Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "KING 5 Seattle" channel.

  1. It says Redmond, not random. It also says stalking incident, which means it wasn’t random.
    5
  2. You’ve been radicalized. Try sobriety.
    4
  3.  @nasoj3029  Zebras exist.
    2
  4. Slimy. Yet, satisfying.
    2
  5. Cops are violent criminals.
    1
  6. Flight 828
    1
  7. The far right isn’t about honor or civility. You’ve heard of Project 2025, no?
    1
  8.  @karlynn7719  The right has a significant number of people who believe in mythical beings. Nice example. Nice straw man argument. Are all your friends made of straw too? Also, you’d first have to demonstrate your original claim to be true…burden of proof is yours. When was the last time the left stormed the Capitol? I wonder if all that damage intentionally excluded any statues?
    1
  9.  @karlynn7719  How did you rule out a disgruntled trumper?
    1
  10.  @karlynn7719  lol. Occam’s razor. As if you understand fallacies. You just admitted to making conclusions based on a complete lack of evidence. OK, believer.
    1
  11.  @nasoj3029  I wonder if you only apply that logic where it supports your bias?
    1
  12.  @karlynn7719  Wrong again. I never once said my conclusion was that it was a disgruntled Trump supporter. You’re using a straw man argument, which is a logical fallacy. I simply asked how you ruled it out to form your conclusion. Just like you formed a conclusion about the statue, without evidence, merit, or warrant. Is it likely it was not a disgruntled Trump supporter? Sure. But until we know, we don’t know. That is the point, believer.
    1
  13.  @karlynn7719  I absolutely understand probability,but you have demonstrated you do not. Something being a logical possibility doesn’t mean it has equal probability. Another straw man from you. Are all your friends made of straw too? It seems so. I never suggested probability isn’t relevant. What you’re missing is that you’re being convinced of things without evidence. So let us know if you ever earn that GED.
    1
  14.  @karlynn7719  A distinction without a difference? All you’ve been able to do is make fallacious arguments, and demonstrate a lack of understanding, and bias. You seem to get rattled when people,point out your obvious mistakes. You have no data that supports your claim that political violence is “incontrovertibly far-left” over the last decade. You clearly have no understanding of probability when you just make things up. All cops are criminals is hyperbole. I never made such an argument on this conversation. And there is a high probability that is true.
    1
  15.  @karlynn7719  5hat attack on Jan6 wasn’t the left, little man.
    1
  16.  @karlynn7719  Every comment you made contained fallacies and blatant lies. Good luck squaring that with your problem of different standards. You even had to drag in an unrelated comment which you admit you “knew” was hyperbole. Lol So, you don’t understand hypocrisy, logical fallacies, or probability. Good show, believer.
    1
  17.  @karlynn7719  Department of Homeland security: Across both datasets, we find that radical acts perpetrated by individuals associated with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent. In the United States, we find no difference between the level of violence perpetrated by right-wing and Islamist extremists. Data, you don’t understand data either. Lol. What else are you going to lie about?
    1
  18.  @karlynn7719  It turns out, the shooter was a registered Republican. So your every argument has been fallacious and wrong.
    1
  19.  @karlynn7719  You don’t get to decide whether my intent was hyperbolic. Just like I don’t get to decide what your favorite flavor of ice cream is. Lol. You’re every argument, destroyed. Puppies, stay on porch.
    1
  20. No, they’re not all criminals. You’d have to prove that, and you can’t. Trump is a convicted felon for a very specific reason. He is a criminal.
    1