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Grigori RP
UsefulCharts
comments

Comments by "Grigori RP" (@GrigRP) on "UsefulCharts" channel.

I like how you included Arabic and Hebrew names too. You really consider everyone, not just Western viewers. Thank you
1500
Ben McKean Too bad yours isn't.
56
Why do you speak like AI?
35
Britain's also had a Jewish PM. If Jews are native to Israel/Palestine as they say, then they would also be of Asian descent. But they switch depending on what suits them.
26
@simulify8726 What is this Modi propaganda? Guru Nanak's most famous quote is "I am not Muslim nor Hindu".
25
@hailgiratinathetruegod7564 Ah yes, translations are knock offs. Very intelligent post.
21
 @Kolious_Thrace If you ask a resident of Constantinople in the year 1000 if they are Roman or Greek, what would they answer? Roman of course.
18
Ben McKean First cousins are only 12.5% similar and according to the chart in the video that's considered safe. Also, outbreeding depression doesn't exist in humans as we're all too closely related.
17
@samirkarki192 Why did you have a maid? Were your parents too lazy to do house work?
15
It is the duty of Abrahamic followers to spread his words. Non Abrahamic peoples see it differently.
15
@FirstLast-ug4ri Never heard of Hindu-Sikh. Sounds like a made up thing. You can't mix religions as you wish. It's either, or.
13
Based supreme emperor
11
@letsknow3753 Judaism isn't spread by message, 99% of Jews are born Jews. Same with Hinduism, no one converts to it, just born into it. Only religions where people actually convert to in large numbers are Christianity and Islam.
11
@Hypie582 No it does not. Turkey isn't relevant in this conversation.
11
You're not Sikh, why are you speaking on their behalf?
10
Ben McKean Outbreeding has NOT been observed in humans. We all have a common ancestor 100,000 years ago. This includes isolated African tribes. If we remove them it's more like 10,000 years. The Indo Europeans only started spreading in 3000 BC. This is not enough to cause any outbreeding. If you have sources that say otherwise please provide them.
9
Most famous Nepalese in history ☸️
8
@Aayush191 I'm sure you have Sikh friends, that doesn't give you the right to speak on their behalf. If Sikhs are proud of India they will say it themselves.
7
Some real stupidity here. Jesus existed just as Ramesis or Muhammad or Julius Caesar existed. It's a historical fact. Whether you believe in his divinity is up to you. But he existed.
7
It didn't backfire. Accepting a colonial proposition to partition your city would backfire. The Palestinians were correct to reject it.
7
@abed9267 Because Sikhs can speak for themselves. Why did you pretend to not be Indian?
6
No it isn't. Do you mean thousands of gods?
6
@o-o2399 Islam isn't falling apart, more people convert everyday. Meanwhile Churches in Europe are empty ghost towns.
6
@o-o2399 West does not have freedom of speech. In most of Europe you will go to prison for making jokes about the Holocaust.
6
Ben McKean I only spoke of a single first cousin birth not compounded births. Outbreeding depression has not been documented in humans. The only one ignorant, and possibly maliciously lying is you. Such is to be expected by people who deny climate change.
6
Both of these lasted less or around 200 years only.
6
@FirstLast-ug4ri Because Taliban follow a purist reading of Islam and think it's unlawful to have statues and idols in their country. I don't think it has anything to do with scared. Scared of what? People destroy things of their ancestors all the time, it is nothing new or ironic. Mao destroyed old China's artifacts. Japan destroyed old customs like samurai to industrialise. Europeans destroyed paganism in the name of Christianity. This is common.
5
@Ghost Ghost In what way were they lazy?
5
@gilpaubelid3780 Well then we agree. Ethnicity is irrelevant. It was a Roman state thus correctly added to the Roman time frame in the video.
5
@gilpaubelid3780 Why would ethnicity be relevant to the state or the allegiance? They were Roman citizens who fought for the Roman empire.
5
Ben McKean you still haven't provided any sources on outbreeding in humans.
5
Never forget the Hawaiian genocide.
4
Makes no sense.
4
Oh, you did? Well I can only imagine that your iq must be very low to just believe something you read without any of your own research
4
Shut up paajeet.
4
@The505Guys what does that have to do with a common ancestor
4
@jbcoolestgamer9786 I know Israel isn't Western. By Western I was talking about the Latin/English names. Arabic and Hebrew were separate.
4
@HinduPhoenix Seems you don't know your own religion. There are countless hindoo stories about god's marrying their own children and siblings.
4
@FirstLast-ug4ri Good for you, I'm Buddhist Jew.
3
@abed9267 What is the issue?
3
@abed9267 You're clearly Indian. Are you too embarrassed to even admit your nationality? Embarrassing.
3
@samanyaaadmi2676 I said most famous Nepalese, not most famous in Nepal. Why would Taliban be terrified by him?
3
@FirstLast-ug4ri How does destroying a statue imply they were frightened?
3
@FirstLast-ug4ri "Because they don't want to it" That sentence makes no sense. Write it again.
3
@samanyaaadmi2676 Because Taliban are not in Egypt, they are in Afghanistan. One of the worst statements I've heard 😂
3
@utss667ii8 Hence, Nepalese.
3
Ben McKean >(edited)
3
An Indo Iranian people group. Not sure what kind of answer you want
3
Quite obviously Egyptian. But I assume you mean sub Saharan Africa? In that case maybe Mali or Zimbabwe?
3
Servantry is their culture.
3
Stoner Zuze This is about Sikhs and Islam, why are you talking about Jews here, fool?
3
@UsefulCharts I'll give you 1000
3
@mariano98ify You will. Plenty of people have been jailed for it.
3
@virgilhoratio9819 Lol, these "maleccha" Abrahamics conquered and colonised you for 1000 years. I understand your insecurity "Horatio" (using a British officer's name when they colonised you LOL)
3
I saw him worshipping a cow too.
3
@nd2997 he asked for evidence not excuses pajeet
3
Greetings to the country of Buddha
3
@jellalfernandes1309 That's for Sikhs to decide themselves, not you.
2
@jellalfernandes1309 As I said, you're not Sikh. Why are you deciding what their home is? Sikhs will decide themselves. When are Sikhs forcefully converted in Pakistan? I've never heard of such events.
2
@jellalfernandes1309 If they're so happy, why did they have the largest protest in world history just this year? "Influential and rich builders", what a joke. What's your source for the second statement?
2
@jellalfernandes1309 Dozens of thousands of Sikhs are "agenda fuelled politicians"? Sikhs can think for themselves, don't patronise them. Randhawa isn't a Sikh name. Ironic you tell others to do research.
2
@jellalfernandes1309 Why did you ignore the first point? Why do you think Sikhs are unable to think for themselves? No, it isn't. That means existed before Sikhism came into existence. Do some research before commenting.
2
@jellalfernandes1309 How can it be a Sikh name if it existed before it? Lol. It is a Punjabi name. And considering majority of Punjabis are actually Muslim, Muslims have just as much right to use that name as a Sikh. Your second point is wrong yet again. Muslims had names like that long before partition. All your posts are incorrect, it's embarrassing.
2
@ferrjuan Mexicans become Western when convenient then say "I'm just Mexican" when otherwise convenient lol. Btw, your whole country was born out of enslavement and rape.
2
@sunnysied713 Yes they did.
2
That's because you haven't even watched it
2
@MrAnsh14638 Another Hindoo.
2
@FirstLast-ug4ri I already gave many examples before, like Europeans destroying their pagan history and Chinese Communist destroying their history. Many reasons exist.
2
Not really. India was fully under Islamic control already, but there was little forced conversion. If they wanted they could. When was India the "richest country"?
2
@DCCrisisclips No, they are not the same.
2
Anyone smell that?
2
Be a good white knight and save them
2
 @kaceobrwa7039 Yes in fact, the entire Indus River is in Pakistan. Look at a map.
2
Malazgirt 1071 why are you copy pasting this comment everywhere?
2
Cry harder
2
@joshuataylor3550 Chav
2
Don't let Zionists censor you. Palestine is the correct historical term.
2
@TohouBohou Parsi or Farsi
2
@IndigenousVoices 𝘓𝘰𝘭, 𝘤𝘳𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘵𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳. 𝘚𝘪𝘬𝘩𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 2% 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘱𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘰 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘴. 𝘗𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘢 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘦𝘳. 𝘛𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘔𝘰𝘥𝘪 𝘎𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘦. 𝘚𝘪𝘬𝘩𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘰𝘴.
2
That's not true, average with South American is 50-60% European depending on the country
2
"Lucifer" lmfao, Islam isn't Christianity lil bro, you have to try harder
2
It's only a century old. If it lasts another century then I'd agree
2
@ayushgupta4376 No, it doesn't. Buddhism spread naturally via silk road trading. By huns do you mean the Hepthalites? Again, no. They were defeated by the Turks. Not sure why you're just straight up lying now.
2
@ayushgupta4376 Lol no. They didn't use trade routes for that. They used trade routes for trade. And naturally cultures exchange when you travel. Hepthalites were not defeated by Guptas. Do you have a source?
2
@lifestyletoday6762 Why do you eat your mother?
2
Are they the ones calling me for tech support?
2
@nd2997 answer the question dalit lookalike
2
@KiranSingh-zr8jr What's racist about what I said?
2
Amazing video
2
What's up with the incorrect map? You would think a channel such as this would keep modern politics out of history and be neutral, guess not.
2
Has to be Quraysh. No other dynasty has had this much influence on the world. Also, where was Achaemenids? The first great empire in world history.
2
Those aren't mutually exclusive.
2
@gabbar51ngh And how does them being older establish their reality?
2
@gautamsrivastav8330 What's wrong with preaching? Of course i agree you shouldn't go up to individuals and preach to them. But standing in a place to preach is perfectly reasonable. People who want to listen will listen and people who don't will keep moving on.
2
It is part of Asia. Asia starts from Turkey and Russia all the way to Japan.
2
What does Pakistan have to do with it? Sikhs live in India.
1
It's just addition and subtraction. Hardly a hassle.
1
@_Jaskirat Most Sikhs want their own country and don't want anything to do with you, let alone be your friend.
1
@FirstLast-ug4ri Punished by whom?
1
@FirstLast-ug4ri What if the people and the government also want to remove their history?
1
@KiranSingh-zr8jr So? Buddha himself was Nepalese. Scholars' background doesn't come in here.
1
@KiranSingh-zr8jr Learn to speak English before spamming replies that don't make sense. And yes, he did have a nationality. He was born in Lumbini, Nepal.
1
@KiranSingh-zr8jr Shakya is a tribe that became Nepal. Did he say he was Indian?
1
@KiranSingh-zr8jr speaking a similar language doesn't mean you are the same you fool. Are German and English the same country?
1
@KiranSingh-zr8jr Shakya kingdom's capital is Tilaurako in Nepal. Shakya was a Nepali Kingdom.
1
@KiranSingh-zr8jr Nationality of Indian also formed in 1947.
1
@KiranSingh-zr8jr "much of early Buddhist scholars were Indian". Stop lying paajeet. You said it here. There was no Indian nationality before 1947.
1
@utss667ii8 No he wasn't. He was from the Shakya kingdom which became Nepal. He's Nepaliese.
1
@utss667ii8 Pali.
1
Pakistan clearly as it was, and is a Muslim majority state.
1
@indiafirst3676 I answered this question
1
Sure, but as there little record of it it's silly to include here.
1
@Absolute_Zero7 No, it isn't.
1
@IIOO Yes. Why wouldn't they?
1
@IIOO You repeated the same thing. I asked why wouldn't they?
1
@abed9267 "India" was only the richest (GDP) under Mughals. Muslims didn't steal any wealth from you. Blame the British for that.
1
@FirstLast-ug4ri I'm not denying there was oppression under Muslim conquest. I'm saying 1. There was little forced conversion. If they wanted they could force a lot more people to convert. 2. Little wealth was stolen under Islamic conquest. All the money and taxes were used within the Mughal empire, not taken away. Whereas the British took wealth back to London. As I said, blame British, not Muslims.
1
@abed9267 Yes you are.
1
lo l industrial era began in 1700s lol. You were under Mughal rule then.
1
@KevinUchihaOG Source on "most religious people are immigrants"?
1
@sahilsingh6048 Is it you? What would your mother say?
1
Please stick to real history, this is just diluting your videos.
1
@A_Red_December Nonsense. Britain did the same as it did in Ireland - absolutely nothing. A genocidal empire the sun has long set on. Thank God.
1
Because it makes Jews like you angry
1
@SyawishRehman You should have this video taken down and re-uploaded.
1
@harshdeepsingh2034 So? It was in response to oppression from the Indian govt and having their holy site bombed. Of course they will want separation.
1
Braaphamic
1
@8and4 I'm Iranian and no, not all Iranians are Persians. There are many groups who are Iranian.
1
@8and4 I like the irony. Persia was a foreign name that Greeks called us. We have always referred to our country as irsnshahr. Don't embarrass yourself, learn history yourself.
1
@ملقرت ملك صور He's simply trying to say that Persia is an exonym.
1
Can you take back Anita Sarkesian?
1
@zaxcollix123 No, it's not a geographic identity.
1
@scorpioninpink I suggest you don't speak of what you don't know. There are many descendants of Muhammad alive today. The king of Jordan himself is one.
1
@UsefulCharts great answer. where do you usually do your research? I generally just go to Wikipedia, how reliable would you say it is
1
@princerao1649 Is that why you were conquered by Abrahamics for a millennium?
1
Ended up missing? You mean stolen by the state of Israel?
1
@ahmedpatel7803 Change your surname.
1
@ahmedpatel7803 It makes you sound like a pajeet.
1
Mohammed Afraz almost all empires in history are full of corruption
1
Indus Valley is in Pakistan though. 90% of the Indus River itself is too.
1
Lasted less than 150 years, not relevant enough
1
@ayushgupta4376 Lol, don't compare yourself to Mongols.
1
@amukherjee9514 LOL the Hepthalites didn't even reach Bengal. Provide sources.
1
@amukherjee9514 Which huns did Guptas defeat then? Because it certainly wasn't Hepthalites.
1
@TF MS Outbreeding is mating with someone too distantly related to you. Who's we and what don't we?
1
Manley Nelson proven where?
1
Manley Nelson No. If you are stating it is "proven" then you should provide the source. Post these studies.
1
@jstrahan2 don't watch his video then.
1
@jstrahan2 if you hate that term so much surely you'd stop watching his videos and unsubscribe?
1
@jstrahan2 he's going to continue using CE/BCE in future videos as he's already stated. If you hate it as much as you say vote with your subscription and view.
1
@priyadhar2011 Yes. No one wants to swim in the Ganges.
1
@abed9718 What?
1
@KiranSingh-zr8jr Why?
1
@KiranSingh-zr8jr Like what?
1
Star Star I understood this version much better. I struggled reading yours.
1
CrouchyTV British empire is not a dynasty, brainlet. Even still if we're talking about empires now, Romans were more influential.
1
CrouchyTV Do you want me to comment in another language on a video in English? Strange.
1
@gabbar51ngh You provided no answers at all. Continuity has nothing to do with being correct or being true.
1
@Kushagra.j Why? Do you not follow hindooism?
1
@swapnaneeldas3227 Age has nothing to do with reality.
1
@TheJenniferKK probably just geography. Middle East and Europeans split off very recently whereas East Asians have been there for a much longer time. Actually Iranians Afghans Pakistanis etc are Indo European so it's highly likely we only need to go back 3000 or so years to have a common ancestor between Europe middle East India and Africa
1