Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "Supreme Court rules on Kennedy v. Bremmerton School District case" video.

@jthomas7904 You’re claiming you prayed the universe into existence? Neat.
2
@kuba2ve Can you be touched by things that don’t exist?
2
@kuba2ve Are you even aware the authors of the gospels are anonymous? Do,you know who wrote them? No, you don’t. Do you know, not a single person in the gospels claims to have witnessed a resurrected Jesus first hand? The only one to claim to have seen Jesus wasn’t even there at the time, and describes it as a vision. So, yeah, I’ve read it multiple times. I’ve attended Seminary. So, that totally was not convincing. Now…did your god tell you to say that?
2
@mollkatless I never claimed to be better than anyone. However, you’re repeating yourself after I already responded. Stacked court through corrupt politics, going against the will of the American citizens. And no, you couldn’t bother to actually respond to my questions. Maybe I do have an advantage over you after all.
2
Religion poisons everything.
1
Yes, it’s all in your head.
1
@GunsDontKillSSRIDoes Faith can be used to justify any belief, whether it is true or false.
1
@mollkatless The state employee is on state property, working for the state, in a position of influence over students. There os no place for it here. What’s wrong with doing it privately, or at church, or even in public when not representing the state?
1
@kuba2ve It doesn’t prove anything. Whether it exists is still in question. Could someone be convinced they were touched by such a spirit and be wrong? Of course they could. And you’re probably on of them.
1
@kuba2ve This isn’t about my ego. I’m just not convinced the supernatural is real, or that god claims can meet their burden of proof. I’m sure your fantasies and delusions feel good. Ego aside, if your god does exist…it should know what would convince me. Are you willing to ask your god what it would take to convince me it exists? It should know, right? It wants me to know, right? So ask, and let me know. Let’s see.
1
@kuba2ve Many things have been written for a long time. So, is it because it was written? Or because it was old? Is that your best evidence? Weird though, because Judaism is written down, and is older. But you don’t accept that. Right? What about Hinduism?
1
@mollkatless Yes, my opinion aligns with the SCOTUS prior to the corruption and stacking of zealot judges.
1
@mollkatless I’m better read than you, child. Why was he doing it in the center of attention, in front of his students and players? Specifically for the reasons you’re denying.
1
@mollkatless Worse yet. You believe in magic.
1
@kuba2ve I am positive I am not lying. You believe what you were told Jesus said. You got it from a book. This book is really a compilation of written material, for which we don’t have original manuscripts. And it makes supernatural claims. The reason you’d believe hearsay from someone you could never meet, over someone you could… Is strictly a bias driven barrier, applied to circular reasoning.
1
@mollkatless If a student is on school grounds after a football game, do the school rules no longer apply because the game is over? Would the courts have supported this if it were a Satanic prayer? Try to be honest.
1
@mollkatless When you start with “be specific”, it demonstrates your immature nature and lack of understanding. But let’s start here…. You remember President Obama? You remember Mitch McConnell? Play like you don’t. Go ahead.
1
@kuba2ve Are you free to believe Ohio floats seven miles over the rest of the country?
1
@kuba2ve And can you choose to believe it? Try. Try to choose to believe that is true. If you say yes, you will soon realize your belief in gods is also unwarranted.
1
@kuba2ve Yes, you have the right to be wrong. I’m asking whether or not you can choose to believe things that aren’t true.
1
@kuba2ve Yes, there are lots of claims for supernatural events, but no evidence. So, by your reasoning, you must believe in every god, Allah, Jesus, Zeus, Odin, Thor…because people claimed they existed. See how that doesn’t work? And child, I’ve definitely invested more than you have. You’re not even aware who wrote the gospels. And you still believe Ohio floats, right?
1
@mollkatless Let’s not forget pushing for seats for those that were under qualified yet selected from a short list of sky daddy believers.
1
@mollkatless Do Americans have the right to choose which God they want to believe in and worship? Yes or no?
1
@mollkatless Don’t pretend both sides play equally. No coup attempts for the side of reason.
1
@mollkatless Are all the people in the room made of straw, like your arguments? Why would you make an assumption and then run with it? I’m glad you find yourself amusing, but I’m not sure you can contribute intellectually. No, I’m not afraid to say that violence isn’t the answer. I’m not afraid to say anyone contributing to destruction of property should be held accountable. Let’s be sure to include anyone posing as a protestor who instead was among those who were rioting. Let’s not label anyone who was protesting as a criminal. I will also ask whether you’d support holding the police criminally responsible for any unlawful actions? And what of the more than 500 falsely arrested and falsely charged with gang activities when they were only peacefully protesting? Don’t saddle me with unreason to make your bias feel good. And your claim that you have trouble finding conservatives who think Jan6’ers were wrong, your simply not trying. I’m not some weak minded fool, and you’re not a Jedi. 🤘
1
@mollkatless You want me to respond to an unreasonable request in order to defend reason? I’m sorry if the topic of gender triggers you. Perhaps, instead of bunkering down on bad information, you actually spend some time understanding the science you’re demanding from me. Top level, you’re confusing sex with gender. It’s a common mistake, but clinging to hatred based on a lack of understanding is embarrassing. If you’re going to use police shootings as an argument, you better come with legit data. Why do you defend criminal cops, then demonstrate dissonance by suggesting they should face consequences? Better yet, why let your bias interfere with your accepting the criminal behavior of police intentionally escalating violence. Tear Gaston innocence protestors. False arrests. Beatings. Kid napping, etc.
1