Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "Pope Francis approves church blessings for same-sex couples" video.
-
8
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
FreePalestine-qj6zn
Depends on which God.
Now, try to follow along….
If you suggest your God has attributes that are in conflict, it could make the God claim logically impossible.
For example, if you’re arguing for a God with the tri-Omni properties, or a God that was a married bachelor…
The logical impossibility would demonstrate the God could not exist, at least unless you first change the attributes.
However, and try to follow here too…
If people claim Vishnu, Odin, Allah, Zeus, Thor and Big Foot exist..
Do we have to prove they all don’t exist?
Or are you telling me you believe they all exist, because you can’t prove they don’t?
It’s called owning the burden of proof.
You believe in a God that nobody can ever demonstrate exists. I don’t accept the claims of people who are convinced a God exists, but can’t ever demonstrate it.
So…you’ve just admitted you can’t demonstrate your God exists. Which makes your God like Big Foot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
FreePalestine-qj6zn
Wow. You’re slow.
Does the God you believe in have the properties of omnipotence, omniscient, and Omni present?
God is sometimes described as omnipotent, meaning all-powerful; omniscient, meaning all-knowing; and omnipresent, meaning present everywhere at all times.
If so, your God is a logical impossibility, which proves he doesn’t exist. So yes, I can demonstrate he doesn’t exist.
Of course, the God you believe in could be mostly evil…
And again…now based on your,own argument….you believe Unicorns, Big Foot, and the Flying Spaghetti Monster exist…
Because YOU can’t prove they don’t.
Say hello to Big Foot for me.
You apparently don’t care whether what you believe is true.
1
-
1