Comments by "Moon Shoes" (@moonshoes11) on "Spotify agrees to take Neil Young's music off the platform" video.

People who follow JRE have low standards of evidence, and can be convinced to believe nonsense.
6
@jaydoggy456 The problem with your argument is two-fold. First, you’re assuming I rely on media for my understanding of science. I’m sure that is a failure in your world, but it’s not in mine. Second, your lack of science literacy allows you to reject the consensus of medical science which is based on data, to chase your own bias confirmation based on opinions who are not experts in the field of study with data to support their misinformation.
4
@9BS50 I don’t care if people you respect are followers of misinformation and poor epistemology. If you’re willing to reject the science because you think you know better, you’ve got to have a better reason than “I follow Joe Rogan”. And just because someone claims to be a scientist doesn’t mean they are knowledgeable in the field, or have data to support their positions. You do understand what grifters are, right?
3
@jaydoggy456 How did you make those conclusions? Oh right, you don’t need evidence to be convinced of anything. Maybe you’re projecting your desperate need to listen to a talking head, eh?
3
@hugoh.9694 That’s great. Now, how do we know if they’re right in their opinions? What measures can we use? Joe does say “it’s entirely possible” quite often, not understanding that you’d have to demonstrate whether something is possible, not just claim it.
2
@hugoh.9694 Specifically what studies are putting Joe on the right side of anything? You’re missing the entire point. Joe is spreading misinformation and has voiced opinions that are in opposition to science. Joe isn’t a prophet. There is. No magic here. Your epistemology is flawed, and all you can do it repeat fallacious claims and avoid acknowledging the point. You don’t get to use your lack of scientific understanding to argue against the science. Grow up, get an education. Seriously, go learn what science is and how it works.
2
@hugoh.9694 If you love him so much, go propose to the guy. Your devoutness isn’t relevant.
2
@hugoh.9694 Actually, it makes my point. You ramble on an entire paragraph which was unrelated to the argument. Your admiration is irrelevant to whether he is qualified, and whether his claims are considered misinformation. You want to suggest you’re using science to argue against actual science, but you don’t even understand how science works. You still don’t seem to understand that your GED isn’t going to match up against the consensus of medical science.
2
@backwatersage First, natural immunity and herd immunity are not the same thing. Yes, they are real. Vaccinations are more effective than natural immunity, and herd immunity can be achieved more efficiently with less suffer and fewer deaths, through vaccinations. Bill Gates isn’t an authority on the subject, so not sure why you’re crying about that. It’s like you’re desperate to be wrong about everything.
2
@natemurray311 You’re still missing the point. The same cannot be said for both sides. A few doctors without qualifications have opinions that differ from the consensus of medical science and the evidence. This has nothing to do with media outlets…except that you’re projecting how you get your misinformation.
2
@natemurray311 Your belief in creationism just doesn’t hold up against the evidence for evolution either, believer.
2
@shumymikaball Science isn’t about debating results. Not debating among the populous. It is a method which includes peer review. So sorry, you don’t even have a grasp on science. And if you think a bunch of drop outs get to “debate” science, as if that is useful, you don’t have the slightest clue what science is. Which is already obvious.
1
@shumymikaball No, peer review comes from peers, not random guys on YouTube. Peer review comes with data. You either can show evidence for what is incorrect about the current model, or you can’t. It’s not a debate. Maybe you don’t understand what the word censorship means. And you’re obviously still confused about science. Here is my recommendation: Look up the word epistemology, and take it seriously.
1
@victoriagore470 Omg. What are you talking about? You might as well have just announced you don’t understand what peer review is, or science for that matter. Your opinions aren’t part of peer review. Lol. Karen.
1
@victoriagore470 I get it. What you are calling expert doctors aren’t immunologists and they don’t have data. Besides, they stand in opposition the the consensus. Right? What part don’t you get?
1
@shumymikaball Review papers are peer review, silly, Come on now, do better. And what censorship? Are you suggesting science will be over turned by a discussion on Joe Rogan’s conspiracy theory hour? Lol. “Anything is possible” my ass.
1
@victoriagore470 That’s the thing, your one off’s are opposing the consensus of medical science and the data. Voicing an opposing position on YouTube isn’t how peer review works. Keep up. We’ve been over this.
1
@victoriagore470 There are what immunologists that disagree specifically with what and based specifically on what? Listen Linda, you’re chasing bias. Nothing more. You’re not qualified. Joe isn’t qualified.
1
@victoriagore470 It’s your assumption that anyone is trying to hide anything, isn’t it? It’s your assumption that these quacks with opposing positions are qualified to do so, right? Doctors that publicly disagree with the consensus of medical science based on nothing but their own bias should be openly mocked. If they get ridiculed for sharing bad ideas, good. The problem here is your epistemology. Look it up and take it seriously. This is like comparing creationism with the scientific theory of evolution. One is fiction, the other has evidence.
1
@bellybap57 Really? Is that your conclusion? That just shows how you make false conclusions based on bias. You lack imagination.
1
@bellybap57 If you’re waiting for input to change your mind, you’ve already made a conclusion. It seems you’re overlooking and dismissing all of the science. Have you heard of the CDC?
1
@bellybap57 And it seems you don’t understand what science is, or how it works. Do you have a method for measuring reality that is more reliable than science?
1
@bellybap57 Yes, I’m sure the consensus of medical science has it wrong, and you…with your GED…magically know better. 🤘🤪
1
@bellybap57 First, try to use proper sentence structure. You’re revealing your illiteracy by being unable to effectively communicate. Are you expecting me to argue with you about science when you can’t form a proper sentence? More importantly…. Do you think this argument will make your GED level opinions somehow more likely to be right than the consensus of medical science? Seriously? Can you do any better?
1
@bellybap57 Who said anything about the virus being eradicated? This is about preventing suffering and death during a pandemic. It’s funny that you think you’re going to use you science incredulity to argue against science. You seem to have sneed to project your own brainwashing. Do yourself a favor….look,up,the word epistemology. And take it seriously.
1
@bellybap57 Oh, I can comprehend better than you. It isn’t a relevant argument. I never made any such assertion, so I wouldn’t have a burden of proof. It’s called a Red Herring. It doesn’t change the fact that you’re asserting your GED level education against the consensus of medical science. Lol. Imagine the arrogance.
1