Comments by "" (@mina86) on "Pete Judo" channel.

 @progamer-df3be you never trust a single study. This case does not change anything in this regard.
2
 @yongmrchen dunno, I find both results equally catchy. Just the fact that there is a difference would be surprising to me.
1
@anonymes2884 , yes, it would be surprising that writing about one thing influences how you feel about an unrelated thing.
1
10:00 — no one programs stuff from scratch. If they need a machine to take pictures, they design the machine and take existing piece of code for handling the pictures. It’s not unthinkable that whoever manufactured it, ended up using the same or similar code to Xerox. This is not to say that the defence stands, but rather to point out that insane things get sometimes programmed. Not to mention the image was probably further processed by other tools and any one of them could have this compression algorithm.
1
@Problemsolver434 , I made no comment about sexism or her being hypocritical. My comment was purely to point out that I didn’t believe she had case against Data Colada. And if she has no case against Data Colada than she should not go after them. However, I’ve since deleted by comment (I’ve made it before watching the entire video). It appears that she the female co-author is friends with Data Colada guys and they created their report knowing it’s false. That would be defamation.
1