Comments by "Tom Bombadill" (@pefo1674) on "McEnany makes bold prediction in NY v. Trump trial" video.

  1.  @bobtrevorah2305  Please tell us how, in your expert opinion, that would be possible ?
    7
  2. Why ? Please state the law behind the reason for your "reasoning"... BTW, it´s "procedural" (possibly, hard to know what you mean), prosicutal ain´t an English word, comrade...
    4
  3. Why ? Please state the law behind the reason for your "reasoning"...
    4
  4. But if they see it for it NOT being a sham ?
    3
  5.  @winsomemartinez  Because they´re trying his/her/it´s god-emperor, silly...
    3
  6.  @C5B-jc1yj  That makes zero sense though...
    3
  7. You DO know that it was a grand jury that "made the call", right ?
    2
  8.  @RedHatRoast  1. More money for the rich 2. Made every leader of every country laugh at him, once even the entire UN assembly 3. Had enemy leaders take advantage of him
    2
  9.  @samesryals6952  Which isn´t an argument... Not that I expected any...
    2
  10. "Once in a blue moon" ?
    1
  11.  @rynoturtle  Only by comparison...
    1
  12.  @rynoturtle  Nope, it´s been verified by both by independents AND a certain outlet paying 788 million for lying...
    1
  13. Yeah, they DARED to prosecute your god-emperor...
    1
  14. That´s on tRump...
    1
  15. Yep, everyone voting against #45 Cheato...
    1
  16. Why ? Please state the law behind the reason for your "reasoning"...
    1
  17. Prove that....
    1
  18. Oh, they did... Now, do you remember WHO he lied to protect ?
    1
  19.  @starchild19743  But you´d have to prove not only that he lied but that he was coached to like #45 Cheato coached him...
    1
  20. Or actually if you intend to do illegal BS for him, "make sure your hand isn’t dirty"...
    1
  21. Eww...
    1
  22.  @gold_ram_5.780  1. Read the indictment 2. The statute was in stasis while #45 Cheato was prez, silly...
    1
  23.  @jonathanp1884  tRumpettes/extreme right-wingers ? Reasoning ? LMFAO They believe what they´re told... So they don´t have to "think"...
    1
  24.  @steveturner726  What ABOUT "Biden and Hunter" ?
    1
  25.  @thefobbie0034  Yeah, against whom ?
    1
  26.  @HelpMeSpock  Why ? If it is proven to the jury, he´s guilty...
    1
  27.  @robertmurphy6566  Nah, that one is in Dallas, waiting for a JFK...
    1
  28. Why ? Please state the law behind the reason for your "reasoning"...
    1