Comments by "Neolithic Transit Revolution" (@neolithictransitrevolution427) on "" video.
-
7
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markbaker6553 I would certainly be against any government funding for Keystone XL.
But these are not pipelines to the US. They are pipelines to Tidewater, from which ships go to the US to find the highest price. But those ships can go elsewhere.
I guess I don't understand you're necessity oil is not sold to the US. I mean right now, yes, obviously being dependent on US trade is bad. But you seem to be arguing we should have a locked in, infrastructure based dependence out of fear that trade with an option will choose a high price environment that is our historic closest ally.
As an aside, I'd like to see a Northern Gateway to those coastal waters without lifting the tanker ban, tbh, since the ban allows Refined Products to be shipped, and that would require industry to build refineries alongside the pipeline. I'd be willing to some funding support for that. If it's a pipeline for crude shipments, then it should be paid for by private industry, or possibly with government support if that is part of a wider trade deal with Pacific allies where we get some reciprocal investment..
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1