Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "Rand Paul challenges Dr. Fauci (again). Watch his response" video.

@southerncross5360 Your inability to understand science isn’t a valid argument against it.
27
@williamcummings2305 If your world view doesn’t comport with reality, what good does,it do in reality? The fact is, you’re completely uneducated and illiterate in Science. You probably believe magic is real. The scientific community bases their position on evidence. You don’t seem to require evidence to form your beliefs. And that is why you consistently reach incorrect conclusions.
22
@Dnic3618 The problem with your argument is that nobody is looking at Fauci like a supreme leader. Fauci represents the hard data derived from science. You don’t get to pretend your feelings are more reliable than the scientific method.
21
Let’s see if a couple internet drop outs can match the experience and expertise of someone who has dedicated his life to the study of immunology.
14
@bubbanikr1 Learn to science. I’m not reading your novel. If you’re ignorant enough to be anti-science, and think you magically have a better understanding than medical science, you’re a turd.
2
@jan-paulkleijn5131 Don’t tell me what I am convinced of based on your incredulity.
2
@jacquelinemartensen5130 Which god?
1
@jujubee8950 And that doesn’t change the science.
1
I find it funny all those that reject science, while using their science based computer devices on a science based internet.... To post comments rejecting science. And most of them still believe in magic.
1
@harsh 1sk You assume people with different opinions are autistic. This isn’t only a demonstration of intolerance, but also incredulity.
1
@harsh 1sk People on the right are known for believing things without supporting evidence.
1
@glennvastine4118 The number of people you know isn’t relevant though. Anti-vaxxers reject science. Creationists reject science. You don’t know any?
1
@harsh 1sk Yes, I assume people with autism can form their own ideas and beliefs, and may hold different views. I don’t see that as problematic in any way. Do you? I’m intolerant of bad ideas, bad ideologies, and misinformation. I’m also intolerant of people who demonstrate a high level of confidence in beliefs for which they don’t have evidence.
1
@harsh 1sk You were using the term autistic to disparage. Doing that seems very short sighted, and narrow minded.
1
@harsh 1sk You mean to say you did use autistic to disparage. I agree you did. I don’t agree you should. Are you suggesting I should be tolerant of bad ideologies, and people like you that disparage the autistic? Ethically, morally, intellectually, I am your superior. Is that a problem for you?
1
@harsh 1sk I don’t assume people with different views are autistic. I simply said people with autism can and do hold independent views. Looks like you’re not as clever as you try to be. Care to try again?
1
@harsh 1sk No, that is your misinterpretation of what I said, and not at all what I meant. I’ve clarified, yet you are still committing to being wrong. All autistic people have independent thought. Not everyone with independent thought are autistic. It’s an elementary level concept. Thanks for allowing me to demonstrate my intellectual superiority. It’s funny how you believe your error somehow trapped me.
1
@harsh 1sk By the way, the earth isn’t flat....it’s a sphere.
1
@harsh 1sk You don’t seem to have anything constructive or intelligent to add. Why would you disparage people with autism?
1