Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "State Sup Ct Orders Woman to Return $70K Engagement Ring" video.

  1. Marriage is a three ring circus. First, the engagement ring. Next, the wedding ring. Then comes the suffering.
    54
  2. @ Those fall under suffering, wouldn’t you agree?
    3
  3. @ First, it was a joke. Second, you assume too much without asking any relevant questions. You think love is magic?
    1
  4. @ Read it again.
    1
  5. She isn’t a bride at that point. And why are you yelling? Also, there isn’t a wedding ring of the engagement is called off.
    1
  6. @ This contradicts your earlier post. And I don’t think you’re qualified to use common sense.
    1
  7.  @JoeSmith-cy9wj  You stated the engagement ring stays with the bride, when she was never a bride. And clearly, the courts don’t agree with you. But you don’t care, remember.
    1
  8. @ Still, she isn’t a bride during the engagement. She becomes a bride on the wedding day. And since that day never happened, she was never a bride. Just own up to it and carry on about your day.
    1
  9. @ You started with poor etiquette and factually incorrect information, and were called out. Then you tried to double down and are now flailing about. Maybe move along before you upset yourself further.
    1
  10.  @JoeSmith-cy9wj  After all, within the context of the story, there was no bride.
    1