Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "WWLTV" channel.

You’re going to have to bring evidence when you make such assertions. Otherwise, you’re just spewing hate speech.
4
@davidgough3512 Making an argument from ignorance is not only a poor way to argue, it is fallacious reasoning. Our Constitution makes only two references to religion. Both are in the First Amendment. Both are exclusionary. It excludes the State from involving itself is religion (the free exercise clause), AND excludes religion from involving itself in the state (the establishment clause). The separation of church and state was woven into the constitutional design. You can look back at the original drafts and revisions to see how religious phrasing as intentionally stricken.
4
⁠⁠ @markbrowning4334 First of all, we don’t need a list of commandments that are Bible based. We have laws that are based on “we the people”, not your imaginary mythical friend. But consider, the First Commandment is in opposition to our First Amendment. You shall have no God before me…? Sorry…you cannot command me to be ignorant or worship an immoral being, even if it is an imaginary one. Also, the command isn’t “thou shall not murder”. It’s “thou shall not kill”. Which denies your second Amendment right to protect yourself. So it is problematic. And we don’t need your imaginary friend to command this. We have laws of our own, that don’t need to be dumbed down. And tell me, how “fsith” anything but just the active practice of self deception?
3
@markbrowning4334 I think we’re making the same point. We don’t need the Ten Commandments, which are Bible based, to be in schools. We have laws for good reasons, not for Biblical reasons. However, the First Commandment is still in opposition to our First Amendment. But commanding people to honor their parents when they were abusive, well….that is Biblical. And it seems you’re projecting with your triggered assumptions. You even admitted you couldn’t read the entirety of my post. So maybe settle down and engage honestly.
3
@davidgough3512 The fact that God is a myth is based in reality. Not authoritarianism. Just because that is true doesn’t mean I am advocating against freedom of religion. I’m only advocating for our Constitutional rights, which includes freedom of and freedom from religion. However, the notion of a God that drowns babies and makes slavery permissible by his own laws (even if imaginary) is still an inferior moral model compared to those that oppose such things.
3
The First Commandment stands in opposition to the First Amendment. This makes Christianity in-American at the very core.
2
@crystalnicolelyle Yes, because they’re lying and it’s manipulative. Love, like an abusive boyfriend kind of love. You’d better love him back, or else…eternal suffering! Also, you’d better be willing to sacrifice your own child for this God of Abraham, right? Like the way God got angry over his own failures and drowned pregnant women and babies during Noah’s flood.
2
@crystalnicolelyle Love is not jealous. But God is a jealous God?
2
@jamesmiller3098 You’re already excluding non-believers and non-Christians.
2
@ericeisenhofer2867 So Eric, tell me about the command thou shall not kill, while supporting the right to defend one’s self as permitted lawfully by the second amendment? Unless we have libraries of laws to make the laws clear? And I wonder…should we also stone women on their wedding night if they turn out to not be virgins?
2
@ericeisenhofer2867 Then how do live with yourself? Especially when you’ve been fooled by…a book.
2
@markbrowning4334 No, I didn’t make your point. You’re just too closed minded to even bother to understand. We have a system of laws specifically because all of society will not abide by the laws. So the laws need to spell out specifically how we address this issues. You’re advocating for a non-existent system of justice. You’re also pretending your God exists. And don’t tell,me none of these are about worship when the first commandment is "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind". Sorry, Mark…but if you can’t understand this violates my First Amendment rights….then you’ve made MY point as to why we need a library full of laws. What are you going to do,with people,who don’t follow these commandments? Lock them in a basement and light them on fire? Should we get into how immoral it is when the punish,ent doesn’t fit the crime? Or how eternal torment for temporal actions can never be just and can never be moral?
2
@KamikazeJustice The bill violates Constitutional law, regardless which corrupt people wrote it.
2
@KamikazeJustice Tell me how the following command allows for religious freedom: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind”. So, you’re wrong. This First Commandment is in opposition to freedom of and freedom from religion. Secularists didn’t replace the Bible with “pseudo science”. That fact that you don’t understand what science is or how,it works is only a demonstration of your own lack understanding. Evolution is a fact. Someone has been lying to you. Our founding fathers made sure there was not Christianity mentioned in our Constitution. You can look back at the rough drafts and see where any mention was stricken. In fact, religion is only mentioned twice. Both times are in the First Amendment, and both are exclusionary. The establishment clause, and the free exercise clause. Congress also agreed upon the treaty of Tripoli, Article 11 of the treaty stated: “As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion” If you’re not hell bent on being wrong, maybe pick up the book by Constitutional Lawyer Andrew L. Seidel “The Founding Myth” and give it a read.
1
@KamikazeJustice Why do you oppose our Constitution and laws?
1
@R0MANS109 If he holds the position that the Bible should be taught in schools, he is indeed opposed to our Constitution. For the government to establish one specific religion over another, is in violation of the establishment clause, as stated in our First Amendment. In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), the Supreme Court held that the establishment clause is one of the liberties protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, making it applicable to state laws and local ordinances. What is your position on the subject?
1
Hmmmm….. God caused the accident and the traffic jam. Maybe just so he would do this. Mysterious ways, right?
1
@davidsegerstrom9313 But a god would have to know it was going to happen, right?
1
@Lowkeylie And he is wrong.
1
⁠ @Roc-Righteous God is fictional. He exists only in the imagination of people. Not in reality. I’m often curious why people choose to worship an immoral God who made slavery permissible by his own laws, drowned babies, and requires blood sacrifices.
1
@ericeisenhofer2867 Then how do live with yourself? Especially when you’ve been fooled…by a book. It seems you can’t even think through the questions posed.
1
@markbrowning4334 You’re making the mistake of demanding others honor people based on your bias, and ignorance. You don’t have a valid justification for demanding that others honor people who do not deserve honor. That isn’t a mistake. Obviously you’re not smart enough to recognize some people during periods of their life, cannot remove themselves from the situation. And even if/when they can, you’re still demanding that the parents are honored. What you’re doing is taking something that is common, and calling it rare, in order to dismiss the absurdity of your position. And your claim about the existence of “one true god” is just nonsense. It is, in fact, a part of the problem here. You can’t ever demonstrate any God exists in reality. Everything you think you know about your God is strictly imaginary and can never be demonstrated to be true. And going back the point of honoring a parent, you’re probed by convinced this imaginary friend of yours deserves to be honored, praised and or worshipped. However, since I’ve attended Seminary, and I have studied the Bible’s historicity, I know a few things about the subject. You’re talking about a fictional character, but an immoral one by all measures. You’re talking about the God who, according to the Bible made slavery permissible by his own laws. You’re talking about an allegedly all knowing, all loving, all powerful being that was so angry over his own failures, couldn’t think of a better way to resolve the problem than to commit genocide and drown everyone…including pregnant women and babies. He didn’t just poof them out of existence, he made sure they suffered first. Including babies. More so, you’re talking about the guy who torments people for eternity, right? So…an eternal punishment which can be warranted for temporal actions. So, even the “one true god” you are convinced exists. (but doesn’t) is neither just, nor moral.
1
@markbrowning4334 Your comments on the ten commandments in school is absolutely favoring one religion over others. Worse, you’re completely dismissing our Constitutional laws. And that isn’t common sense. That is absurdity. Even the First Commandment stands in opposition to our First Amendment. What you’re missing is, for these “common sense” things, we don’t need them coming from the Bible. And I don’t need someone with a limited capacity and full blown indoctrination to tell me who or what to honor, and when. I already have a superior moral position.
1
@R0MANS109 You believe a lot of things that are simply untrue. In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), the Supreme Court held that the establishment clause is one of the liberties protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, making it applicable to state laws and local ordinances. So stop spreading lies and misinformation.
1
He should have picked softer water.
1