Comments by "Tom Bombadill" (@pefo1674) on "Michael Cohen's attorney calls out Trump: 'He promised to testify'" video.

  1. That is correct... However, an innocent defendant should have nothing to fear nor hide...
    16
  2. Fantastic Joe Biden
    6
  3. Read the indictment, silly...
    5
  4. You DO know that´s actually a bad thing, right ? LMFAO
    3
  5. When English is hard for YOU...
    3
  6.  @timotheusd  Well, we can´t expect Russian trolls to get it right ALL the time, right...
    2
  7. Really, have you asked them personally ?
    2
  8. Sure "we" do...
    2
  9.  @karlfowler3742  1. Correct. 2. Only "vulnerable" if he lies, which he does habitually. 3. Read the indictment. Plenty of proof but the jury has got to be convinced. 4. Only "stoopid" if he lies
    2
  10.  @mikekerr9125  Ain´t it weird that somehow #45 Cheato lies are only misstatements (one word, comrade) whereas anyone NOT on your side that does the same is a liar ?
    2
  11. Loser ex-prez...
    1
  12.  @Free_To_Decide  1. No one is "begging" except #45 Cheato for you to pay his legal expenses... 2. Your 2´nd part would assume that he´s incapable of NOT lying... Of which I certainly agree on...
    1
  13. How would you KNOW ?
    1
  14.  @roseannasturtevant1860  Read your own comment, silly...
    1
  15. And when most of us (US ?) watch #45 Cheato, the bathroom scene in "Pet detective" comes to mind...
    1
  16.  @ricksterbobolishious7523  Nah, I don´t believe any and all BS lies #45 Cheato spews, silly...
    1
  17.  @clv6267  You´re not makin´ sense... Maybe bacon ?
    1
  18.  @akshonclip  Nope... See, I don´t automatically believe any and all BS lies #45 Cheato spews...
    1
  19.  @RagaSHOT  Is that a "trick question" ?
    1
  20.  @chrislockwood5299  Well, that´s true... It´s a paper pointing to what they´re gonna put forward as evidence... Or should I write "evidence not included" but will, have been, and is presented...
    1
  21.  @cherryapplebottom5006  Unless you read what´s said, that is...
    1
  22.  @darthmalagus  Ironic statement there...
    1
  23.  @mikekerr9125  That would work if one didn´t read your comment, silly...
    1
  24.  @cherryapplebottom5006  1. Correct, not evidence just a way to point to what will be evidenced 2. Yep, the prosecutor has 3. That´s weird, all witnesses have corroborated 4. Yep but tRump has been struck down because NDA´s have to be precise... What do they encompass and a time-frame... Not everything in perpetuate...
    1