Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "Teachers in the Midwest caught up in OnlyFans controversy" video.

Why? What’s wrong with it?
7
Public interest news story. No problem.
5
But not your morals.
3
@PhilSophia-ox7ep Oh, I bet I do. And I’m not your son.
3
@daggers101 if you think teaching is easy, you’ve never done it.
3
@carriew662 Both ways? Says who?
3
@PhilSophia-ox7ep Ok, but it seems too easy. Son; a boy or man in relation to either or both of his parents.
2
@PhilSophia-ox7ep They’re inferior to models that support free will and well being. And honesty. Which is made obvious by your comments.
2
@PhilSophia-ox7ep You already have.
2
@PhilSophia-ox7ep By the way, when institutions set rules, they are indeed limiting one’s free will and freedoms. The thing is, you’re volunteering to abide by the infringements by accepting the job.
2
@jackkraken3888 It’s OK to have different views. But so what if people don’t respect another person’s decision? There are many decisions that people make that I personally don’t respect. That doesn’t mean I get to determine what they choose to do. What does it matter whether a husband and wife engage in any activity, if they’re consenting adults? That would be between them. If a couple doesn’t want to engage in any activity, they can choose not to. If one chooses to, and the other chooses not to, that issue is between them. And that, for example, would include extra marital affairs, which is probably far more common than porn or SW. What is it about SW that is a grey area? Of course, if you’re not in agreement with it, you’re free not to engage, right? But shouldn’t consenting adults be allowed to choose? If some people don’t like it or respect it, whose problem is that? Again, we may not agree on things, but that is OK. Thanks again for being respectful. ✌️
2
@jackkraken3888 How can you guarantee that, and even if it were true…how is that her fault? She didn’t give them access. She didn’t promote it in school. Slavery and traffic is wrong. Kids playing at the park or walking to school can lead to being trafficked, right? People from broken homes may also not engage in SW. people from good homes also engage in SW. If a person comes from a broken home, is it their fault?
2
@PhilSophia-ox7ep Your initial comment was suggesting that you get to decide for someone else what they should be doing, as if they don’t have the free will to decide for themselves. School curriculum to behave honorably, courteously, and kindly, and to work hard and strive for excellence doesn’t specifically exclude OF or SW. Your position goes against both free will and well being. Your specific position against such things is just you pushing your world view onto others, and you can’t justify it. You’re done here.
1
@PhilSophia-ox7ep Goal posts. My comment was specifically “not your morals”.
1
@PhilSophia-ox7ep Morals. Not your specific morals. How is it you pretend to be an intellectual but can’t follow? You’re done here. Moving the goal posts won’t help you. Teaching students to behave honorably, courteously, and kindly, and to work hard and strive for excellence doesn’t mean doing whatever you believe they should do.
1
@PhilSophia-ox7ep You’re the one not being honest. My first reply was “not your morals”. Which implies, yes…morals, but not your morals. I never disputed whether teachers instill morals. And the morals listed for curriculum include “Teaching students to behave honorably, courteously, and kindly, and to work hard and strive for excellence” which doesn’t mean doing whatever your personally believe to be moral. Let me know when you can be an honest interlocutor. And a moral one.
1
@PhilSophia-ox7ep You can’t be honest here. Which proves my position about morality. I never suggested I disagreed with your original comment, other than it’s not your morals they are to model or teach. And no, I do not in any way disagree with her content. Another example of you being dishonest, suggesting you know what I believe better than I do. Yea, institutions limit free will even if you agree to abide by the rules. Yes, you’re free not to work there but if you choose to work there, your free will is limited. This is clear that her free will to do OF or SW is limited, by your own admission. You’ve demonstrated you’re against free will, and want to control what other people do, as well as inferior morals, and repeatedly being dishonest. All truths you repeatedly demonstrate. My moral model is superior to your own. I can’t say you’re mentally undeveloped, but you’ve lost this argument and have been unable to learn anything here. Even suggesting I’ve had too many teachers like her demonstrate your moral inferiority. You’re done here. I wish you well, and hope you can learn to be a better person. Do t take it personally, just do better.
1
@jackkraken3888 Someone needs to explain how it is immoral,to begin with, instead of just assuming it is, and pushing their own standards onto others.
1
@jackkraken3888 I think most people’s models for morality are cultural, so while we may not remember specific lessons from teachers, we do pick up a lot from the world around us…and for students, that means during school. What is taught about morals seems vague and doesn’t address the specifics of OF or SW. When I search for core values taught in schools, I find honesty, integrity, empathy, compassion, responsibility, and respect. What I don’t see if how or why holding a second job such as the one she does would go against any of this, or how her engaging in this would circumvent such teachings. I understand others may hold different opinions, but I think it is fair to question why. Thanks for a reasonable and respectful response. ✌️😎👍
1
@PhilSophia-ox7ep It’s restricting freedom even when you volunteer to be restricted. Absolutely.
1
@Radmountainbiking59 Part of the obvious problem with that book as a moral model is shown in the Euthyphro dilemma, and the slavery and genocide as described in the book itself.
1
@Radmountainbiking59 Hundreds.
1
@Last_one_before_I_go She is.
1
@vish5798 It seems to me, the LGBTQ is only pushing equality and acceptance. There is nothing immoral about being LGBTQ either. The damage is t caused by the LGBTQ but those who oppose, reject, and attack their community based on a lack of understanding, and bigotry. If demanding to be treated equally is a moral dispute, it’s one I’d agree with, and one worth the fight. If history shows anything, it shows people who are part of that community are at risk of people who refuse to accept them as equals.
1
@Anonymous-sb9rr So what? Do you think you know more than others and need to lecture people who are already better informed than you?
1
@Anonymous-sb9rr Like yours?
1
@abram730 Why would you think I need a lecture from someone less informed than I am?
1
@abram730 Nice. A blatantly false attack. See, my world view is based on evidence, not emotion and bias. I understand what reliable methods are. Any assertion you make about kool-aid is obvious projection. The earth is not flat, and magic is not real. Let me know when you earn that GED. I’d ask you to point out one lie I’ve made, but you wouldn’t be able to.
1
@lobo0122002 If it’s the book it sounds like you’re talking about, it condones slavery and genocide. I’d argue worshipping idols isn’t as immoral as slavery or genocide.
1
@nunyabusy I’d have no problem with that. I could use a good hug.
1
@jackkraken3888 Questioning it is fair. What is the problem? She isn’t giving students access to it. She isn’t flaunting the fact she is on OF in front of the students.
1
@jackkraken3888 I understand some organizations may not permit working in other places, though I don’t see that as lawful, right, or moral. I also don’t see it as a conflict of interested to be on OF, so long as you keep those worlds separate. Again, she isn’t promoting it at school, and is t giving students access to it. I also don’t see SW as lacking dignity necessarily. Watching the comments on videos isn’t really useful or an intellectual means of determining right and wrong. I also don’t agree it is degrading. Now, I understand you do, and we have a difference of opinion, and that is OK. However, that just means you shouldn’t choose it for yourself. If she doesn’t find it degrading, who should stop her? Referring to someone as a whore or hooker depends on intent. Sure, porn can be destructive. So can any industry. If SW was legalized, people could be better protected, just as legalizing marijuana, for example allows us to better regulate it and make obtaining it less dangerous since people don’t need to deal,with shady criminals. What is it about SW you find degrading? If an adult freely chooses to engage? I mean, I find the slave mentality of many religions to be degrading, but I don’t think it’s my job to stop you or anyone else from practicing as they see fit. I might be able to make an argument against it in some cases, but people are free to engage.
1
@bannedmann4469 Yes, they are. Cut the crap. Were you making the same argument when people refused vaccines?
1
@zoella2349 She doesn’t represent the school on OF. And it was your idea not to be dumb. Almost Everyone has sex. Almost everyone with children has had sex. You act like sex is bad. What a shame.
1