Comments by "Glass Chin" (@glasschin871) on "John Fury Exposes Dillian Whyte" video.

  1. Whyte was never mandatory 3 years. He became Mandatory in July 19 but was suspended for 6 months. He then was made mandatory in dec 19 but lost the mandatory when Povetkin knocked him out in Aug 20. That’s 8 months as mandatory. He then became mandatory a second time in sept this year.
    2
  2. Good interview
    1
  3. Whyte was never mandatory 3 years. He became Mandatory in July 19 but was suspended for 6 months. He then was made mandatory in dec 19 but lost the mandatory when Povetkin knocked him out in Aug 20. That’s 8 months as mandatory. He then became mandatory a second time in sept this year.
    1
  4. when Fury came back Breazele was Wilders mandatory and Wilder fought Fury as a voluntary defence. As he could with any top 15 ranked fighter. The Breazele Mandatory wasn’t due so what did the WBC do that was corrupt ?
    1
  5.  @jimmy6283  Fury and Wilder are both ranked above Whyte on Box rec lol
    1
  6.  @nahnotatall4291  not if you know the history. Breazele was ordered to fight a final eliminator months before Whyte was ranked 1. Against Stiverne when Stiverne was ranked 1.
    1
  7.  @nahnotatall4291  No Breazele was made mandatory because Stiverne and Povetkin was signed to a final eliminator and povetkin popped dirty. So Breazele replaced Povetkin as the next available contender. They were meant to fight ok the Wilder vs Ortiz undercard but Ortiz got suspended so Stiverne was elevated to mandatory and Breazele became next in line. Mean while Whyte beat Helenius for the silver to become rank 1. After wilder beat Stiverne and while Ortiz was still suspended but Breazele and Molina had already been signed and agreed as an eliminator. Explain how Whyte was rank one after beating Helenius for the silver when Helenius wasn’t even ranked in the top 15 at the time. Surely that’s strange too.
    1
  8.  @nahnotatall4291  when Povetkin failed they would have gone down the list of next available contenders. It doesn’t mean Breazele was ranked a head of Whyte. Whyte was already signed to fight Mariusz Wach in June 17 but pulled out with a foot injury. So he wasn’t available so Breazele jumped the Que.
    1
  9.  @nahnotatall4291  June is summer lol 😂 Whyte was signed to fight Wach when Stiverne vs Breazele was ordered Whyte wasn’t available. Whyte then got injured. Sorry but I’m really not sure what’s hard to understand.
    1
  10.  @nahnotatall4291  Stiverne and Breazele was signed in the summer , Stiverne fought wilder in the winter ffs. When Povetkin got done for juicing. Whyte wasn’t available as he was signed to fight already. So Breazele got the spot. Ortiz failed so Stiverne became mandatory and Breazele was ordered to fight Molina. Whyte was injured at the time after pulling out against Wach. I’m not explaining it again it’s not difficult. Whyte wasn’t ranked 1 until he beat Helenius 2 fights later.
    1
  11.  @nahnotatall4291  Whyte wasn’t free he had a foot injury that’s why he didn’t fight Wach. Stiverne was mandatory by the time Whyte healed. Povetkin and Stiverne were signed to fight in Russia the same month Whyte fought Chisora on the Joshua undercard. Duhaupas Jumped in on 24 hours novice. Who said about povetkin or Whyte propping up the Wilder vs Stiverne card what are talking about. Whyte wasn’t a PPV star in 2017 , really you are clueless. Whyte didn’t fight Parker on PPV until summer 2018. Chisora’ and Minto weren’t even main events and Browne and Helenius were on sky sport 1. Really do some research and stop spurting complete rubbish.
    1
  12.  @nahnotatall4291  Mate that video is from after the first Wilder vs Fury fight in 2019z It has nothing to do with 2017. Breazele was already mandatory but because Fury and Wilder were going to rematch. The WBC agreed to order Breazele to fight Whyte for the interim belt. Fury then pulled out so Breazele vs Wilder was ordered. Whyte was then allowed to fight Rivas for the interim belt. I’m not trying to be rude but you are clueless. Breazele become mandatory in 2017 beating Molina. Whyte was ordered to fight Ortiz in 2018 for second mandatory. He then waited a whole year to fight an eliminator in 2019 against Rivas. In 2017 Whyte was injured
    1
  13.  @nahnotatall4291  for what winter date ? Stiverne fought Wilder in November. Povetkin failed the December before. Stiverne vs Breazele was ordered while Whyte was signed to fight wach in June. Stiverne vs Breazele then didn’t happen because Ortiz got suspended so Stiverne was made straight mandatory. Breazele then signed to fight Molina and the WBC voted on that being an eliminator at their yearly convention. What has Whyte being able to fight in winter 2017 got to do with anything that happened? From Dec 2016 to Stiverne getting made mandatory in the summer ?
    1
  14.  @nahnotatall4291  Stiverne was made mandatory because Jennings turned down fighting wilder to fight klitcho , povetkin was then made mandatory but popped dirty after his ban was lifted Stiverne was meant to fight povetkin but povetkin popped again. Ortiz was first in line but wilder signed him as a voluntary. When Ortiz popped what was the wbc meant to do wilder had been champ two years without a mandatory. Breazele and Molina didn’t sign to fight until Oct 2017 so how the f uck was it changed in Feb 2017 lol 😂 The Stiverne Mandatory against wilder was decided on the summer. Breazele then became next in line because the WBC took his mandatory shot against Stiverne away. We aren’t waiting for that second mandatory to be called as it didn’t take place. The second mandatory didn’t happen until July 19. Whyte was suspended and Fury became the Mandatory to wilder for the second wilder fight. Whyte was then reinstated as interim and mandatory but lost the spot when Povetkin knocked him out. He was then made mandatory a third time in set 2021. Please I’m tired of this chat your bias for Whyte is blinding you to what happened.
    1
  15.  @nahnotatall4291  Breazele was ordered to fight Stiverne after povetkin popped in dec 16. Then Breazele wilder case didn’t stop until sept 2017. Breazele was already next in line. Whyte didn’t lose his mandatory for popping against Rivas he was suspended pending investigation. By the time UKAD cleared him the WBC had already ordered Fury vs wilder 2. Vada didn’t suspend him UKAD did the British agency nothing to do with the WBC No that’s not corruption at all any fighter who fails a test should be suspended. Why did Whyte hide the failed test and have a private hearing without informing the WBC or Rivas. Why was Whytes B sample never tested. Whytes lucky the Rivas fight wasn’t changed to a no contest.
    1
  16.  @nahnotatall4291  So you think a governing body should just ignore a hidden failed drugs test and not investigate? What a stupid comment when you talk of corruption. The WBC suspended Povetkin and Ortiz too as they should have done. As they should do to anyone who fails a test. What do you mean why would he need to inform the WBC or Rivas. The BBBOC only agreed to let him fight as there wasn’t enough time to get the results back from his B test. Any fighter who fails has the right to have there B sample tested after a failed test due to possible contamination. The trouble was like in the Fury vs Hammer fight there wasn’t enough time to test the B samples before the fights. Furys B sample was clear. Whytes was swept underr the carpet and never released. Strange it took UKAD and the BBBOC 6 months to clear Whyte. Again the WBC was right to suspend him pending investigation and your a fu cking idiot if you thing otherwise. All the body’s should act in the same why. If they didn’t that would be corruptions. The fighters safety should always come first. Whyte had history already serving one drugs ban and now trains in Portugal away from UKAD funny that.
    1
  17.  @nahnotatall4291  And what you think the WBC should have ignored the failed test because a Statement UKAD made 6 months later lol what if they had banned Whyte, would the WBC have been right or wrong? Your dumb the suspension was warranted after a failed test regardless of the end result. A suspension isn’t a ban. Why bother having drug testing in sport of the bodies ignore it lol 😂
    1
  18.  @nahnotatall4291  The wbc didn’t charge him they suspended him. They didn’t jump the gun they acted according, imagine if the investigation showed whyte was guilty and in the mean time the BBBOC and the WBC sanctioned him to fight and someone got injured bad or died. It’s common practice to suspend a fighter when they fail. It’s not corruption it’s the right thing to do. Your argument is just ignorant. If the WBC hadn’t have suspended Povetkin then banned Povetkin or suspended Ortiz. Then Whyte would have been another year away from a mandatory fight in the first place. You just have rose tinted glasses on for your lover boy.
    1
  19.  @nahnotatall4291  So you think a cop is accused of a racist attack on a citizen or sexual assault or what ever. You think they should be allowed to carry on working as a policeman until they are found guilty of course they shouldn’t. They would get suspended pending investigation like any other work place. So you think Jerral miller should have been allowed to fight Joshua and then got his ban 6 months later after the investigation was over. ? What if Joshua was killed in that fight ?
    1
  20.  @nahnotatall4291  Mate your stupid. Any job in the world people get suspended before being found guilty strange you didn’t answer. Do you think Miller and Joshua should have still gone a head ? If your nan was in a nursing home and one the staff was accused of neglect would you be happy that staff member still working during the investigation. What about one hour kids teachers being accused of touching a child. What you really be stupid enough to say they shouldn’t be suspended pending the investigation. You know I’m right your just too ignorant to admit it.
    1
  21.  @nahnotatall4291  I haven’t studied the Valdez Why can’t you answer any questions should miller have been allowed to fight Joshua ? Would you want a teacher , policeman or cared suspended? What you hiding from be a man and answer what do you mean he never failed Whyte did failed they just accepted the explanation that low levels could have been a contamination like the common meat excuse. Why was the B sample not released if it was just one test lol 4.41 Sanctions for Anti-Doping Violations. A boxer who has been found to have tested positive for banned substances or otherwise found to have engaged in prohibited procedures under these rules shall be subject to such penalties or treatment as the WBC may determine appropriate in its sole discretion. Such measures may include but are not limited to disqualification in the contest, a fine up to the amount of the boxer’s purse, imposition of medical treatment and further testing or investigation, suspension and removal from the ratings of up to one (1) year, and vacating the boxer’s status as a champion or challenger. The WBC rules clearly state they can suspend while investigating.
    1
  22.  @nahnotatall4291  Whyte and miller both failed tests. Both were suspended After investigation miller was deem guilty and Whyte did fail the test but was later cleared of any wrong doing. The test was still a fail though. They went through the same precess. Do the governing bodies have a crystal ball to see what the future out come will be? Again do you think the miller vs Joshua fight should have gone ahead after millers failed test?
    1
  23.  @nahnotatall4291  mate your stupid , they were in his system he failed the test. He was cleared of wrong doing for why trace amounts were in his system 6 months after the fact. If you failed for drugs or contaminated meat or a health shake or what ever the test was still a fail. They never released the B sample so you don’t know that. A contamination doesn’t mean the test was contaminated. Could mean lots of different things. Stop ducking the question or fu ck of replying. Should the miller vs Joshua fight have gone ahead?
    1
  24.  @nahnotatall4291  I can read just fine your just to thick to understand what it means. It was in Whytes system the test was a fail. Other wise they wouldn’t have been investigating , he was cleared of wrong doing but it was a failed test , he just wasn’t guilty how it was in his system. There was low levels and due to his vada tests being clear they accepted his contamination excuse. Anyway you look at it the test was a fail. Still not answering a yes or no question what you scared of tough guy? Should the miller vs Joshua fight have gone ahead ?
    1
  25.  @nahnotatall4291  what you pasted doesn’t say that at all, you just don’t understand what it’s saying. Send the part were it says Whyte never failed. Why won’t you answer what you scared of lol
    1
  26.  @nahnotatall4291  then why was it a failed test in the first place lol your so thick , it was a failed test they just done him not guilty of any wrong doing to why it was in the system. If it wasn’t a failed they wouldn’t have had a private hearing 3 days before the Rivas fight. Whyte wouldn’t have had to request his b sample tested and it wouldn’t have taken 6 months to clear him. The BBBOC and the WBC wouldn’t have suspended him. Why didn’t Whyte continue fighting ? They both failed and got investigated stop the bs you look like a fool. You said innocent until proven guilty , miller was suspended and investigated too before his ban. So again should the miller vs Joshua fight have gone ahead , simple yes or no answer. Stop tap dancing around it and answer yes or no
    1
  27.  @nahnotatall4291  I never said Whyte was guilty, he was innocent of doping but the test was still a failed test. When Ortiz failed he was deemed innocent by VADA as it was high blood pressure medication. He was suspended by the WBC until vada investigated. Then when proved innocent he was still suspended until he passed a medical. He was innocent but still failed the test. My friend failed a drugs test at work , he was suspended with full pay. A more detailed test showed he failed due to poppy seeds of his bacon roll. The fact is the test was still a fail but the reason why wasn’t his fault. The same as the test Whyte failed. All the info the info the WBC had was Whyte failed a test , had a private hearing and fought Rivas without informing. So they suspended him pending investigation. It doesn’t matter what happened 6 months later. Whyte could be either guilty or not guilty the same as Miller.
    1
  28.  @nahnotatall4291  the comparison isn’t stupid because the situation at the time was exactly the same. The out come of the investigations is irrelevant to how the governing bodies should act when a failed test is announced. Whytes b sample results clearly failed too as they were never released and the investigation went on 6 months. If someone commits a crime a procedure is followed regardless of the end out come months of years down the line.
    1
  29.  @nahnotatall4291  murder or a self defence is the verdict, the procedure followed is a the same regardless of the outcome isn’t it? Your a failure to the education system never heard someone so stupid, keep carrying on when he’s clearly wrong. You know the Miller vs Joshua fight shouldn’t have gone ahead your just to pathetic to admit it.
    1