Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "KGW News" channel.

Good human.
62
People are people.
3
The far right are the assholes who reject democracy and support insurrections. They’re also the ones who believe in magic and reject science.
2
@jimthain8777 Have you considered there is no reason to conclude the Cosmos is conscious, or has a mind? Or that any god exists?
2
@michaelcasile1036 You want me to “please look up” your confirmation bias and anti-science rhetoric? You’re literally making an argument from ignorance, you don’t understand the process therefore “magic” makes more sense. Oh, let me see…DNA is way to complex to come about naturally, but something as complex as a god is necessary? You don’t have the first clue how science works, believer.
1
@michaelcasile1036 You’re obviously on the right, correct?
1
@michaelcasile1036 Natural causes don’t require magic, no matter how much nonsense you try to apply. But your gods does. And no, you lack a basic understanding of science if you’re rejecting science but believe a god exists. And by the way, the difference is that science doesn’t claim to have answers to which they don’t have evidence. What was the cause of the inverse to come into existence? You pretend you have an answer. Science doesn’t. Only one is honest, and it isn’t you.
1
@michaelcasile1036 Consider the number of examples we have of causation being natural. Contrast that to the number of ex apples we have with a supernatural explanation. We have only examples of natural causes, and not a single example of a supernatural one. Next time to you try to calculate probability, keep this in mind.
1
@michaelcasile1036 Please, don’t try to pretend you understand science, philosophy or,logic to be. You’re simply under qualified, as demonstrated in my previous post. Tell me how you calculate the probability of a supernatural event when you have exactly zero examples of supernatural events to use as reference. It doesn’t matter what you calculate the probability of the universe existing is, the reality…the universe exists, and must necessarily be exactly 1:1 because it is here. And none of this is relevant to whether or not your imaginary friend exists.
1
@michaelcasile1036 You have a problem with the Big Bang, which is our best model for the expansion of the universe. So you reject the science. And macro evolution? You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. There is NO difference in the processes between micro and macro evolution. The only difference is the time involved. So your problem with “macro” evolution is like arguing that seconds can turn into minutes, but not years. Stop using church websites to get your understanding of science. You have a problem with the science, which is our most reliable method, but instead you insert the “god of the gaps” which has no evidence to support it. And here you are, demonstrating that you don’t really have a base level understanding, but somehow you use magic to know all of science is somehow wrong.
1
@michaelcasile1036 Oh, so you’re going to conclude…because you can’t understand science…. That somehow I don’t have meaning or purpose, or must lack morals? You sit here, suggesting you have magical access to knowledge you can’t possibly have… You sit here denying reality and science, yet offer nothing supporting your claim that a god exists. And of course, this god of your has doctrine that makes slavery permissible by the law of your god. But somehow I am immoral? You worship the god of slavery, but you want to pass moral judgment because I think your standards for evidence are inferior?
1
The Bible isn’t any sort of authority on reality. The Bible does speak of talking snakes and talking donkeys. It also suggests the earth was formed in under six days. The Bible makes claims but cannot support them with evidence. Particularly for supernatural and magical claims. It’s a shame, the education system has failed you. Or, you it.
1
@jimthain8777 If the Cosmos has always existed, there is no need for a God hypothesis at all.
1
⁠⁠ @seventhdayissabbath8747 If the Holy Spirit is imaginary, and you can’t prove it isn’t, then nothing was moved by it.
1
I only read one book, but it's a good book, don't you know I act the way I act because the Good Book tells me so If I wanna know how to be good, it's to the Good Book that I go Cause the Good Book is a book and it is good and it's a book I know the Good Book's good because the Good Book says it's good I know the Good Book knows it's good because a really good book would You wouldn't cook without a cookbook and I think it's understood You can't be good without a Good Book cause it's good and it's a book And it is good for cookin'
1
@seventhdayissabbath8747 “God” changes all the time. And yes, I can use the Bible,to make an internal critique of the Bible. You can either demonstrate God exists, or you can’t. And guess what? You can’t. Start there. If you’re choosing whether or not to believe a thing, you’re doing it wrong.
1
@jimthain8777 My beliefs aren’t based on wishes, but evidence. Can you choose to believe Ohio floats seven miles over the rest of the country? Is choosing beliefs you can’t demonstrate a reliable way to make a conclusion? Yes, many others believe things that aren’t true. The question is whether or not you can demonstrate such beliefs are true, or if they can be demonstrated to be concluded using fallacious reasoning.
1
@marieknight9385 I agree. God didn’t give us free will at all. Gods that don’t exist can’t give anyone anything. It’s really quite simple.
1
@marieknight9385 I agree men wrote the books within the Bible. I am also certain that you can’t prove any evidence for the existence of any god or God. And a God that doesn’t exist can’t agree with anything.
1
@marieknight9385 I know you can’t demonstrate any God exists. I know you’re making things up when you try to tell me what I think about the Bible. Believers, always pretending to know things they don’t.
1
@marieknight9385 You’re not even capable of admitting you don’t have evidence. I am better educated than you are, so don’t go there. I’ve attended Seminary, you haven’t. Let’s get to the evidence you claim to have, but don’t. Oh, and if you knew anything about science, you’d know science doesn’t have to prove your God doesn’t exist. Science shows there is no use for a God hypothesis. The reality is, you can’t demonstrate one does. That is the standard.
1
@marieknight9385 You’re so dishonest. I didn’t mention the Bible only to agree it was written by men. I never once suggested you’re defending any position about the Bible. My only position is that you cannot demonstrate any God, god, or gods exists. Sure, you can believe a “god” exists, you just can’t ever demonstrate it isn’t simply imaginary. It doesn’t matter which religion or non-religion.
1
@marieknight9385 The fact is, you can’t demonstrate any God exists. Right? This isn’t an assumption. It’s a fact. And you’re a liar. You’ve lied to yourself, you’ve lied to me. You’ve lied about me. And that tells us all we need to know about the existence of your imaginary friend.
1
@marieknight9385 False. Nature exists, therefore natural processes exist. And we have evidence of natural processes. You still believe in a god for which you have no evidence. You don’t even know what evidence is. I’d ask you why you’re convinced, but it seems like you don’t even know.
1
@marieknight9385 Don’t tell me what I expect others to do. You’ve been wrong about everything else so far. If your standard is that nobody can prove a god doesn’t exist, you’re doing it wrong. Nobody has to prove a god doesn’t exist when you can’t prove one does. By your standard, since you can’t prove unicorns don’t exist…then YOU must believe in unicorns. And Big Foot… And Odin, Thor, the FSM, and leprechauns. Unless you can prove they don’t all exist, they’re as likely as the imaginary friend of yours. Now, you claim a creator guided natural processes. Which of course is just another claim for which you have no evidence. So you’re still at square one, believing something you have no evidence for. And….you don’t even know why you believe it to begin with. What..do you expect others to believe when there is no evidence….like you did? Lol.
1