General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Moon Shoes
CNBC Television
comments
Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "Moderna shares drop after company cuts Covid-19 vaccine outlook" video.
Sounds like you skipped science class.
7
@kden 99% of those that have died from the virus have been unvaccinated. But I’m sure your bias keeps you laughing.
4
@madzmadeit Sounds like you skipped it, too. And…I’d bet your world view includes the existence of magic, and mythology. You’re also a flat earther, Mr. Michael?
3
@madzmadeit Yes, you do seem triggered. It’s never too late to go back for your GED.
3
@teeminator30 Do you know what over turns science? Better science. Do you know what doesn’t over turn science? Conspiracy theories. I find it ironic when people who reject science do so using a science based computer device of a science based internet.
3
@paper8nintendo Oh well, let me explain..since you apparently missed more than just science. The OP was suggesting the need for boosters is based on profits, and not health. As if the vaccines weren’t useful during a pandemic where more than half a million lives were lost in this country alone. I don’t know whether or not boosters shots will impact profits. After all, this was reporting losses. Regardless of profits, vaccines reduce risk of infection, reduce risk of spreading infection, and reduce symptoms…including death. But if you’re not scientifically literate, you are more likely to be influenced by conspiracy theories and misinformation. Also, for the record…. one can be educated in different fields outside of science. They’d still qualify as educated. Just not in science. How triggered are you that I call someone out for blatantly misrepresenting based on bias and lack of understanding? Are you also a flat earther?
3
@madzmadeit Sure, that’s a thing. Didn’t you forget to reference Satan, or communism, or something?
2
@KB-ke3fi This is part of the problem, and the problem is you. The border issues aren’t about science, but about politics. I’d take immigrants over MAGA heads 9 times out of ten.
2
Skylar, how many people have died world wide as a result of the pandemic? Just because the institutions that provide medical science to society also participate in capitalism, doesn’t mean it’s about money alone. How is it any different than every other commodity in that regard?
2
@FJBtV-os2pv Omg, you’re so funny. “Literally made up of poison” suggests you don’t understand dosages. Also, people who take this “poison” tend to have a higher survival rate than those that don’t, if infected. Very strange. Very strange, indeed.
2
@teeminator30 You love the freedom to remain ignorant on the topics, and you seem to have an eager desire to remain so. Instead of trolling and arguing from a place of ignorance, maybe take some science classes, or watch a few high school level videos.
1
@bobbysmurda2268 This isn’t an argument about elites. It’s about science, really.
1
@teeminator30 So you’re making a predication based on zero credibility, and zero evidence, which stands against all of medical science and all the data. So you’ll remain skeptical of our reliable methods, while presupposing you’re smarter than the rest of the world. Good luck with that. Now, the only questions that remain are whether you’ll change your mind about medical science if you need a ventilator, or whether you’ll take other experimental medications to recover, and be hypocrite like Rogan and Trump.
1
@teeminator30 Millions of people have died from bad science? Sure…can you offer any specifics or any numbers? And, more importantly…..Can you offer any methods more reliable than science? Is this where magic and mythology lead you to believe you have special access to information that experts in the field don’t have access to?
1
@teeminator30 For those example, how is it you know they are harmful? Is it just magical access to knowledge, or did science provide that info? If you don’t understand science, you don’t understand science. And you don’t. Science is always tentative based on current understanding of best available evidence. But answer this question: By the way, give me evidence that science ever made a declaration about doctors and Camel cigarettes. Give me evidence science ever suggested spraying DDT into kids’ faces. You can’t. You can’t, but you’re dishonest in your claim because you don’t have a valid argument. Your examples are weak, and we both know you don’t have evidence of science making the proclamations you’re asserting. But you can’t be honest. You’re not educated, you’re biased.
1
@momojo88 I think it’s very telling you mentioned Fox, Trump or Biden, and I never did. I’m arguing science versus lack of understanding science. You’re the one who is categorizing people with a lack of understanding and misinformation as Fox viewers and Trump supporters.
1
@RashadPrince Who is forcing anyone. Please, be specific.
1
@madzmadeit Is that the best you can do…mocking science because you don’t understand it? Do better.
1
@teeminator30 I am asking…how,do,you know? What magical access do you believe that your brain has which is more reliable than data? These things you’re claim ping are bad, you only know are bad through science. You didn’t use just your brain to form conclusions without some information. But you’re also,using examples that are unrelated to the vaccine as well. You don’t have data or good reason to suggest the vaccines are harmful or bad….but you’ve made that conclusion based on your,own lack of understanding. And your suggesting to use my brain is funny, because my brain is demonstrably better informed than yours.
1
@teeminator30 I really want to know the source of your magical abilities.
1
@paper8nintendo The “biased, tribalistic undertones” as you suggest are indeed dissimilar to anti-vax conspirators in the fact that my position is based on science and not make believe and magic. Your argument seems to suggest that, for example, those that understand evolution have an equal argument as creationists. It seems you recognize these anti-fax folks as the problem they are. But you feel a need to diminish those of us who actually have an understanding of reality and science by up using an equivocation fallacy.
1
@zero1zerolast393 I’m not telling people,who disagree with me they they don’t believe in science. I’m stating those that hold an opposing opinion than medical science don’t understand the medical science. My world view is evidence based. Which is indeed superior to those that are not.
1
@AltCTRLF8 Sure, a life saving vaccine was never about health. They could have invested money and been more profitable with other investments, no?
1
@kden Is this the upper limit of your intellect?
1
@Joe"mybuttsbeenwiped"Biden You don’t seem to understand that statistic, and it’s embarrassingly entertaining. That “lucky 1%” would be categorizing the 1% that were vaccinated and still died. I’m pretty sure you don’t fall into either vaccinated or dead category. But thanks for the laugh.
1
@ricksanchez9798 You don’t believe people who you’re convinced are liars. There is a difference. It’s a matter of deploying reliable methods in determining whether something is true. Also, if you’re convinced of something, you may be be lying…but you could still be wrong/mistaken. Does your world view include the existence of magic?
1
@PreserveSakartvelo Like Jesus?
1
@chrisbova9686 Done how? What is your evidence? Nice try, troll boy.
1
@here2play760 So your position is that if someone is old, they don’t deserve to live any longer. That tells me all I need to know about your character, and your lack of education
1
@ricksanchez9798 Rick, it long past time you go back for your GED. Or at least, learn about Epistemology.
1
@ricksanchez9798 So, your best argument is “look at the trees”? Lol. Evidence based world views are superior to fiction based ones.
1
@ricksanchez9798 You’re already confined, but not for good reason. But you are indeed a liar. And you don’t have evidence that warrants your position. And, your world view isn’t based in reality. So, it’s a bit problematic.
1
@ricksanchez9798 Please explain how you have magical access to information and knowledge that stands against the entire field of medical science. Did some wizard offer to grant you this magic if you just refused to pass any and all science classes?
1
@ricksanchez9798 What you need is to go back and check the math on your epistemology. Make sure you have good reasons to believe the things you do. Your world view should be based on evidence, and it fails because it isn’t.
1
@ricksanchez9798 Be specific, Bozo…. What are “they” “lying” about? And be sure to offer relevant evidence to support your claim.
1
@ricksanchez9798 Sure, humans are known to lie. But humans are also known to tell the truth. So, that means by your own admission, does that mean you are also a liar? Your approach is flawed as well. Let me explain. If we agree that all people can and do lie, and all people can and do also tell the truth…. Then approaching everyone as if you’re convinced they are lying instead of remaining neutral….holding the null position, until you have evidence one way or the other, then your making conclusions unwarranted by evidence. You’ve admitted to this flawed approach.
1
@here2play760 Oh, your biased opinion is that population is being manipulated into a belief that NOBODY is claiming? Tell me who is reporting that EVERYONE is at risk of dying? Nobody. I don’t even have to paint you as a person who doesn’t have warrant for their beliefs, because you’ve already shown that to be the case.
1
@ricksanchez9798 There’s that “look at the trees” argument again. Saying history is evidence fails to support your position. Do you honestly think worthy of that screen name? Lol. You can’t even have an intellectual conversation.
1
@ricksanchez9798 So, your world view is based on fairy tales?
1
@ricksanchez9798 “If yo never question anything, you’ll,never know you’re being lied to”. First, I am question you…Ya liar. Second, what do you suppose the word Epistemology means? (Time to go look it up, yes?)
1
@here2play760 Are you capable of honest dialog? Who is being forced? You can comply or lose your job. It’s your choice. Children being forced? By whom? Their parents? Lol. The scientific data justifies being vaccinated. But if you don’t have the capacity to understand science, maybe you could work on that? And Malpractice? Lol. Child, you’re not supposed to snort the koolaid. Are you really convinced you have magical access to information that opposes what all of medical science can show?
1
@chrisbova9686 This is equivalent to saying “when you do, you will have evidence that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is real”. The time to believe is after you have evidence. You’re convinced without evidence, which means you don’t have reason for your beliefs. I bet this is a recurring problem with your world view.
1
@chrisbova9686 Sure. That’s possible. Ever heard of street epistemology?
1
Sure. All the lives lost versus lives saved are irrelevant…. To you.
1