Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "AOC Exposes the Group Behind Super Bowl "Jesus" Ads" video.
-
5
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@crabbypattie
There is no reason to conclude any God or gods exist. But according to doctrine he drowned babies and OK’d slavery.
Do you not understand what * according to doctrine* means?
So, no, there is no good,reason to believe any god exists, but if you’re going by the Bible, the god you’re convinced exists, and the god you worship, according to the doctrine, would be immoral.
Why are parents protesting CRT if it is being taught in schools?
Because, like you, they’ve been radicalized to believe things based on misinformation.
This is the difference between an evidence based world view, and emotion based world view.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@crabbypattie
Yes, some people who don’t understand Moses was a fictional character assert that Moses wrote part of the Bible, including details about his own death.
You’re still very confused, and apparently not very bright. Darth Vader isn’t real, but his character is immoral based on the fiction.
The seminary doesn’t have to show me that God does not exist. People that claim a god exists own a burden of proof they can not meet.
And yes, of course I know more than just slavery and drowning babies. But you’re not at the level to even address those two subjects.
Now you’re claiming god created the universe. But you know you can’t demonstrate or prove that is true, or anything beyond fiction.
What evidence would you offer for such a claim?
Of course I know more than any god that doesn’t exist. Simple logic. And since your claims can’t be demonstrated to be true, there is no reason to believe them.
Are you impaired?
If God created man in his image, god would certainly be immoral. Also, we would have to be invisible, or god is a great ape, right? Lol
Instead of just repeating your indoctrinated garbage, try some level of critical thought.
So you think slavery is moral? How about drowning babies?
1
-
1
-
@crabbypattie
If you have children, do you have a right to destroy them?
The answer is no. Might makes right, is your argument. And it would still be immoral.
Rights are granted and supported by humans. So no, your imaginary friend has no rights.
Don’t tell me whether to be condescending when you’ve been nothing short of condescending from the start, hypocrite.
Oh, yeah…and god made everything but didn’t put a fence around the fruit. If you leave a child alone with a loaded gun, you’re responsible if the child pulls the trigger. Not only that, but if the tree was tree of,knowledge of good and evil, then they couldn’t have know it was wrong until after they had eaten it.
Lol. So many holes in the plot.
Yeah, you’re not arguing whether or not it is fiction be sue you have no ground to stand on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@crabbypattie
Nowhere in the U.S. Constitution does it say our rights come from any god or gods.
I understand the concept, it just isn’t true. Nor can you demonstrate any god or gods exist, which is obviously too,deep,for you to comprehend.
The Adam character may have known Gods character according to the myth, but couldn’t have known good from evil before eating from the tree.
God could have created a fence, but didn’t. God created man exactly in the way that man would choose to eat the fruit?
Again, if you leave a child alone in a room with a loaded gun, it’s your fault if the child reaches the gun.
You don’t need to try to explain the story to me, child. I attended Seminary, and you haven’t applied any critical thinking.
You are just here defending immoral actions of a fictional being.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1