Comments by "Tom Bombadill" (@pefo1674) on "'Rogue' judge ripped for blocking Trump order: 'Supported terrorists over Americans'" video.

  1.  @umpire29  "Appointer", silly... The judge is the appointee... You´d know that if you passed 7´th grade...
    9
  2. They aren´t...
    6
  3. How ? Return with legal reference(s)...
    4
  4. Someone who cares about laws being followed...
    4
  5. You don´t like judges making sure the law is followed ?
    3
  6. Unless you want the US to be a dictatorship, you need unbiased actual suspicions, investigations, indictments, trials, verdicts and sentencings... All of this seems to be something the extreme right has no need of...
    1
  7. Unless you want the US to be a dictatorship, you need unbiased actual suspicions, investigations, indictments, trials, verdicts and sentencings... All of this seems to be something the extreme right has no need of...
    1
  8. Return with legal reference(s)...
    1
  9.  @mattk3649  Not really, I just like judges following the law...
    1
  10.  @teresaperez174  Not really, you on the extreme right are just mad that there are checks and balances...
    1
  11.  @ninfa0001  Don´t have to, they´re going along with the constitution...
    1
  12.  @ak_getright9905  Or maybe you´re full of it... LMFAO
    1
  13.  @DB-ug1pr  Nah, unlike the extreme right, I do want education to be equal all over the USA...
    1
  14.  @fckuudmbfck  So he´s less likely to be corrupt and more likely to follow the law... OK...
    1
  15. Why ?
    1
  16. For what, exactly ? Return with legal reference(s)...
    1
  17. 1. It´s unconstitutional and 2. The USA ain´t officially at war with ANY country
    1
  18.  @rosssimpson6268  Well, to the extreme right, everyone who doesn´t do what their god-emperor damands needs must be replaced with loyalists, (project 2025)...
    1
  19.  @reginaldwiemers6183  Return with legal reference(s) for your claim and I just might read it...
    1
  20.  @ChaiChai-d9f  Well, unless a higher court changes it, yes...
    1
  21.  @marklowe8061  But in the case of the extreme right "corrupt" does mean following the law... LMFAO Or you could make your case with evidence and legal reference(s)...
    1
  22.  @marklowe8061  So "corrupt" is when they don´t rule as the extreme right wants them to ? That would mean if they DIDN`T follow the US constitution, they wouldn´t, somehow, be "corrupt" "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means"
    1
  23.  @danielwessel9884  1. Return with legal reference(s) on that. 2. Yep, they were. 3. They don´t do that, only if the defendant has followed the law. 4. How is Donold Jessica tRump´s record at appeals ? Hint: don´t look it up. 5. He´s never done that....
    1
  24.  @siriusquarks6272  Read up...
    1
  25.  @LoriFoster-s4n  Evidence needed...
    1
  26. Unless you want the US to be a dictatorship, you need unbiased actual suspicions, investigations, indictments, trials, verdicts and sentencings... All of this seems to be something the extreme right has no need of...
    1
  27.  @marywalton8139  He follows the law...
    1
  28.  @mikestory2269  But there´s almost no evidence of these claims...
    1
  29.  @sheiladills3968  Not unless the USA is currently officially at war, no...
    1
  30.  @MAGADON-i5q  Not really, comrade since you have none...
    1