Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "Portland police say they were busy with other calls during downtown clash" video.

The far right are the assholes who reject democracy and support insurrections. They’re also the ones who believe in magic and reject science.
2
@michaelcasile1036 You want me to “please look up” your confirmation bias and anti-science rhetoric? You’re literally making an argument from ignorance, you don’t understand the process therefore “magic” makes more sense. Oh, let me see…DNA is way to complex to come about naturally, but something as complex as a god is necessary? You don’t have the first clue how science works, believer.
1
@michaelcasile1036 You’re obviously on the right, correct?
1
@michaelcasile1036 Natural causes don’t require magic, no matter how much nonsense you try to apply. But your gods does. And no, you lack a basic understanding of science if you’re rejecting science but believe a god exists. And by the way, the difference is that science doesn’t claim to have answers to which they don’t have evidence. What was the cause of the inverse to come into existence? You pretend you have an answer. Science doesn’t. Only one is honest, and it isn’t you.
1
@michaelcasile1036 Consider the number of examples we have of causation being natural. Contrast that to the number of ex apples we have with a supernatural explanation. We have only examples of natural causes, and not a single example of a supernatural one. Next time to you try to calculate probability, keep this in mind.
1
@michaelcasile1036 Please, don’t try to pretend you understand science, philosophy or,logic to be. You’re simply under qualified, as demonstrated in my previous post. Tell me how you calculate the probability of a supernatural event when you have exactly zero examples of supernatural events to use as reference. It doesn’t matter what you calculate the probability of the universe existing is, the reality…the universe exists, and must necessarily be exactly 1:1 because it is here. And none of this is relevant to whether or not your imaginary friend exists.
1
@michaelcasile1036 You have a problem with the Big Bang, which is our best model for the expansion of the universe. So you reject the science. And macro evolution? You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. There is NO difference in the processes between micro and macro evolution. The only difference is the time involved. So your problem with “macro” evolution is like arguing that seconds can turn into minutes, but not years. Stop using church websites to get your understanding of science. You have a problem with the science, which is our most reliable method, but instead you insert the “god of the gaps” which has no evidence to support it. And here you are, demonstrating that you don’t really have a base level understanding, but somehow you use magic to know all of science is somehow wrong.
1
@michaelcasile1036 Oh, so you’re going to conclude…because you can’t understand science…. That somehow I don’t have meaning or purpose, or must lack morals? You sit here, suggesting you have magical access to knowledge you can’t possibly have… You sit here denying reality and science, yet offer nothing supporting your claim that a god exists. And of course, this god of your has doctrine that makes slavery permissible by the law of your god. But somehow I am immoral? You worship the god of slavery, but you want to pass moral judgment because I think your standards for evidence are inferior?
1