Youtube comments of SolarChronicle (@SolarChronicle).

  1. Wow…so many graduates of YouTube University calling this fake. SMH…
    114
  2. No. A smart man would bring evidence, not gut feelings.
    44
  3. The Apollo landing footage wasn’t covered in real time.
    23
  4. Owens conveniently leaves out that part.
    21
  5. “Wikipedia is not a reputable resource because information can be altered by anyone.” And yet nobody has ever changed the factual information regarding the Apollo moon landings. Why is that?
    17
  6. Thank you. Owens is a poor fact checker.
    10
  7. It was a preemptive pardon. He hasn’t been found guilty of anything yet.
    9
  8. "when you know you’re right" About what? "and the person debating with you is trying to talk down and insult your intelligence .." Got a timestamp of where this occurred?
    8
  9. Yup, it’s always been public but people won’t fact check Bart. They just swallow his lies.
    8
  10. Oops! You forgot to bring that “evidence”. Maybe next time.
    7
  11. “doesnt make sense to me” Makes perfect sense. After Congress canceled the Apollo program in 1972 and cut NASA’s funding the leftover Apollo hardware was decommissioned, some of it was repurposed for Skylab and some of it was hung in museums. After that, NASA wasn’t able to go to the moon despite the fact that technology improved. Instead, they focused their attention on other lower cost missions. It’s only recently that NASA received new funding for returning humans to the moon albeit with less aggressive funding compared to Apollo. Artemis III will be the next moon landing a few years from now.
    7
  12. Tell us how you, as a 5th grader, knew more about science and engineering than the people who built the Lunar Module.
    7
  13. I know, right. He should have left that stupid part out if he wanted to be taken seriously.
    7
  14. Or maybe he actually walked on the moon like the evidence proves.
    7
  15.  @fourliltadpoles  “to accept the pardon he admits to wrongdoing” That’s your opinion.
    7
  16. Quote: "The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." - James A. Van Allen
    7
  17. Nope. Next?
    7
  18. “Build another Apollo Rocket and make it unmanned, fly it around the moon and back, or at least try, so we can sear that there isn’t enough fuel or technology to do so” Artemis 1 already did that.
    7
  19. There’s plenty of crappy photos. But regarding the exposure, it was worked out ahead of time. They knew the lighting during the missions would pretty much stay the same no matter where they were. The Hasselblads had a fixed shutter speed of 1/250”. The film speed was something like 140 ASA if memory serves me right. And the only apertures needed were f/5.6, f/8 and f/11. These three apertures covered every lighting situation they encountered – full sun, full shade, part sun/part shade.
    7
  20.  @EDM-Jigger  If you’re too bothered to type coherent sentences then you’re nothing more than a waste of time for everyone.
    6
  21.  @JosieThankful  You just donated money to someone who promotes disinformation. SMH…
    6
  22. The man who discovered the radiation belts said this: "The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." - Dr. James A. Van Allen
    6
  23. So you believe he was kidnapped by the CIA but then he escaped? And apparently they’re too bothered to come after him again? 👌😂
    6
  24. Nor does he comment on videos countering his claims. I don’t believe in the moon landings either because my belief is irrelevant. Facts are all that matter and the Apollo landings are supported by a mountain of facts.
    6
  25. Why?
    6
  26. So then you believe the earth is flat with a magical dome above since flat earth videos also have a content warning. SMH…
    6
  27. There were six moon landings. None of them were faked.
    6
  28. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    6
  29. “This is a great video, but I don't think there's anyone alive who believes in the moon landing today.” That’s total nonsense, and the fact you think there was only one moon landing says a lot about your education.
    6
  30. Sam Harris Trump never fails to exhibit his intellectual dishonesty Fixed it for ya 😉
    6
  31. They’re coming home in February.
    6
  32. The Apollo footage shows a motionless flag for hours when they aren’t moving it.
    6
  33. What was lacking in the 1960’s technology wise that leads you to think that?
    6
  34. He didn’t. He made that sh!t up.
    6
  35. " I had never thought twice about the Moon landing" The fact you used Moon landing in the singular form is proof you're not very educated on the history of the Apollo program. "I watched with an open mind and this makes perfect sense now" Except you didn't fact-check any of his claims. You just swallowed it whole without second thought. "I don’t know if it will end with Trump, but I hope it sure will start with him!!!" LOL! Trump acknowledges the moon landings 😂 July 19, 2019 "Well, thank you very much. Tomorrow is a very big day because tomorrow will represent 50 years from the time we planted a beautiful American flag on the moon. And that was an achievement — possibly, one of the great — considered one of the great achievements ever. And we’re going a lot further now. We’re going to the moon but we’re then going to Mars. "We have with us, of course, Buzz Aldrin, who has been an incredible gentleman. I’ve known him for years, for a long time. And we’ve been friends for a long time. But just a fantastic, fantastic man. And Michael Collins, you all know flew Apollo 11 overhead. And it’s Aldrin and Armstrong, they walked on the moon."
    6
  36. Yes, it takes guts to give grifters a platform to spread their lies.
    6
  37. They traveled 1000’s of miles by horse and buggy across the continent on less computing power than an abacus?
    6
  38. Except they don't get away with the deception at the end.
    6
  39. Maybe you should learn how radio signals work. 😉
    6
  40. Which troll video told you to say that?
    5
  41. Wrong on both counts.
    5
  42. Proof or SHTFU.
    5
  43.  @Xformat01  Collin’s was responding to a question being asked by a man in the audience. He asked specifically whether or not they could see stars despite the glare of the solar corona during the solar eclipse the crew witnessed on the return trip. Collin’s said he didn’t remember seeing any for that event. Collin’s was not talking about not seeing stars during the entire mission.
    5
  44. Thank you 👍
    5
  45. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    5
  46. Wrong
    5
  47. “why would Russia not call the U.S out on this?” Because they knew the U.S. landings were legit. The Soviets gave up because they couldn’t keep their N1 rockets from blowing up.
    5
  48. Say whatever you want. They landed on the moon six times. 😊
    5
  49. If you use valid premises such as the feasibility of 1960s technology, the scientific evidence available, and international corroboration, deductive reasoning does not support the idea that the moon landings were faked. It’s only when people start with flawed premises or misunderstand the evidence that they arrive at such conclusions.
    5
  50. This is not truth
    5
  51. "Even to this day there is no space suit that can withstand the vacuum and radiation beyond low earth orbit." And your evidence is? "Even to this day there is no space vessel capable of safely taking a human beyond low earth orbit...let alone the moon." Except there is. It's called the SLS and Orion Capsule. Derp? "No one can breath in a LEM or space suit at 3.3 - 5 psi....no matter if in oxygen is pure oxygen." Why not? Facts only please. "Show us even ONE instance (besides nasa's lies) here on earth (preferably footage) of any astronaut in a vacuum chamber and breathing at 3.5 psi for days on end. You cant." So? A lack of footage (even if none existed) doesn't prove anything. And why would a person need to breathe oxygen at 3.5 psi for days on end here on earth? Give reasons. "It's all a HOAX folks....as if well over half a century of no one going beyond low earth orbit isn't enough of a clue." Not having a ride (until Artemis) to take people beyond LEO since 1972 doesn't disprove the Apollo moon landings. We can't take supersonic flights in passenger jets across the Atlantic either. Does that mean the Concorde was a hoax? Sorry but you need to have actual evidence that disproves Apollo instead of jumping to irrational conclusions premised entirely on ignorance fueled personal incredulity.  @yomommaahotoo264 ​
    5
  52. Ok but NASA still sent 24 men to the moon and 12 of them walked on it.
    5
  53. So you voted for a proven liar?
    5
  54. So that it? You’re just going take this guy word for it?
    5
  55. There were six successful moon landings.
    5
  56. The moon landings aren’t a lie, champ.
    5
  57. Fictional movies don’t disprove the mountain of evidence that supports Apollo. Sorry.
    5
  58. That it actually happened. “Please convey our congratulations and best wishes to the courageous space pilots.” – Nikolai Podgorny (Soviet head of state)
    5
  59.  @jasminesmith4637 Yeah. Where’s your proof?
    5
  60.  @jasminesmith4637  Uhm, it’s your thread and your claim therefore YOU have the burden of proof. You could start off by provide FACTS that support your claim. So please, the floor is yours.
    5
  61.  @jasminesmith4637  You edited your comment and still managed to f— it up. Proof read much? Dude, like I said, you could easily provide FACTS in your comments that PROVE men never stepped foot on the moon. But clearly you ain’t got sh!t, just lame excuses. You made a definitive claim in your opening post and now you cop-out with, “it’s my onion”. Your onion? 😂
    5
  62. Translation: “I haven’t the slightest bit of credible evidence to back up my claim so I’ll use insecure projection, claim victory and bail.” You’re welcome.  @ppstorm_ 
    5
  63. Debunked.
    5
  64. Seek psychiatric treatment, bud.
    5
  65. Meanwhile you’ve had over 50 years to produce some evidence and ya still got nothing.
    5
  66. Ok. We still landed on the moon six times between 1969 and 1972 so get over it.
    5
  67. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    5
  68. $ibrel is a proven liar, convicted criminal (look it up), stalker of astronauts and third-rate filmmaker. Everything he mentioned has been debunked numerous times. Everything.
    5
  69. So then put forth your “proof” and collect your Nobel Prize.
    5
  70. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    5
  71. Camera exposure is set for daylight conditions.
    5
  72. They went back six more times and landed on five on those occasions.
    5
  73. Moonhoaxers and flurfs? Yes.
    5
  74. Yup.
    5
  75.  @fourliltadpoles  And what did Schiff admit to doing wrong?
    5
  76. He’d probably have more believers had he left that dumb part out.
    5
  77. TDS. A meme created to stop conversation.
    5
  78.  @doylestoner5779  It’s just a mockumentary film called– Shooting Stanley Kubrick, released in 2015 starring actor Tom Mayk as "Kubrick" and the interviewer is the director T Patrick Murray.
    5
  79. Ah, flat earth dimwit. That explains your other comments.
    5
  80. Probably doesn’t = fact
    5
  81. Don't watch the video. It's a waste of time. There were six moon landings, btw.
    5
  82. “Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?” implies we went in the past.
    5
  83.  @moviesgalore9947  “but they never showed any real videos from the lunar surface” What??? You can literally watch HOURS of video made from the surface of the moon during the Apollo missions right here on YT. Why lie like that?
    5
  84. Apollo photo archive. Look it up.
    5
  85. Because the BuyBull says to never swear an oath on anything (Matthew 5:34-37)
    5
  86. Didn’t you hear what he said? He was kidnapped by the CIA but escaped. Who needs security if you can pull that off?
    5
  87. So why did they fall so much if they’re on cables? And why can’t we see the cables?
    5
  88. Where’s your evidence? All I see is dumb-asf questions.
    5
  89. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    5
  90. If they were on wires then why did they fall so much?
    5
  91. On the moon.
    5
  92. Some people believe that Trump was actually the president throughout Biden’s term and that Biden was actually Obama in disguise. The lunatics that believe this sort of thing are the same people that believe NASA faked the Apollo landings.
    5
  93. And that’s the best evidence you could come up with? 😂😂😂
    5
  94. Not proof. Lies.
    5
  95. You forgot to bring evidence.
    5
  96. Probably around 80%. They either never return or another Hoaxtard jumps in the thread and tries to rescue the OP.
    5
  97.  @boxingandbulldogs6341  Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    5
  98. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    5
  99. Flat earth is just a dumb scam perpetuated by con-men who make a living off gullible rubes like you. What wrong with you that you can’t figure that out?
    5
  100. Why would they need strings attached to their legs? Were they paralyzed?
    5
  101. WRONG
    5
  102.  @rayna463  This video is not truth.
    5
  103. Just because your Dad said it was lie, doesn’t mean it’s a lie.
    4
  104.  @gives_bad_advice  I think it’s mainly the younger generation that doesn’t realize that the term “wireless” is just a marketing term. Any device that receives a radio signal can be considered wireless including our old TV’s with rabbit ears antennas.
    4
  105. I guess that means the Apollo moon landings are legit since nobody has used today’s advanced tech to disprove them. Cool, thanks.
    4
  106.  @OdinWarrior514  No, you don't know anything. You have no proof. You never have and you never will. You're in a cult who's only objective is to deny reality and spread lies.
    4
  107. If he was then he wouldn’t have fallen so much.
    4
  108. None were faked.
    4
  109. Billions of people had no clue but you did.
    4
  110. Found the FLATWIT.
    4
  111. Nope.
    4
  112. What he meant was, the flag was designed with a horizontal rod along the top hem to keep it stretched out instead of drooping in the vacuum of space and looking lame. Your gut feelings were totally off.
    4
  113. What about the families of the other 399,976 that helped make Apollo a success? Were they in danger as well?
    4
  114. It was Buzz Aldrin who punched $ibrel, not Armstrong.
    4
  115.  @briantitchener4829  “Ok, I'll agree so long as they have never left earth orbit.” Several countries including the Soviet Union tracked the Apollo spacecraft to the moon and the Doppler shift in their radio transmissions aligns with the mission profile. If they had stayed in low earth orbit the entire time they would have been visible to the naked eye from earth and radio telescopes would not be able to move fast enough in order track the spacecraft across the sky as it orbited at 17,000mph. Furthermore, radio telescopes are highly directional. So if these telescopes were pointing at the moon and receiving data, voice and TV then the source signal had to be coming from the moon. The moon landings are factual history just as much as WWII is factual history. Deal with it.
    4
  116.  @Xformat01  They specifically stated they were never able to see stars from the surface of the moon or while in cislunar space without the aid of the navigation optics. There was no verbal message or “nudge” from Armstrong’s elbow.
    4
  117.  @Xformat01  You probably watched the deceptively edited version.
    4
  118. So you think he’s right. SMH…
    4
  119. It’s called collecting evidence.
    4
  120. Did you notice that at the end of Capricorn One they don’t get away with the deception? Also, did you notice that cellphone coverage has nothing to do with the moon landings? My new car broke down last week. What?? Cars have been in production for well over 100 years. So that means the moon landings were faked, right?
    4
  121.  @chuckp_again_and_again  Apollo denial cult: NASA didn’t have the technology to land men on the moon in 1969. Also Apollo denial cult: They used cutting edge CGI in 1969.
    4
  122. Also. The clouds and landmasses never change during the video. If they were actually in LEO the entire time we would see a rapid change as they orbited at 17,000 mph.
    4
  123. I never lose WiFi in my kitchen so they must have went to the moon and didn’t lose any maps. 😊
    4
  124. Except it wasn’t a fraud.
    4
  125. It's called, "The Moontruth" video. It’s a prank video shot in 2002 by a British advertising company.
    4
  126. He’s all BS.
    4
  127. I’m a photographer too. No, it can’t.
    4
  128. They’re all too busy making silly TikTok videos instead of learning history.
    4
  129. Oh ffs! Worried that YT might delete this video cause it’s ,,dah troof”? 😂
    4
  130. What seems to be the problem?
    4
  131. The only footage of the actual moon landing was made from inside the Lunar Module with a 16mm movie camera. That footage was never erased. If the BBC erased a copy of that footage then it doesn't matter. The original is intact.
    4
  132. What seems to be the problem?
    4
  133.  @JillyJoan  Refusing to swear on the Buybull does not imply guilt.
    4
  134. “Call me crazy if you want but the science of photography and videography is only truly exposed by professionals.” And yet not one pro photographer or cinematographer on the entire planet has ever proven the Apollo lunar photographs were faked. Not a single one. Ever. Not a one.
    4
  135. Let’s not. 🙄
    4
  136. Yes, you are correct. Neil Armstrong, astronaut and Apollo 11 commander who also operated a Hasselblad medium format camera was the first person on the moon.
    4
  137.  @jossylopes  But NASA doesn’t want to repeat what Apollo did. They want to do bigger and better with modern technology.
    4
  138. Yeah, ok 😂
    4
  139. Except the moon landings are factual history.
    4
  140. Your inability to see through bs is EPIC.
    4
  141. Your belief is irrelevant.
    4
  142.  @Shapeshifter1210  “know it’s hard to take, but it’s been widely accepted that y’all faked it lol.” You’re talking about belief. You believe it was faked.
    4
  143. I guess you didn’t watch the whole video.
    4
  144. Oh please 😂
    4
  145. What?
    4
  146. “I feel so sorry for the taxpayers in this country.” Ikr. The poor taxpayers who threw money away on kids like you that flunked out of school.
    4
  147.  @chrismanning9336  Notice how you ignored @randyschissler’s post? Don’t even pretend like you can’t see it.
    4
  148.  @loriwilliams5206  Who said they carried flashlights???
    4
  149. Liar 😂
    4
  150. LOL! The footage is the best proof it’s real.
    4
  151.  @stuartsloan  So you voted for a proven liar?
    4
  152. Now imagine if you had actually stayed in school.
    4
  153. Proof?
    4
  154. Yup. All of that is evidence they were actually on the moon. Do better research. Learn. 😉
    4
  155. ​ @AyloynOwlFeather  1. Addendum A Funny Thing Happened... (By GreaterSapien - MIRROR) 2. Debunking Apollo 11 Fake Window cutout claim Watch them and learn. $ibrel is a con-man and you’re a gullible rube.
    4
  156. Prove it 😊
    4
  157. The VABs aren't his problem. Those can be dealt with quickly. The 6-months journey each way is more important.
    4
  158. If the moon landings were faked you’d have provided real evidence.
    4
  159. Notice how you have cowardly avoided my question?
    4
  160. Poe’s Law 🙄
    4
  161. July 19, 2019 PRESIDENT TRUMP: “Well, thank you very much. Tomorrow is a very big day because tomorrow will represent 50 years from the time we planted a beautiful American flag on the moon. And that was an achievement — possibly, one of the great — considered one of the great achievements ever. And we’re going a lot further now. We’re going to the moon but we’re then going to Mars. We have with us, of course, Buzz Aldrin, who has been an incredible gentleman. I’ve known him for years, for a long time. And we’ve been friends for a long time. But just a fantastic, fantastic man. And Michael Collins, you all know flew Apollo 11 overhead. And it’s Aldrin and Armstrong, they walked on the moon.”
    4
  162. Well I guess that settles it then 🤷‍♂
    4
  163. Correction: most of you got duped by con-men into believing it was faked. So you need to admit it and stop being gullible.
    4
  164.  @paolorossi8470  Even if Bill Clinton openly said the moon landings were faked you do realize that wouldn’t be conclusive proof, right?
    4
  165. Wrong on both counts.
    4
  166. “I've known since 2006 that the moon landings were fake” No, you haven’t. You believe they were faked.
    4
  167. NASA: There are belts of energized particles surrounding the earth. Hoaxtards: We believe you. NASA: And we’ve found a way to deal with them. Hoaxtards: LIARS!!!!
    4
  168.  @CursedPerception  So then prove all the editors are biased and are all in on some global conspiracy to hide ,,dah troof”. Go ahead. I’ll wait.
    4
  169.  @daynaream9936  No. Flat earth is just a dumb scam on YouTube. What’s wrong with you that you can’t figure that out?
    4
  170. What about the other five landings?
    4
  171. No ground based telescopes can see the tracks left behind by the Apollo astronauts.
    4
  172. Six moons landings? All faked? Get TF outta here 😂
    4
  173. Found the flat earther.
    4
  174.  @viper2148  Patel ain’t got sh!t on Schiff. Get over it.
    4
  175. Ah yes, that silly infantile “I can’t get a signal” argument. Do you nitwits find these comments on a website to copy and paste or do you genuinely believe it’s somehow related to the moon landings?
    4
  176. He didn’t because it never happened.
    4
  177. She knows that. It’s all about the likes, subs and money.
    4
  178. If you’re over 40 and you still live in your mom’s basement brainwashing yourself daily with moon landing hoax videos posted by con-men instead of having a real job then I feel sorry for her.
    4
  179.  @yusufbest4475  Some are. Many others aren’t.
    4
  180. You haven’t shown PROOF that the six Apollo landings were faked therefore your “gut feeling” that the top employees (most of which have already died from old age) would get murdered for speaking out means nothing.
    4
  181. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    4
  182. Oh dear…
    4
  183. You got owned by common sense.
    4
  184. How did you manage to get decieved by $ibrel and Owens?
    4
  185. The moon landings aren’t a lie. The Hidden Figures ladies were real.
    4
  186. He called Buzz who is a Korean War veteran, a liar and a coward. That’s why he punched him.
    4
  187. Debunked.
    4
  188.  @TheMaskedBaptist  Refer to my Van Allen quote - the man who discovered them and knew more about them than you.
    4
  189.  @solitairecat1  American Moon has been debunked.  Go to moonhoaxdebunked - chapter 5.32
    4
  190. Worst “evidence” ever.
    4
  191. Governments don’t dictate the shape of the earth. Anyone with a few brain cells can prove to themselves the earth is a slowly rotating terrestrial spheroid. The Apollo moon landings on the other hand are backed by a mountain of credible evidence and is accepted by millions of engineers, scientists and physicists worldwide including those from foreign governments that HATE the United States and would pounce at the opportunity to call them out. The fact that skeptics like yourself say, “moon landing” i.e., in the singular form, is a prime example of how little research you’ve done on the subject.
    4
  192.  @marinabasco9280  “Harness and wires” Then why did they fall so much?
    4
  193. You were convinced with ZERO evidence? 🙄
    4
  194. Don’t have to. It really did.
    4
  195. I call BS on you actually watching the entire Apollo 11 post flight press conference.
    4
  196. Sorry to disabuse you of your religious beliefs, but we know the Earth is a slowly rotating terrestrial spheroid. Just because you are unable to understand this or willfully refuse to learn it doesn't mean it becomes our problem. Here are some questions that are used every day in the real world. Can you answer them? What is the relationship between longitude and distance when traveling east or west parallel to the equator? If you know the answer, then you know the Earth is a spheroid. If you don’t, then you are not qualified to comment on the shape of the Earth. Describe the development and function of a gyrocompass. If you can, then you know that the Earth is a slowly rotating terrestrial spheroid and gravity is a fact. If you can’t, then you are not qualified to comment on the shape of the Earth, its movement, or gravity.
    4
  197. Thanks for spreading disinformation.
    4
  198.  @HenryDurth <— Flat earther
    4
  199. People equally get upset when you defend the SIX successive moon landings.  “…and wonder what else might not be true..” So you let a proven liar, convicted criminal and stalker of astronauts convince you it didn’t happen?
    4
  200. Belief has nothing to do with facts.
    4
  201. Did you forget that Trump LIED when he said he won the 2020 election?
    4
  202.  @Lauraaaaa719  Ok, so you agree Bart Sibrel is a liar since everything is a lie to you. Gotcha.
    4
  203. It wasn’t taken “on the moon”. It was taken from Lunar orbit during Apollo 8 in 1968, not 1964.
    4
  204. Because there were no ropes.
    4
  205.  @CornpopNL  Proof?
    4
  206.  @CornpopNL  Nope. Next?
    4
  207. Except he's a liar and Jesus doesn't like liars. Right?
    4
  208. That’s true because the spacecraft didn’t require fuel for the entire outbound and inbound flights. It coasted most of the way, each way.
    4
  209. It’s not impossible to do it today. You first need to be on the moon. Nobody is on the moon right now.
    4
  210. Oh that’s cute. A FLATWIT attempting to debunk the Apollo moon walks 😂
    4
  211. What’s hilarious about that? It’s the same as calling a cellphone from a landline.
    4
  212. Really? A theme park on the moon before affordable travel up to space and back for regular folks? Id!ot.
    4
  213. You’ll have to ask NASA or Intuitive Machines.
    4
  214. Check your timeline there, sport.
    4
  215.  @LunazulBaraka  Why would people assume he's the director of the moon landing? The moon landing footage is just raw footage. Most movie directors use a structured format that usually starts by introducing the characters, setting, and main conflict. The story then builds through rising challenges, reaches a peak at the climax, and wraps up with a resolution that ties everything together. Some films also include an epilogue or post-credit scene for extra closure or to hint at what's next. The Apollo 11 footage has none of this.
    4
  216. Conspiritards never think of those obvious questions.
    4
  217. Except it’s not honest and factual.
    4
  218. That’s been debunked.  Look up “moonhoaxdebunked” Chapter 5.32
    4
  219. Flat earther?
    4
  220. “MAGA” So you voted for a proven liar?
    4
  221. Wooow…how many conspiracy theories do you actually believe in? Btw, there were six moon landings.
    4
  222. In other words, you respect proven liars.
    4
  223. Why do you lie?
    4
  224. Lies from Sibrel? Yes.
    4
  225. Yeah, they did. Get over it.
    4
  226. It is. No worries.
    4
  227. Or if they didn’t have to wear a bulky suit in low gravity.
    4
  228. How does the greater technology of today render historical events false?
    4
  229. This video is not about disproving the spherical earth 😂
    4
  230. Yes but we don’t need Elon Musk to confirm something that was already confirmed 55 years ago.
    4
  231. Do you honestly think scientists haven’t thought of that possibility?
    4
  232. They did go back.
    4
  233. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    4
  234. In other words you got duped by Sibrel.
    4
  235. Imagine if Apollo 13 had landed. Deniers would have another forceful assertion - ”You can’t land seven times in a row without something going wrong, FAKE!”
    4
  236. Hence flat earthers and moon landing deniers.
    4
  237. “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    4
  238. "When he says there is a cutout being removed you believe it because he says it." Exactly! This is what I've been telling people for years. We don't actually see the crop placed over the window. He just states it's there and people believe him. Also, he claims the earth outside the window is just a model (which would indicate a studio) but then he claims they were in low earth orbit the whole time. So which is it? He can't have it both ways.
    4
  239. Indeed. It more or less warns that what you are about to watch isn’t truth.
    4
  240. They went back six times and landed on five of those occasions. How many times should they go in order to satisfy you? Moon missions are very expensive.
    4
  241. “All of these politicians lie.” No, they don’t all lie. That’s just a stereotype that people use to defend their candidate –“Well, everyone lies so what’s the difference?” How many politicians have lied about winning a presidential election and have perpetuated that lie to this very day? Spoiler alert: Just one. “Trump has at least been consistent.” Yeah, lying consistently (30,000+ verifiable lies) is better than just lying sometimes. 🤦‍♂ “Kamala has lied…” There have been some instances where Harris faced scrutiny or questions about the accuracy of her statements regarding her personal experiences, but you have to be able to distinguish between exaggerations, misstatements, and intentional falsehoods. Flip-flopping on a subject doesn’t necessarily mean someone lied. It can simply be a change of stance. “Think, lied about her accent to manipulate” That’s your opinion. There’s no way to prove that claim anyway. Just because you can detect variations in her accent that doesn’t mean she is attempting to be dishonest. You’re really grasping at straws here. “Defending, justifying, spinning kamala's lies is such a weird stance too.” It would be weird if she was actually lying but so far the only people lying are you and Trump. 💁
    3
  242.  @stoneysauce  So you just blindly accepted this codswallop from $ibrel and Owens? Where are the millions credentialed aerospace engineers, physicists, scientists, astronomers and doctors who would agree with these grifters? Why haven’t they called BS on the moon landings?
    3
  243. About what specifically?
    3
  244. Keywords: “On the surface”
    3
  245. While we’re at it, let’s summit Mt Everest to see if anyone has been there.
    3
  246. 0
    3
  247.  @McRcFly  "I take it your up to date with all your boosters?" I see this question all the time. Is there a handbook or website that Hoaxtards like you reference for these these responses?
    3
  248. Another deluded flat earther. Why do you fall for such stupid scams?
    3
  249.  @OdinWarrior514  Your comments must be AI generated. No human can be this daft.
    3
  250.  @thegreatestmantoevrwlkthep9986  You don’t know? Just “don’t look right” therefore fake?
    3
  251. NASA sent 24 men to the moon and 12 of them walked on it between 1968 and 1969. The only liars are Candace and her guest.
    3
  252. What does that make you?
    3
  253.  @SG-jv5zi  “but the more dense the atmosphere, the heavier it will be and so it will be lower to the ground. The lighter atmosphere and gases will be higher up” Ok, but what is the force that separates the different densities?
    3
  254. The only person with TDS is Trump himself.
    3
  255.  @realomon  Nah, I’m just having fun collecting id!ots. 😉
    3
  256. Comparing it to Star Wars is a bit of a stretch, don’t you think? Are you a flat earther?
    3
  257.  @Joze28314  First of all. Thanks for having the courage to admit you’re a deluded flatwit. The rate of curvature is 1° per 69 miles. You could have easily looked that up yourself.
    3
  258. “Dude, if you think we didn't go to the moon, bro. you probably believe the Earth is also flat as well.” From the sound of it you do believe the moon landings are real. That’s good. Now you just need to work on your punctuation.
    3
  259. Cameras can be attached to things, doofus.
    3
  260. There’s another video that shows the screen.
    3
  261.  @kimberleesimmering6228  Can’t converse? I’m giving you the opportunity to set the record straight about the six Apollo moon landings. Do you actually believe the grifter in this video found something that apparently none of the best aerospace engineers, physicists, doctors, radiologists, geologists, metallurgists, cinematographers, astronomers and astronauts all over the world were too stup!d to notice? Ever consider that fact that maybe you’re just a little gullible?
    3
  262.  @kimberleesimmering6228  "not gullible, just not ready to blindly trust a government who has been proven to be lying for years." Belief has nothing to do with it. The Apollo program required the cooperation of MANY governments in order to make it a success. Not a single foreign government on the planet disputes the six Apollo Moon landings, and that includes countries that HATE the US. "That's the problem with the world today, if the state tells you the sky is green everyone just nods their heads in agreement." Nah, the real problem is people like you who let grifters like Sibrel and opportunists like Ownens do your thinking. "but he's not the only person blowing the whistle on NASA" That might be your hint right there, lady. Why aren't any of the tens of millions of people from the fields of study I previously mentioned not coming forward with any facts that prove fakery? You won't find any. There are none. Not a single one.
    3
  263.  @andrewworth7574  Did he really say that? Wow, what a coward.
    3
  264. You forgot to bring evidence, John.
    3
  265. Flat earther.
    3
  266. 8” per mile squared calculates the drop from a line tangent to the earth surface back down to the surface. This drop is perpendicular to the line that is tangent. It does not calculate the obscuration height.
    3
  267. Moon landings. PLURAL. And they aren’t classified.
    3
  268. No follow-up to my comment? Realized how ignorant you sounded?  @angelac9181 
    3
  269.  @Xformat01  What makes you think they never saw stars?
    3
  270.  @Xformat01  There’s plenty of deceptively edited videos on Bart $ibrel’s channel. So what exactly didn’t you understand about Armstrong’s statement regarding seeing/not seeing stars?
    3
  271.  @Nakolezestodoly  Yes, I know that Collins wasn't on the moon. I meant to say that Armstrong was responding to the reporter and Collins said to Armstrong, "I don't remember seeing any" but the question from the reporter was about seeing stars despite the glare from the solar corona.
    3
  272. No, you believe it never happened.
    3
  273. I’ll say it. It’s bad.
    3
  274. Well, she pretends to. She knows the moon landings are legit. This is about getting exposure and making herself money.
    3
  275. No, they don’t. You just want so badly for the moon landings to be fake that you’ll make up anything. You’re pathetic.
    3
  276.  @lostmymarbles9151 Here ya go. Argument from Incredulity Fallacy: The argument from incredulity is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone concludes that since they can’t believe something is true, then it must be false, and vice versa. For example, someone using the argument from incredulity might claim that since they don’t see how a certain scientific theory could be true, then it must be false. It is committed when the arguer presumes that whatever is true must be easy to understand or to imagine. The fallacy seems to be most frequent when the contrasting expert opinions differ from our deeply held beliefs. The fallacy is very commonly found in debates over science.
    3
  277. Does your cellphone have a 200’ diameter satellite dish attached to it? Probably not. Does your phone put out the same power as the Unified S-band? Probably not. Does your service provider have towers in the dead areas you experience? Probably not. Does your cellphone have “line of sight” communication with the towers? Not always. You’re welcome.
    3
  278. The dirt makes a perfect parabolic path as it’s kicked up leaving no lingering dust clouds. This only happens on the moon. Do better. Learn.
    3
  279. “On the moon, that parabolic path should be 6 times and longer higher than what you see on the film” How do you know that what you’re seeing isn’t 6 times longer and higher than it would be on earth? Have you seen footage of the LRV running on earth?  @SoCalLucifer 
    3
  280. What?
    3
  281. More like hating. So will I.
    3
  282. Yeah, ok 😂
    3
  283. So then using that logic you might be a flat earther.
    3
  284. BS… “The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense.” — James A. Van Allen
    3
  285. “Thank you brother Bart for your deep research and standing for truth.” 😂😂😂
    3
  286. CGI in 1969? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    3
  287.  @karungarimaina7613  "Technology has advanced so much that you’d think people like Elon Musk would be jumping at the chance to collaborate with NASA." He is collaborating with NASA. His company, SpaceX is designing the lunar lander for NASA's Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the Moon. SpaceX's Starship HLS (Human Landing System) was selected by NASA as the primary lunar lander for Artemis III, the mission that will carry astronauts to the Moon's surface.
    3
  288. False generalizations are always false.
    3
  289. So?
    3
  290.  @stusue9733  Absolutely! You should never listen to experts.
    3
  291. I’d LOVE to see your evidence they used wires and slow motion.
    3
  292. Well said 👍
    3
  293. 😂😂😂
    3
  294. Cool. Now just point to the map flat-earthers use for long distance navigation.
    3
  295. In other words, let's all come together as sheeple who blindly accept any codswallop promoted by opportunists like Owens? Okay.
    3
  296. But it wasn’t about faking a moon landing. It was about faking a Mars landing to which they don’t get away with in the end.
    3
  297. Nobody has tried to go to the moon since 1972. That’s the difference.
    3
  298. Except she’s giving liars like $ibrel a platform.
    3
  299. All research shows the earth is a slowly rotating terrestrial spheroid.
    3
  300.  @VintageFootball32  Flat earth is just a dumb scam invented by con men who make a living off gullible rubes like you. What’s wrong with you that you can’t figure that out?
    3
  301.  @VintageFootball32  You struggle with getting easily duped by con men who are laughing in your face.
    3
  302. You’re a liar. How do you live with yourself being this dishonest?
    3
  303.  @JillyJoan  Buzz Aldrin is a Korean War Veteran and fighter pilot who shot down two MiG-15 enemy aircraft. He earned a PhD from MIT and started training as an astronaut ALL before $ibrel was ever born. Aldrin is a stud. $ibrel on the other hand is a proven liar, con-man, stalker of astronauts, convicted criminal and a third-rate filmmaker. He insulted Aldrin by calling him a liar and coward. You do the math.
    3
  304. “Always remember the conference afterwards” Yes. A serious technical discussion that contained many moments of puns, quips, jokes and outright laughter if you watch the full version.
    3
  305.  @alchemY.420  Are you the arbiter of truth? So where’s your history-changing evidence that nine moon missions were faked? Spoiler alert - you ain’t got any. You never have and you never will. The best you dullards can come up with is a line from a Chili Peppers song. You’re all pathetic. Lmfao!
    3
  306. What’s your evidence that a human never went? No evasions. Just a straight answer.
    3
  307. Frustrated you can’t come up with an answer? I understand.
    3
  308. Prove it.
    3
  309. Oof…worst “evidence” ever. Vacations on the moon? Hah! How old are you?
    3
  310.  @DeanShankly  “That booster jab how many did you get.” Why does every moon landing denier use that line? Is there a website you reference for those comments?
    3
  311. I can’t understand why Trump lied about winning the 2020 election.
    3
  312. It’s doesn’t. NASA’s Blue Marble photo shows Africa.
    3
  313. $ibrel is a proven liar, champ. Wake tf up.
    3
  314. "All we get at the moment is excuses reasons." Fixed it for ya.
    3
  315.  @suzanneportch113  No you didn’t and by the way, confessions are not conclusive proof.
    3
  316. Nope. You misunderstood.
    3
  317. Oh please, don’t be a drama queen. 😂
    3
  318. “How did they take off from the moon with no fuel.” Easy. They had fuel. “Or if you do the math the distance they flew verse the time they would have to be going at 18Gs impossible.” I’m bad at math. Can you show yours? “Every crisis in the US has been the government. Maui, 911, JFK. Shall I go on.” Whatever. Even if those were government coverups it doesn’t mean the moon landings were. You have to have PROOF.
    3
  319. Did go. Nine times. Landed on six of those occasions. Get over it.
    3
  320. <<<DYR HOAXTARD>>>
    3
  321.  @solitairecat1  Confessions are not absolute proof. You need to find actual evidence. Keep trying, kid.
    3
  322. OOPS! YOU FORGOT TO BRING EVIDENCE! OH WELL….
    3
  323. A rare and sane comment. Thank you.
    3
  324. Woooow….how many conspiracy theories did you fall for?
    3
  325. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    3
  326. What technology do we have now that we didn’t have back then? iPhones, PlayStations, Wi-fi, 45mp cameras and Roomba’s don’t count.
    3
  327.  @enoch87  Boomers are the ones who invented PC’s and your beloved smartphones. What has your generation done? Post stup!d videos on tictok?
    3
  328.  @SAsh-zg6ln  “Does Candace not do her own research before bringing people on?” Of course not. She’s an opportunist riding the disinformation wave that has swept the world. You have liars like $ibrel and then people like Owens making money off the lies.
    3
  329. Not truth. Lies.
    3
  330. The Soviets knew the Apollo moon landings were legit. They weren’t stupid.
    3
  331.  @fart-gravy  You said photographs and plans. You were wrong. Now we’re talking about the tapes? Ok. The only tapes that were lost/erased/reused were the ones that contained the RAW SSTV signal which was actually converted to NTSC in realtime. So in essence, no footage was lost since copies of the original exist. And, what you don’t seem to realize is that NASA publicly admits the lost tapes. So if they were trying to cover up something, they wouldn’t publicly admit something that would give the hoax away. Conspiracy theorists latch onto the lost tapes because they are so desperate to find actual evidence of a conspiracy that it drives them insane.
    3
  332. What would make it impossible?
    3
  333. Why do you believe the government about the VABs?
    3
  334. Unfounded lies? So Trump did win the 2020 election?
    3
  335. In other words you haven’t the slightest clue of its purpose.
    3
  336. “Think about it.” Well, I thought about it and came to the conclusion that NASA couldn’t afford to mount the camera to the exterior of the craft in a dropdown compartment so they brought along a dedicated cameraman instead.
    3
  337. Nope. That’s the VHF antenna that stops 10” above the backpack. Nice try though.
    3
  338. Please elaborate.
    3
  339. Proof?
    3
  340. What did you say? Your post got censored 😂
    3
  341. The Model A Ford is fake because they don’t make it anymore!
    3
  342.  @espenbjerke665  Whether or not republicans in congress received threats, Trump is STILL a proven liar. He created a massive lie, rammed it down the throats of every American. Created death and destruction because of it. And he has perpetuated that lie ever since. All because he wasn’t man enough to admit he lost an election.
    3
  343. The moon landings are factual history. You've spent over 50 years of your life living in denial.
    3
  344.  @Aurora666_yt  This video is bringing them out in droves, huh?
    3
  345. Sibrel duping you is the mind control you talked about.
    3
  346. Belief is irrelevant.
    3
  347. Even when they say you’ll be getting an income tax refund?
    3
  348. Liar 😂
    3
  349. The BuyBull is not a science book.
    3
  350. Live from the moon.
    3
  351. The evidence disagrees with you.
    3
  352. False generalizations are always false.
    3
  353. Maybe that’s the whole problem. You rely on belief instead of facts.
    3
  354. The six Apollo moon landings are supported by a mountain of evidence. What excuses and explanations are you talking about?
    3
  355. 😂
    3
  356. Modern microprocessors have literally hundreds of millions of transistors on the size of a postage stamp. This makes them more vulnerable to damage from particle radiation because of their close proximity to each other. The Apollo-era hardware only had around 5 or 7 transistors in the same area. Imagine releasing a hundred million balloons and firing a gun at them. You’re likely to take out several. But release 7 balloons and you’re likely to miss them all. The Orion spacecraft is a new type of vehicle designed with state-of-the-art modern technology. All new vehicles are fully tested prior to putting people in them. Apollo did the same thing. Also, the Artemis missions will last longer than the Apollo missions, up to a month compared to 7 to 10 days for each Apollo mission. So, there is more radiation absorption that needs to be considered. Bart Sibrel is just a con man trying to make a living by pushing his agenda. There’s literally no credentialed scientist on the face of the planet who backs this man up.
    3
  357. Think you better go back to sleep.
    3
  358. They fell so that rules out being suspended by cables. Hoaxtards keep disproving their own bs every day. 😊
    3
  359. There were over 130 eyewitnesses.
    3
  360. People are entitled to their opinions but not to facts, and the six Apollo moon landings are factual history.
    3
  361. The earth is still a slowly rotating spheroid.
    3
  362. Wrong. In the movie Interstellar, the father isn’t arguing with the school official over the moon landing[s]. The central argument revolves around Murph's education, her curiosity, and Cooper's disapproval of the narrow-minded priorities of the school system.
    3
  363. What? Ben literally sounds like a 10-year old boy talking.
    3
  364. Nope. Never proven fake.
    3
  365. 🤦‍♂
    3
  366. Proof?
    3
  367.  @graymcmic1419  It’s all real. Deal with it.
    3
  368. Governments don’t control the physical characteristics of the earth so please, stop embarrassing yourself by using the using the cop-out that governments are ,,hying dah troof” on your inability to prove your false reality.
    3
  369. No, please don’t.
    3
  370. Yes! Let’s all pray together that the corrupt Trump administration will be dealt with and justice served!
    3
  371.  @paulbeardsley4095  😂👍
    3
  372. And then Trump said, “They’re eating the dogs! They’re eating the cats!” 😂🤣
    3
  373. Flat earth is not a theory. It’s a delusion. There were six moon landings, btw. All verified and confirmed.
    3
  374. False.
    3
  375. Candace Owens is a grifter. She lies to stup!d people for money.
    3
  376. And he’s a liar 😊
    3
  377. “But Buzz has numerously admitted they never went to the moon” No, he didn’t. Stop spreading disinformation.
    3
  378. So basically you got dumber.
    3
  379. Yes, I remember. In the end they don’t get away with the deception. Oops!
    3
  380. I pray that the next four years goes to complete sh!t so Sam Harris can say, "Told ya so"
    3
  381. Ah, I get it now. Insecure projection. Tell me something, smart guy. What credible evidence do you have that proves this video didn’t happen?
    3
  382.  @avelee8.21.7BC Can you give specific examples of NDT talking down to Patrick?
    3
  383.  @aleanafox9905  Even if Aldrin blatantly admitted to not landing on the moon it still wouldn’t be conclusive proof.
    3
  384. Lmao! You’re an id!ot.
    3
  385. Apparently it never went down because people have continued to comment. It was hidden for me until someone replied to a comment I made.
    3
  386. Everyone who voted for Trump in 2024 KNOWS he lost the 2020 election. But you can’t change people who are willfully ignorant.
    3
  387. What source do you trust that leads you to believe that the VAB’s really exist?
    3
  388. 0.012” not 0.0012”. This pressure vessel skin only needed to hold back 5 psi. A soda can is about half that thickness and holds back 30psi.
    3
  389.  @michellemorgan3862  “like flooding our country to change the voting to democrats” Can you explain this in more detail?
    3
  390.  @JohnMitchem-e2k  “Yeah, no... just used my phone. Guess what? STARS!!!” Yeah, but using Night Mode on your iPhone is cheating. Take another photo using SAME settings that Apollo used - f/5.6 @ 1/250”, ASA/ISO 140. Guess what? You won’t see stars. Ever looked at photos taken from low earth orbit with part of the earth in background? Guess what! No stars! Ever looked at photos of other planets taken by space probes? Guess what? No stars!
    3
  391.  @JohnMitchem-e2k  “Y'all were wrong about the vax” Deliberately off-topic evasive derailments are a telltale sign you’ve been defeated.
    3
  392. Returned six times more.
    3
  393. Yes, what you said was a lie.
    3
  394. What does belief have to do with anything?
    3
  395. Come at me bro…
    3
  396. You're praising her for supporting a proven liar.
    3
  397. Stop using pathetic cop-outs to cover up your inability to disprove the six manned moon landings.
    3
  398. Your post was reported as disinformation.
    3
  399.  @AGON17  Ah...I see. You're a flat earther.
    3
  400.  @SSerebraSSana  "Try duping someone else. You're wasting your time with me." Translation: I'm too scared to watch videos that debunk $ibrel because I struggle with cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias" 😂😂😂
    3
  401.  @SSerebraSSana  What you're doing is called - Being gullible asf. We've all watched $ibrel's 'debunking' video, and most people don't actually need a video to counter his claims. But because you lack common sense and critical thinking, we thought we'd try to help you out.
    3
  402. "That's the red flag right there." Not if you understand the reasons. Congress canceled the Apollo program in 1972. The remaining hardware was dismantled; some was scrapped, some repurposed for other projects, and some displayed in museums. The contractors that produced this equipment either closed down or transitioned to other government contracts. So, we stopped going to the moon. Simple as that. "With extreme technological advancements, we would've been back dozens of times." Yes, technology has advanced, which is why we have a self-landing rover and a mini helicopter on Mars, as well as a telescope that can see back almost to the beginning of our observable universe. Not having been back despite advances in technology should tell you it's not about the technology. It's about money.
    3
  403. People will believe any horseshit these days 🤦‍♂
    3
  404. Ok….but, I’ve seen flat earthers make comments and refer to $ibrel’s arguments as evidence against the moon landings.
    3
  405. You didn’t. I didn’t. But 24 men did and 12 of them walked on it. So get over it.
    3
  406. Yes, more making us LOL so much!
    3
  407. Who won the 2020 election?
    3
  408. There are no ground based telescopes in existence that can discern any reasonable detail to see the junk left behind from the Apollo missions. Not even Hubble. One pixel from Hubble of the moons surface is equal to about 400 feet across.
    3
  409. They did in photographs.
    3
  410. Yeah because it’s better to be dead and cool than alive and uncool, right? 🤣😂🤦‍♂️
    3
  411.  @MAL-p4h  You want the names of the 7 million deaths?
    3
  412.  @dansv1  In Sibrel's video, "Astronauts Gone Wild", Bean, Mitchell and Cernan are shown swearing on the Bible.
    3
  413. Ascent Propulsion System - Wikipedia
    3
  414. Buzz is still alive, mor0n.
    3
  415. Sounds personal.
    3
  416. Man, you nimrods are ssoo desperate for evidence. 😂
    3
  417. I always respond: The camera that recorded Neil Armstrong coming down the ladder was initially attached to the Lunar Module. Once both men were standing on the moon they relocated the camera to a tripod.
    3
  418. False generalizations are always false.
    3
  419. Nope. You fell for a lie.
    3
  420. Which moon landing?
    3
  421. Not real news. Just lies.
    3
  422. She simply entertaining these subjects for the money because giving these grifters a platform it’s the only way she knows how to make an honest living
    3
  423. And you never once cared until NASA publicly admitted it. 💁‍♂
    3
  424. It wasn’t possible to recreate 1/6 gravity in a vacuum environment for hours on end in 1969.
    3
  425.  @tecumseh4095 Spot on but Trump isn’t the only problem. It’s his supporters and their willful ignorance who refuse to acknowledge his lies.
    3
  426.  @solitairecat1  So you’re a flatwit too. Why am I not surprised.
    3
  427. "Rather amusingly, conspiracy theorists hail Capricorn One as a prime example of how easily the Moon landings could have been staged despite the fact that the attempted fakery depicted in the movie actually fails: the fakers forget a crucial technical detail and their deception is spotted by a NASA engineer and disclosed spectacularly by a journalist. Moreover, the movie’s technical explanation of the effects used to fake the landing is riddled with implausibilities and absurdities." -- Paolo Attivissimo
    3
  428. We got ourselves a flat earth dimwit, folks.
    3
  429.  @littlered7820  Take a photo of the night sky with the moon and use the same settings that Apollo used: f/5.6 @ 1/250", ASA/ISO 140. You won't see stars in the photo.
    3
  430. Who cares?
    3
  431. He is. Moon landingS aren't.
    3
  432. You must be new. This video brings nothing new to the debate.
    3
  433. Proof?
    3
  434. Nixon called Mission Control and that call was routed through the Unified S-band network. Don’t be a dur da durrrrr
    3
  435. “I'd like to point out that 51% of Americans did not elect Trump, it's more like 30%,” 51% of total votes went to Trump. That’s what Sam is implying. “only 58% of eligible Americans bothered to vote at all, which is in itself a tragedy.” Well, you can’t count people under 18. “Biden deciding to seek a 2nd term, not allowing a primary process to happen, ugh.” In most cases, an incumbent president who seeks re-election is the presumptive nominee for their party. Since they have the advantage of being the sitting president, there’s little incentive for other members of the same party to challenge them. As a result, primary elections for the party’s nomination are often seen as a formality or even non-existent in practice.
    3
  436. Aldrin is a Korean war veteran who shot down two MiG-15 enemy aircraft, earned a PhD from MIT in 1963 and started training in the Gemini program ALL before $ibrel was ever born. Aldrin is a stud. $ibrel is a proven liar, convicted criminal, stalker of astronauts and a third rate filmmaker. Are you still siding with $ibrel?
    3
  437. What did he lie about?
    3
  438.  @paolorossi8470  Clinton “admitting” it didn’t happen. Aldrin “admitting” it didn’t happen. Lmao. You guys are desperate asf. 😂
    3
  439.  @paolorossi8470  No matter how many times you post that quote, it’s STILL not proof of fake moon landings. Find REAL EVIDENCE, kiddo. 🤡
    3
  440. Got proof?
    3
  441. The tennis ball doesn’t have enough mass to keep the water stuck to it ya dope.
    3
  442. No. We don’t need another denier of reality in Congress.
    3
  443. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    3
  444. Oh, ffs. Stop pretending like she’s uncovered a conspiracy and in danger. The Apollo moon landings are probably the most documented event in history. There’s absolutely no evidence they were faked.
    3
  445. https://youtu.be/6wUXXgfN2fM?feature=shared
    3
  446. Good work on what? Promoting the lies of a con man?
    3
  447.  @Thereal100pack  $ibrel is a con-man who makes a LIVING off the gullible and Owens is an opportunist riding the disinformation wave that has swept the world and cashing in too. Guess you got duped by both of them…tisk tisk.
    3
  448. Boycott Joe Rogan, Dana White and the UFC.
    3
  449. “Buzz Aldrin was very ill in his senior years.” You talk as if he already died. Guess you don’t know much. Pretty sure you don’t.
    3
  450. Humans can't survive at those temperatures without proper protection.
    3
  451.  @zounds010  I like how he abandoned the time delay argument and went for the Don Pettit quote mining. The usual amateur arguments long ago signed, sealed and filed under ‘DEBUNKED’.
    3
  452.  @donaldstephens11  👏 Thank you.
    3
  453.  @1st_Powder_Puff  Because Trump specifically said that the members of the January 6th committee should be jailed and that he would use the FBI to investigate the matter. And, now that Trump has the house, senate and supreme court on his side, they could likely make this happen.
    3
  454. Reported as disinformation.
    3
  455.  @mooneyes2k478 Making up your own facts is ssoo much fun. Isn’t it?
    3
  456.  @Snowman374th  “YouTube removed my comments” That’s just an overused excuse. How do you know the VABs are real?
    3
  457.  @Snowman374th  "That's why you see so many comments." Which means they are NOT removing comments, champ. 😂🤦‍♂ " I learned about them in SCHOOL" VAB's were discovered by a NASA employee, dim dim. So again, why do you trust NASA on their existence?
    3
  458. News Flash... July 19th, 2019 "Well, thank you very much. Tomorrow is a very big day because tomorrow will represent 50 years from the time we planted a beautiful American flag on the moon. And that was an achievement — possibly, one of the great — considered one of the great achievements ever. And we’re going a lot further now. We’re going to the moon but we’re then going to Mars." "We have with us, of course, Buzz Aldrin, who has been an incredible gentleman. I’ve known him for years, for a long time. And we’ve been friends for a long time. But just a fantastic, fantastic man. And Michael Collins, you all know flew Apollo 11 overhead. And it’s Aldrin and Armstrong, they walked on the moon." -- Donald Trump
    3
  459. We learned it from your government 🤣
    3
  460. People are in space right now, dummy.
    3
  461. Please, enlighten us.
    3
  462. But they will in a few more years.
    3
  463. Looks like it was added in for editorial purposes. That sound is missing from the “Jack Schmitt on the moon” video.
    3
  464. Yes but NASA has already proved they landed on the moon.
    3
  465. Several countries including the Soviet Union tracked the Apollo spacecraft’s radio transmissions all the way to the moon and the Doppler shift is consistent with the mission profile.
    3
  466. The camera was mounted to the exterior of the landing craft.
    3
  467. “We can’t see them because they must not be there.” Or they ARE there but we can’t see them for the REASONS explained in the video.
    3
  468. Why didn’t “God” protect Bart from Aldrin’s knuckle sandwich? 🤣
    3
  469. “Anyone can write any lies they want.” Anyone is free to edit the information. So why don’t you set the record straight and correct Wikipedia?
    3
  470.  @DN-nm4rl  Hah! What a cop out!
    3
  471. Including your education.
    3
  472.  @billowspillow  “You don’t take him at his word. You take him at your interpretation of his word, despite all evidence opposing it.” So when Trump vehemently claims to this day that he won the 2020 election were not supposed to take him at his word?
    3
  473.  @solitairecat1  The pro photographers were give false photos to examine. One of them was a montage. They never once looked at an unedited scans of the originals. Moonhoaxdebunked - chapter 5.32
    3
  474. Ah yes, TDS. A meme designed to gaslight and stop conversation.
    3
  475. You’re wasting your time folks. Henry Durth is a Flatwit.
    3
  476. Prove it.
    3
  477. Prove it or shut tf up.
    3
  478. Because in most of these videos you’re not seeing the true horizon. You’re seeing the local horizon which could be the rim of a large shallow crater, or rises and hollows.
    3
  479. But it ain't. Go watch a sunset.
    3
  480. Who won the 2020 election?
    3
  481. False equivalence fallacy. Even if Covid—19 was deliberately designed to kill millions it has no bearing on the veracity of the Apollo landings.
    3
  482. Wrong.
    3
  483.  @Peter_ghee  Oh shut tf up. You can’t even form proper sentences.
    3
  484. You’ll get an F on it.
    3
  485. @JoshuaTitobiloluwa “They've got evidence mate” No. They have lies that gullible people like you fall for. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    3
  486. Wrong on all counts.
    3
  487. I saw it. It wasn’t funny at all. Actually it was pretty pathetic but hey, whatever floats your boat.
    3
  488.  @TheMaskedBaptist  Quote: "The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." - Dr. James A. Van Allen
    3
  489. Imagine your only argument is, “I don’t believe this crap”. 😉
    3
  490. Yes, the same way someone on a landline can be connected to someone on a boat with a VHF radio by going through the marine operator.
    3
  491. There are no Gods. Get over it.
    3
  492. You’d be there a while 😂
    3
  493.  @user-Rocket-Fest  “ lol, sorta like the covid science story??” Oh boy, there goes the deliberately off-topic evasive derail attempt 😉
    3
  494.  @user-Rocket-Fest  "what part of Newtons laws dont you understand??" Why are you are being ret@rded now? That's literally our question to you, champ.
    3
  495. The approach and landing itself wasn’t broadcast live but was recorded on a 16mm film movie camera that had to be developed back on earth. The First Steps onto the surface of the moon by Armstrong was broadcast live with a TV camera. Disgruntled astronauts at the press conference? Lmao! Did you watch the full unedited press conference where there are many moments of smiles, jokes, puns, quips and outright laughter or did you watch the deceptively edited version where boring dialogue was the main focus? Or are you just a mindless repeater claiming “glum” astronauts because someone else told you that?  @veritasomniavincit7 
    3
  496. Proof?
    3
  497.  @reincarnated95  “information” Please elaborate.
    3
  498. What troll video told you to say that?
    3
  499. False. NASA sent 24 men to the moon between 1968 and 1972 and 12 of them walked on it. Your lousy dishwasher as no bearing on historical facts.
    3
  500. Facts don’t rely on belief.
    3
  501. I’ve had two. There haven’t been ten. You do know that refusing to get jabbed doesn’t make you special and it doesn’t mean that you’re smarter than the entire medical industry, right?  @LeftyRighty123 
    3
  502. Wtf is wrong with you? Kennedy died 6 years before the first moon landing. FFS! 🤦‍♂
    3
  503. Earth is still a slowly rotating terrestrial spheroid.
    3
  504. Libra
    3
  505. Prove it or shut tf up 😊
    3
  506. My condolences.
    3
  507.  @sub-zero7008  You’re still here? You were asked two widely asked questions used every day in the real word. If you can’t answer them then you are NOT qualified to continue. C’mon son, don’t make yourself look bad on YT. People are reading this thread.
    3
  508. Nope. Next?
    3
  509. Because “level” doesn’t mean flat. Something that is level means it’s perpendicular to the force of gravity.
    3
  510. Sorry, but a Red Hot Chili Peppers song doesn’t disprove space exploration.
    3
  511. You haven’t. I haven’t. But 24 brave men have and 12 of them walked on it.
    3
  512. Trump lost all connection to reality when he blatantly LIED about winning in 2020. That’s all you need to know. Well, you already knew that but you refuse to accept it.
    3
  513.  @BigVin6588  No, I’m here to let you know that what you said was dumb asf.
    3
  514. The entire Democratic establishment was referring to the conditions surrounding Trumps victory as being "illegitimate" in the sense that they were affected by foreign interference. They did not argue that his election was legally invalid. Clinton also conceded in 2016 unlike your daddy Trump in 2020.
    3
  515. *dying False.
    3
  516. God says the moon landings happened.
    3
  517. The Soviets tracked the Apollo crews all the way to the moon. They’re not stup!d.
    3
  518. Nope. Not a confession. Just your inability to understand English.
    3
  519. The same person who’s holding the camera when you walk into your bank. Nobody.
    3
  520.  @justthinking526  NASA never gave petrified wood and passed it off as a moon rock to anyone. It was mislabeled by the museum and the story turned into a hoax that you fell for, you dullard.
    3
  521. Just so you know, your hero Sibrel isn’t a flat earther. Sorry.
    3
  522. The problem with this world is people like you who just accept this as truth without ever looking back.
    3
  523. Are you pretending to be stupid or are you actually a stupid person?
    3
  524. Except it’s not a lie.
    3
  525. No, this is not truth.
    3
  526. Reported for misinformation.
    3
  527. No. Where did you hear that?
    3
  528.  @Lauraaaaa719  No, everything isn’t a lie.
    3
  529.  @solitairecat1  Massimo Mazzucco asked pro photographers to examine Apollo photos by giving them edited photos and a totally false photo to examine. Go to “moonhoaxdebunked” and find chapter 5.32
    3
  530. “The Van Allen radiation belts would have fried them.” The man who discovered the belts, Dr. James Van Allen, disagrees with you.
    3
  531. What version of the press conference did you watch? The carefully edited one designed by con-men? Where they zero-in on their faces and repeat the responses over and over again? The one I watched had many moments of jokes, puns, quips and outright laughter.  So you believe our entire legal system shouldn’t be based on credible evidence but instead by judging a person’s “expression” of whether or not they are telling the truth? Is that your position?
    3
  532. Wrong. You didn't know anything. The Apollo mooon landings are factual history. Get over it.
    3
  533. Which moon landing are you referring to?
    3
  534. Seek psychiatric treament.
    3
  535.  @johnmurphy3874  “seek truth” That too.
    3
  536. NASA’s return on investment typically falls between $3 to $7 for every $1 spent.
    3
  537.  ryanlengacher  Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    3
  538. TDS. A meme designed to gaslight and stop conversation.
    3
  539. The dropped bag? It was added in for effect. The sound is missing from other copies of the same footage.
    3
  540. Imagine what you could have accomplished had you passed kindergarten?
    3
  541. Really? Not actors in a desert? Or green screen? Wish you potheads would make up your minds.
    3
  542. ⁠ @drosales43 1. Ed Fendell at Mission Control. The camera was remotely controlled by him. 2. False color. It’s the result of the debris being ejected from the explosive bolts during stage separation moving faster than the spinning 3-color wheel (red, blue, yellow) inside the TV camera. So each piece of debris was captured by 1 or 2 colors instead of 3 colors blended.
    3
  543.  @Aurora666_2.0  Actually, the one that captured Armstrong’s one small step…was mounted to the MESA of the Lunar Module 👍
    3
  544. Dems dialed up the temperature? Nonsense. Trump fabricated a MASSIVE lie during election night 2020 and has perpetuated that lie ever since. He brainwashed his supporters into thinking he’d won and inspired a mob to attack the capitol. Yes, it’s ok for a candidate to protest the results of an election but you don’t forcefully assert you won without credible evidence and continue to claim you won when it was proven you lost. Trump is nothing but a con-man who managed to dupe tens of millions of people into voting himself into office again.
    3
  545. Belief isn’t required.
    3
  546. Thanks for what? Perpetuating lies?
    3
  547. Where? What studio?
    3
  548. Jesus was a proven liar who promised: "If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer" (Matt. 21:22). You KNOW this is a lie. Otherwise, post a video showing you praying for an amputee to regrow his missing limb! Let’s see the miracle that DOESN’T HAPPEN ! What happens when credulous fools believe liars? "Faith-Healing Parents Jailed After Second Child's Death" – NY Times. Where did they get that stupid idea?!! "And the prayer offered in faith will make the sick person well" (James 5:15). "And these signs will accompany those who believe...they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well" (Mark 16:17-18). "Nothing will be impossible for you" (Matt. 17:20).
    3
  549. ⚠FLAT EARTH IDIOT ALERT⚠
    3
  550. “Candace, and everyone who is doing their research for truth.” The truth is, between 1969 and 1972 NASA sent 24 men to the moon and 12 of them walked on it. This is factual history. Owens is giving this liar a platform.
    3
  551. "If it was Russia who succeeded moon landing they would all claim it’s a lie" You mean like how we didn't claim Sputnik was a lie?
    3
  552. Wait, I thought Trump was in charge during the last administration?? That’s what Trump lovers tell me.
    3
  553. Nope. Next?
    3
  554. One pixel from Hubble of a moon image is approximately 400 feet across. That’s not enough detail to be able to discern anything left behind. The Lunar module for example has a diameter of 14 feet.
    3
  555. I’m surprised he even makes that ridiculous claim.
    3
  556. You’re thankful Owens is giving liars a platform?
    3
  557. Stay in school, Veronica.
    3
  558. Your belief is irrelevant.
    3
  559.  @mariadeissinger646  Really. The veracity of the achievements of Apollo doesn’t depend on your belief.
    3
  560. The guest is really fake.
    3
  561. The flag has a horizontal rod in the top hem to keep it stretched out. That’s why it looks like it’s flying. The only time you see it moving is when the astronauts are adjusting it and let go. Naturally it will keep moving some until it settles down.
    3
  562. No astronauts died during the subsequent Apollo missions after Apollo 11.
    3
  563. Which moon hoax troll video told you to type all that nonsense?
    3
  564. He lies. Plain and simple.
    3
  565. Fun Fact: Obvious lies
    3
  566. Liar.
    3
  567. Or Apollos12, 13 (aborted) 14, 15 and 16.
    3
  568. There’s no credible evidence that proves nine Apollo missions, six of them being successful landings, were ever faked. All of $ibrel’s claims have been addressed, signed, sealed and filed under ‘DEBUNKED’. You’re simply enchanted by the idea of a conspiracy and thus you’ve allowed yourself to become easily duped by con men like $ibrel.
    3
  569. Well, aren’t you gullible asf.
    3
  570. So you just blindly accept any codswallop that Owens and Sibrel promote?
    3
  571. Why would there be no gravity on the moon?
    3
  572. But the claim that NASA took him out because they were afraid he would go to the media about the mechanical problems associated with the command module is a self-defeating argument because the accident was ultimately blamed on faulty wiring.
    3
  573. Amateur argument 🤣🤣🤣
    3
  574. *You’re
    3
  575. Sounds personal.
    3
  576. Tell us more about these "dumb science believers", you know...the tens of millions of credentialed engineers, physicists, scientists, astronomers, doctors, pro-photographers, cinematographers, astronauts and radiologists WORLDWIDE who were all apparently too stup!d to notice a global hoax.
    3
  577.  @zil0484  Lack of video is not proof it didn’t land. Try again?
    3
  578. Listen to his podcast video “The Reckoning” that came out after the election. He doesn’t make excuses for democrats losing. Sam exaggerates everything about Trump? lol. Trump still claims he won the 2020 election. It’s hard to take Trump seriously.
    3
  579. Have you ever heard of a False Equivalence Fallacy?
    3
  580. The guy in this video isn’t a flat earther so don’t go looking to him to support your silly flat earth pizza fantasy.
    3
  581. Space X and NASA are working together to return people to the moon. Just at a slower pace than Apollo. You’re not understanding the facts and you’re deliberately spreading misinformation.
    3
  582. You mean you actually buy his story about his kidnapping and escape from the CIA? 😂
    3
  583. Flat earth is just a dumb scam on Youtube invented by con men who MAKE A LIVING off gullible rubes like you. What's wrong with you that you can't figure that out?
    3
  584. Why?
    3
  585. 😂
    3
  586. Not to the mention the Lunar missions that didn’t land. Apollo’s 8, 9, 10 and 13.
    3
  587. Yep. Everything is fake including what you just typed.
    3
  588.  @yusufbest4475  “All under one president” Ok? So? Is that supposed to be some sort of ‘gotcha’ moment?
    3
  589. Quote: "The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." - James A. Van Allen
    3
  590. Deadly? Not exactly. The Apollo astronauts would have to spend an entire week in the most intense parts of the VAB’s to receive a fatal dose. They spent about 2 hours in the least intense parts going out and 2 hours going back in.
    3
  591. Your evidence is very compelling.
    3
  592. He’s not a flat-earther. He’s just con-man and convicted criminal.
    3
  593.  @rzadigi  Trump and his supporters are the biggest fkn hypocrites on the planet.
    3
  594. Flat earther?
    3
  595. Why would it be censored?
    3
  596. Did Owens debunk the moon landings?
    3
  597. Posting disinformation gets you reported ;-)
    3
  598. Did. Six times. Get over it.
    3
  599. Yes, look into it more.
    3
  600. Wrong! On September 10th, 2024 the crew of Polaris Dawn went beyond LEO. Try doing some research before spreading disinformation. 😊
    3
  601. Wrong. The complete interview along with the pictures can be found here on YT.
    3
  602. *about What about him?
    2
  603.  @Fi-tt7yq  Yes, I did. Sibrel makes assertions without practical experiments. Watch Dave Mckeegan’s debunking video.
    2
  604. Gravity.
    2
  605. Well I guess that’s settles it then. 🫤
    2
  606. What is that supposed to mean? He’s calling like it is. Trump is a proven liar and half of voters couldn’t care less.
    2
  607. It’s called R-A-D-I-O W-A-V-E-S. Your smartphone works the same way. Your Bluetooth earbuds work the same way. Your WI-FI connection works the same way. They downsized their equipment to save weight.
    2
  608. But it’s impossible to convincingly fake the 1/6g footage and a vacuum environment. Even modern Hollywood can’t get it right and in most movies they don’t even bother trying.
    2
  609. Wowww…Eight posts and not a single shred of evidence for “fake” moon landings.
    2
  610. Look for other role models in your life, Misty.
    2
  611. Trump acknowledges the moon landings you nitwit.
    2
  612. He already has. Trump has told over 30,000+ documented lies since starting his first term as president.
    2
  613. Flat earther.
    2
  614. Green screens don’t allow you to walk into the background ya big goof.
    2
  615.  @makaupurple8242 You’re a film maker, huh? That’s interesting because not one prominent filmmaker agrees with you.
    2
  616. Ignore the link, folks. It’s nothing but flat earth sh!t.
    2
  617. Except when they are deliberately crashed. Also there’s no credible evidence for anything other than a B757.
    2
  618.  @terronmathes  Birds aren’t real
    2
  619. Since when is “foreal” a word?
    2
  620. Soviet N1 rockets exploded several times in the 60’s. What’s your point, champ?
    2
  621.  @RusijadoTokija-oc9nz  I’m having trouble making sense of your incoherent rambling but whatever. The point is, rocket technology in the 60’s was exploding too. So, your false equivalence fallacy means nothing and as usual, you have ZERO proof the Apollo landings were faked.
    2
  622.  @RusijadoTokija-oc9nz  Like I said, you have ZERO proof. Your infantile cellphone comparison is NOT proof. Grow tf up.
    2
  623.  @44warden  “ In order to compensate for the difference in gravitational pull i.e. to prevent the astronauts from floating uncontrollably into space there was extra weight added to the space suit to keep them grounded.” Well, ok. At least you are finally acknowledging they were actually on the moon. 😉 “The dust would NOT have settled at the same rate as the astronauts descent because the astronauts weight was augmented any dust that was caused to rise would have kept rising at least six times the rate and distance at its expulsion.” Oops! What happened to you? You were doing so well having acknowledged they were really on the moon. Guess you’re WRONG again. Dust, rocks, astronauts and golf balls ALL fall at the same rate in a vacuum. Dur da durrrrrr…..🤓
    2
  624.  @fkb247  Because Musk endorses Trump.
    2
  625.  @fkb247 And so he supports a proven liar. Why would he do that?
    2
  626.  @fkb247 When he claimed to have won the 2020 election.
    2
  627.  @lostmymarbles9151  Begging the question fallacy ✅ Argument from Incredulity fallacy ✅ Tu quoque fallacy ✅ Any more you want to add there, sport?
    2
  628. Need more emoji! More emoji = more truth!  🤡 ——> @lostmymarbles9151 
    2
  629. My condolences to you.
    2
  630. What seems to be the problem?
    2
  631. There are six.
    2
  632.  @SG-jv5zi  If density and buoyancy are the only attributes that make objects fall or rise then 1 gallon of water vs. 2 gallons of water would balance out on a balance scale. In reality they don’t. Density isn’t a force. Density is physical property of a material and buoyancy isn’t possible without gravity.  Gravity is a scientific theory. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence and has stood up to repeated testing and validation. In science, when we use the word “theory” we aren’t referring to the casual use of the word itself, like…”I have a theory as to why my car won’t start”.
    2
  633. The six Apollo moon landings took the cooperation of many governments and are backed by a mountain of evidence.
    2
  634. Neither do your trollish comments.
    2
  635. Practice what you preach, Flurf.
    2
  636.  @Joze28314 You’re welcome.
    2
  637. How come it’s always grandma telling us it was “faked”?
    2
  638. Not the mission objective, Einstein. 🤦‍♂
    2
  639. The usual trollish questions that almost always have the wrong year and time span. Educate yourself.
    2
  640. Proof?
    2
  641. Proof?
    2
  642. Found the flat earther.
    2
  643. “Why doesn’t Musk, and Bezos go at least as far as the moon” They’re working on doing that as we speak. “As for money, much of it wouldn’t cost a penny” Nonsense! Going to the moon and landing on it is extremely expensive. It’s not like these people have hundreds of billions of dollars lying around to finance a mission. When we say that Musk or Bezos are worth billions, it means the value of their stock holdings in their respective companies (and potentially other investments) adds up to those billions. However, they do not have billions in cash. Their wealth is largely tied to the performance of their companies' stocks, not physical cash sitting in a bank. “When you watch the interview of Armstrong, Collin’s and Aldrin; they are so subdued and rather sad looking, hardly what you would expect from three men who have accomplished something so remarkable.” Which moon-hoax troll video told you to say that?
    2
  644.  @Brenda2Bee  “And for me, that depressing interview, watching the landing with my parents on our black and white Telly, with the caption in the bottom left side of the screen that said, “simulated “, well indeed it was” It said “simulated” because the approach to the moon and actual landing wasn’t televised live so they used animation so regular folks at home would have something to watch in addition to the live audio. Only Armstrong coming down the ladder and stepping onto the moon was live TV. No, you’re not depressed about the post flight press conference. You’re just regurgitating what you heard in a moon hoax troll video.
    2
  645. “We interviewed him several times over the years” “We interviewed him twice” Anyone else notice that?
    2
  646.  @Lostartsradio  Nice try?? Those are your words, @sswipe!
    2
  647.  @Mjg_00  Since you say that NASA isn’t a valid source then you can’t use statements from their employees that you believe debunk the moon landings. “We destroyed that technology…” — Pettit “…because we didn’t go there…” — Aldrin “I don’t remember seeing any” — Collins “We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space.” — Smith
    2
  648. Please elaborate.
    2
  649.  @dfkuz  “I remind myself of how depressed that first crew of astronauts were when they held that first news conference after returning” You mean the one with many moments of puns, quips, jokes and outright laughter? Oh…you watched the deceptively edited version? Well there you have it.
    2
  650.  @dfkuz  Name of video: Apollo 11 Press Conference - Full Mission Direct inks are probably blocked so I won’t even try. Keep in mind the post flight press conference was only 2 days after their 21 days in quarantine.
    2
  651. If there’s a firmament above then why aren’t there dinosaurs walking around today?
    2
  652.  @ApolloKid1961  Oh, ok. Let me guess. Because the buybull doesn’t mention them?
    2
  653. Anyone can go on Wikipedia and change the information on any subject. So, if it’s wrong why aren’t you doing something about it?
    2
  654.  @kimberleesimmering6228  If you had something halfway intelligent and convincing to say then if might reconsider 😉
    2
  655.  @kimberleesimmering6228  “I question his claims and those of the State” Who is the “State”?
    2
  656. Care to go into more detail?
    2
  657. YOUR BELIEF IS IRRELEVANT AND DOESN'T CHANGE HISTORY.
    2
  658.  @christianweber1347  Yes. Are you?
    2
  659. American Airlines 77
    2
  660.  @andrewworth7574  I'll check that out. Thanks.
    2
  661. There’s no photo at 10:45
    2
  662.  @KGTheProducer94  The timestamp you provided is from an interview with astronaut Alan Bean sometime in the early to mid 2000’s.
    2
  663. What your evidence that it never happened?
    2
  664. What’s the matter? Botox paralyzed your mouth?
    2
  665. "J.P Morgan sank the Titanic" Ok. And how did he orchestrate the sinking?
    2
  666. Here ya go 😉 Argument from Incredulity Fallacy: The argument from incredulity is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone concludes that since they can’t believe something is true, then it must be false, and vice versa. For example, someone using the argument from incredulity might claim that since they don’t see how a certain scientific theory could be true, then it must be false. It is committed when the arguer presumes that whatever is true must be easy to understand or to imagine. The fallacy seems to be most frequent when the contrasting expert opinions differ from our deeply held beliefs. The fallacy is very commonly found in debates over science.
    2
  667. You’re off by about 3 billion people 😂
    2
  668. Virtually every scientist, engineer, physicist, pro-photographer, cinematographer, doctor, pilot, astronomer and astronaut worldwide have never had a problem with the moon landings. Are you saying they’re all idiots?
    2
  669. NASA went to the nine times and landed on six of those occasions between 1968 and 1972. Your belief is irrelevant so get over it.
    2
  670. Look up and watch the stars rotate around the celestial poles!
    2
  671. astro’not’ Hmmm…Flat earther?
    2
  672. Comment reporting as DISINFORMATION. Enjoy your 24- hour ban. 😂
    2
  673. And of course the other nations not to mention the amateur radio enthusiasts who tracked the Apollo crews all the way to the moon and back.
    2
  674. Which one?
    2
  675. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    2
  676. Which moon landing do you think was faked?
    2
  677. “95% of taxes are illegal” 😂👌
    2
  678. You heard wrong.
    2
  679. Candice Owens won’t acknowledge the details.
    2
  680. Where do you see humans floating away?
    2
  681.  @leeinwis  If only it made sense.
    2
  682. Ok? How bout some f+cking proof it’s fake?
    2
  683. Lmao! Troll reported…
    2
  684. Oops! You forgot to bring evidence. Oh well…
    2
  685. “or anything regarding outer space for that matter, comes directly from the government.” The Apollo landings took the cooperation of many governments, not just our own and there’s plenty of third-party evidence as well.
    2
  686. Millions of people did die from the virus. Nobody, including your husband has the ability to know 100% that they won’t get sick.
    2
  687. Answer my questions first and then get back to me. Remember, we’re talking about the APOLLO Moon landings not the IM-1 mission.  @Assertiveman 
    2
  688. Again, how do you know that what you’re seeing in this video isn’t 6 times higher/longer than would be on earth given the same rover, same speed and similar terrain?
    2
  689. Prove it.
    2
  690. He was an introvert. Nothing weird about that.
    2
  691. What relevant technology do we have today that we didn’t have back then?  Btw, we went back six times more and landed on five of those occasions.
    2
  692.  @peggymartin7681  You’re funny. You had no clue that NASA landed men on the moon six times until I told you. So many deniers assume there was only one landing.
    2
  693. Because you fell for his lies?
    2
  694. Your belief is irrelevant.
    2
  695. is not interested in you.
    2
  696. Proof or shut tf up.
    2
  697. “having to go through her comments and correct her 60 year old fans on the science of the moon landing” Plenty of comments are coming from younger generations too.
    2
  698. Liar 😂
    2
  699. The shape of the earth was figured out millennia ago.
    2
  700. Stop listening to your boyfriend.
    2
  701. 1.
    2
  702. The only frauds are derps like you who flunked out of high school wasting taxpayer money.
    2
  703. Wow, that sure is a lot of words for not actually understanding anything about the Apollo moon landings. Engines were throttled down to about 10% of max thrust before touchdown and completely cutoff before footpads hit the ground.
    2
  704. You forgot to bring evidence.
    2
  705. I think he’s right. 77 million voted for a candidate who is a proven liar and they don’t care.
    2
  706. Go cry somewhere else. You’re just mad because we don’t allow your disinformation efforts to go unchallenged.
    2
  707. I never believed that Mt. Everest was conquered.
    2
  708. The bible has been debunked by science, archaeology and biblical scholarship. There is simply no good reason for educated people in the 21st century to believe absurd claims about a talking snake, talking donkey, 900-year-old men, virgin birth and zombies with NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER , correct? “When a leader or group makes extraordinary claims, demand extraordinary proof. The burden of proof is always on the leader or group to prove their claims. It’s not on us to disprove them.” — Steven Hassan, cult expert, author of Combatting Cult Mind Control,
    2
  709. Yeah. I keep hearing that over and over but nobody has ever been able to back that up with evidence.
    2
  710.  @daryllect6659  Seen it already. Bart $ibrel is a con-man, stalker and convicted criminal (look it up) Everything in his movie has been addressed, signed, sealed and filed under ‘DEBUNKED’. Ever wonder why he disabled commenting on ALL his videos? It’s because he knows he’s full of sh!t. He makes a LIVING off gullible folks like you.
    2
  711. Flat earther.
    2
  712. Nope. There was no live TV of the approach and landing in 1969. Only the part where Armstrong stepped onto the moon was live TV so...try again 😀
    2
  713.  @brucegoodall3794  “You're full of shit. Misqouting Van Allen.” Feel free to leave the correct quote then. I’ll wait.
    2
  714.  @littlered7820  Your I.P. address has been captured and your posts are now being forwarded through the relevant US Government channels. Ref. S019812
    2
  715. Ok but you’re still wrong.
    2
  716. You should be questioning yourself and how you came up with those temps the crews never experienced.
    2
  717. Proof?
    2
  718. You’re just gullible. $ibrel is a con-man.
    2
  719. Ok? And? Is that sup to be proof of something?
    2
  720. Yes, you can. But the moon landings actually happened.
    2
  721. Ok, flat-earther.
    2
  722. Disinformation gets you reported, champ 😉
    2
  723. Thank for your opinion.
    2
  724. The more I want to vomit 🤮
    2
  725. What? 😂
    2
  726. I doubt it since Musk’s company Space X has a contract with NASA.
    2
  727.  @therealzilch  Republicans like @81overon think that Biden sets gas and food prices. 😂😂😂
    2
  728. How many years did you calculate it would have taken?
    2
  729. Proof?
    2
  730. Your government doesn’t dispute the moon landings.
    2
  731. Uhm, they did. It was called Apollo 13.
    2
  732. Yes, go back to school so they can you tell you to pause the video.
    2
  733. Which one?
    2
  734.  @jaymac1355  “Aah, attack the poster instead of the post..” Post something worth attacking then maybe your character won’t get attacked.  “Duct tape and curtain rods” is right out of a moon hoax video you recently watched. Not exactly original.
    2
  735. Over 130 witnesses saw a plane hit the Pentagon. That makes hearing the plane it irrelevant.
    2
  736.  @BwanaFinklestein  “because we never went back in half a century?” No, it’s not a lie because the facts say it’s not. “Or forgot about how to cross the VAB?” Forgot? They didn’t forget. They just haven’t had a vehicle capable of going that far since 1972. Actually, Artemis 1 (unmanned) passed through the VABs twice in 2022 and Polaris Dawn (manned) went into the VABs last year. “Or because we'll be back in '26, sorry '27... positive... '27!” ‘26 for the next manned fly-by and ‘28 for the next manned landing tentatively speaking. This can all change depending on the future administration and Congress.
    2
  737. Why should anyone listen to a YT nobody like you who’s best “argument” is Covid boosters?
    2
  738. Yeah. But the moon landings are factual history. Get over it.
    2
  739. Content warnings are there to tell you that the video you are about to watch is a lie.
    2
  740. So when you watch a video claiming the earth is flat do you distrust the content warning?
    2
  741. The sound appears to have been added in for effect. It’s missing from other videos of the same footage. Just to be clear though, sound can travel through solids and be picked up by their mics.
    2
  742. There isn’t one hence the simulation.
    2
  743.  @RunkStillRides  Proof?
    2
  744. TROLL
    2
  745.  @aseelanza  That won't change your mind. Be honest. We have a MOUNTAIN of evidence for the six Apollo Moon landings and people like you STILL deny them.
    2
  746. Those are some piss-poor arguments. Right up there with; “there should be stars” and “the film would have melted”.
    2
  747. Dur da durrrrr….
    2
  748. You moon derps will come up with just about anything.
    2
  749. Ok. We still went to the moon.
    2
  750.  @JB-yr4vd  Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    2
  751.  @MetalDeathHead Where’s your flat earth map? The OP couldn’t answer.
    2
  752. Hell no. She needs to find another career.
    2
  753. 🤦‍♂
    2
  754. Yup 🤣
    2
  755. So in other words you bought $ibrels bs.
    2
  756. In all fairness their campaign wasn’t centered around the trans community.
    2
  757. No it doesn’t. 😂
    2
  758. Look at the size of the rocket that left earth compared to the ascent stage of the LM. That should answer your question.
    2
  759.  @jordansmith2461  Either man is free to call out the other if they are pretending to know things that they don’t actually know. As far as Smith is concerned, I don’t know much about him except that he opposed Covid—19 policies and that he endorsed Trump, a proven liar.
    2
  760. Because he knows the guest is full of sh!t.
    2
  761. Van Allen, dummy.
    2
  762. 🤦‍♂
    2
  763. No. In Capricorn One they didn’t get away with the deception.
    2
  764. So in others words you’re easily duped by grifters like Owens and $ibrel.
    2
  765. The Hasselblad EL500 medium format film cameras as mentioned above had excellent quality. Today’s digital cameras are just now catching up to medium format. The 16mm cameras and TV cameras were good enough. Quality in those had to be sacrificed for the sake of size and weight savings.
    2
  766. And?
    2
  767. Is is just me or do all Terminator movies after T2 suck @ss?
    2
  768.  @paulabevan  Yes. Apollo 11 Press Conference Full Mission right here on YT.
    2
  769. @ Translation: “I have no f— clue which technology wasn’t up to par in the 1960’s. I just made that sh!t up”
    2
  770.  @MMAproAtGOLF  Maybe they can help you find real evidence of fake moon landings since you can't seem to come up with any.
    2
  771.  @NoneOfYoir  “why can't we go again?” We will in about 2 more years if everything goes as planned.  “What proof that an actual "man" walked space AND not bring back physical evidence that we went?” No physical evidence? The Apollo crews brought back 800+ pounds of Lunar regolith and rocks. “our countries can't agree on anything, YET they all agree that we lost the technology that allowed us to travel to Mars??” What?? I thought we were talking another moon landings? Humans beings have never been to Mars. “we can't even make it to the Moon.” We did make it to the moon and we will again. They’re just not ready yet. “And I'm paraphrasing, but it was said that our phones have more tech than what was used to go to Mars .” Let’s be clear. Humans have never been to Mars. Why do you keep bringing up Mars? Only unmanned vehicles have been to Mars. Comparing the tech in your phone to an unmanned mission to Mars makes no sense. Why do you do that? So back to your original post. Why do you feel your ignorance of facts gives you the reason to doubt the six manned Apollo moon landings?
    2
  772. Happened under Nixon.
    2
  773. Did. Six times. Get over it.
    2
  774. Lmao! Cosmonauts on the ISS spend MONTHS being weightless in low earth orbit. The Apollo astronauts spent 6 or 7 days being weightless and 1 to 3 days in lunar gravity. So yeah, no surprise they walked out of the capsule. Idi0t.
    2
  775.  @paulbeardsley4095  Oh yeah, and I’ve seen people reply to you with, “Only Americans believe in the moon landing.” Note use of singular form as well.
    2
  776.  @GazanCondomCommittee  Well said 👏What a shame that over half of voters can’t or refuses to acknowledge that.
    2
  777. So?
    2
  778. “We have all the footage in the world here in NYC they caught if from all kinds of angle different directions ground, sky, water other buildings where people took footage how did they get all of that???” Well duh! Common sense would tell you that the reason NYC had a ton of footage is because after WTC-1 was hit all eyes were on the WTC complex. So everyone was aware of what was happening and started taping.  Are you pretending to be stup!d or are you actually a stup!d person?  @TheFuture-lq2qc 
    2
  779. Go back to sleep, Hoaxtard(R)
    2
  780. Flat earther
    2
  781. “After that, I figured if the US did it once in the 60s, why nothing since then?” They did it FIVE more times after Apollo 11. How were you not aware of that?
    2
  782. Proof?
    2
  783. Elon Musk is a brilliant businessman but he’s far from a genius.
    2
  784. What does that make you?
    2
  785. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photosu available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    2
  786.  @dr.edsozfamilytravel   "that’s not going to convince me." It's not meant to convince you of anything. The Artemis missions will be more aggressive than Apollo. More fuel will be required. That's just facts. "So they failed to do it again?" What are you talking about?? They did it again FIVE TIMES more after Apollo 11. How many more times does NASA need to land humans on the moon before you will accept it?
    2
  787. What?
    2
  788. Right, right. Because you’ve done a FULL investigation yourself. 🙄
    2
  789. “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    2
  790.  @aren1998  Yeah but not the same thing. Notice that Patel is not denying that he helped facilitate or support the project in some capacity just that he didn’t have hands-on involvement in the actual recording or musical creation process. At any rate, he is still part of the we.
    2
  791. I used to believe in that NWO horseshit too. You’ll outgrow that one day.
    2
  792. Prove it.
    2
  793.  @solitairecat1  There were six moon landings.
    2
  794.  @solitairecat1  Factually!
    2
  795.  @Jgall71  Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    2
  796. A video wouldn’t change your mind. You’re a hoaxtard for life.
    2
  797. ​ @bobboonah  Proving the moon landings didn’t happen is not the same as proving God doesn’t exist because evidence exists for the moon landings. So, that evidence can be examined and debated. There is no evidence however for a supreme being.
    2
  798. ⁠​⁠​⁠ @paulbeardsley4095  Same here, Paul. Waiting for the next excuse.
    2
  799. If they were on wires then why did they fall so much? If they were on wires then why can’t we see the wires? If they were on wires how did each astronaut manage to keep them from getting tangled with each other? If they were on wires what was attached to the individual grains of lunar soil that fall at the same rate?
    2
  800. Well, aren’t you gullible asf.
    2
  801. That’s nice. So no actual proof that six moon landings were faked. Just ignorance, incredulity and misinformation?
    2
  802. Footage probably wouldn’t change your mind. Be honest.
    2
  803.  @icare7151  I’m curious as to what type of bridge will replace this one. These long span truss bridges are becoming a thing of the past. Perhaps a we’ll see a cable-stayed bridge..E.g. Arthur Ravenel in Charleston, SC.
    2
  804.  @icare7151  Yeah, SSB is a cable-stayed bridge. Modern engineering.
    2
  805.  @fart-gravy  No photographs and plans were destroyed. Someone is lying to you.
    2
  806.  @roamsalone4020  WTF does his view on that have anything to do with the shape of the earth?
    2
  807. The only person with TDS is Trump himself.
    2
  808. Ben was wrong though. All the names of the people he thought Trump would appoint weren’t tapped.
    2
  809. Proof?
    2
  810. Why would the camera pick up stars? It’s daytime.
    2
  811. “then it might be possible to leave to space” 🤦‍♂
    2
  812. Buzz Aldrin is a Korean War veteran who shot down two MiG-15 enemy aircraft, earned a PhD from MIT, and began training for the Gemini program—all before $ibrel was even born. Aldrin is a man of honor and courage. $ibrel, on the other hand, is a proven liar, a convicted criminal (look it up), a stalker of astronauts, and a third-rate filmmaker. He tricked Aldrin into believing he was making a space documentary for children. When Aldrin realized $ibrel was a con artist, he left, but $ibrel followed him and demanded that Aldrin swear on the Bible. He then called Aldrin a coward and a liar. You do the math.
    2
  813.  @arnethd9730  Moon landings (plural). What specific technology was lacking?
    2
  814. If you’re looking for an amazing woman, try someone like Harriet Tubman, Ruth Bader Ginsburg or Katherine Johnson. Candice Owens misses the mark.
    2
  815. @marisawoods Amazing at giving grifters and liars a platform, yes.
    2
  816. Why are you lying? Not very nice nice to lie.
    2
  817. Doesn’t matter what he believes. Belief is irrelevant.
    2
  818. So in other words you voted for a proven liar.
    2
  819.  @jmc5335  It’s was a simple question. Who won the 2020 Presidential election in the United States?
    2
  820. Disinformation gets you reported, champ 😉
    2
  821.  @Globehoax  “open Gleason flat earth map and see our realm” Fun Facts. The map beloved of FE cultists is simply an Azimuthal Equidistant Projection, a projection first mathematically developed by Abū Rayḥān Muhammad ibn Aḥmad Al-Bīrūnī (a devout Muslim) in the 10th Century, and Gleason simply copied the projection method. As did the UN and the USGS etc. Al-Bīrūnī knew the earth was spherical and believed that it rotated, he also measured the earth's radius. He deduced the existence of the Americas based on his accurate estimations of the Earth's circumference and Afro-Eurasia's size. This was several hundred years before Columbus et al. So, your revered plagiarized map is proof the earth is not flat. Most Muslims know the earth is spherical which is why they use great circles to know when they are facing Mecca.
    2
  822. Hmm, that’s sounds like an earlier post. Reported as misinformation.
    2
  823. When my car broke down last week it made me wonder how cars existed 100 years ago.
    2
  824. Yes, she’s a DITZ.
    2
  825. And the people in your country come here to do our landscaping.
    2
  826.  @m.a.j.i.c  Nice whataboutism? Lmao. All you’re doing is running your mouth, troll. Where’s your evidence for “fake” moon landings?
    2
  827. @zoesunkid Regarding the subsequent interaction, occurring on September 9, 2002,[5] the BBC reported that witnesses came forward to the police with jurisdiction, the Beverly Hills Police Department, stating: "Mr Sibrel...lured Mr Aldrin to the hotel under false pretences in order to interview him."[4] By Aldrin's account, he went to the Beverly Hills hotel on that date under the pretext of an interview on space for a Japanese children's television show.[5] At the time, Aldrin was aged 72 and Sibrel was aged 37.[5] Sibrel attempted on-camera to coerce Aldrin to swear an oath on a Bible that he had been on the Moon.[5] Witnesses came forward to the police indicating that "Sibrel had aggressively poked Mr Aldrin with the Bible".[4] When Aldrin refused Sibrel's request, Sibrel followed him, saying: "You're the one who said you walked on the Moon when you didn't."[14] The BBC reported that "Deputy District Attorney Elizabeth Ratinoff told Reuters... [the] videotape shot by a cameraman hired by Mr Sibrel had shown the film-maker follow Mr Aldrin, calling him a 'thief, liar and coward'."[4] Still being recorded by Sibrel's camera crew, Aldrin responded with "Will you get away from me?" and then punched Sibrel in the jaw.[4][5] On the day following the altercation, a statement from a lawyer for Aldrin described the "6-foot-2, 250-pound [1.88 m, 113 kg] Sibrel forc[ing] Aldrin up against a wall and refus[ing] to let him leave", thus making the case for self-defense.[5] Aldrin made the case to police that he had been attempting to defend "himself and his stepdaughter, who was with him at the time".[4] Sibrel gave the tape to the police,[4] apparently alleging assault. The incident received significant publicity, with many television talk shows airing the clip, usually supporting Aldrin's action. Shortly after the altercation, Sibrel told the St. Petersburg Times: "[Aldrin] has a good punch. It was quick, too. I didn't see it coming."[5] As described by Eric Spitznagel for Popular Mechanics, since "witnesses testified that Sibrel had provoked [Aldrin], assault charges against the former astronaut were dropped".[3] Police either did not file or dropped charges based on Aldrin's lack of a prior criminal record, witness accounts of Sibrel's having drawn Aldrin to the hotel under false pretenses, Sibrel's aggressiveness before the punch, and his having declined to seek medical attention and sustaining "no visible injury".[4][3]
    2
  828. Finally a sane comment. Thank you!
    2
  829. ❓
    2
  830. The moon landings aren’t a lie.
    2
  831. NASA engineer Kelly Smith was talking about modern microprocessors found in the Orion spacecraft that need to be fully tested and certified before putting people in the spacecraft. Modern microprocessors have millions of transistors on the size of a postage stamp and are way more susceptible to damage from particle radiation than the Apollo era solid state devices which only had like five transistors in the same amount of space. Sibrel is simply engaging in conjecture and trying to force his interpretation of the Kelly Smith quote as conclusive proof that NASA never went to the moon.
    2
  832. “Show us how corrupt YouTube is” The fact that videos like this exist shows us how gullible people like you are!
    2
  833. Notice how you’re making a definitive claim while at the same time admitting ignorance (asking questions) Do better. Learn.
    2
  834. Which moon landing do you think was a hoax?
    2
  835. Did you curse or try to post a link?
    2
  836. Your belt is irrelevant.
    2
  837. So where’s Titanic hiding?
    2
  838.  @yomommaahotoo264  What would make landing on the moon from 1969 to 1972 impossible? Facts only please.
    2
  839. Prove it.
    2
  840. More misinformation 🤦‍♂
    2
  841. Does the word "DERP" echo inside your head?
    2
  842. Two cameras.
    2
  843. Was it not? 🙄
    2
  844.  @beyondnow1600  Btw, you replied 9 times to @TwentyEighthparallel. YT isn’t deleting your comments 😂
    2
  845.  @beyondnow1600  “The posts that contained information were taken down by yt.” Still lying. Every moon landing denier and flat-earther uses that exact same excuse, “my proof keeps getting deleted”. BS! You have no proof because there aren’t any statements of NASA claiming that it’s impossible to pass through the VAB’s. Engineer Kelly Smith did not say it was impossible. If the moon landings were faked then you should be able to provide other kinds of evidence instead of relying solely on “impenetrable VAB’s”.
    2
  846. Don’t be a drama queen, ffs.
    2
  847. Flat earther.
    2
  848.  @kareemsalessi  Yes, you're a flat-head too.
    2
  849.  @ВиталикАршлнкмидов  What we believe is irrelevant.
    2
  850. “Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?”’— Zoey
    2
  851. Sounds like you’ve been at sea too long. $ibrel is a proven liar, convicted criminal and stalker of Apollo astronauts, some of which were flying jet fighters in wars long before he was ever born.
    2
  852. "size of the earth from moon must be 4 time greater as moon size" It is.
    2
  853.  @chrisstokie2361  And he’s disabled commenting on all his vids. Why is that?
    2
  854. Does it matter? We already know the earth isn’t flat.
    2
  855. Tyson never made the agreement to debate Dubay in the first place. So nothing was ever set in stone. Not sure what you think this proves. Even if Tyson backed out 100% that wouldn’t mean the earth is flat with a magical dome above and no gravity.  Do better. Learn.  @LuisHernandez-ph6ji 
    2
  856. It’s called R-A-D-I-O W-A-V-E-S HELLOOOO…. McFLYYY…ANYBODY HOME???
    2
  857. This is a self-voting chronic troll. It’s only purpose is to attack anyone who posts factual information. ——— >  @shillhunter4380 
    2
  858. Proof?
    2
  859. Troll…lol
    2
  860.  @lostmymarbles9151  So you’re a flat earther id!ot like the guy above me?
    2
  861.  @RetroRogue.  “Yea nobody is reading all that.” Because your cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias is getting the best of you. But you go right and rely on belief rather than the facts.
    2
  862. Wow…troll owned! 😂
    2
  863. Flat earther.
    2
  864.  @randyschissler5791  👍
    2
  865. They did up until 1991.
    2
  866. Post reported for stup!dity.
    2
  867.  @JRey-re9rl  I just noticed in your opening post that you put ‘space’ in quotes. So you must be a deluded FLATWIT which means everyone can ignore anything else you have to say. 😉
    2
  868. Why are you defending Trump? He still claims to this day he won the 2020 election.
    2
  869. “Indians have been talking about the moon landings being faked for decades.” The ISRO disagrees with you.
    2
  870.  @mystik.mermayde.aotearoa  "What you're saying is that regardless of what we've learned here from Candace today, you still believe that governments tell the truth, and aren't caught up in defending each other's lies...." No, that's not what he's saying. All governments lie, all the time. But that doesn't mean that everything they claim to have accomplished is a lie.
    2
  871. Which government lied?
    2
  872. Look for other video: Apollo 11 press conference full mission
    2
  873. @stephenstaedtler6902 "They changed the 30-year period for reporting a rape or sexual assault statute of limitations just to get Trump." False! The law you're referring to is the Adult Survivors Act, which was signed into law in New York in 2022. This law temporarily extended the statute of limitations for adult survivors of sexual assault to file civil lawsuits, giving them a one year window to do so. It was not designed specifically to target Donald Trump. The law applied to all adult survivors, and while Trump was one of the high profile individuals named in lawsuits, the law was not enacted solely with him in mind. "The woman who made the accusation accused 6 other guys of rape." So? "Took her story from a 'Law and Order' TV episode." Wrong. There is no credible source or record of Jean Carroll ever saying that "rape is sexy." "This was a civil trial and not a criminal trial in a leftist enclave where the jury only had to be 51% sure." The standard of proof in civil trials is preponderance of the evidence, meaning that the plaintiff only needs to show that it is more likely than not (51% sure) that the defendant is liable. In criminal trials, the standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt," which is much higher. A civil case does not require the same level of certainty as a criminal case, but this does not mean that the trial was unfair or designed to target Trump. "If you had the goods, you go to criminal court." That's a misleading statement. Many sexual assault victims choose to pursue civil lawsuits for various reasons, including the burden of proof required in criminal cases and the possibility of securing compensation. Criminal cases require a much higher standard of proof ("beyond a reasonable doubt"), and many victims of sexual assault choose to pursue civil lawsuits, which have a lower threshold ("preponderance of the evidence"). The fact that Carroll's case was civil does not mean that there wasn't evidence to support her claims,. nor does it imply that she should have filed criminal charges instead. "Changed the law to make a misdemeanor a felony just to get Trump." Wrong again. The charge was based on existing statutes, and prosecutors did not create a new law to target Trump. The issue was whether the intent behind the falsified records was criminal (to influence the election), which is what made it a felony rather than a misdemeanor. "Andrew Cuomo said the charges would never have been brought against anyone else but Trump." So? That's subjective, and other legal experts disagreed with Cuomo. The prosecutor's office stated that the charges were justified based on evidence, and the decision to bring them was made independently, not based on Trump's status. "There was no damaged party for what they accused Trump of." Wrong again. The damaged party in this case was the public and the votrs. The charges primarily stemmed from allegations of falsifying business records in a way that could have violated campaign finance laws. The idea was that Trump attempted to conceal the true nature of the payments to Daniels (meant to influence the 2016 election) by misreporting them. The claim is that Trump misled the public, which could have affected voters' understanding of his campaign's financial activities. Furthermore, in criminal law, a "damaged party" does not always have to be an individual who directly suffers a physical or financial loss. In cases involving campaign finance violations or falsifying records, the damaged party is typically the public interest or the electoral process itself. The idea is that by hiding the payment, Trump may have prevented the public from knowing about actions that could have influenced their vote.
    2
  874. Liar 😂
    2
  875.  @fart-gravy  So are we done talking about modern microprocessors being susceptible to damage from particle radiation? Answer yes or no before we move on to any other amateur arguments you’ve brought into this.
    2
  876. ​ @fart-gravy  “so what, how can you lose all tapes and just say shit happens” Because tapes were reused back then. It was regular practice. And even if they didn’t mean to reuse the Apollo 11 tapes, shit still happens. It’s called ‘making mistakes’ something every human being has done and will continue to do.  “are you that ignorant?” Ask yourself why you even care about the lost tapes. And be honest. If NASA had never publicly admitted the tapes were lost would your view regarding the moon landing change? Probably not. “why would GOOGLES new AI say the pictures are fake” Because it didn’t. Russia claims they used Google AI and it flagged ONE Apollo photo as possibly being “synthetic” due to “discrepancies in contrast”. LOL! That literally means NOTHING. Btw, I can ask Google AI right now if the moon landings are legit and it will say yes. Same thing for ChatGPT. So yeah, nice try. “can you prove that every scientist doesn't agree with him ?” I don’t have to. Where are the droves of credentialed scientists coming forward over the last half century claiming the six moon landings were faked? Where are the scientific journals and publications proving fakery? Why aren’t the aerospace companies that built the Apollo hardware not coming forward? Why are the only people in total denial always YouTube self-styled experts and nobodies like you? “they said there was no such thing as UFOS and anyone who endorses them was a wack job” Wrong. The term ‘UFO’ refers to anything that can’t be identified. It does not automatically mean ‘alien spaceship.’ “don't care what science says anymore because they've been proved wrong so many times.” By who?
    2
  877.  @fart-gravy  Yes, your arguments are amateurish. You haven’t done any research. All you’ve done is parrot what you’ve been told by con men like $ibrel. The technology is being rebuilt as we speak. But they aren’t rebuilding the Apollo hardware. They’re building new, state-of-the-art hardware based on 50 years of tech advancement. Yes, it is a painful process because it takes time, money, resources and approval from Congress. Lost tapes don’t disprove Apollo. Why? Because this happened after the fact. If you want to disprove Apollo then find something about the actual missions that disproves them. Just remember, there were nine moon missions, six of those were actual landings. So you have a lot of work to do. Neil Armstrong was hostile? Wtf are you talking about? I just explained to you why the Apollo-era hardware was less susceptible to particle radiation. It’s a cogent argument because it addresses your false assumption that NASA must have lied about going to the moon in the sixties and seventies if they are testing space vehicles without people onboard.
    2
  878. Who told you the Van Allen Belts were real?
    2
  879. Sam doesn’t vote for proven liars.
    2
  880. The fact that you think there was only 1 moon landing says a lot about how little you understand the history of Apollo. "With all this new technology and we still cannot leave the obit of earth." Then that should tell you it's not about the new technology.
    2
  881. Why do you think that?
    2
  882. Thanks for your opinion.
    2
  883. Aww, poor baby is scared of factual history. Don’t worry. It’ll be okay.
    2
  884. What do you mean?
    2
  885. Oh my 🫢 I’m sorry for you. Maybe one day ☺
    2
  886. Imagine believing the LM was made of foil. SMH…
    2
  887. Suits were tough.
    2
  888. That was straight from the ‘Conspiritards Handbook’ on how to “debunk” factual history. 👍
    2
  889. 🤮
    2
  890. Why?
    2
  891. Mike Lindell. A Trump sycophant.
    2
  892. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photosu available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal. @Burzumlegacy 
    2
  893. You’re commenting on the wrong video.
    2
  894. Flat earther.
    2
  895.  @Kronic1Chillz  Which moon hoax troll video told you to come here and ask that question?
    2
  896.  @Kronic1Chillz  No, I’m not denying he rarely did interviews. I’m asking you which moon hoax video told you that. Only people who have been told that by someone else go around regurgitating it as if it’s proof he didn’t walk on the moon. It’s not and you know that.
    2
  897. For making you laugh?
    2
  898. Except the six successful Apollo moon landings aren’t a lie.
    2
  899.  @JonMcglynn  Belief is irrelevant. Facts are all that matter.
    2
  900.  @Cletus-y5u  “I don't believe any part of the cartoon like fantasy.” Says the derp-head who thinks the dah erff is flah with a magical dome above. 🤣😂🤦‍♂
    2
  901.  @RAakaCHI-191  Sort comments by “newest first” then scroll down to this thread. That usually fixes the problem.
    2
  902. It’s incomprehensible how half of our voters put that proven liar back in office. Absolutely appalling.
    2
  903. Yeap. It’s @ssholes like her and Joe Rogan who are contributing to the decline of this country. The rest of the world is laughing at us.
    2
  904. The Apollo landings were not live streamed. Only the part where Armstrong stepped onto the surface was live streamed.
    2
  905. Prove it. Go ahead and provide a single shred of actual evidence to substantiate your ,,gubbermint shill” claim that is supported by sound logic and reputable sources. I bet you’ll respond with a desperate deflection full of ignorance, feelings, and fallacious logic. That, or you will cowardly not respond at all. Go ahead, prove me right.
    2
  906. Why are you pathetically projecting again, little one? @shillhunter4380 
    2
  907. Proof?
    2
  908. Reported as DISINFORMATION.
    2
  909. ⁠ @Socom-Elite LOL! Like seriously dude, what are you doing arguing with a female. Shame on you! 🤣 Hey…she ain’t about to write ,,paragraphs of information” to prove her bs assertion but she’ll post multiple paragraphs pathetically projecting her feelings onto everyone else in the thread…. ,,this is YouTube comments, why are you challenging me?? Get a life, dude” 😂😂🤣
    2
  910. In space. Where else?
    2
  911. Because it’s not 😂
    2
  912. There are no Gods. Get over it.
    2
  913. Another gullible dullard get’s duped out of $10 😂
    2
  914. @RaymondHernandez33 “Bet… these same people complaining about your donation actually don’t donate themselves.” No sh!t, Sherlock. Why would we throw our money away on grifters like Candace Owens?
    2
  915. The moon landings are factual history. The only thing that got exposed was your gullibility.
    2
  916. False.
    2
  917. Technology wasn’t good in ‘69? Explain.
    2
  918. The only person with TDS is Trump himself.
    2
  919. “but the fact they even had the hesitations and awkward meeting…” I think you’re referring to the Apollo 11 post mission press conference. If you watch the entire video, not the deceptively edited version, you will find many moments of puns, quips, jokes and outright laughter. Look for, Apollo 11 Press Conference Full Mission here on YT.
    2
  920. Why would they tap the soil first?
    2
  921. Sounds personal.
    2
  922.  @ppstorm_  No. You?
    2
  923. Birds aren’t real.
    2
  924.  @therealzilch  She could probably sell a boatload of those shirts, Scott 😁
    2
  925. You’re absolutely right. Why should airplane crashes be investigated?
    2
  926.  @douglaspelin9062  So true. None of them realized they could have rewatched the visuals right here on YouTube.
    2
  927. Tells me you can’t spell. It’s Occam’s Razor.
    2
  928.  @littlered7820  Yes, there is more than one spelling but his spelling isn’t one of them.
    2
  929. Finally a sane comment. Thanks.
    2
  930. Why is that funny?
    2
  931. Sort comments by “newest first” then scroll down to find your thread.
    2
  932. Please don’t troll
    2
  933.  @plusmalin  Interesting. I found out by going to history > comments and then seeing “video not available” next to each comment I made.
    2
  934. Because they were on the moon.
    2
  935. Nine times. Landed on six of them.
    2
  936. Recorded it. 👍
    2
  937.  @zounds010  Ain’t it funny how people use amateur level arguments like this? Even Bart Sibrel, who’s as dishonest as they come, doesn’t bring up the “no stars” argument because even he understands how exposure works.
    2
  938. Proof?
    2
  939. What about them? 💁‍♂
    2
  940.  @nunyabiz1780 Who’s gives AF? What difference does it make to you? What does knowing or not knowing the answer prove?
    2
  941. Notice how you couldn’t prove it?
    2
  942. Except you can and that’s what he did.
    2
  943. He’s just a dumb flat earther.
    2
  944. Prove the 130 witnesses were paid off or $hut tf up. @spokiee2000 
    2
  945. Artemis III is sending humans to the moon in a couple years. Educate yourself before putting your ignorance on public display.
    2
  946. Thank you 👏
    2
  947. “Virtually no enthusiasm” Except for the many moments of jokes, quips, puns and outright laughter.
    2
  948.  @arthorse6835  “there are many issues that make me skeptical.” Ok, so name a few of these “issues”. “What I wonder is what difference does it make to you personally whether I fully accept the moon landings or not? ” It doesn’t. I’m just curious. You did after all start a thread for everyone to see. Are you not interested in having a discussion with others?
    2
  949. 🤦‍♂
    2
  950. Even if that were true, confessions are not conclusive proof.
    2
  951. “wow that would be the nail in the coffin” How so?
    2
  952. Got proof? Who am I kidding…of course you don’t!
    2
  953. Omg…Freemasons. I’m scared. 😱
    2
  954. Ask Bart why he has comments turned off on all his vids. Oh wait…that’s right…you can’t.
    2
  955. And you believe them? Why? I thought NASA always lies??
    2
  956. How is that possible? It landed at the South Pole, nowhere close to the Apollo sites.
    2
  957. Why does Bart contradict himself here in this video? He claims the crew was only in low earth orbit the entire time and in the same breath he claims they used a 1 foot model of the earth outside the window which implies they were in a studio environment. Which is it?
    2
  958. The moon landings did happen. You’re just a gullible twerp.
    2
  959. No. There’s no wind on the moon. It’s being thrown by his feet.
    2
  960.  @yousefmerimeche732  Yes but the dust doesn't linger around like on earth.
    2
  961.  @yousefmerimeche732 It doesn’t fall faster. It falls first.
    2
  962. The shadows are out of frame, dumdum.
    2
  963. I can’t find a source for that statement.
    2
  964. You sound like one of those deluded flat earthers, tHeY'rE tAkInG dOwN aLl tHe ViDeOs tHaT pRoVe EaRtH aIn'T a BaLl….bawhaaaaaa 😭😭😭
    2
  965. What queston(s) about the moon landings specifically did you ask him?
    2
  966. Yes, but the SIX manned moon landings are legit.
    2
  967.  @benjamynn1989  “Research it dumbass” Translation: “I have no actual substantial, history-changing evidence backed up by sound logic and reputable sources so I’ll just rely on burden of proof fallacies, evasion and pathetic projection.” Got it 😊👍
    2
  968.  @RollingThunder5880  "Those 2 accounts replying to you are bots." Why do you turnip-brained halfwits insist on letting us BOT's and NPC's kick your human asses in the comments?
    2
  969. My goodness. Spell check needed.
    2
  970. Your profile pic is a lie.
    2
  971.  @deceio  Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    2
  972. Your personal incredulity is meaningless.
    2
  973. Wrong.
    2
  974. Proof?
    2
  975.  @MAL-p4h  What? The 7 million people who died are the same people who created the virus? Huh?  Think about how you want to convey your question and try again.
    2
  976.  @MAL-p4h  “Why you angry at me?” Because I’m not. That’s just you projecting. 😉
    2
  977.  @ReVo-p2v  Dummy, just because the kid was wearing an Apollo sweater that doesn’t mean Kubrick had any involvement. Use your brain.
    2
  978. @ He's still wrong. Armstrong never confessed such a thing.
    2
  979. Liar 😂
    2
  980. If their reciting from memory, why do they refer to their notes?
    2
  981. ⁠ Photoshopped images don’t mean the original photo was faked. Photos are often altered to make them more appealing for magazines. You should know this.
    2
  982.  @Agent_86_  In other words you have ZERO credible evidence that the Apollo moon landings (note use of plural) were faked so you’ve resorted to making spurious characterizations about me. Sound about right?
    2
  983. “Knowing what we know” Please elaborate on what we know.
    2
  984.  @davidadiwego4608 In other words you can’t elaborate on “what we know” about these “fake” moon landings. Got it.
    2
  985.  @davidadiwego4608  I’ve watched the entire show, wise guy. All of Barts claims have been addressed, sign, sealed and filed under “DEBUNKED’ ever since he came onto the scene. You’re just enchanted by the idea of a conspiracy and you allow yourself to get hoodwinked by these con-men. Do better. Learn.
    2
  986.  @davidadiwego4608  I’ll say what I want when I want to say it. Thanks. No, they did not have the means to convincingly fake hours of continuous footage in a 1/6 gravity vacuum environment back in 1969. The technology wasn’t there. The Apollo moon missions required the cooperation of many governments not just the US. Yes, the US government has conducted plenty of very dark shit. But there is also credible EVIDENCE that proves the dark shit. There is no credible evidence that proves the six Apollo moon landings were faked. Period.
    2
  987. What’s your point? They remember everything about the mission.
    2
  988.  @teacat55  Uhm, they talked for nearly an hour and a half. Nobody had to beg them to do it. And yes, there are moments of smiling, puns, quips, jokes and outright laughter. You’re pretending like you didn’t notice any of that.
    2
  989. Right, that's why the clone everything we make here first.
    2
  990. What ❓
    2
  991. ❓
    2
  992. The problem isn’t our government. It’s the citizens like you who allow yourselves to be manipulated by grifters like Sibrel and opportunists like Owens.
    2
  993. Rogan does it for the money. Views + likes = money.
    2
  994.  @BigMikeObama-q7y  So then you believe the earth is flat?
    2
  995. How can you call Trump a good president when he couldn’t man-up and admit he lost the 2020 election? He created a MASSIVE lie and has perpetuated that lie to this day and now you have literally millions of ignoramuses who still believe his lie voting for him. Honor and integrity mean nothing to his supporters.
    2
  996. Huh?
    2
  997.  @browneyedgurl7262  The saying is, ‘Opinions are like like @ssholes, everyone has one.’ Thanks, I will have a great Friday. Even without pretending to know that Jesus was born of a virgin.
    2
  998.  @jovitamoore-s5r  “highly trained observers couldn't remember/recall what they saw.” You’re misrepresenting what they said. They were specifically asked if they could see stars during the solar eclipse on the return flight despite the glare of the solar corona. Collins replied he didn’t remember seeing any (during that moment).
    2
  999. Sands aren’t flying, dummy 😂
    2
  1000.  @dianesilva1078  You can’t convincingly fake 1/6 gravity in a vacuum environment for hours upon hours in Hollywood film. This is why in movies they don’t even bother with more than a few seconds of low gravity. Even modern movies like “First Man”, they show Aldrin’s character hopping in the distance for less than 5 seconds. And in “The Martian” with Matt Damon, they didn’t even bother trying to simulate the 1/3 gravity.
    2
  1001. Thanks for your technical explanation. 👍
    2
  1002. No, they just following a format because they have a lot to discuss. I know you want so badly for the six Apollo moon landings to be fake but sadly for you, they are not.
    2
  1003.  @ovichggat  Man, you moon derps are so desperate for evidence 😂
    2
  1004. LOL! Another delusional flat earther.
    2
  1005. No government on this entire planet disputes the six Apollo moon landings. Let that sink in.
    2
  1006.  @TheMiddleClassholes  She has a military family. Her obnoxious uncle Bob told her at the last family cookout that ,,dah gubbermint” did 9/11. Or maybe it was her miserable boyfriend. Trust her, bro 😊👍
    2
  1007.  @MNgardengirl  Translation: “I’m too ashamed to admit I’m a silly flat earther”
    2
  1008.  @littlered7820  "then it means they used the wrong settings" No, it means they used the correct settings because their goal was to photograph the surface of the moon, equipment and each other. Not the stars. Ever look at photos taken from low earth orbit with part of the earth in the photo? Same thing...no stars are visible. Seeing millions of stars in the Apollo photographs would be a dead giveaway that they were faked. The whole "no stars in the photos" is an amateur level argument. "the symphony of stars must have been an awe inspiring sight out there" Which can also be photographed and enjoyed with the naked eye from the surface of the earth.
    2
  1009. Dog
    2
  1010. https://youtu.be/QkaNqud_VxU?feature=shared
    2
  1011.  @ethancochran365  Lmao! You said Trump wants the truth but he continues to lie to this day about winning the 2020 election. Do you respect liars?
    2
  1012. My condolences.
    2
  1013.  @Chitov646ckmych  Yes again, your video isn't proof.
    2
  1014. Another ignorant Gen-Z’er. Nothing to see here folks.
    2
  1015. “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    2
  1016. Have you ever looked through the window of an airplane? They’re small. You can see a lot.
    2
  1017. Fun fact 3: The same scientists that know the temperature on the moon also agree we landed on the noon 😉
    2
  1018.  @ManifestingDestiny  No, it’s just that some people don’t understand the difference between heat and temperature or the fact the astronauts arrived during lunar morning when ground temperatures were much lower that the numbers you stated.
    2
  1019. Apollo 11 landed on the moon, dimwit.
    2
  1020. The earth isn’t flat. Sorry.
    2
  1021. Yeah, what about the other two men?
    2
  1022. Oops! You forgot to bring evidence! Oh well….
    2
  1023.  @DriveMusicVibes  You don’t know anything. You believe they didn’t go to the moon. But your beliefs are irrelevant.
    2
  1024. The six Apollo moon landings are factual history backed by a mountain of evidence. The Covid--19 pandemic was real. Millions of people worldwide died from it. You're just easily fooled by grifters and disinformation promoters. Very sad.
    2
  1025. “All maga supporters are deplorable, weird, domestic terrorists?” No. All MAGA supporters are gullible rubes for getting duped into believing Trump won 2020.
    2
  1026. Please elaborate.
    2
  1027. Or don’t. You do you.
    2
  1028. What anomalies? All I've ever seen from conspiracy theorists is arguments from personal incredulity based on their ignorance of physics and engineering. - They don't know that perspective will cause shadows cast over irregular terrain to appear to be pointing in different directions, so they assume they know what it should look like without ever bothering to test their claims practically, and they ignore the fact that multiple light sources would cast multiple shadows from each object. - They "research" crappy, low resolution scans of the original 70 mm photos and notice that some fiduciary markers seem covered up by objects in frame. But they never bother to look at high quality scans in which the fids are still visible, and they never wonder why the alleged hoaxers would composite only the white stripes on a flag. - They watch science fiction movies and think that they should see stars in photos taken with a camera set to an aperture of f-5.6 and an exposure of 1/250 sec, ignorant of the fact that you'll never image stars with those settings, even from the highest observatory on the clearest, darkest night. So what "anomalies" do you have that haven't been sunk already?
    2
  1029. Oh, shut tf up. You don’t even know his name.
    2
  1030. For spreading lies??
    2
  1031.  @solitairecat1  “It is claimed that deep space radiation should have fogged the Apollo films. The photographers support this claim by noting that X-ray machines used in airports would fog their films unless they were shielded in lead containers. But this comparison is wrong, for the reasons already discussed in detail in Section 8.5: the intensity of radiation in space is nowhere near that of an X-ray scanner. It’s like comparing a breeze and a hurricane. Besides, if radiation actually fogged films in deep space, then it should have fogged the films used in the uncrewed American and Russian probes that visited the Moon (Lunar Orbiter 1-5, 1966-67; Luna 3, 1959; Luna 12, 1966). It didn’t.” — Moonhoaxdebunked
    2
  1032. You really believe that sh!t. Don’t you?
    2
  1033. Yeah, why not link the full video where he talks about going to the moon? Reported you for misinformation
    2
  1034. @ So then believe the earth is flat?
    2
  1035. Well…no shit.
    2
  1036. 🙄
    2
  1037. Sounds personal. 🫢
    2
  1038. Best evidence ever!
    2
  1039. “Is it possible considering the distance ?” Given the fact that radio waves theoretically travel indefinitely without obstructions, yes it is possible.
    2
  1040. You don’t start a sentence with “I mean” unless you’re clarifying a prior statement.
    2
  1041. He won’t say.
    2
  1042. Even if the moon landings were faked, why couldn’t he talk about Mars?
    2
  1043. How is it a new golden age if he’s already been president?
    2
  1044.  @golftownpro999  You mean the country was worse under Biden? If yes then in what way?
    2
  1045. You’re delusional.
    2
  1046.  @shillhunter4380  Questioning is much different than asserting unfounded lies and spreading misinformation. Your premise is incorrect. You aren’t “questioning” anything. You’re just lying. Deal with your issues. Do better, learn.
    2
  1047.  @shillhunter4380  Why do I care? I’m a gOvErNmEnT sHiLl. Remember? I get PAID to monitor r3tards like you.
    2
  1048. 🙄
    2
  1049. 🙄
    2
  1050. If you say so Mr. Knowledgeable.
    2
  1051. Proof?
    2
  1052. President Nixon was on the moon?
    2
  1053.  @RenoLaringo  Tell me something. What map that do flat-earthers use for long distance navigation?
    2
  1054. “There must be some kind of solid barrier….” FLATWIT confirmed.
    2
  1055.  @billellis3137  A preemptive pardon does not automatically strip a person of their Fifth Amendment rights. They can still invoke it if answering could expose them to state crimes, unpardoned offenses, or new charges (such as perjury).
    2
  1056.  @Shhh_94  “That doesn't mean he's exempt from being investigated because he definitely will” Yes, I know that. Everyone on the Jan. 6th committee is going to be investigated and it will be a total FAIL for Trump and his simps just like it was a total FAIL for him trying to prove the 2020 election was stolen.
    2
  1057.  @Lindsay_sutherland24  Guilty of what?
    2
  1058.  @AbiDas-k8k  Well, innocent people can be convicted due to flawed trials, bad legal representation, or political motivations.
    2
  1059.  @viper2148  "He's a piece of crap and FBI Director Patel is going to take him down." Meet me back here in this thread after Patel FAILS to nail Schiff to the wall so I can LOL in your face.
    2
  1060.  @GoranM-c4p  You should answer his question. Why did Trump ask the Supreme Court for presidential immunity and why did he pardon 1,500 “patriots” for storming the Capitol?
    2
  1061. @ First of all, Trump has zero integrity. Let’s not pretend like he does. Secondly, Schiff initially opposed the Pardon but Biden insisted. Why? Remember, Biden is no longer in office. Trump is there now and has all three branches of government and he’s suggested the idea of using the FBI to go after the January 6th committee members. Trump can’t be trusted. That’s why Schiff has been preemptively pardoned. Now let me ask you. Why would 1,500 people who committed a crime by assaulting police officers, breaching/entering the capitol and committing vandalism accept a pardon when they know they were wrong?
    2
  1062. Trump fired a lot of his appointees to cover up his own awful performance.
    2
  1063. Except they didn’t. All the telemetry, aka - flight data, is preserved.
    2
  1064. @modul83r <— Derp-heads of the world unite!
    2
  1065. How did you measure that distance?
    2
  1066. Quote: “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    2
  1067. Oh please 😂
    2
  1068. “My car broke down last week therefore the moon landings were faked” <— Your logic Dur da durrrrrr…
    2
  1069. $ibrel demanded that the astronauts he was able to interview, swear on the Bible or they were lying about being on the moon. Three of them did. Bean, Cernan and Mitchell all swore on the Bible. So then that means they walked on the moon.
    2
  1070.  @tedoneil7464  Again, Sibrel demanded they swear on the bible and if they didn't he would conclude they lied. Three of them swore on the bible therefore he must accept they told they truth. Your so-called "body language examination" is not proof they lied. There's a mountain of credible evidence that proves these men walked on the moon.
    2
  1071. Why are you lying? 3 of them, Bean, Cernan and Mitchell all swore on the buybull. It’s in the video, dumdum.
    2
  1072.  @mathiasbrandt9419  “don't be silly. I saw a video with those who ran away.” Confirmation bias is seeking out information that supports your beliefs and ignoring information that doesn’t. The same video shows 3 astronauts swearing on the buybull. “And after they returned they destroyed their starship.” No, they didn’t. Id!ot.
    2
  1073. You're Gen-X? You type like you're Gen-Z.
    2
  1074. Not really.
    2
  1075. “if Elon Musk is finding Waste, Fraud & Abuse, what’s gonna happen when he gets to NASA & SpaceX?” Elon Musk owns SpaceX which has a contract with NASA. I’m guessing you don’t read much.
    2
  1076. Nobody pretended.
    2
  1077. ❌
    2
  1078. SPAM
    2
  1079.  @shabzyhoney1166  Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    2
  1080.  @shabzyhoney1166  We can make up “what if’s” all day long. The point is, there’s no credible evidence that proves the Apollo landings were faked. Not one iota. Bart Sibrel has been around a long time. None of his arguments have held up scrutiny. He’s just a con man who’s betting that you won’t fact-check. He has publicly stated that he will not enter a debate with someone that has more knowledge than himself on the subject. Candace Owens is an opportunist who is simply riding the disinformation wave that has struck the world and reaping the benefits. It’s sad really. At any rate, that list of proof I posted earlier should keep you busy if you’d like to learn more about the Apollo program.
    2
  1081. How do you know the Van Allen Belts actually exist?
    2
  1082. My condolences.
    2
  1083. "Bill Nye admitted we can't leave earth." Sorry but you can't use Bill Nye to back your claims because he's part of what you hoaxtards call the "establishment".  @raymond3803 
    2
  1084. The BuyBull says not to swear an oath on anything.
    2
  1085.  @ItsmeA717  How is AI going to help?
    2
  1086. Moon landing? There were six. All of them real. You're just a gullible rube.
    2
  1087. It’s truly sad.
    2
  1088. No, that’s proof you didn’t listen to the question the interviewer asked Armstrong.
    2
  1089. No he didn’t but even if he did, confessions are not conclusive proof.
    2
  1090. Yup, but he’s betting people won’t check his video.
    2
  1091. Liar 😂
    2
  1092. Except the spacecraft wasn't made of cardboard. Derp?
    2
  1093. The camera was remotely controlled from Houston.
    2
  1094. You’re welcome.
    2
  1095. “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    2
  1096. Mobile phones and gps weren’t required technologies for the moon landings. Use your brain. The photography is odd? Please elaborate. They got back in the ascent stage of the LM which docked with the command and service modules. Research much?
    2
  1097. Finally, an intelligent comment. Thank you.
    2
  1098. Why can’t YOU reveal these “lies” since you seem to be so smart?
    2
  1099. Troll Lmao...
    2
  1100.  @billowspillow  “That’s not the dunk you think it is.” A dunk? What are you talking about? Trump has said over and over again he won in 2020 and also that if he lost 2024 it was because it was all rigged. So yeah we needed to take him on his word that would have claimed voter fraud again. “I think he really believes he did.” No you don’t. Stop pretending to be playing devils advocate. You, I and everyone else knows that Trump knows he lost in 2020.
    2
  1101. Who cares?
    2
  1102. I don’t believe people have climbed Mt. Everest.
    2
  1103. It was added in for effect. That sound is missing from other videos that contain the same footage.
    2
  1104. The young man is a flat earther. Nuff said.
    2
  1105. Argument from personal incredulity.
    2
  1106.  @annie.ake-Abasi  "Just that they've not been going recently" Correct. Not since 1972. Watch the whole video. He talks about GOING to the moon.
    2
  1107. False global generalizations are always false.
    2
  1108. Proof? @RedDefender77 
    2
  1109. Notice how you failed to provide proof?  @RedDefender77 
    2
  1110. He was just trolling you.
    2
  1111. Buzz never said that. Anyone can easily fact check that bs. So, why are you lying?
    2
  1112. Look up “Unified S-band”. That might answer your question. The signal didn’t need to be strong leaving the moon. Back on earth there were radio telescopes as large as 200’ diameter to capture the weak signals.
    2
  1113. Which moon landing was fake! There were six.
    2
  1114. No logic or evidence was introduced here.
    2
  1115. Liar 😂
    2
  1116. “How is this guy still alive?!!” Because he’s lying?
    2
  1117. More weird is your lack extreme lack of intelligence and fake profile picture. 🤣🤣😂
    2
  1118. The only person who has TDS is Trump himself.
    2
  1119. Just the ignorant ones.
    2
  1120.  @jmc5335  Everyone agrees with the fact we need better border security, a better economy and better foreign policy. Republicans want that, democrats want that. Trump and Sam H. want that. What I'm saying is that Sam does not agree with Trump's politics in terms of the methods of governance that enable him to achieve what he wants. Honor and Integrity are more important to Sam than anything else.
    2
  1121. Oh dear. I hope your children aren’t home-schooled.
    2
  1122. So because my car broke down last week I’m supposed to call my girlfriend a liar when said she drove from NY to CA decades ago without a hitch?
    2
  1123. How do you figure? She asked him a yes or no question. She didn't ask him if he was a General. She knows he not a General. She asked him point blank if he would not work for a contractor for 10 years just like all previous Generals have promised not to do in past.
    2
  1124.  @CollinMonohan24  Yes, really. When someone gives you a shockingly dumb answer you tend to have a surprised look on your face.
    2
  1125. How was the moon landing fake if Armstrong actually landed on it and saw “aliens?
    2
  1126. Poe’s Law.
    2
  1127.  @ApolloKid1961  😂👍
    2
  1128. Proof or shut tf up. 😊
    2
  1129. What tf are you talking about? They were laughing and making jokes. Quit being a drama queen.
    2
  1130. There are no “ Gods”. Get over it.
    2
  1131.  @RawdaYoussef-k5d  Try actually following Jesus! "Sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven" (Matt. 19:21, Luke 18:2), and "Any of you who does not give up everything he has cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14:33).  But Christian hypocrites respond, "F– you, Jesus!"
    2
  1132. You forgot to bring evidence.
    2
  1133.  @skybudd  No, there isn’t, my guy.
    2
  1134.  @skybudd Name a single government that disputes the six manned moon landings. I’ll wait.
    2
  1135.  @skybudd  You’re welcome.
    2
  1136. “the car they had on the moon would never have fitted in the capsule” Unless of course it did because they designed it that way. Watch: Lunar rover deployment
    2
  1137. Proof or SHTFU.
    2
  1138. All debunked. 😊
    2
  1139.  @TheMaskedBaptist  Dr. James Van Allen worked for NASA. Read his quote again. ”However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt.” In other words, they avoided the areas with higher radiation levels.
    2
  1140.  @freedomdove  Flat earth is just a childish scam on YT designed by con-men who make a living off gullible rubes like you. What's wrong with you that you can't figure that out?
    2
  1141. Two more words. Prove it.
    2
  1142. “Why did Clinton choose the moon landing example when he could have easily chosen some other example (or no example) to make his point?” Because the other examples weren’t associated with a memorable person.
    2
  1143. Stay in school, Mike.
    2
  1144. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    2
  1145. “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    2
  1146. “how’s that Kool-aid…” In other words you have ZERO evidence to dispute the FACTS I just gave you. Gotcha. Thanks for playing.  @veritasomniavincit7 
    2
  1147. ✅
    2
  1148. Wrong, 😂
    2
  1149.  @laneyljk  “However, the impact on radio signals largely depends on the frequency of the signals and the specific location and intensity of the Van Allen belts at the time of transmission. Satellite designers and engineers often take these factors into account to minimize interference when planning communication systems.” Thanks for providing evidence that radio signals can pass through the Van Allen Belts! 😂Seriously though …you should have left that part out in your reply if you want to insist it wasn’t possible 😂😂😂
    2
  1150. So Rogan used to disbelieve and now he believes. What’s wrong with that?
    2
  1151. You’re probably a flat-earther.
    2
  1152. There’s no credible evidence that proves the six manned moon landings were faked.
    2
  1153. July 19th, 2019 “Well, thank you very much. Tomorrow is a very big day because tomorrow will represent 50 years from the time we planted a beautiful American flag on the moon. And that was an achievement — possibly, one of the great — considered one of the great achievements ever. And we’re going a lot further now. We’re going to the moon but we’re then going to Mars.” – Donald Trump
    2
  1154. “Why won't they simply use barges and cranes to transfer all of those containers to another ship?” They probably will. “why all of those other ships are not being rerouted to another port. ” Incoming ships are being rerouted. Ships that were already docked are trapped until bridge debris is removed. “that no one seems to want to investigate the cause. ” The crash is being investigated by the NTSB, US Coast Guard and Baltimore Port Authority.
    2
  1155. Oh now we’re pretending to be an expert in body language. 😂 Shut tf up.
    2
  1156. No, the entirety of the medical industry and its knowledge worldwide. Not estimate given by the FDA (who represents the US, not the whole world) to produce the requested documents.  @LeftyRighty123 
    2
  1157. One is a proven liar, convicted felon and sex offender. The other isn’t.
    2
  1158. July 19th, 2019  “Well, thank you very much. Tomorrow is a very big day because tomorrow will represent 50 years from the time we planted a beautiful American flag on the moon. And that was an achievement — possibly, one of the great — considered one of the great achievements ever. And we’re going a lot further now. We’re going to the moon but we’re then going to Mars.” – Donald Trump
    2
  1159. The Space Shuttle missions didn’t go to the moon doofus. You should know this if you were alive when the Challenger blew up.
    2
  1160. 🙄 😂👌
    2
  1161. Get some professional help there, bud.
    2
  1162.  @Jonny-wt3rg  "but I dont think people like candace and bart are idiots for thinking that we didnt." LOL! Sibrel is a proven liar, convicted criminal (look it up), stalker of Apollo astronauts and a third-rate filmmaker. He KNOWS that NASA landed men on the moon six times between 1969 and 1972. But this is how he has decided to MAKE A LIVING $$$ - by being a grifter. Owens on the other hand is taking advantage of willful liars like Sibrel. She's an opportunist who's riding the disinformation wave that has swept the world. It's how she MAKES A LIVING $$$.
    2
  1163. How many floppies does it take to get to the moon and back??
    2
  1164. What?
    2
  1165.  @YOGI-RS-USA-NRI  Again, I don’t know what you mean.
    2
  1166. Sibrel doesn’t bring that up because he knows how easily it’s debunked.
    2
  1167. A conspiracy theory is only as strong as it’s weakest link. Once you find the weak link the rest of it just falls apart.
    2
  1168. No 😂
    2
  1169. Good for you that you see this guy is an obvious liar.
    2
  1170.  @Tim22222  And Bart $ibrel.
    2
  1171.  @sub-zero7008  Thank you for confirming that you are unqualified to comment on the shape of the earth, its movement and gravity
    2
  1172.  @sassafras8677  No, you didn’t see them.
    2
  1173. “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    2
  1174. Proof?
    2
  1175. Ok so no proof. Got it.  @Dawo23 
    2
  1176. Where did Sam say Ben lied?
    2
  1177. Personal incredulity is NOT a valid argument. Sorry 😊 @ochenhorosho 
    2
  1178. There were actually two cameras. One was a 16mm movie type camera held by Buzz Aldrin as he filmed through a window while Armstrong descended the ladder. The other was a Westinghouse live TV camera that was mounted outside the cabin on the inside of a panel that dropped down via a switch. When the camera deployed it was already aimed at the base of the ladder.
    2
  1179. Fair enough but In my experience this how people cleverly spread misinformation/disinformation while appearing to be genuinely inquisitive. "Why do I smell a conspiracy?" And there you go. Ask a bunch of questions (presumably because you don't know the answers) and then make definitive claims or at least allude to a definitive claim before getting those answers.  @MFitz12 
    2
  1180.  @MFitz12  I respect what you’re doing in these videos but we just have a different approach. My initial comment is based on my experience dealing with doubters, hoaxers and outright trolls.
    2
  1181. At least you recognize your own gullibility.
    2
  1182. Oh please 😂 Like she’s in great danger…
    2
  1183. ❓
    2
  1184.  @youbreakinmyballsbro  Wtf is a “JUUUUU” SHILL?
    2
  1185. Trump is a real patriot? Lmao! Trump still hasn’t accepted that he LOST the 2020 election. Even our 4-star generals have called him a disgrace. He’s an awful human being but I guess he’s managed to brainwash you just like he did with his tens of millions of supporters.
    2
  1186. Flat earther
    2
  1187.  @jespernielsen9320  “Flat earth yes, we live on a round planet. But the area we live on is flat.” Wow! I called it! 😂 This is good news for you because all you have to do now is PROVE is earth is flat with a magical dome above and the moon landings will debunk themselves.
    2
  1188.  @jespernielsen9320  There’s no dome? Why do other flattards disagree with you? Maps are flat for convenience and to show greater detail. That’s common sense. Airplanes navigate over a slowly curved surface. 1° per 69 miles. Prove you wrong? You haven’t proved anything right. You’ve only asserted the earth is flat. So, the burden of proof lies with you, not me. You’ve got work to do. Get busy.
    2
  1189. This is about Apollo 13. The other six missions, Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 landed.
    2
  1190. Keep throwing away your money, dummy.
    2
  1191. You’re living proof the “No Child Left Behind Act” was a waste of taxpayer money.
    2
  1192. "By the way when the lunar lander allegedly took off from the moon the camera panned up to follow the take off, is the cameraman still on the moon as they didn’t have the technology back then to achieve that." Lmao! I thought you said you spent, "hundreds of hours researching this subject"? And you still can't figure out how they did that? It's obvious you're a LIAR who's done ZERO research. 😂 Do better. Learn  @KimSenior 
    2
  1193. The video I directed you to isn’t even needed. Why? $ibrel claims they put a cardboard crop in the window. Do we actually see the cardboard crop? No, we don’t. $ibrel merely claims one is there and you believed him. Also, if they were really in low earth orbit then we would see the clouds and landmasses rushing by the window at they orbited at 17,000 mph. Instead we a “stationary” earth which is consistent with being half-way to the moon. Of course, if you had any common sense you would have picked up on that.  @weswelk6014 
    2
  1194. R3tard!!!!!!!!
    2
  1195. By people like you and me. So if it’s wrong, why aren’t you doing something about it?
    2
  1196. Oh, you don’t know why you’re not doing anything about it.
    2
  1197. Ah yes, when realizing you've been defeated just up boosters, BLM and other cowardly off-topic subjects. Works every time. @@dooothedooo1102
    2
  1198. Proof?
    2
  1199. Troll
    2
  1200. @ Cool story.
    2
  1201.  @Swordsman77  I've already proved to my self that the flat earth cosmology is a fantasy for people who can't handle even simple math. If you want to defend your position, then pick any of the following geometric proofs and explain how they work on a flat earth. If the moon is revolving on a plane parallel to and about 3,000 miles above a flat earth, then people in Oslo, Norway and Cape Town, South Africa, 6,500 miles apart, would have to see the moon at the same moment from angles differing by 94.6° when it is above a point exactly between them (over the Republic of Chad). In real life, they see it from viewing angles differing by just 1.4°, and people all over the world see the moon at the same time from no more than a 1.9° difference in viewing angle. In the flat earth model, someone on the equator during an equinox would see the sun at a heading of 45° at 6:00 am. The sun would then curve around to pass through the zenith at 12:00 noon. Finally, it would curve around to be seen at a heading of 315° at 6:00 pm. In real life, people in that situation see the sun rise at 6:00 at a heading of 90°, pass through the zenith at noon, then set at 6:00 at a heading of 270°. The motorized equatorial mount of a telescope can track the sun across the sky by rotating only through a single axis parallel to the earth's rotational axis. If the sun was really revolving in a plane parallel to, but some 3000 miles above a flat surface, then the telescope mount would need to rotate through two axes simultaneously to track the sun, or any other celestial object. Observers in the southern hemisphere see the stars appear to revolve around a point directly over the earth's southern pole. During the Southern Hemisphere's winter, a person in Rio Gallegos, Argentina, and a person in Sydney, Australia can both see the constellation Octans to their south at exactly the same time. That is not possible in the flat earth model. In the flat earth model, the angular sizes of the sun and moon would change considerably during the course of the day, and would vary according to one's position. If you're at the equator on an equinox and the sun is 3,000 miles directly above you, then to have an angular diameter of 0.5°, it needs to have a real diameter of 26.2 miles. But what about six hours later? Euclidean geometry let's us determine that the sun would then have moved to a point 9,285 miles away from you. At that distance, an object 26.2 miles in diameter would have an angular diameter of just 0.16° of arc. That's a 68% reduction in angular diameter. But in real life, the sun's angular diameter is always right around 0.5° of arc. Flat earth proponents claim that perspective causes the illusion of the sun passing below the horizon. But that doesn't work. For the sun to appear to be just 0.5° away from the horizon (that's just one time its own diameter from the horizon) at 3,000 miles above a flat surface, it would need to be 343,770 miles from the observer. (If a right triangle has an opposite of 3,000 miles, and an alpha of 0.5°, then the length of the adjacent is 343,770 miles.) That's 43% farther than the actual moon, and 22X the diameter of the Tropic of Capricorn in your flat model. It gets even worse as the sun gets nearer the horizon. To be half its own diameter away from the horizon and still be 3,000 miles above the plane of your flat earth, it has to retreat to a distance of 687,550 miles, where its angular diameter would be just 0.002°. And to get to 1/4 of its angular diameter from the horizon at 3,000 miles up, it would need to retreat to a distance of 1,375,100 miles, at which point the angular size of this 26.2 miles diameter sun would be a miniscule 0.001°. To put that in perspective, the average angular diameter of Jupiter as seen from earth is 0.01°. That's 10X bigger than the flat earth sun would appear at 1,375,100 miles. Moving on, for the flat earth sun to appear to even touch the horizon due to perspective, the angle between sun and horizon would need to be less than the minimum angle resolvable by the eye, which in the case of people with 20/20 visual acuity is about 1 minute (') of arc, or 1/60th of a degree. To appear to be 1' of arc from the horizon, an object 3,000 miles above the surface of the flat plane you're standing on would need to be 10,313,000 miles away from you. That's 43.33 times farther away than the actual moon in the heliocentric model.
    2
  1202.  @chadrudidier4550  Yes
    2
  1203.  @mbb8482  1/6.
    2
  1204. Prove it or shut tf up 😊
    2
  1205. Seeing stars in the Apollo photos would be a dead giveaway that they were faked.
    2
  1206. Anyone is free to change the information on wiki. So if it’s incorrect, why aren’t you doing something about it?
    2
  1207. Notice how you’re making a definitive claim while at the same time admitting ignorance by asking questions?
    2
  1208. Did. Six times. Deal with it.
    2
  1209. You heard WRONG.
    2
  1210. Did you know that you can use a VHF radio to call the marine operator and have them connect you to a landline telephone number? Same basic concept.
    2
  1211. 🤦‍♂
    2
  1212. 2 bodies were recovered and I believe there are 5 more people still missing and presumed dead.
    2
  1213. The ultimate truth? LOL! Problem is, you accept these conspiracy theories without fact checking the people making them.
    2
  1214. I’d LOVE to see your evidence that proves it’s a missile.
    2
  1215. No need. There’s plenty of proof already. 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    2
  1216. ​ @godswill2260 . You derp-heads have beat this dead horse way too long. Find better evidence. Find ACTUAL evidence.
    2
  1217. He better not claim the earth is flat if he also claims the Apollo crew was in low earth orbit.
    2
  1218. Why do you lie so much?
    2
  1219. “Why didn't they land at the original landed site of Neil Armstrong.” So you didn’t even watch the video 🤦‍♂
    2
  1220. July 19, 2019 PRESIDENT TRUMP: “Well, thank you very much. Tomorrow is a very big day because tomorrow will represent 50 years from the time we planted a beautiful American flag on the moon. And that was an achievement — possibly, one of the great — considered one of the great achievements ever. And we’re going a lot further now. We’re going to the moon but we’re then going to Mars. We have with us, of course, Buzz Aldrin, who has been an incredible gentleman. I’ve known him for years, for a long time. And we’ve been friends for a long time. But just a fantastic, fantastic man. And Michael Collins, you all know flew Apollo 11 overhead. And it’s Aldrin and Armstrong, they walked on the moon.” Oops! You didn’t see that coming. Did you? 😂
    2
  1221. This video isn’t about the Challenger disaster.
    2
  1222. It’s a simulation. Video clearly states that.
    2
  1223. Trump lost. Get over it.
    2
  1224.  @flackjacket3dits  The 2020 election. People still think he won it.
    2
  1225.  @Lauraaaaa719  Impressive? Um, he’s a proven liar, dude. FFS! Don’t be so gullible.
    2
  1226. Read up on the Apollo program before putting your ignorance and picture on public display.
    2
  1227. Except there’s no evidence they lied.
    2
  1228. It doesn’t. If they were on wires then why did they fall so much?
    2
  1229. Not truth.
    2
  1230. Lmao! You didn't type a single fact that disproves the Apollo landings. Just a bunch of rambling. "The computer on earth's processing power wouldn't even matter." Why? Because you say so? The Manned Space Flight Network (MSFN) used large ground based tracking stations and computers to calculate precise trajectory data. This information was then transmitted to the spacecraft for course corrections and mission updates. "Especially when the Astronauts are traveling through the vacuum of space." Ok, and what does that have to do with the ability to send the Apollo spacecraft data? "We still can't even perfect cell phone communication, Bluetooth, or Wi-fi on Earth." False analogy fallacy. Apollo's communication system was designed for a highly specific and controlled mission, primarily using radio signals over long distances with large, powerful ground based antennas. Consumer wireless technologies (cell phones, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi) must operate in unpredictable environments with interference, limited power, obstructions and millions of simultaneous users. "People can make these videos where they jump through hoops and more, in order to explain how it was even possible to send a man to the moon and back in 1969." The only people jumping through hoops are the dullards who refuse to accept facts. You do so to deal with your denial. "The fact is, it really is laughable, when they try to fool people who understand computer processing power." Yeah, what's really funny are the tens of millions of computer science engineers around the world who are all apparently too stup!d to have spotted these "errors" like you have. "1000kb equal 1mb. 1000mb equal 1gb. 1000gb equal 1tb." Ok? And? "Do you see how ridiculous it is to say a 36kb ROM could possess the necessary processing power to put man on the moon and bring him back in 1969?" The AGC wasn’t a general purpose computer like the ones we use today. It was designed with hand optimized assembly code that executed only mission-critical tasks with extreme efficiency. The computer wasn’t running the mission on autopilot. Astronauts manually input commands, and NASA’s ground computers provided updated calculations for trajectory corrections. The AGC’s role was primarily real time guidance, navigation, and control, not handling complex simulations or general processing tasks. "I don't care how many computers they claim to have used. Even if they had 1000 of them working together it would be laughable." Translation: "I don't understand how this was possible therefore FAKE!" Go cry somewhere else.
    2
  1231. There’s literally no credible evidence to suggest that the six manned Apollo moon landings didn’t happen.
    2
  1232. “Donald Trump has been open about corruption” 🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣 Ya think?
    2
  1233.  @jillbear904  “His whole "drain the swamp" motto is in reference to corrupt politicians and his plan to kick them out.” Right, right…let’s trust a man who lied about winning the 2020 election, inspired a mob to stop the certification of said election and became a convicted felon sex offender to get rid of these so-called corruption politicians and replace them with actual corrupt politicians. 👌
    2
  1234. The only person with TDS is Trump himself.
    2
  1235. You're just gullible asf. No government throught this world, including those that HATE us (which is many I'm sure) have never disputed the six Apollo moon landings. Not a single one. Never. Not a one.
    2
  1236. ?
    2
  1237. You’re just pissed because you can’t spread your disinformation without being challenged.
    2
  1238.  @KalinFamilyForJesus  Just about everything. https://youtu.be/03x2MC3wv5Q?feature=shared
    2
  1239. THE moon. Hollywood would have produced a higher quality film.
    2
  1240. Nope. Next?
    2
  1241. "my longstanding question as to why they claim in the museums that the spaceships are made of metal as thin as tin foil." Not the main structure itself. The outside is wrapped with Kapton foil to reflect solar radiation. There are also thin panels but those aren't structural. The pressure hull of the spacecraft varies but is at least 0.25" thick.
    2
  1242. Is that what she told you?
    2
  1243. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    2
  1244.  @colinm610  Because we don’t have a ride. No rocket = no moon landing.
    2
  1245. Freemasons are educated and honest. YouTube flatwits aren’t.
    2
  1246. What map do flatwits use for long distance navigation?
    2
  1247.  @rickreid8572  "My opinion does not need to be backed up at all, least of all to some nobody on a keyboard who has no aeronautical nor aviation experience." 1. Your opinion is irrelevant. 2. You are in no position to assume who has or doesn't have experience in said fields. "Just sits watching documentaries whilst rolling up his sleeve." Oh the irony of that statement. 😂 "Artemis can't get there" Wrong. Artemis 1 got there in 2022. "Starliner is struggling to get to LEO" Wrong again. Starliner is currently in LEO. "no one has been to the Moon." Wrong again! 24 men have been to the moon and 12 of them have walked on it. Modern history is what it is, not what you want to be or wish it should have been. Deal with it and move on with your life.
    2
  1248.  @brittanycompton8451  You can’t tell why which moon landing you’re referring to?
    2
  1249. 55 years ago. It wasn’t faked.
    2
  1250. Quote: “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    2
  1251. 😂😂😂😂
    2
  1252. Coordinates?
    2
  1253. If that’s the reason why people voted for Trump then they are truly helpless.
    2
  1254.  @ramzichouk4080  None were recorded in 4k of an astronaut on the moon. The live video was captured with a TV camera and other footage was recorded on a 16mm movie camera (film).
    2
  1255.  @almcdonald8676  LOL! The only person with TDS is Trump himself.
    2
  1256. Never mind. Flat earth idiot confirmed in other thread.
    2
  1257.  @DanielCharlesWilson  Fallacy! You made a claim therefore the burden of proof is on you. Take your time. I’ll wait.
    2
  1258.  @Comezehere  “their body language is way off.” No, it’s consistent with professional pilots talking in clear and concise language at a speed in which journalists can keep up with.  “They can’t remember but later they said they remembered.” Remember what? Explain.  “The lack of photography from space.” False. There are thousands of photos from space.  “No micro meteors were ever recorded on film.” Learn how exposure works. “The size of the lunar lander and the problem with putting an air lock in it.” Huh? Why don’t you go into detail?  “So many to count.” Yeah, especially when you can make up any sh!t you want.  “I do know a way they can prove man went to the moon conclusively.” Ok. Enlighten us, please.
    2
  1259. All you learned was Candice perpetuating lies.
    2
  1260. Bring your evidence, not your gut feelings.
    2
  1261. Yeah except there no wires.
    2
  1262.  @Chitov646ckmych  Proof?
    2
  1263. Add your name to the Wall of the Owned 😂
    2
  1264.  @therealzilch  😂👍
    2
  1265. Feel free to prove it with actual substantial, history-changing evidence backed up by sound logic and reputable sources.
    2
  1266. Why?
    2
  1267. There are denier's all over the world.
    2
  1268. @karlgreene2177 Yes, don’t be ridiculous. Bring proof next time.
    2
  1269. Presidents don’t control the price of gas, bread, eggs and milk. Supply and demand does. People complain all the time that prices are too high but if you turn on the news the next time there’s a holiday you’ll see them reporting on the millions of people FILLING airports heading to their favorite vacation destinations. Wait, I thought people were struggling to put food on the table?
    2
  1270. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    2
  1271. Your punctuation and spelling is abominable therefore anything you’re trying to convey is meaningless.
    2
  1272. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    2
  1273. Just not as much as your corrupt country I’m sure.
    2
  1274.  @majorbotha1072  If believing that six moon landings were faked with no evidence to prove it makes you sleep better then go right ahead.
    2
  1275. Or neither
    2
  1276. We will because there aren’t any.
    2
  1277. 🤦‍♂
    2
  1278. No because it’s not fake.
    2
  1279. How much money has your broke @ss sent to Trump for his so called legal defense fund?
    2
  1280. Proof?
    2
  1281. Nope. Next?
    2
  1282.  @shillhunter4380  No, you do it because you're a third-rate troll enchanted by the idea of conspiracy. You simply parrot what you have seen on id!otic YouTube videos created by self-styled experts. You’ve not nothing, Flurf.
    2
  1283. 😂👌
    2
  1284. The explosion was 800 feet away and is being captured through an ultra wide-angle lens. It's going to look smaller than it actually was.
    2
  1285. Well of course. Why would they land at the Apollo sites?
    2
  1286. Covid—19 was a worldwide pandemic. It wasn’t limited exclusively to the United States. FFS 🤦‍♂
    2
  1287. In case you didn’t notice, Martin Kennedy is a flat earther therefore he’s the only one that looks dumb. And no, a romantic comedy about faking the moon landing is not proof the moon landings were faked.
    2
  1288. Proof?
    2
  1289. Guess it was real then.
    2
  1290. Yawn…
    2
  1291. Lmao! They used an Apollo style lander to fly through the atmosphere of Mars. Do you see the problem with that?
    2
  1292. Your incredulity isn’t a valid argument. Try again.
    2
  1293. *landings
    2
  1294.  @911insidejob-md  You need proof, not patterns. Where's you proof for six "faked" landings?
    2
  1295. Well, the younger guy was wrong about Trump’s appointees.
    2
  1296.  @peterthompson6651  “2: K2 and Everest is pronounced (Eve-er-rest).” K2 is pronounced the same way as Everest??
    2
  1297.  @peterthompson6651  Clarify your second point.
    2
  1298.  @peterthompson6651  What’s taking so long for you to clarify your second point?
    2
  1299.  @Rustyshackelford177  “all politicians are liars” That would require proof. But let’s assume you’re right for arguments sake. How many of them have vehemently claimed they won a presidential election without credible evidence?
    2
  1300.  @dwightaaron3113  Exhibit A: Clinton didn’t argue that Trump was not the president or that his election was legally invalid. She was referring to the conditions surrounding his victory as being "illegitimate" in the sense that they were affected by foreign interference. Clinton also conceded unlike your daddy Trump. Exhibit B: Gore conceded to Bush after the Supreme Court’s decision despite contesting the election results over the handling of the vote count in Florida. Gore never claimed that Bush 'stole' the election, unlike Trump, who falsely claimed that the 2020 election was 'stolen' from him by widespread voter fraud. Trump also sought to pressure state officials, particularly in Georgia, to overturn the election results and incited the January 6 Capitol riot, refusing to admit defeat and undermining the democratic process.
    2
  1301. In other words you bought his lies.
    2
  1302. Not really.
    2
  1303. PLANE…
    2
  1304.  @michaeltaylor2631  No, dummy. The FBI never claimed it was missile. Try again.
    2
  1305. The whole bridge didn’t collapse.
    2
  1306. Well obviously most of it is inside the building.
    2
  1307. “Plane!?!?! Where is it.” 0:05 and 1:32 “Missle!” Nope. “Towers melt steel” Did you mean to say “jet fuel”? No, it didn’t. “terrorist passports are found in near perfect condition.” One passport was found. The condition of it was not disclosed. So what? Millions of sheets of office paper also survived unscathed. Do better. Learn.
    2
  1308.  @miciavelli  <––– 🤡
    2
  1309. Because he’s right and you’re mad?
    2
  1310. Ok, sure buddy 😂👌
    2
  1311. Whatever. We still went to the moon.
    2
  1312. ​ @1Corinthians15.1-4  I’m talking about the Apollo moon landings which is what this video is about. The fact that future moon and Mars missions can be delayed, postponed or possibly cancelled has no bearing on the veracity of the Apollo landings. $ibrel has several videos that have been up for years. None of them have been taken down. You’re just enchanted by the idea of conspiracy. $ibrel is nothing more than a con-man who makes money off gullible rubes like you. Listen to what you’re saying, “They're scared of the truth coming out.” It’s been over 50 years since the last moon landing. What’s is taking so long for this “truth” to be revealed? Every one of $ibrels claims have been addressed, signed, sealed and filed under ‘DEBUNKED’. Nobody takes him seriously.
    2
  1313. Stay in school, Holly.
    2
  1314. All governments are crooked but that doesn’t mean the moon landings were faked.
    2
  1315. Extreme temperatures, pressures, and geological challenges would make drilling to the center of earth extremely difficult and dangerous. Also the Earth's mantle, located between the crust and the core, is partially molten and behaves like a solid over geological timescales. This would complicate any attempt to drill through it.
    2
  1316. Prove it.
    2
  1317. You forgot to bring evidence ya big dummy.
    2
  1318. 👍
    2
  1319. In other words, you got duped by the guy in the video?
    2
  1320.  @rammalammadingdong1  Proof men walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video as well. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material have been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world, showing chemical signs of originating from the Moon. 4. The LRRR (Laser Retroreflector Arrays) left by Apollo 11 and other subsequent Apollo missions can still be interacted with today using sufficiently powerful lasers from Earth. 5. The SELENE photos show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang’e 2 photos show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2 managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory observed Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observed Apollo missions during their return coast to Earth and produced live television pictures, which were broadcast to U.S. West Coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco. 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages from the lunar vehicles and not to them, because the Earth was between him and Houston. Also, backyard amateurs around the world were able to tune in to the Apollo audio (not the video—that would have required bigger hardware—but the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi antennas and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds, or maybe thousands, of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, which monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, had its leader, Vasily Mishin, describe in an interview for the article “The Moon Programme That Faltered” how the Soviet Moon program dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to remain silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud highlights the implausibility of conspiracy theories. 14. In October–November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon’s surface by all Apollo landing missions, excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and transmitter power outputs (20 W) were in agreement with NASA reports. 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images provide some of the most effective proof to date rebutting the “landing hoax” theories. Although this probe was launched by NASA, the camera and image interpretation are managed by an academic group—the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University—along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center in Berlin, are outside the U.S. and are not funded by the U.S. government. 16. After these images were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher-resolution imaging. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at a higher resolution. 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent, compared to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site, shows an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts at all Apollo landing sites. The exception is Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin’s account of the flag being blown over by the lander’s rocket exhaust upon departure from the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia accounted for two-thirds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world, including those of adversarial nations, used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. More information can be found on MIT’s website. The tracking was accurate to within one mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time and used it to photograph the S-IVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned miles, making them visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (which behaved similarly). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent to the lunar surface by monitoring the Doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    2
  1321. Flat earther? 🤣🤣🤣
    2
  1322. Yes because he made himself look like a fool.
    2
  1323. Proof?
    2
  1324. One hand holding da pants. Smfh…
    2
  1325. What?
    2
  1326. “It's doubtful if NASA landed on the moon 50 years ago.“ NASA went to the moon nine times and landed on six of those occasions between 1969 and 1972. Get over it.
    2
  1327. I know, wasn't that a ridiculous claim? There are literally hundreds of billions of stars in space.
    2
  1328. @ Oof, poor judgment on the republicans part.
    2
  1329. Proof?
    2
  1330. If he was such a great president and leader then why did he have to create this massive lie that he won the 2020 election and why did his supporters respect him for perpetuating such a massive lie?
    2
  1331. 🥱
    2
  1332. Derp-heads of the world unite!
    2
  1333.  @ReVo-p2v  None of the Apollo missions were faked.
    2
  1334. “the additional 12 million votes in 2020, not seen before or since, was basically statistically impossible.” Please explain. “I am not a Trump supporter.” Yet the first you bring up is TDS, a meme designed to gaslight and stop conversation.
    2
  1335. Ah, it’s the “never before in history…” bs. That’s a telltale sign you have no direct evidence that the six Apollo moon landings were faked. Tell me, what’s it’s like to be so desperate?
    2
  1336. Trump accepts the moon landings.
    2
  1337. Prove it.
    2
  1338. Added in for effect.
    2
  1339.  @syang7775  Desperate? Nah. Im just having fun collecting id!ots.
    2
  1340. It’s a figure of speech
    2
  1341. Yeah, he’s a real tough guy. SMH…
    2
  1342. Highly charged particles and x-rays are both forms of ionizing radiation. The astronauts were exposed to both.
    2
  1343. Or they went and saw the moon up close and walked on it. Well, two of them.
    2
  1344.  @Iamnyka29  No. What the evidence says.
    2
  1345.  @Iamnyka29  That’s right. The Artemis program is planning to return humans to the moon by 2026. The keyword here is planning. No attemps have been made so far, therefore nobody is struggling to get back to the moon. You are distorting the facts. “astronauts Barry “Butch” Wilmore and Sunita Williams, were trapped in space for 9 months due to technical difficulties and that was a test mission to the ISS” Wrong. They were not trapped. If they were truly trapped then by that logic everyone on board was trapped. From the moment they arrived, they could have left on another vehicle that was already docked. They were never in danger, abandoned ot trapped; they simply had to be integrated into the crew rotation schedule like any other astronauts. Other crew members, who had already been on the ISS longer, needed to return first due to mission timelines, health considerations, and spacecraft availability. Williams and Wilmore stayed longer, not because they were left behind, but because NASA prioritized a safe and structured return rather than an improvised one. This has NOTHING to do with the Apollo moon landings.
    2
  1346. 😂👌
    2
  1347.  @cosmossci4883  Us dems should have claimed mass voter fraud just like Trump and his cronies did in 2020. Tit for tat.
    2
  1348. Anyone is free to change the info on Wikipedia. So if you think it’s wrong then why aren’t you doing something about it?
    2
  1349. You mean it appears to be waving in photos? That's because there's a horizontal road in the top hem and the flag of course is wrinkled.
    2
  1350. You’re right because it’s a 757.
    2
  1351. Unfortunately for you reality doesn’t care about what you believe.
    2
  1352. Why are you asking all these questions and not following up?
    2
  1353. Proof?
    2
  1354. It was filmed 2 days after spending 18 days in quarantine. They’ve had time for the excitement to wear off. Plus, they’re exhausted after from the training, studying and working 6 days a week for the last 8 years.
    2
  1355.  @andrewworth7574  It links you back to this video.
    2
  1356.  @jimrockford4309  Not all scientists make discoveries, dipsh!t.
    2
  1357. If the moon landing wasn’t real we wouldn’t be working on it in the future as well as around it. 😉
    2
  1358.  @JohnG-r6v  “This is why they have been using a space station with the Russians, circling the Earth because they can’t go to the moon.” We can’t go to the moon because we don’t have a rocket that ready to launch today that can reach the moon. The Apollo Program was cancelled by congress in 1972. Other projects issued. The ISS is one of them. Not sure why people don’t get this.
    2
  1359. He may have been thinking of highest point in terms of from the center of the earth.
    2
  1360. Flat earth Id!ot?
    2
  1361. Thanks for confirming you’re a flat earth id!ot.  @AvianCorrado 
    2
  1362. The majority is inside the building obviously.
    2
  1363. Reported as disinformation.
    2
  1364. Yeah, the guest of the video is oddly wrong.
    2
  1365. Oh, ok. You’re having an orgasm over Trumps trifecta. Sounds personal 🫢
    2
  1366. They just sent some yesterday. Derp?
    2
  1367. Sam
    2
  1368. Nobody is forcing you to accept the moon landings.
    2
  1369. Found the Flattard.
    2
  1370. I can’t understand how people can’t differentiate civil rights protests and riots from a legitimate coup and attempt to overturn a free and fair and election. These things are not alike.
    2
  1371.  @backinmyrightmind  “ok….you seem to want to argue….have a great night” Translation: “I have no logical response so I’m just gonna hi-tail it outta here”
    2
  1372. Are you talking about the Apollo moon landings?  @Kopie0830 
    1
  1373.  @Kopie0830 Hello???
    1
  1374. "I'm not a flat earther" Uh-huh...Heard that one before. "i think if they are hiding something its much more likely they are hiding land in antartica," Who is "they"? "And the ones that arent alot do have fish eyes lenses ." Because the earth is large and most photos/videos from low earth orbit can't fit the earth into the field of view with a normal lens. @FireKingMadness 
    1
  1375. You sound like a Flatwit.  @npcarnivore 
    1
  1376.  @hawaiifreespeechnews All the Flurfs, moon landing deniers and other members of the lunatic fringe weren’t so committed to this video which means one thing- they’re nothing but silly trolls.
    1
  1377.  @hawaiifreespeechnews  Where’d they all go then?
    1
  1378. Stop looking up to yoga instructors to inspire you.
    1
  1379. False.
    1
  1380. Nothing was forced and it wasn’t experimental.
    1
  1381. Looks nothing like a missile and besides, there’s literally no credible evidence for one.
    1
  1382.  @realtruthloveearth1769  <— Found the flat earther.
    1
  1383. Ok flat-earther. Whatever you say.
    1
  1384. So what are the odds? You obviously calculated them.
    1
  1385. Ted Cruz isn’t very good at lying.
    1
  1386. Sam’s wrong about what?
    1
  1387. You believe a liar? https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=t1tjbyLy6lhhuv4w
    1
  1388. There’s no credible evidence that proves the footage was faked. The footage can’t be convincing faked on earth.  @dingytv538 
    1
  1389.  @tubecated_development  👍
    1
  1390. So in other words you have no evidence.
    1
  1391. Soviets were first in space but not on the moon. Deal with it.
    1
  1392. @Nura-mb2st When you watch the full press conference, you'll notice moments of puns, quips, jokes, and even outright laughter. These astronauts didn't just step off the spacecraft; this press conference took place two days after their 18-day quarantine. By then, the initial excitement had worn off. Some people expect them to be performing cartwheels on stage, with smiles so wide that even a coal shovel couldn't knock them off. But let's be realistic.
    1
  1393. F+CK YEAH! CAPS LOCK BABY!!!
    1
  1394. Real
    1
  1395. Prove your claims or $hut tf up.
    1
  1396. So that’s a wrap then. The NTSB should have consulted you, ffs.
    1
  1397.  @user-Rocket-Fest  Oh I see, you’re one of those Conspiritards - ,,dah gubbermint is hiding dah troof”
    1
  1398. Video clearly states it’s a simulation.
    1
  1399. Artemis 1 proves you’re lying.
    1
  1400.  @raiderlarry3255  Hellooo? McFly??? ARTEMIS 1 went to the moon in 2022. New technology. Not lost.
    1
  1401. The camera was essentially attached to the exterior of the landing craft.
    1
  1402. Nope. Next?
    1
  1403. You forgot to bring evidence 😂
    1
  1404.  @makaupurple8242  First you said green screen which doesn’t allow people to walk into the background and now you say it’s CGI which was laughable in 1969 and nowhere even close to this crappy video. Lmao! You’re no filmmaker.
    1
  1405. Approximately 238,000 miles.
    1
  1406. Proof? @vladyyukhimets5815 
    1
  1407. 🙄
    1
  1408. “Wake up people!” Go back to sleep, mor0n!
    1
  1409. “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    1
  1410. No, that would be your education.
    1
  1411. Something as simple as observing a sunset obliterates the flat earth fantasy.
    1
  1412. “no footage of intercepting the mothership on the way back up from the moon” FALSE
    1
  1413. The only person with TDS is Trump himself.
    1
  1414.  @ArYan-fx3ty  Prove it.
    1
  1415. Sky News Australia. Just another far-right disinformation network.
    1
  1416. "I always knew the moon landing was fake" Which one?
    1
  1417. "she hit him first and he gave her a quick humbling." So? He brought himself down to her level. That doesn't make him a man. He slapped her back because he didn't want people there to think he was a b!tch for not doing anything. @Mahh024 
    1
  1418. I don't believe you. You're not his type.
    1
  1419. By Hoaxtards, yes.
    1
  1420.  @44warden Yes, we’re just BOTS. So why do you insist on having your human @ss consistently kicked by a few algorithms? As a human aren’t you embarrassed?
    1
  1421.  @zagudivine1850 Are you a Trump @ss eater too?
    1
  1422. The 20 million figure includes overstays. If you enter the country legally but overstay your visa it doesn’t make you an illegal alien.
    1
  1423.  @earthlycreature8772  Not according to an immigration lawyer I consulted on a friend’s behalf. If you enter legally but overstay, you're often referred to as being "out of status" or "unlawfully present." If you enter illegally (without inspection), you're typically called an "illegal alien."
    1
  1424.  @earthlycreature8772  Yes and when everyone in the political sphere is talking about the problem of undocumented immigrants in the United States they are mainly referring to immigrants who have entered illegally. However, the number of illegal immigrants is almost always exaggerated to include those who overstayed.
    1
  1425. Trump acknowledges the moon landings, derp-head. PRESIDENT TRUMP: “Well, thank you very much. Tomorrow is a very big day because tomorrow will represent 50 years from the time we planted a beautiful American flag on the moon. And that was an achievement — possibly, one of the great — considered one of the great achievements ever. And we’re going a lot further now. We’re going to the moon but we’re then going to Mars….” “We have with us, of course, Buzz Aldrin, who has been an incredible gentleman. I’ve known him for years, for a long time. And we’ve been friends for a long time. But just a fantastic, fantastic man. And Michael Collins, you all know flew Apollo 11 overhead. And it’s Aldrin and Armstrong, they walked on the moon.…”
    1
  1426. Proof?
    1
  1427. Which one?
    1
  1428.  @lostmymarbles9151  Proof?
    1
  1429.  @lostmymarbles9151  The footage is proof that the footage was faked? What kind of r3tarded logic is that?
    1
  1430. Do you have a point?
    1
  1431. Liar.
    1
  1432.  @chrissyg1700  " Seems to me a lot of money has been put into the space program for over 50 years" Indeed but the money has been on multiple smaller scale missions both manned and unmanned. Still, that's no reason to assume the Apollo landings were faked.
    1
  1433. False.
    1
  1434. Look for other video: Apollo 11 press conference full mission
    1
  1435. It wasn’t designed solely for verifying the landing sites. It was designed to photograph and map the entire surface.
    1
  1436.  @yassassin6425  Smells like drive-by truthing to me.
    1
  1437. I guess Trump must be on the left then.
    1
  1438. Research great circle navigation.
    1
  1439.  @amybella  “Apollo mission was 1961 end of story.” Wrong. Apollo 11 was 1969. CGI was a JOKE in 1969 https://youtu.be/8FzXL3G0JR0?feature=shared
    1
  1440.  @amybella  “Your forgetting the fact that I am an expert when it comes to photo manipulation. We have a company where we work on images all day long, all of those are fake.” 😂😂😂 Ok, so which of 8,000+ images taken over the course of the Apollo program using FILM was faked? Be specific and explain how they were faked.
    1
  1441. In 1972? 😂
    1
  1442. No.
    1
  1443. What?
    1
  1444. "doesn't science already understand that???" We know a lot about the VAB's but until now I don't think anyone has done a "spacewalk" within them. So naturally they want to acquire data on the direct affect of the body without being surrounding by the spacecraft.
    1
  1445.  @jedi10101  Yes that why I put spacewalk in quotes 😊
    1
  1446. I disagree. They’re not falling on purpose.
    1
  1447. 😂Look for other role models in your life, lady.
    1
  1448. So?
    1
  1449.  @LilBaritone17  “People have had the suspicion that the U.S. never landed on the moon.” Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photosu available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  1450. Sad part is, people who actually believe that the sitting president controls the price of bread, eggs, milk and gas.
    1
  1451.  @jmc5335  A sitting president does not have direct control over the prices of everyday goods like bread, eggs, milk, or gas, etc., as these are primarily influenced by market forces such as supply and demand. The can president can though influence economic factors, such as through fiscal policies, trade agreements, or addressing supply chain issues, which may indirectly affect prices.
    1
  1452.  @jmc5335 Do you believe that Biden was purposely keeping inflation high and simply didn’t want to do anything about it?
    1
  1453. 🤦‍♂ Oh boy….here we go again.
    1
  1454.  @HAE777  Since you seem to have done more “research” and have all the “facts” than the NTSB, US Coast Guard, Baltimore Port Authority and ABS has in just four days then do please share your conclusion with us.
    1
  1455.  @HAE777  I’m sorry but saying, “I have eyes!” is meaningless. Flat-earth Id!ot mentality right there. So where’s your evidence, smart guy? Or have you throw the towel in already?
    1
  1456.  @eg1789  How did it feel to get completely OWNED by mooneyes and mfitz? 🤣
    1
  1457.  @eg1789  Where’s your history-changing evidence backed up by sound logic and reputable sources that proves it’s a cruise missile?!?!? You have none. So SHTFU!
    1
  1458.  @eg1789  “I never said it was a cruise missle.” Oh SHTFU, dude. 😂 That’s exactly what you’re alluding to. Own up to it.
    1
  1459. Found the flat earth id!ot 😂
    1
  1460. Where’s your proof?
    1
  1461.  @anacletogeranciopancracio.2465  Why did you put it there?
    1
  1462. Wow, you’re all up his @ss. Disgusting 🤮
    1
  1463. Trump is the biggest liar in the history of mankind.
    1
  1464.  @betacuck3145  Lot's of politicians lie, wise guy. But how many how claimed they won a national election without proof which set off a movement in the country like we've never seen before? Just one. Your daddy, Trump. You’re welcome.
    1
  1465. No.
    1
  1466. 😂😂😂🤦‍♂
    1
  1467. Aww poor wittle baby is all butt-hurt over Santa being fake 😭🍼
    1
  1468. “His personal behavior doesn't matter one F-,ing bit.” True, but falsely claiming that you won an election (even to this day) and brainwashing your followers into thinking you won and inspiring them to attack the capitol in order to stop the certification DOES MATTER. The man has no honor and integrity and is completely unfit to serve as president.
    1
  1469. “They lied” No, they didn’t.
    1
  1470. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photosu available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  1471. Why should there be cameras on the moon? Set up a bunch of random cameras pointed at gray dirt and rocks?
    1
  1472. 1.3 seconds delay each way.
    1
  1473. Proof he did it?
    1
  1474. He won't fuck!ng around...
    1
  1475. Another body language "expert". Yawn...
    1
  1476. False equivalence fallacy. Try again.
    1
  1477.  @Brenda2Bee  You watched the Apollo 11 post flight Press Conference. SO WHAT? Your opinion of their demeanor is NOT proof anything. Get over it.
    1
  1478.  @Brenda2Bee  What?
    1
  1479. Idi0t
    1
  1480. Why don’t we just wait for the investigation to conclude before jumping to conclusions?
    1
  1481.  @yourmajesty3858  I have no idea what the wind speed was. An outgoing tide will also make the ship harder to stop.
    1
  1482. The bridge is classified as “fracture critical” because it contains one or more fracture critical members which if were to fail can result in partial or total collapse of the bridge. Basically all of truss portion of the bridge failed because there was no structural redundancy from span to span. The approach spans didn’t collapse because they were independent of the truss portion.
    1
  1483. First of all, you don’t start a sentence with, “I mean” unless you’re clarifying a prior statement. Secondly, Sibrel left out the part where he misled Aldrin under false pretenses about making a space documentary for children. Instead, he pressured Aldrin to swear on the Bible that he walked on the moon. When Aldrin realized Sibrel was a con-man, he got up and left. Sibrel stalked Aldrin outside the hotel and cornered him demanding he swear on the Bible. He called Aldrin a liar and a coward to his face. You know the rest. Just in case you’re religious- the Bible says never to swear an oath. On anything. (Matthew 5:33–37)
    1
  1484.  @adrianchetwynd1334  We have a choice here in the US to put our hand on the Bible or not. If not you simply take an oath to tell the truth.
    1
  1485.  @KimKim-ci8hf  “the fact we never see live video of the moon from space is enough for me to conclude nasa is hiding something” Why do you need a live video of the moon when you can just look up? “there’s no reason why they couldn’t besides they are hiding something” So because nasa didn’t point the camera at the moon during the eclipse that automatically means they are hiding something? Oh man, you really have trust issues.
    1
  1486. Nonsense! Dems didn’t push vaccines. Science and empirical evidence pushed vaccines. The CDC and WHO make recommendations on illnesses, not democrats. They simply listen to the experts. Stop demonizing dems. Vaccinations saved lives during Covid. Fact.
    1
  1487. But did you notice they used an Apollo style lander to fly through the atmosphere of Mars (which wouldn’t work) and at the end they ultimately don’t get away with the deception?
    1
  1488. Cool story, bro.
    1
  1489. But he lied about his evidence https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=Rx7JTAP8q6cKi_cQ
    1
  1490. Not truth.
    1
  1491.  @dfkuz  “It’s a net of enchantment that humans just naturally love being caught in.” Yup. That perfectly describes flat-earthers, holocaust deniers and moon landing deniers.
    1
  1492.  @dfkuz  1. Yes, Disney partnered with prominent aerospace engineer Wernher von Braun and other experts to create educational TV specials that explained space exploration concepts to the public. This doesn't imply a conspiracy. Von Braun was a German rocket scientist with vast knowledge. His ties to Nazi Germany doesn't imply the moon landngs were faked. If you think so then you need to explain how. 2. Kubrick had ZERO involvemnet with the Apollo program. His own daugther, Viivan Kubrick as asked people to stop spreading lies about her father. 3. Nixon called mission control in Houston. They routed his voice through the Unified S-band. It's the same principle if someone uses a landline to call you on your cordless phone at home or your cellphone. You can call a marine operater from a landline and have them connect you with some out at sea that has a VHF radio. Nothing special. It's called RADIO WAVES. 5. The technology wasn't lost. It was decomissioned when Congress cancelled the Apollo program in 1972. NASA moved on to cheaper/smaller scale projects. The technology is being rebuilt was we speak. Look up: Artemis Program.
    1
  1493. Give her a pass to the moon landings (plural). Why?
    1
  1494. ❓
    1
  1495. Btw, $ibrel isn’t on your side. He’s not a deluded flurf like you 🤣
    1
  1496. lol...
    1
  1497. There are images. It landed and tipped over so the images are basically worthless.
    1
  1498. What exactly are you able to see on the other side of that lake? The shoreline? A mountain? Be specific.  @gerrieklijzing3198 
    1
  1499. TDS. A meme created to stop conversation.
    1
  1500. Don’t forget to send more money to Trump to help pay his multimillion dollar judgements 🤣
    1
  1501. Blah, blah, blah.
    1
  1502. Huh? Everyone from that time didn’t believe the earth was flat.
    1
  1503. There's no credible evidence to suggest that the six Apollo landings were faked. Sorry but your gut-feelings don't mean sh!t. Covid-19 and everything else you mentioned got nothing to do with the achievements of Apollo.
    1
  1504.  @BwanaFinklestein Woooow….how many conspiracy theories do you actually believe in?
    1
  1505.  @KGTheProducer94  Yeah I don’t see what’s so impressive about the quality. $ibrel was probably using a typical news reporter style ENG camera.
    1
  1506.  @KGTheProducer94  👍
    1
  1507. 🤷‍♂️Well I guess that settles it then. Conspiracy.
    1
  1508. It’s obvious you’re a liar.
    1
  1509. 😂👌
    1
  1510. "First, Joe said that there haven’t been any manned moon missions programs recently." I think what he meant was there haven't been any actual moon mission attempts since Apollo. "As for the claim that Earth would appear so large in the window that it wouldn’t fit, so they had to film it from a distance," The claim Bart is making is the crew placed a crop over the window to make the earth look smaller as if they were 1/2 way to the moon. But we don't actually see a physical crop being placed over the window. He simply asserts they did. Furthermore, if the crew was actually in low earth orbit then we would see the landmass and clouds changing as they orbited at 17,000 mph but we don't because they are in fact 1/2 to the moon.
    1
  1511.  @moonfakery  So let me make sure I understand correctly. Your argument is that the Saturn V rockets didn’t have the ability to put men into low earth orbit?
    1
  1512. It wasn't the slam dunk you thought it was. Listen to it again.
    1
  1513.  @sherri2463  If he had answered “yes” would you still feel the same about him?
    1
  1514.  @sherri2463  Fall for what? It was a yes or no question. You’re not making any sense.
    1
  1515.  @sherri2463  Correct. That’s why I asked you, “Fall for what”. These tough questions exist for a reason. It makes a difference whether Hegseth works for the defense industry because of potential conflicts of interest and the impact on public trust.If he joins a defense contractor, it raises concerns about whether his decisions in office were influenced by future job prospects. Even the perception of impropriety can undermine confidence in government institutions. Ethical standards, such as cooling off periods exist to prevent undue influence and ensure officials prioritize national interests over personal gain. Ignoring this issue contradicts principles of transparency and accountability.  Similar restrictions apply to ex-military generals to maintain fairness and consistency. If public trust in decision making is important, then Hegseth’s post-office employment matters. Even without legal violations, ethical considerations remain important. Avoiding the question suggests he may already be considering such employment or does not want to be held accountable for a commitment he may break later. There was no “crap” to fall for. It was a important question.
    1
  1516.  @sherri2463  Did she ask him if he was a General?
    1
  1517.  @sherri2463  OMG is right!!! You finally get it! Good for you 👍
    1
  1518. 😂😂😂
    1
  1519. All governments lie but the six manned moon landings are factual history. Deal with it.
    1
  1520. And Trump?
    1
  1521. So?
    1
  1522. TROLL!!!!
    1
  1523. Who is?
    1
  1524.  @briantitchener4829  Ok, but why can’t they be real astronauts?
    1
  1525. And this one https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?feature=shared
    1
  1526. Wow…so many Trump simps in the comments.
    1
  1527. Except the guest lied about his evidence. https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=0shzVNWLiei2clUl
    1
  1528. Proof?
    1
  1529. No, there isn’t 😂
    1
  1530. Go back to school, David.
    1
  1531.  @lostman1ful  Right, right. What’s taking so long for the MILLIONS of credentialed mechanical engineers, physicists, geologists, scientists, astronomers, cinematographers, pro-photographers, aerospace engineers, computer engineers and doctors who have NO PROBLEM with the Apollo landings to wake up??
    1
  1532. No! Go back to sleep.
    1
  1533. Tyson vs. Dubay? They’ve never debated each other. Your comment is still there.
    1
  1534. Proof?
    1
  1535. “the kind that explode and don't look like planes” Translation: “I have no fuck!ng clue. I just made that sh!t up.”  @ChrisRaucci 
    1
  1536. "a little mad and cranky there aren't we?" No. That's literally what you were thinking when you read MFitz's question but didn't have an immediate answer. "Also it was a tomahawk missle, you're welcome" Ok, great. What type of Tomahawk? There are several kinds. Provide credible evidence and explain how it took out several traffic light poles. @ChrisRaucci 
    1
  1537. Ah, projection and gas-lighting. Right on queue. Meanwhile you STILL haven't provided the type of cruise missile used, the credible evidence for it and how it managed to knock down muliple light poles. Do better and don't forget to include facts.
    1
  1538. Good for him.
    1
  1539. The US landed on the moon six times. Facts.
    1
  1540.  @jimrocket3452 Whatever he’s doing, conning or grifting, it doesn’t matter. Bottom line…He’s lying.
    1
  1541.  @jimrocket3452  Which government is lying? The Apollo moon landings took the cooperation of several governments.
    1
  1542. ❓
    1
  1543. “ain’t gone nowhere up” Care to elaborate? But before you do, If you’re a flat-earther then have the damn courage to admit it.
    1
  1544.  @chiwaled  So when you said, “ain’t gone nowhere up” you mean only to the moon?
    1
  1545.  @chiwaled  What did you mean by “ain’t gone nowhere up”?
    1
  1546. Nope. Next?
    1
  1547. Maybe if you derp-heads had an ACTUAL ARGUMENT for once in your life we wouldn’t have to “attack you”. But you’ve never been able to come up with any solid evidence for your case. Your “gut feelings” is NOT evidence. Your ignorance of facts and personal incredulity is NOT evidence yet you persist. So, the only thing left to do is ridicule you to no end.
    1
  1548. 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video as well. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material have been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world, showing chemical signs of originating from the Moon. 4. The LRRR (Laser Retroreflector Arrays) left by Apollo 11 and other subsequent Apollo missions can still be interacted with today using sufficiently powerful lasers from Earth. 5. The SELENE photos show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang’e 2 photos show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2 managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory observed Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observed Apollo missions during their return coast to Earth and produced live television pictures, which were broadcast to U.S. West Coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco. 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages from the lunar vehicles and not to them, because the Earth was between him and Houston. Also, backyard amateurs around the world were able to tune in to the Apollo audio (not the video—that would have required bigger hardware—but the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi antennas and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds, or maybe thousands, of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, which monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, had its leader, Vasily Mishin, describe in an interview for the article “The Moon Programme That Faltered” how the Soviet Moon program dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to remain silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud highlights the implausibility of conspiracy theories. 14. In October–November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon’s surface by all Apollo landing missions, excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and transmitter power outputs (20 W) were in agreement with NASA reports. 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images provide some of the most effective proof to date rebutting the “landing hoax” theories. Although this probe was launched by NASA, the camera and image interpretation are managed by an academic group—the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University—along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center in Berlin, are outside the U.S. and are not funded by the U.S. government. 16. After these images were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher-resolution imaging. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at a higher resolution. 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent, compared to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site, shows an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts at all Apollo landing sites. The exception is Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin’s account of the flag being blown over by the lander’s rocket exhaust upon departure from the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia accounted for two-thirds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world, including those of adversarial nations, used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. More information can be found on MIT’s website. The tracking was accurate to within one mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time and used it to photograph the S-IVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned miles, making them visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (which behaved similarly). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent to the lunar surface by monitoring the Doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  1549. It’s not about exercising free speech. It’s about determining whether or not a man who glorifies convicted criminals by helping produce a song is qualified enough to be head of the FBI.
    1
  1550. Was a plane. There’s no credible evidence for a missile.
    1
  1551.  @Darlene-r8d Who proved it was a missile?
    1
  1552. ”Science”. Great. Can you point to the scientific consensus that proved it was a missile? And give the type of missile used? “plus the critical thinking mind knows it was a missile.” Circular reasoning fallacy. Your statement doesn't provide any independent evidence or reasoning to support the claim that a missile hit the Pentagon. Instead, it relies on the assumption that those with "critical thinking minds" already accept the conclusion without presenting any substantive evidence. “The proof is in the event itself.” More circular reasoning. “A 757 is incapable of achieving the Pentagon flight path.” How so? Be specific and provide only facts. “A 757 flown by Hanjour is ridiculous!” Because you say so?   @Darlene-r8d 
    1
  1553. "I haven't provided any evidence?" Correct. "The government narrative is so far fetched that only a fool would believe it." Argument from incredulity fallacy. "The evidence is in the impossibility of the government narrative." Ok? You still haven't explained how it's impossible. You keep going in circles. You ---> "It's impossible because the evidence says it's impossible" "A made for the Pentagon mission only, one of a kind, bunker busting cruise missile." Evidence? "Brought to us by the, "Military Industrial Complex". Which, is the only organization in the world capable of achieving, "911"" Evidence? @Darlene-r8d 
    1
  1554. "Because, you don't know what you're talking about!" Then prove me wrong or shut tf up.  @Darlene-r8d 
    1
  1555. It took you 9 days to repeat the same lie? You’re pathetic. 😂 Do better. Give up.
    1
  1556. Who won the 2020 election?
    1
  1557. The LRO has photographed the junk left on the moon.
    1
  1558.  @TyourieParker  No real footage? Lmao! Dude, there’s a TON of real footage right here on YT. What’s your excuse for not seeing it?
    1
  1559. Point yourself to it. Type in the search bar, “Apollo EVA footage”. Done!  @TyourieParker 
    1
  1560. “There is ZERO proofs of the moon landing other then footage…” Landings. Not landing.  Apollo proof: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the moon landing missions. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.  Your argument: “The proof it’s fake is the footage itself” No, that’s not proof. Want to try again?  @lostmymarbles9151 
    1
  1561. Seen it. And?
    1
  1562. Oh shu tf up. Who the hell are you?
    1
  1563. ???
    1
  1564. Check the news.
    1
  1565. Zoom bleaching.
    1
  1566. The comments LOADED Trump sycophants. Be careful my friend. We’re outnumbered.
    1
  1567.  @shillhunter4380  <—— ⚠FLAT EARTH ID!OT ALERT⚠
    1
  1568. F+CK YEAH! CAPS LOCK!!!
    1
  1569. Oops! You posted in the wrong video, turnip-brains. Do better!
    1
  1570. Ok. Don’t forget to send Trump money to help pay for his multi-million dollar judgements 😂 @lordtrump8126 
    1
  1571. What? A space station? You mean orbiting the moon? Why would they need that? They didn’t need one orbiting earth in order to leave earth. Don’t be so WE-TODD-DID.
    1
  1572.  @LilShawtyWood  A fuel station IN SPACE wasn’t required to get TO THE moon. They carried enough fuel for the entire mission in the rocket.
    1
  1573.  @LilShawtyWood  So they’d need a bigger rocket. Ok. How much bigger?
    1
  1574.  @LilShawtyWood  The Saturn V is literally a 3-stage rocket, dumdum.
    1
  1575. If Trump is the best leader then why did he find it necessary to blatantly lie about winning the 2020 election?
    1
  1576.  @RudeDogRanch  How do you know the radiation belts exist?
    1
  1577. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  1578.  @wharrel1914  I’m curious as well.
    1
  1579. ❓
    1
  1580. India's Vikram lander crashed on the moon in 2019.
    1
  1581.  @sshivash  I know what you said. Point is, they failed before they got it right.
    1
  1582.  @sshivash  👍
    1
  1583. Wrong.
    1
  1584. Finally an intelligent comment. Thank you.
    1
  1585. Troll Lmao….
    1
  1586. Not truth. Keep praying.
    1
  1587. He may have been thinking the highest point on earth in terms of from the center of earth. In that case it’s not K1, K2 or Everest. That would be Mount Chimborazo in Ecuador.
    1
  1588. Clearly your education never happened.
    1
  1589. Why don’t we?
    1
  1590.  @claudb5892  The technology wasn’t lost, it’s was decommissioned. The same way Concorde, the SR-71 and Space Shuttle were retired.
    1
  1591.  @Lauritz777  “Does not matter” Yes, that’s what I’m saying.
    1
  1592. Proof?
    1
  1593. So, no proof? Gotcha 👍
    1
  1594. "you can clearly see the object is not over half the height of the building." You can clearly see it is. Notice the vertical tail at 0:05? Now, scroll your screen until the top of the vertical tail touches the top of your brouswer. See how the top of the building lines up with the top tail? They are actually at about the same height which makes sense because the plane is still off the ground.  @madworld4489 
    1
  1595. No follow-up to my last comment ?  @madworld4489 
    1
  1596. Ask Jeebus you imbec!le.
    1
  1597. ❓
    1
  1598. Didn’t show the submission. UFC SUCKS!
    1
  1599. Source for that claim?
    1
  1600. Prove the earth is flat and the moon landings will debunk themselves.
    1
  1601. No, it landed at the South Pole. Nowhere near the Apollo sites.
    1
  1602. You almost had me convinced.
    1
  1603. Stop getting your news from Alex Jones and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
    1
  1604. Because he was deflecting. It was a yes or no question. "Will you not work for a contractor for 10 years after you leave?" YES or NO.
    1
  1605. How come we never hear from experts who would agree with you?
    1
  1606. Nope.
    1
  1607. Proof? @fusion82 
    1
  1608. When did you start making spurious characterizations?
    1
  1609. The man in the video didn't mention a firmament.
    1
  1610.  @susanchappell796  "correct. But he did mention that they can’t get passed a certain point." He's wrong and so is your 3000-year old book.
    1
  1611. I hope you get over it.
    1
  1612. ❓
    1
  1613. Troll
    1
  1614. “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    1
  1615.  @daryllect6659  If you can't prove a negative then try disproving a positive - that they were there. The burden of proof typically lies with the claim that contradicts established facts. If you have specific evidence or arguments against the lunar landings, I'd be interested in hearing them.
    1
  1616. Because they didn’t know it at the time.
    1
  1617. Must be ,,conspuracee’ 🙄
    1
  1618.  @Fotografiaastronomia  1.3 seconds delay each way. The delay is only heard on one side because the conversation is being recorded in Houston. In other words after the astronauts speak Mission Control can answer right away. But if Mission Control asks a question they must wait at least 2.6 seconds before receiving a response.
    1
  1619.  @russelllayne8908  <----🤡
    1
  1620. Jumping out of his seat and running out the door wouldn’t have changed what happened. He handed it well.
    1
  1621. Can you prove he was “in on it” with direct evidence? Or are you just running your mouth like everyone else?  @kyodizzy 
    1
  1622. Oops! You forgot to bring evidence,
    1
  1623. The gravity is 1/6 of Earths yet he still has the same strength. That is how he can push off the ground so easily.
    1
  1624.  @brucegoodall3794 Notice how you ran like a lil bish? 😂
    1
  1625.  @littlered7820  “You shld know this by now.” I’m sorry. Y-T blocked the first part of your comment so I have no idea what you typed.
    1
  1626. Ok?
    1
  1627. The federal government wants to expedite the replacement bridge and not wait on what could take months to resolve in court of who is ultimately responsible.
    1
  1628. 🥱
    1
  1629. So what’s fishy about the moon landings? Note “landings” not “landing.”
    1
  1630.  @Vizerantius  Why are you saying moon landing in the singular sense? There were six manned landings in total backed by a mountain of evidence.
    1
  1631. 👍
    1
  1632. Schiff has never stated he was against defunding the police, @sshole. Stop getting your news from Marjorie Taylor Greene and Alex Jones.
    1
  1633. Which government?
    1
  1634.  @DeborahJacobus Stop using ,,dah gubbermint lies” cop-outs and stereotypes as an excuse for your ignorance and incredulity.
    1
  1635.  @loriwilliams5206  Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  1636. They only believe NASA and the ,,gubemint” when they think their statements support them.
    1
  1637. Trump’s rhetoric made it sound like that’s all democrats cared about. That was clearly false, but those who were on the fence about who to vote for believed his lie anyway.
    1
  1638. Gravity of moon!
    1
  1639.  @spidey5324  Go back to sleep. Men landed on the moon six times.
    1
  1640. Seek psychiatric treatment
    1
  1641. Prove it 😂
    1
  1642. For likes, subs, comments and ultimately 💰
    1
  1643. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    1
  1644. Flat earther?
    1
  1645.  @shillhunter4380  <—— ⚠FLAT EARTH ID!OT ALERT⚠
    1
  1646. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    1
  1647.  @shillhunter4380  <—— ⚠FLAT EARTH ID!OT ALERT⚠
    1
  1648. 🙄 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  1649. ❌
    1
  1650. What’s real is that Trump lied about winning the 2020 election and has perpetuated that lie to this day. Why should we respect him for doing that?
    1
  1651. Why do you lie?
    1
  1652. ?
    1
  1653. 😂🤣🤦‍♂
    1
  1654. No that doesn’t make it a lie.
    1
  1655. Trump was an awful president. He miss-managed covid—19 which contributed to the highest infection and mortality rate per capita than any other country. Trump is a twice impeached president, a proven liar, con-man, thief and convicted felon who inspired a mob to attack the capitol. He has completely divided the country with his lies and half of the voters who just put him back in power don’t give a damn.
    1
  1656. No it wasn’t. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
    1
  1657. The moons South Pole? True.
    1
  1658.  @pmodrat  "two days" Let us know when you want to be serious.
    1
  1659. Are you kidding me? He sounds like a kid.
    1
  1660. @ Not yet.
    1
  1661. Get yourself into rehab, son.
    1
  1662. Not sure why there isn’t an footage but I guess it really doesn’t matter. We have excellent of Apollo astronauts landing on the moon and excellent footage of Perseverance landing on Mars. So, having footage of the IM-1 landing would probably not be that impressive anyway.
    1
  1663. “and trust me I know we didn’t go to the moon” We trust you bro!!!
    1
  1664. Except it's not a lie.
    1
  1665. They saw the earth from the moon.
    1
  1666. Dog
    1
  1667. The port anchor didn’t help. You need a good amount of lead on the anchor before it will set properly.
    1
  1668. Liar! Nobody knew the plane’s intended target or that it was even going to be deliberately crashed into the Pentagon. And it wasn’t in the air for hours. How do you live with yourself being this dishonest?
    1
  1669. “Either they landed on the moon and they don't want us to see what or whos really on there, or they didn't land there at all.” Now think about that. If they were trying to hide something on the moon why would they go through the trouble of even publicly announcing that they were going to land a probe on the moon? Why not just be silent about the whole thing?
    1
  1670. Blank stares? That’s a lie.
    1
  1671. Your inability to see through bs is EPIC.
    1
  1672. Facts don’t rely on belief. Sorry.
    1
  1673.  @Swordsman77  A fact is a true statement about something or someone. You can find a list of third party evidence that supports the Apollo landslide on Wikipedia
    1
  1674. Ohh wowwwwww, must be ,,conspuracee”
    1
  1675.  @frankfleming1103  They are jumping higher than they would on earth. If they tried jumping with 180 pounds of gear (spacesuit and backpack) they wouldn’t even leave the ground on earth. Also, HOW DO YOU KNOW they are giving it their best effort?
    1
  1676. “The Intuitive Machines 1 (IM-1, TO2-IM) mission objective is to place a NOVA-C lander, called Odysseus, at crater Malapert A near the south pole of the Moon. The commercially built lander carries five NASA payloads and commercial cargo. The scientific objectives of the mission include studies of plume-surface interactions, radio astronomy, and space weather interactions with the lunar surface.”
    1
  1677. You’re an id!ot.
    1
  1678. https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=UFeceiiDIb77jJhi
    1
  1679. 👍
    1
  1680. Forgot to say that I didn't know outside links were allowed. They almost always blocked on other videos.
    1
  1681. And therein lies your problem, personal incredulity. Reality is under no obligation to make sense to you.
    1
  1682. What?
    1
  1683. DEI win.
    1
  1684.  @WiiFan-1300  Easy. Because it’s not. You’re just gullible asf.
    1
  1685. Name the democrats that “rigged” the voting machines.
    1
  1686. Careful now. Your ignorance and photo are on public display.
    1
  1687. I studied the GE pictures. They match up perfectly with the photos taken by the astronauts. Thanks for confirming the moon landings 👍 CGI in 1969 to 1972 was laughable and nowhere even close to the Apollo footage. Thanks for ruling out CGI 👍 Lost technology? The Artemis program proves you wrong. Thanks for confirming they still have the technology 👍 @enriqueramireze8288 
    1
  1688. Nobody cares what you think.
    1
  1689. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  1690. No we don’t. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    1
  1691. False.
    1
  1692.  @DarrenJames-h3p  Spot on! 👏
    1
  1693. Funny how you know but nobody else does.
    1
  1694. 😂👌
    1
  1695. Go back to sleep, kid.
    1
  1696. Tugboats are only used to get a ship underway. After that the ship is in its own.
    1
  1697. Who won the 2020 election?
    1
  1698. Man….you flatwits are desperate for evidence 🤡
    1
  1699. Nobody cares that you don’t believe it.
    1
  1700.  @sailorman8668  The comments are littered with them 🤪
    1
  1701. Did happen. Six times. Get over it.
    1
  1702. ❌
    1
  1703. ⁠ @Karlrainer Yes, I agree.
    1
  1704. 🤦‍♂
    1
  1705. Those silly conspiracists don’t realize that the ship was enough to take out the bridge?
    1
  1706. Understandable. They're sick and tired of getting caught in fishing lines.
    1
  1707.  @DODCIAworksforUK  He’s a moon derp just like you but sometimes his replies seem like he isn’t. He’s on your side— the mentally disabled.
    1
  1708. Them? It was unmanned.
    1
  1709.  @Henry3dev  There footage of the falcon rocket launch that carried IM-1.
    1
  1710. 💁‍♂️They are investigating it immediately
    1
  1711. What country are you in?
    1
  1712. 1. It’s not the same thing. 50+ years ago men walked on the moon. 2. More money than the Apollo missions? Yeah right 😂
    1
  1713. Loaded question.
    1
  1714. Nope. Next?
    1
  1715. 1. Personal incredulity is not a valid argument. 2. They didn't record anything in HD.
    1
  1716.  @andrewworth7574  “looks like my comment is only visible in newest, so they may not be seeing it.” They’re not very good trolls if they don’t know by now that you should always sort comments by newest first.
    1
  1717. Never trust a guy with slick-backed hair.
    1
  1718. Proof or go home 😊
    1
  1719. Exactly. It’s not a man. It’s an aircraft.
    1
  1720.  @jarednelson6645 What kind of missile? Also, the video was shot at 1 fps. Slowing down the video does nothing.
    1
  1721.  @jarednelson6645  Originally posted by @Mfitz “The above video was shot on 2 low res parking lot cameras with short focus. The plane won’t jump out at you. It takes a little effort to make out what you are seeing. The footage was shot using 2 identical co-located parking lot entry gate cameras with a fish-eye lens to widen the view at the short ranges the cameras were intended to capture. Each camera was focused at about 10-15 feet and shooting at just 1 fps. It is NOT continuous video (which is shot at 60 fps or better) so don’t expect continuous video. The target is roughly 800 feet away and moving at 462 knots, which means it travels about 775 feet between frames. You can see the target by pausing at 0:05 for the 1st camera and 1:32 for the 2nd. There is just one frame per camera, the target is far away and not in focus. At 0:05 the aircraft is partially obscured by the parking lot ticket post on the right side of the frame. The nose, top of the fuselage and vertical tail are visible around the obstacle, as is the spiral smoke trail from the damaged left engine behind the aircraft. At 1:32 the entire aircraft is visible, easiest to spot by following the smoke trail from left to right until it stops. That’s the airplane Personally, I always found it easier to watch for the doppler. Compare the frame before and look for what isn’t there. Have two tabs open and bounce back and forth between them. If you still can’t work it out then this video should help: youtube.com/watch?v=hixQ3zc2Bho&t=293s&ab_channel=Doll1789MarshallDhody Then of course there is the mountain of other evidence,… which you seem to be ignoring. For,…. reasons… We know Flight 77 hit the Pentagon because of ALL of the following true and relevant facts, not because of one random anomaly. When complied together, all of these true and relevant facts form a single inescapable conclusion; 1. Witnesses: Local and national media published or broadcast the accounts of ALL of whom reported a plane hit the Pentagon, while no witnesses reported seeing anything else (ie: none saw a missile). Around 2 dozen witnesses could identify either the aircraft type, the airline or both. 2. Flight Path: On its way in, Flight 77 created a damage path (the tree hit by the left engine, the 5 light poles, the garden wall on the Pentagon lawn and the mobile diesel generator) which is consistent with an aircraft the dimensions and layout of a Boeing 757. No missile could do any of that. 3. Impact Hole: The impact hole in the outside wall of E-Ring at Wedge 1 of the Pentagon matches in size and shape the Boeing 757 from engine to engine. Wing impact marks extend out on either side of that to the span of a 757. 4. Building Damage: The damage path inside the Pentagon takes the shape of an inverted cone, with over 80 support columns all of them bent in the direction of travel. This is consistent with the high speed impact of a Boeing 757 aircraft and NOT the high-explosive blast warhead of any missile. 5. Aircraft Wreckage: 19 tons of B757 wreckage were recovered at the Pentagon crash site including the landing gear, both engines, the entire left wing flap assembly, part of the cockpit, seats (some still occupied), landing gear bay doors, fuselage sections, the Flight Data and Cockpit Voice Recorders for Flight 77, etc, etc,... youtube.com/watch?v=kCRuVNgrAAw&ab_channel=cjnewson88 6. Two parking lot security camera videos from the north parking lot security booth captured images of a B757 sized aircraft in AA livery flying along the exact flight path of Flight 77 and at the same velocity recorded by its FDR. The aircraft was trailing smoke from the right engine due to hitting the aforementioned tree moments earlier as confirmed by several witnesses. 7. Human remains: The remains of everyone aboard Flight 77 were recovered and identified with the exception of 1 infant whose remains could not be identified. Some victims were recovered still strapped in their seats. Each of the victims families were provided with a detailed autopsy report. 8. Personal Effects: Several thousand personal items belonging to persons aboard Flight 77 were recovered at the crash site at the Pentagon with the victims families being provided with a 1,000+ page book detailing every item for identification and return. 9. Radar: A total of 6 FAA and NORAD radar sites tracked Flight 77 from take off to impact. The radar data matches EXACTLY the 25 hours of flight data recovered from Flight 77’s recovered FDR, right down to the last decimal. youtube.com/watch?v=3vqDDlS9Hyw&t=6s&ab_channel=cjnewson88 10. Insurance: American Airlines and its insurers accepted responsibility, admitting Flight 77 crashed at the Pentagon and subsequently paid out tens of millions of dollars in damages. 11. Boeing; The good folks at Boeing confirmed it was a Boeing 757 and specifically Flight 77 which hit the Pentagon. 12. Where is Flight 77? It is a fact that Flight 77 never landed anywhere, nor has anyone aboard been seen or heard from since 77 crashed into the Pentagon. 13. Even if the 9/11 attacks were an inside job, Flight 77 still hit the Pentagon and the above true facts are still true facts. “9/11 was an inside job” does not mean “flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon”, because,… 14. Pilot Skill: Hani Hanjour was a crap pilot and his flight path proves it. But he was grossly over-qualified to crash a plane – something anyone can do. A number of Hanjour’s instructors are on record stating that while he was not a good pilot, they have no doubt he crashed Flight 77 into the Pentagon. The conspiracy types always leave that part out. 15. When staging an attack that absolutely has to use planes, you use planes Common sense. All of the above is true no matter who planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks or why - which I know will be seen as a blasphemy by many reading this. Now you know. If you can do better then by all means, have at it. I am open to any more plausible alternative as to what hit the Pentagon using ALL of the available evidence while relying on fewer unproven assumptions than what I outlined above. Go ahead, be the first to even try. Since no one ever does, and you probably just shit your pants and ran away as soon as you saw this anyway, it’s been nice knowing you.”
    1
  1722. Prove it.
    1
  1723. Potential to do what?
    1
  1724. Why would you have doubts?
    1
  1725. When did that debate happen?
    1
  1726.  @jordansmith2461  “Sam refuses to debate him.” Oh, ok. You made it sound like they already had a debate. “what the fuck gives him the right to speak on Islam... ” What do you mean? Is he not entitled to his opinions on religion?
    1
  1727.  @jordansmith2461  Well to be fair, Sam Harris has never claimed to be an expert in any study that he’s not an expert on.
    1
  1728. No.
    1
  1729. Your third sentence was a complete train wreck. Holy sh!t.
    1
  1730. They replicated it 5 times more.
    1
  1731. Stay in school, Cameron.
    1
  1732.  @concilium1  Who won the 2020 election?
    1
  1733. America voted for a man knowing he is a proven liar with no honor and integrity. That’s a sad state of affairs.
    1
  1734. What does belief have to do with facts?
    1
  1735. Proof?
    1
  1736. Ok so no proof then just your personal feelings. Gotcha.
    1
  1737. @StayPositive-sd8op Typically, the channel span (the center) has the most clearance and is has the greatest water depth to handle these large ships.
    1
  1738. @StayPositive-sd8op Many of these larger bridges that ships pass under have a fender system which is a line of “dolphins” that extends out perpendicular from the support columns and are angled back at the far ends. This helps to guide a ship that might veer towards the support columns.
    1
  1739.  @itsamazeofmirrors  If they were on wires then why did they fall so much?
    1
  1740. You posted in the wrong video.
    1
  1741.  @paulabevan  “Technology said they did not go.” Please elaborate. What specific technology was lacking?
    1
  1742. Right, right. Well all just listen to you, a YouTube nobody.
    1
  1743. The usual AMATEUR arguments long ago signed, sealed and filed under ‘DEBUNKED’. You must be new at this. Which moon hoax video did you just finish watching? Lmfao!
    1
  1744.  @MMAproAtGOLF  “NASA people are jabbed” Refusing to get your jabs doesn’t make you special and it doesn’t mean you’re smarter than the entire medical community. Grow up.
    1
  1745.  @MMAproAtGOLF  No, it doesn't. Stop getting your news from Marjorie Taylor Greene, MMA fighters and other members of the lunatic fringe.
    1
  1746.  @Colonel-Rayy  Proof we landed on the moon 👇 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the moon landing missions. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  1747.  @Colonel-Rayy  Hah! Digging deep through the comments are ya? No worries. Your account will be long deleted in two years anyway. Troll. Lmao...
    1
  1748. It reversed because it had veered towards the substructure of the bridge.
    1
  1749. Why are you waiting? I thought you numbskulls had evidence?
    1
  1750. But he lied about his evidence https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=Rx7JTAP8q6cKi_cQ
    1
  1751. He was laughing at Hegseth. I was too.
    1
  1752. SURVEY SAYS! ❌❌❌
    1
  1753. 🤦‍♂
    1
  1754. “The ablative heat shield on the Apollo command module was made of a material called Avcoat. Avcoat is a type of ablative material composed of epoxy resin with phenolic microballoons and silica fillers.”
    1
  1755.  @paulbeardsley4095  Another dumb one I keep hearing is, “You must be a Democrat”, as if only Democrats accept the Apollo landings. 🤦‍♂
    1
  1756. Yes it’s a UFO (unidentified flying object) which doesn’t mean aliens.
    1
  1757. Well first of all, Sibrel contradicts himself. He claims they used a model of the earth which would indicate they were in a studio but he also claims they were really in low earth orbit and simply placed a crop over the window to make the earth look small like they were halfway to the moon. So which is it? He can’t get his story straight. The answer is, it doesn’t matter because he’s lying either way. He provides no evidence for a model or crop. He simply asserts the ideas and expects you to believe him. Btw, the moon landings (note use of plural) are factual history. The consilience of evidence overwhelmingly supports them.
    1
  1758. ❓
    1
  1759. 🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗
    1
  1760. Oh, ffs! This was hardly a "Gotcha Moment". She knows he's not a General. This was just another blatant refusal to question because he's knows the answer is, YES.
    1
  1761. Prove it, @sswipe.
    1
  1762. Why?
    1
  1763. Ok, we’ll believe you instead.
    1
  1764.  @rakeshbu7574  How does watching the footage alone reveal the ship was hacked?
    1
  1765. Proof or $hut tf up.
    1
  1766. Proof or SHTFU 😊
    1
  1767. You’re kind of stup!d aren’t you?  @mfitz1969. 
    1
  1768. Sh!t happens.
    1
  1769. Ok, you go tell ‘em 👍 @Rocky-xx2zg 
    1
  1770.  @Thatsong-fr9nq  Proof?
    1
  1771. Wrong. It was lunar morning the entire time.
    1
  1772.  @Thatsong-fr9nq  Ok, so no proof. Thanks.
    1
  1773. dur da dur!!!
    1
  1774. You ‘tuner’ guys are dumb asf.
    1
  1775. No. They crashed it instead of landing it like you normally would. No math involved.
    1
  1776. No, he didn’t lie dude 😂 The Mueller Report did not find clear evidence of criminal conspiracy or "collusion" between Trump and Russia, but it did document significant Russian interference in the election and various efforts by Trump’s campaign team to engage with Russian officials.
    1
  1777. “also how do you call 📞 the moon 🌖 “ By running an extremely long phone line.  Seriously though, you couldn’t figure that one out?
    1
  1778. “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    1
  1779. Yes. On the moon. Next?
    1
  1780. Not giving Trump a fair chance? Why should a proven liar who claims to this day that he won the 2020 election and who inspired a mob to attack the capitol in order to stop the certification be given a fair chance?
    1
  1781. Relax. It’s just a figure of speech to make it seem more dramatic.
    1
  1782. Your first two points contradict each other. The rest is lies and baseless claims.
    1
  1783. Good. Then I won’t have to try and decipher any of your bs.  @Darlene-r8d 
    1
  1784. Because I don’t. Why are you digging up 2-week old threads?  @patrikpass2962 
    1
  1785. Flat earth is just a dumb scam on YT invented by con men who make a living fleecing gullible rubes like you.  1. No, it’s not biblical and even if it was, it’s STILL WRONG.  2. Yeah, we KNOW flat earth is a huge lie. That’s why so many believe it.  3. Water bends all day long. Water is an inanimate substance. It doesn’t seek anything. What’s wrong with you that you can’t figure that out?
    1
  1786. Intuitive Machines.
    1
  1787. Prove it.
    1
  1788.  @dr.edsozfamilytravel  What’s the matter? You don’t have PROOF so you resort to fallacies? That’s typical. What we’re doing TODAY in space has nothing to do with events that happened 50 years ago. Future lunar missions will be more ambitious than the Apollo era. Longer lunar missions, pre-staging, different trajectories, larger rockets, heavier payloads, etc. will require MORE fuel. Get it?
    1
  1789. Kash Patel's response appears to be an attempt to downplay his level of involvement. While reports indicate that he co-produced and promoted the song, during this confirmation hearing, he is seemingly trying to distance himself by claiming he did not have direct involvement in its production. He’s not denying that he helped facilitate or support the project in some capacity just that he didn’t have hands-on involvement in the actual recording or musical creation process. At any rate, he is still part of the we. His phrasing is often used in political discourse to create ambiguity about one's role in a controversial matter. His denial likely aims to avoid deeper scrutiny regarding his association with individuals convicted for their roles in the January 6th attack.
    1
  1790. Impossible? Prove it or shut tf up. 😊
    1
  1791. The first half of your post was spot-on but then it got retard3d. No orbit?? What?
    1
  1792. Who won the 2020 election?
    1
  1793. No.
    1
  1794. Kash Patel's response appears to be an attempt to downplay his level of involvement. While reports indicate that he co-produced and promoted the song, during this confirmation hearing, he is seemingly trying to distance himself by claiming he did not have direct involvement in its production. He’s not denying that he helped facilitate or support the project in some capacity just that he didn’t have hands-on involvement in the actual recording or musical creation process. At any rate, he is still part of the we. His phrasing is often used in political discourse to create ambiguity about one's role in a controversial matter. His denial likely aims to avoid deeper scrutiny regarding his association with individuals convicted for their roles in the January 6th attack.
    1
  1795. No. 23,900 is the circumference.
    1
  1796. Proof? No? Why not?
    1
  1797. The only person suffering from TDS is Trump himself.
    1
  1798.  @TheNewEngine  You have a vivid imagination.
    1
  1799. ❓
    1
  1800. Thanks.
    1
  1801. Proof?
    1
  1802. It’s a figure of speech.
    1
  1803.  @patdaveydrums  Maybe to those who aren't familiar with Apollo 13.
    1
  1804.  @MXedits_1 Ask the company that made the lander.
    1
  1805. Ok, so?  @geocentrictruth 
    1
  1806. Iraq had WMD up until 1991, as confirmed by various intelligence reports and investigations, particularly during the Iran-Iraq War and the Gulf War. However, after the Gulf War in 1991, Iraq was subjected to stringent inspections by United Nations weapons inspectors as part of the disarmament process mandated by UN Security Council resolutions. Iraq's cooperation with UN inspectors varied over time. While there were periods of cooperation, there were also instances of non-compliance and obstruction. This inconsistency in cooperation led to ongoing suspicions and concerns regarding Iraq's compliance with disarmament obligations. After 1991 the assessments of Iraq's WMD capabilities were influenced by a range of factors, including intelligence reports, inspections findings, and political considerations. Ultimately, the issue of Iraq's alleged possession of WMD and its cooperation with UN inspectors was one of the key factors that led to the 2003 invasion of Iraq by a coalition of countries, although subsequent investigations found no evidence of active WMD programs in Iraq at the time of the invasion. So in summary there’s no clear evidence that the US lied just so they go to war with Iraq.
    1
  1807.  @bobboonah  “Just point me to the telemetry data for Apollo 11 and I'll concede they definitely happened.” Look up, Apollo 11 Mission Report. All of the flight data (telemetry) can be found in the report. 359 pages.
    1
  1808. @ Yep. Confirmation bias is a b!tch.
    1
  1809.  @bobboonah  Did you look up the report?
    1
  1810.  @bobboonah  I’ll take that as a NO.
    1
  1811.  @bobboonah  No, it wasn’t destroyed. I literally just told you what to search for but I guess your confirmation bias is getting the best you. It’s ok. Happens to every moon Hoaxtard.
    1
  1812.  @bobboonah  No, it wasn’t erased. I literally just told you what to search several posts back. Refusing to acknowledge me or pretending like you can’t see it (while everyone else can see it) just makes you look like a loser.
    1
  1813. You should look for other role models in your life.
    1
  1814.  @boardwalkbw7130  Don’t be stupid.
    1
  1815. Flat earth is just a dumb scam put on YouTube by grifters who make MONEY off gullible rubes like you. What’s wrong with you that you can’t figure that out?
    1
  1816. Lmao! Nobody covered up anything, troll.
    1
  1817. Ah yes, another flat earth id!ot.
    1
  1818. Proof?
    1
  1819. Trump winning means we’re all losers.
    1
  1820.  @hamzak7261  We as in you, me and everyone else. Harris’ position on taxpayer funding for such procedures has been nuanced depending on the context. Harris expressed support for ensuring that incarcerated individuals receive necessary medical care, which aligns with legal precedents regarding the provision of healthcare, including treatments deemed medically necessary by healthcare providers. So basically you got duped by an attack ad that was approved by a man who still claims he won the 2020 election.
    1
  1821.  @hamzak7261  The provision of medically necessary care, including gender-affirming surgery for incarcerated individuals, is rooted in the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits cruuel and unusual punishment. Courts have interpreted this to mean that prisons must provide adequate medical care, and this includes gender dysphoria treatment when deemed necessary by healthcare professionals. This is not about "radical" policies but about compliance with constitutional protections. If Harris made statements comparing her stance to the Trump administrtion, those comments would need to be evaluated in their specific context. Broad accusations like "deranged, psychotic lie" do not contribute to meaningful discourse and ignore the complexities of policy debates and the nuances of what each administration did. The Trump administration did roll back some policies related to transgender rights, but court rulings on prisoner healthcare have consistently upheld the right to medically necessary treatment regardless of the administration. Policies during the Obama administration related to healthcare for transgender prisoners reflected evolving standards in medical care and legal interpretations. These were not about giving "mass murderers" special privileges but ensuring that prisons meet basic healthcare standards as required by law. The claim that Harris "bragged" about packing the Supreme Court and destroying the filibuster is misrepresentative. Those are broader policy debates involving numerous politicians, not personal crusades by Harris. Gun policy debates are also widely contested, and supporting stronger regulations does not make someone a "radical lunatic" but places them within the spectrum of legitimate policy positions. Harris''record includes both progressive and pragmatic policies. example, her criminal justice policies in California were criticized by both progressives and conservatives, suggesting that she occupies a more nuanced political position than the "far-left radical" label suggests. So tell me something. Who won the 2020 election?
    1
  1822. This video show footage before impact.
    1
  1823.  @BooBuKittyPhuk  Gotcha. I can only assume that News channels don’t show the long approach of the ship because it’s a waste of air time. So they cut that out for editorial purposes.
    1
  1824. The piers are surrounded by protective piles but a fender system should have been put in place. A fender system extends out perpendicular to the bridge to deter an off course ship.
    1
  1825. He may have been briefly thinking of the highest point from the center of earth which isn’t Everest and got mixed up.
    1
  1826. Apparently it was added in for effect. That sound is missing from other videos of the same footage.
    1
  1827. Thanks for your opinion.
    1
  1828. ???
    1
  1829.  @jvegas3209  You literally pulled that explanation outta your @ss, didn’t you? 😂
    1
  1830. What does that make Trump?
    1
  1831.  @droc158  Give me an example.
    1
  1832. Go back to sleep, troll.
    1
  1833. False.
    1
  1834. Flat earth id!ot ———> @truthseeker
    1
  1835. So you believe the earth is flat?  @LeftyRighty123 
    1
  1836. Which government created the flat-earth model? @LeftyRighty123 
    1
  1837.  @LeftyRighty123 So you don’t know. That was just some sh!t you made up. Got it.
    1
  1838. There’s no credible evidence to suggest the Apollo photos, videos and telecasts were doctored or faked. Slide film that has been digitally scanned and adjusted for contrast, brightness and sharpness is not considered doctored or faked.
    1
  1839. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  1840.  @Aakhir_A  “We should be buying real estate on the moon presently!” But we’re not and we still landed on the moon six times. Get over it.
    1
  1841. I’d love to see your evidence.
    1
  1842. Wow! You got OWNED! 😂
    1
  1843. Proof?
    1
  1844.  @jmc5335  Sam agrees with Trump’s politics?
    1
  1845.  @jmc5335  I didn’t get that from him.
    1
  1846.  @jmc5335 Who won the 2020 election?
    1
  1847.  @jmc5335  Still trying to figure it out?
    1
  1848.  @jmc5335  Nice deflection.
    1
  1849. Because you said Sam shares Trump’s politics. If he did then he would be claiming Trump won the 2020 election. So, will you answer the question?
    1
  1850. ⁠ @jmc5335 You’re not going to answer the question? Lmao! That doesn’t surprise me. Everyone I’ve posed this question to has either evaded the question or run away completely. Trump’s politics are about LYING so…no, Sam does not share his political views.
    1
  1851.  @jmc5335 Thanks for proving my point, again.
    1
  1852.  @jmc5335  No, my point is you keep deflecting because you’re a coward just like Trump.
    1
  1853. Russians acknowledge the moon landings as legit. As a matter of fact, no foreign government disputes them.
    1
  1854.  @roberthak3695  But in American Moon, they don’t get away with the deception at the end 😂
    1
  1855. The crazies are the one's who put Trump back in office.
    1
  1856. Which one?
    1
  1857. Except he lied https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=afSln0AzHWKtbi15
    1
  1858.  @manilajohn0182  FYI, he doesn’t disagree that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. Just your claim that the Citgo video shows the actual impact.
    1
  1859. A lot of variables at play. You also have to consider the tide. Was it outgoing? We’ll just have to wait for investigation to conclude.
    1
  1860. Trump isn’t solely responsible for the degeneration of American politics. Trump’s just a figurehead. The problem is his tens of millions of supporters. They are ones that have to change. TDS….lol. A meme created to stop conversation.
    1
  1861. Yeah, but the moon landings are legit. Get over it.
    1
  1862.  @StreetTerrorist187  How does time work on the moon?
    1
  1863. He was.
    1
  1864. The “far away camera” you’re referring to was a separate TV camera mounted to the Lunar Rover. Nothing fake about it.
    1
  1865. No evidence for one.
    1
  1866. Dewdrop. If I said, “we went to the store” that means I’m included, You and Patel need to go back to school.
    1
  1867. 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video as well. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material have been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world, showing chemical signs of originating from the Moon. 4. The LRRR (Laser Retroreflector Arrays) left by Apollo 11 and other subsequent Apollo missions can still be interacted with today using sufficiently powerful lasers from Earth. 5. The SELENE photos show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang’e 2 photos show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2 managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory observed Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observed Apollo missions during their return coast to Earth and produced live television pictures, which were broadcast to U.S. West Coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco. 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages from the lunar vehicles and not to them, because the Earth was between him and Houston. Also, backyard amateurs around the world were able to tune in to the Apollo audio (not the video—that would have required bigger hardware—but the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi antennas and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds, or maybe thousands, of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, which monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, had its leader, Vasily Mishin, describe in an interview for the article “The Moon Programme That Faltered” how the Soviet Moon program dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to remain silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud highlights the implausibility of conspiracy theories. 14. In October–November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon’s surface by all Apollo landing missions, excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and transmitter power outputs (20 W) were in agreement with NASA reports. 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images provide some of the most effective proof to date rebutting the “landing hoax” theories. Although this probe was launched by NASA, the camera and image interpretation are managed by an academic group—the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University—along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center in Berlin, are outside the U.S. and are not funded by the U.S. government. 16. After these images were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher-resolution imaging. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at a higher resolution. 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent, compared to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site, shows an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts at all Apollo landing sites. The exception is Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin’s account of the flag being blown over by the lander’s rocket exhaust upon departure from the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia accounted for two-thirds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world, including those of adversarial nations, used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. More information can be found on MIT’s website. The tracking was accurate to within one mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time and used it to photograph the S-IVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned miles, making them visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (which behaved similarly). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent to the lunar surface by monitoring the Doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  1868.  @diomerdadiocan  “Deceitfully trapped him for confrontation? Uhm, what about faking the Moon landing and pretending to be a hero?” Notice how you keep referring to the moon landing in the singular form? There were six moon landings. Aldrin was on the first one. There is no credible evidence that suggests the six manned moon landings were faked. $ibrel is a proven liar, convicted criminal, stalker of astronauts and a con-man who makes a LIVING selling books to gullible rubes like you.
    1
  1869. So you voted for a coward who can’t accept that he lost the 2020 election?
    1
  1870. Tried but charges were dropped.
    1
  1871. @zoesunkid Well, Aldrin was provoked.
    1
  1872. @zoesunkid Do you think Owens bothered to look up any of that?  Hell no.
    1
  1873.  @DavidDavoDavidson  You can’t convincingly fake hours of continuous footage of astronauts walking around in1/6g in a vacuum environment. Not in 1969 and not today.
    1
  1874. Why do fake gods always get the credit?
    1
  1875. *You’re  @Pablo-ot1op 
    1
  1876. The NASA lander sent pics but they’re sideways because the lander tipped over. “That's the sequl of Apollo 16, pathetic.” *Apollo 17. No, Artemis III will be the sequel.
    1
  1877. Ya think??
    1
  1878. No 😂
    1
  1879.  @Shapeshifter1210  Btw, Aldrin is a Korean War veteran who shot down two enemy MiG-15 fighters, earned his PhD in aeronautics from MIT and started training in the Gemini program ALL before Sibrel was ever born. Sibrel is a proven LIAR, convicted criminal, stalker of astronauts and a third-rate filmmaker. You do the math.
    1
  1880. Go back to school, Kwamie.
    1
  1881. Don’t be a r3tard. We know it was a plane.
    1
  1882.  @RollingThunder5880 Here’s an idea. Instead of accusing one man of having multiple accounts try actually presenting some FACTUAL evidence to support your claims. Basically put up or shut tf up.
    1
  1883. Here ya go 😉 Argument from Incredulity Fallacy: The argument from incredulity is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone concludes that since they can’t believe something is true, then it must be false, and vice versa. For example, someone using the argument from incredulity might claim that since they don’t see how a certain scientific theory could be true, then it must be false. It is committed when the arguer presumes that whatever is true must be easy to understand or to imagine. The fallacy seems to be most frequent when the contrasting expert opinions differ from our deeply held beliefs. The fallacy is very commonly found in debates over science. Do better. Learn.   @RollingThunder5880 
    1
  1884. Got Proof? Oh course you don’t. Who am I kidding.
    1
  1885. Aldrin is a Korean War veteran who shot down two enemy MiG-15 fighters, earned his PhD in aeronautics from MIT and started training in the Gemini program ALL before Sibrel was ever born. Sibrel is a proven LIAR, convicted criminal, stalker of astronauts and a third-rate filmmaker. You do the math.
    1
  1886.  @jmc5335  Voters may have believed the economy was bad and went with Trump but they were just grossly misinformed and swayed by stereotypes. “I’m tired of paying $5 for a loaf of bread”…but when you turn on the news and you see airports FILLED with people going to their favorite destinations such as Labor Day for example, then people aren’t really complaining about the price of bread, eggs, milk and gas.
    1
  1887.  @jmc5335 No. Dems lost because more voters put their faith in a proven liar than in a well qualified candidate.
    1
  1888.  @Viralvid2024  Ok. And the other five?
    1
  1889.  @Viralvid2024  All the evidence points to the moon landings being legit. Photo manipulation doesn't necessarily mean a photo is fake.
    1
  1890.  @Viralvid2024  They went back five times. I already mentioned that. The radiation belts are a NASA discovery. So you believe NASA when they tell you the belts exist but you don’t believe NASA when they passed through them? Photos can be manipulated for adjusting contrast, brightness, sharpness, color cast, etc. This doesn’t imply they are faked. Do you have a particular photo in mind? The same mountain appears in different photos because the mountain is very far away. Shadows appear to be going in different directions due to perspective. The guy in video knows this but he’s hoping you won’t. Go outside sometime and see how shadows work. YES, C’mon! You’re presenting all the usual amateur arguments that are easily debunked! FFS!
    1
  1891. 12 men have walked on the moon. Get over it.
    1
  1892. “and it’s pretty obvious that there is definitely better footage but it’s being kept secret all these years.” Do you have good reasons for believing that? Name them.
    1
  1893. Your argument is exactly the same one that flat earthers and moon landing deniers use.  “There used to be videos proving the earth is flat but they’ve all been deleted” “All the videos that prove the moon landings were faked have been taken down” HORSESH!T By the way. This video is from TWO different cameras. And, there are two more cameras, one from the Double tree hotel which show the obvious vertical stabilizer and the shadow of plane from a Citgo gas station camera. https://youtu.be/hywAmUHxBds?si=PDEZf8sB-ASgsh0A But be honest with yourself. Clearer videos aren’t going to change your mind. I mean, we have crystal clear videos of planes crashing into the twin towers and doubters like you who believe they weren’t actually planes but instead holograms. Also, you’re focusing solely on the available videos or lack of quality video and ignoring all the physical evidence that proves AA77 crashed into the pentagon.  @mrDmastr19 
    1
  1894. “Surely if highly skilled pilots couldn't replicate the exact speeds and path taken without crashing that plane…” So then they could have replicated the flight if they had crashed the plane? I ask because Hanjour crashed the plane.
    1
  1895.  @stecrawley6590  Hani Hanjour was a crap pilot and his flight path proves it. But he was grossly over-qualified to crash a plane – something anyone can do. A number of Hanjour’s instructors are on record stating that while he was not a good pilot, they have no doubt he crashed Flight 77 into the Pentagon. The conspiracy types always leave that part out.
    1
  1896. 🤦‍♂
    1
  1897. Nope. Next?
    1
  1898. CGI in 1969? 😂 Even Sibrel is smart enough not to claim CGI and green screen. Here’s what CGI looked like in 1969 https://youtu.be/8FzXL3G0JR0?si=5ax3RudGZo8SAZ0f And green screens don’t allow the actors to walk into the background as seen in the Apollo EVA footage. Also, half of moon landings deniers claim it was filmed in the Nevada desert. So there would no need for a green screen, right? Right.  You’re just a mindless repeater perpetuating lies because you saw it in a YT video.  Do better.  @Muniiks ​
    1
  1899. Confessions are not conclusive proof. Even if you pretend they were actual confessions.
    1
  1900.  @belovedwarrior5961  There was nothing cryptic about anything he said. Conan said he watched them on TV land on the moon. That is false. The approach to the moon and actual landing was not broadcast live. The TV networks used animation so folks watching could understand better of what was happening. This is why Aldrin corrected Conan and said, “You saw animation”. The FIRST STEPS by Armstrong onto the moon was broadcast live.
    1
  1901.  @belovedwarrior5961  https://youtu.be/sJv5_y2l5as?feature=shared
    1
  1902.  @Donrickyrock  India, China and Russia have only sent unmanned probes, rovers, etc. to the moon.
    1
  1903. 1. What’s 130,000 miles away? 2. Probes use gravitational assists from other planets to traverse the solar system. They’re also smaller and require smaller rockets to get them off earth. 3. Musk can try to fake a mars landing but it won’t be convincing.
    1
  1904.  @inky3  Practice what you preach, dawg.
    1
  1905. Yeah, good luck with that. Trump tried to look into “election fraud” and we all know how well that went.
    1
  1906. You’re just regurgitating what you heard in a hoax video. The pilot of the plane obviously made the necessary maneuvers because the plane did hit the building. So…
    1
  1907.  @beyondnow1600  “Well, nasa said them selves that it's currently impossible to go beyond the radiation belts.” No, they haven’t said that. Why are you lying? “Besides you're in a minority now most people know they didn't go to the Moon.” Also false. The majority of people polled around the world accept the Apollo moon landings. “This is my third response to you as yt keep removing my comments.” No, they aren’t. Sort comments by “newest first” then scroll down to find your thread. All of your comments are there. “Nasa has admitted that it is currently impossible to go beyond the radiation belts.” No, they didn’t. You’re still lying. “This is a FACT YOUTUBE so don't remove this, if you do you're in violation of freedom of speech.” YT isn’t removing your comments unless you used vulgar language or tried to post outside links. You just don’t know how to sort comments by “newest first” or you just want to pretend that your comments have some “evidence” that debunks Apollo and YT is covering up for NASA. Also, YT can if they wanted to, delete any comment they please. YT is a private company and doesn’t even have to exist. Therefore, they are not violating your rights.
    1
  1908.  @beyondnow1600  “No those 9 are the ones that they didn't delete.” And they all pretty much say the same thing. So why did you keep reposting the same comment if the 1 of 9 wasn’t deleted?  “The others had much more information in them that yt didn't like.” BS. There weren’t other threads that were removed. You’re just using the same lame excuse that all moon landing deniers use when they have no legitimate argument, “I posted proof but YT keeps deleting it” Liar.
    1
  1909. No. What claims have you heard regarding that?
    1
  1910. @Mcwaffles86 Yeah, that look like a serious channel 🤦‍♂
    1
  1911. And what does make you?
    1
  1912. "She will lose the belt to Natália Silva" Gosh...what will you say if Silva wins but the fight is boring?
    1
  1913.  @viniciusamancio2374  Cool.
    1
  1914. She’s a flat earther, folks. Nuff said.
    1
  1915. Did.
    1
  1916. Because there was no interest.
    1
  1917.  @dansv1  I second that 👍
    1
  1918. Never a yes/no answer. Never.
    1
  1919. Money, purpose and will.
    1
  1920. 🤦‍♂
    1
  1921.  @BwanaFinklestein  Because he makes $$$ from doing it.
    1
  1922.  @BwanaFinklestein  “lol... well, not necessarily convincing... but an answer” He lied when he said NASA accidentally sent him the footage of the Apollo11 crew doing a telecast half-way to the moon which is talking about in this video. That footage has been available to the public for years. He then edited his copy by removing footage at the end in order to suit his agenda – lying by omission.
    1
  1923.  @BwanaFinklestein  “watching the occultation tonight?” No.
    1
  1924. In case you didn’t notice, the guy in the video is not a flat earther.
    1
  1925. One word comment, shouted. The mark of a troll!
    1
  1926. Ask Intuitive Machines why they don’t have a video. But be honest with yourself bro…a video wouldn’t change your mind. You still call it fake.  @astenxxx8930 
    1
  1927. If that’s true why hasn’t Hollywood been able to replicate the footage since?
    1
  1928.  @Liquoricilicious  Try actually following Jesus!  "Sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven" (Matt. 19:21, Luke 18:2), and "Any of you who does not give up everything he has cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14:33).  But Christian hypocrites like you respond, "F– you, Jesus!"
    1
  1929. Who won the 2020 election?
    1
  1930. Let me guess. When Trump takes office?
    1
  1931. NDT has said that he doesn’t debate objective truths. It would be like having a debate if 2+2=4 or if fire is hot. Totally pointless. Dubay won’t even debate other flat earthers who have different beliefs and claims about their model. Dubay will shadow ban you if you post anything that debunks his false reality. Ask him on any of his vids how in December, in Melbourne, the Sun rises 30° south of east and sets 30° south of west. You will instantly be shadow banned.  @LuisHernandez-ph6ji 
    1
  1932. It’s definitely been a rarity up until now.
    1
  1933. Thanks for your opinion.
    1
  1934. ⚠FLAT EARTH ID!OT ALERT ⚠
    1
  1935. Who cares?
    1
  1936. Still waiting for your “proof”.
    1
  1937.  @JRey-re9rl  No you haven’t. Van Allen Belts are a NASA discovery. So you believe NASA that the belts exist but you don’t believe them when they said going through them wasn’t a problem? Explain yourself.
    1
  1938.  @JRey-re9rl  Here’s what the man who discovered the belts had to say. “The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense.” – James A. Van Allen
    1
  1939.  @JRey-re9rl  You said, “Read the posts” Yes, READ THE POSTS. “The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense.” – James A. Van Allen
    1
  1940.  @JRey-re9rl  <— Ran away like a lil bish! 🤣
    1
  1941. Sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings but the earth isn’t flat. Never has been and never will be. Get over it.
    1
  1942. Tugboats are only used to get a ship underway. After that the ship is in its own.
    1
  1943. 1:32 That’s not the nose. It’s the trail of smoke coming out of the starboard engine. None of the hijackers were from Afghanistan.
    1
  1944. They’ve already infiltrated the comments.
    1
  1945. “The ground around the lander for many yards in all directions should have been bare rock.” This can be explained. Look up, “Dunning Kruger Effect”.
    1
  1946. ⚠FLAT EARTH ID!OT ALERT⚠
    1
  1947. Thanks for your opinion.
    1
  1948. Oops! You forgot to bring evidence!
    1
  1949.  @BOBOBOBO2438  Replying 5 months later? Ok 😂 No, this video shows a plane crash and nothing more.
    1
  1950.  @BOBOBOBO2438  You have to put some work into it. This will help https://youtu.be/YVDdjLQkUV8?feature=shared The white thing is smoke trailing from the starboard engine. The black box was recovered by investigators.
    1
  1951. Why do you lie so much?
    1
  1952. Stop doing hat.  @dii_ea 
    1
  1953.  @dii_ea  Liars get reported. 😊
    1
  1954. Kash Patel's response appears to be an attempt to downplay his level of involvement. While reports indicate that he co-produced and promoted the song, during this confirmation hearing, he is seemingly trying to distance himself by claiming he did not have direct involvement in its production. He’s not denying that he helped facilitate or support the project in some capacity just that he didn’t have hands-on involvement in the actual recording or musical creation process. At any rate, he is still part of the we. His phrasing is often used in political discourse to create ambiguity about one's role in a controversial matter. His denial likely aims to avoid deeper scrutiny regarding his association with individuals convicted for their roles in the January 6th attack.
    1
  1955.  @dustymojave  Spreading disinformation gets you reported, champ.
    1
  1956. 🙄
    1
  1957. Proof?
    1
  1958. Flat earther?
    1
  1959. Hundreds of hours of footage was made during the nine Apollo lunar missions.
    1
  1960. Are you referring to Apollo 17 where they used duct tape to repair a fender on the Lunar Rover?
    1
  1961. “I refuse to believe that a fucking convenience store back then had more surveillance cameras, hidden or otherwise, than a fortified government compound.” Good, because it didn’t. “You're telling me that they only had one shitty camera from the 70s that ran at stop motion speeds watching that side of the building?” Two cameras and they weren’t designed to watch the building. They were put there to watch vehicles coming in and out of a parking lot.
    1
  1962. That’s great. Now all you have to do is prove how the lack of video from this “roof camera over the hole” unequivocally proves it wasn’t a plane.  @shillhunter4380 
    1
  1963. Oh goodness…you presented a strawman. Want to try that again? How does the lack of video from a camera (any camera) prove it was a plane?  @shillhunter4380 
    1
  1964. The buybull also says donkeys and snakes can talk and that some men lived to be 900 years old.
    1
  1965. Proof?
    1
  1966. ❓
    1
  1967. And Trump is?
    1
  1968. They were all within roughly 90 mph of each other.
    1
  1969. No.
    1
  1970.  @tedkezio567  Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  1971. What?
    1
  1972. Why did $ibrel lie about his evidence? https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=p6O1ec4CHOlB-AiP
    1
  1973. “Because the charges surrounding Trump everyone knew were fraudulent.” Which charges?
    1
  1974. Incredulity is not a valid argument.
    1
  1975. Planes came from the outside.
    1
  1976. I’d LOVE to see your evidence that it was intentional.
    1
  1977.  @swflscratcher5893  You STILL haven’t provided evidence of intentionality. And I’m sorry but you can’t judge how far off-course the ship is in this video. You need to be looking from a higher elevation to get a better sense of its alignment prior to it losing propulsion. The angle of the video is too skewed to see it’s true alignment.
    1
  1978.  @swflscratcher5893  “yes I have” No you haven’t. Your argument is simply, “The ship shouldn’t have been that close therefore this was intentional”. Do you understand how burden of proof works? You need to show that the person steering the ship intentionally went off course in order to hit the bridge. If you can’t meet this requirement then don’t bother replying back and wasting my time.
    1
  1979. Nope.
    1
  1980.  @Ciprian-lb1gn  No!
    1
  1981.  @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я  If they're suspended from ropes then why are they falling so much?
    1
  1982.  @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я  Probably? So in other words you don't actually know? You just want to assert they have ropes and pretend it's a fact?
    1
  1983. The security camera recorded the footage at only 1 fps. Slowing the video down to 0.25 speed means 1 frame every 4 seconds. That literally does nothing.
    1
  1984. Wrong.
    1
  1985. And you know this how? By going from post to post? 😉 @mickmuffin4345 
    1
  1986. Describe “they locked us down”.
    1
  1987.  @jludo Why is that?
    1
  1988.  @betacuck3145  Biden and Harris didn't lie about winning a national election. Trump did, and has perpetuated that lie to this day. No Trump supporter has been able to address this fact.
    1
  1989.  @andrewworth7574  Americans
    1
  1990. What?
    1
  1991. Trump didn’t pardon him.
    1
  1992. Go back to sleep, kid.
    1
  1993. Try forming a coherent sentence if you want to be taken seriously.
    1
  1994.  @danid7472  Exactly. This ain’t high school. So talk like an adult now that you’re grown. 💯
    1
  1995.  @MetalDeathHead  If I’m a weirdo what does that make you?
    1
  1996. Racial bias has been a recurring issue in Fred and Donald Trump's businesses. Fred Trump faced legal actions in the 1970s when the U.S. Department of Justice accused him of discriminating against Black tenants in his properties, refusing to rent to them and using codedd language to enforce racial segregation. Donald Trump continued in his father’s legacy in his own business ventures. In the 1980s, his casinos and hotels were sued for racial discrimination, including allegations of hiring practices that favored white employees and denied opportunities to people of color. Despite efforts to deny these claims, both Trumps have faced criticism for their involvement in business practices that appear to favor white people over minorities.
    1
  1997. What does that make Trump?
    1
  1998.  @stuartsloan  <— Dude is too embarrassed to admit he voted for a proven liar so he runs away like a lil bish 🤣
    1
  1999.  @imdaedalus  Fixed it for you, Mr. Smarty Pants. 😉
    1
  2000. Wrong video.
    1
  2001. If he’s right then why did he lie about his evidence? https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=p6O1ec4CHOlB-AiP
    1
  2002. Yep, he lied. Don’t be in denial. https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=SuHmHsCBZ2F9xp23 @Die-sel13136 
    1
  2003. Nah. Real alpha males show strength and great leadership and they don’t lie about winning Presidential elections.
    1
  2004. Doesn’t look like it fell straight down to me. What are you implying?
    1
  2005. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    1
  2006. The video CLEARLY states it’s a simulation, dim dim.
    1
  2007.  @ThankthemosthighGod  What seems to be the problem? Just because they didn’t have an actual video of the landing doesn’t mean the landing didn’t happen.
    1
  2008.  @ThankthemosthighGod  We have REAL footage of the six manned Apollo Lunar missions and people in your camp still deny their authenticity. Be honest with yourself. If an actual video of IM-1 was available you’d find a reason to call it fake.
    1
  2009. Tell me more about your “ability” to see the BS. I’d love to hear how you’re ssoo much smarter than the millions of physicists, engineers, scientists, astronomers, geologists, pro-photographers, cinematographers, doctors, etc. WORLDWIDE who were apparently too stup!d over the last half century to spot not one fake but six. In the meantime here’s the proof that men have walked on the moon.  1. There are over 8,000 photosu available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.  @ThankthemosthighGod 
    1
  2010.  @bbeamin  Because it’s fun 😊
    1
  2011. They want to use the moon as a stop-over for missions to Mars.
    1
  2012.  @lemcakes32422  Proof?
    1
  2013.  @lemcakes32422  Yes, there’s proof it wasn’t a studio. But here’s your dilemma. If they’re really in a studio, why would they worried about tearing their spacesuits?
    1
  2014. Did.
    1
  2015. You’re delusional 😂
    1
  2016.  @kipsmithers6470  😂👍
    1
  2017. ❓
    1
  2018. Nope. Next?
    1
  2019. Men went to the moon nine times and landed on six of those occasions between 1968 and 1972. Get over it.
    1
  2020. 🙄 😂
    1
  2021. Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
    1
  2022. Lies told in movies are still lies. Btw, there were SIX moon landings between 1969 and 1972.
    1
  2023. It’s maritime lingo.
    1
  2024. July 19, 2019 PRESIDENT TRUMP: “Well, thank you very much. Tomorrow is a very big day because tomorrow will represent 50 years from the time we planted a beautiful American flag on the moon. And that was an achievement — possibly, one of the great — considered one of the great achievements ever. And we’re going a lot further now. We’re going to the moon but we’re then going to Mars. We have with us, of course, Buzz Aldrin, who has been an incredible gentleman. I’ve known him for years, for a long time. And we’ve been friends for a long time. But just a fantastic, fantastic man. And Michael Collins, you all know flew Apollo 11 overhead. And it’s Aldrin and Armstrong, they walked on the moon.”
    1
  2025. Source: “Trust me bro”
    1
  2026. 😂👌
    1
  2027.  @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я  It looks nothing like slow motion. They make quick arm and hand movements.
    1
  2028.  @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я  No. They often made quick arm and hand movements. This can be seen during the Apollo 17 mission when they are driving stakes into the Lunar soil with a hammer. Or when they salute the camera. The wheels of the LRV rotate slowly because the are rotating slowly. The LRV had a top of speed of only 8 mph on the moon. On earth it would barely move.
    1
  2029. Well, to be fair it was hit by a massive container ship. Even a non-fracture critical bridge would probably have failed at least partly.
    1
  2030.  @Relkond  Yes. I’m not disagreeing.
    1
  2031. Why?
    1
  2032.  @Kronic1Chillz  “I used chat gpt” LOL! ChatGPT says the Apollo moon landings are legit. “dude if you can't connect the dots thats on you” The dots were connected over 50 years ago, sport. And every one of those dots are a piece of evidence that when combined together form an inescapable conclusion — that the six Apollo moon landings actually happened. “he barely does interviews” You mean he barely did interviews. He’s dead. “look behind the curtains that protect the truth" or something” What I find hilarious is all you moon-derps only believe Apollo astronauts when they say something that you think supports your preconceived beliefs but you’ll dismiss all the other statements from astronauts that corroborate the veracity of the missions. “he looks super scared and nervous here” No, he doesn’t. He’s speaking clearly. He’s measuring his word and talking slowly so reporters can keep up. You want to pretend they are nervous and scared because deep down you KNOW you don’t have actual evidence to support your preconceived beliefs. “they lost all the moon tapes” No, they didn’t. Only two backup tapes from Apollo 11 were erased over and reused. Tapes that aren’t even compatible with your TV set. Funny thing is — before NASA even publicly announced the tapes were lost, not once did you ever ask NASA to see them. And I’m pretty sure you never even heard of them until NASA mentioned them. So yeah, why do care now? “we have more powerful technology in the palm of our hands on our smart phones than they did in 1960's they also say we can't rebuild the technology” Uh…WRONG. The technology is being rebuilt as we speak. Look up the Artemis Program and learn.
    1
  2033. No it didn’t 😂
    1
  2034. Yes. You misinterpreted what the article said or you got the wrong information from someone else and now you’re spreading disinformation. The Russians used GoogleAI analyze some of the Apollo photos. It flagged ONE photo as possibly being “synthetic” due to “discrepancies in contrast”. Keyword: possibly. That means the analysis is inconclusive. Also, “Discrepancies in contrast” is not a valid explanation. Any photo can have any level of contrast. AI is far from infallible. If it finds garbage “sources” or was given a garbage prompt, it’ll give a garbage answer. You are foolish to blindly trust it. And you’re still ignoring mountain of evidence that supports the veracity of Apollo.  @LeftyRighty123 
    1
  2035. Shadows appear to be going in different directions due to perspective, focal length of lens used and contours of the ground. All shadows on the moon are parallel when viewed from above just like railroad tracks are parallel. Shadows can be longer or shorter than the objects casting them depending on the elevation angle of the sun. The lighting on the moon is consistent with a single light source, the sun. Multiple studio lights would produce multiple shadows per object.  @LeftyRighty123 
    1
  2036.  @LeftyRighty123 Why didn’t GoogleAI mention the shadows were “wrong”?
    1
  2037. “Why didn't the government mention the shadows are wrong 60 years ago?” Because they weren’t wrong. Why didn’t GoogleAI mention wrong shadows if they were actually wrong?  @LeftyRighty123 
    1
  2038. I hope you do as well.
    1
  2039. Hydrogen fuel cells are the future.
    1
  2040.  @Colonel-Rayy  <--- Says the high school dropout workin' as the fry-basket shift manager at McDonald's 🤣
    1
  2041.  @Colonel-Rayy  Well, you see...there's a lot of Hoaxtards in this world that need to be put in their place. Thanks for adding to that number.
    1
  2042. No he didn’t confess anything and his daughter has asked people like you to stop spreading disinformation.
    1
  2043. Yes, your education is all fake.
    1
  2044. What?
    1
  2045. Trumps the liar, not Sam.
    1
  2046. Nope. Next?
    1
  2047. Oh please. Don’t be a drama queen.
    1
  2048.  @guymerritt4860  “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    1
  2049. Not truth.
    1
  2050. What?
    1
  2051.  @JonMcglynn  Yes, you were quick to believe the lies coming from $ibrel.
    1
  2052.  @JonMcglynn  You’re not interested in what others have to say because your cognitive dissonance gets the best of you when people point out facts.
    1
  2053. After everything you said, shouldn’t you be saying the election was about MONEY and not MORALS?
    1
  2054.  @flaviodrusovalerio2825 Are you Biden’s doctor?
    1
  2055.  @flaviodrusovalerio2825 So then you should have urged him to step down after of course other doctors corroborated your opinion.
    1
  2056.  @flaviodrusovalerio2825  Lmao. I’m not. You are. You said you were Biden’s doctor and that he’s “mentally decaying”. Go back and read the comments, dude.
    1
  2057.  @flaviodrusovalerio2825  You brought up Biden, not me. You need to read the entire thread. Sort comments by “newest first” then scroll down to this thread.
    1
  2058.  @RAakaCHI-191 👍
    1
  2059. Look up “Dunning Kruger Effect”.
    1
  2060.  @Physics072  I’m talking about you.
    1
  2061.  @Physics072  No, I’m not a boat captain but in your opening post you’re alluding to the idea that the engine didn’t stop because, “water friction would have stopped them”.  Well ok, eventually that would happen but obviously there wasn’t enough distance. So how did you determine that the ship should have coasted to a stop before hitting the bridge? Also, it’s very interesting how you say in your opening post, “Sorry not buying the excuse.” as if you’ve already made up your mind and now you say, “I will wait for the investigation results thank you very much”.
    1
  2062.  @Physics072  Why don’t you just be patient and wait for the NTSB, Coast Guard, ABS and Baltimore Port Authority to do a thorough investigation before assuming anything?
    1
  2063.  @Physics072  So then don’t jump to conclusions mention “red-herrings” and say, “Sorry not buying that excuse”.
    1
  2064.  @Physics072  “Just asking questions with no answers.” It’s only 4 days into the investigation. You’re not going to get all the answers right away. Try to use a little common sense or remain silent.
    1
  2065.  @Physics072  I didn’t tell you what you can and can’t do. I’m only pointing out that you make no sense. Alluding to the idea of foul play before a proper investigation is completed is how misinformation/disinformation is spread. It’s people like you who are ruining this world.
    1
  2066.  @Burn2024notice  “They guy has some valid questions.” And it was brought to his attention that the investigation was only 4 days old. So why make assumptions and pretend to know things you don’t know? He’s alluding to the “fact” that the ship shouldn’t have hit the bridge because water friction would have stopped it first. Well, ok…water friction will stop the ship eventually assuming there wasn’t an outgoing tide but you can’t just arbitrarily claim that the ship shouldn’t have hit the bridge due to water friction if you don’t have all the data first.
    1
  2067.  @Burn2024notice  “Tugs should have been used for sure, probably saving money.” Tugs are used to berth and unberth the ships from the pier. Once the ship is under its own power the tugs leave. That’s standard practice worldwide.
    1
  2068. The only person suffering from TDS is Trump himself.
    1
  2069. Seeing stars in the Apollo photos would be a dead giveaway they were faked.
    1
  2070. Yes, it’s called Apollo 13.
    1
  2071. “America just had enough and needed the one man that has immunized himself against mainstream media propaganda, despite his many faults.” Oh, ffs! Trump LIED about winning in 2020. Do you have respect for someone that fabricates and perpetuates a HUGE lie like that?
    1
  2072.  @noahharding8889  He doesn’t believe anything he spews. He’s nothing but a con-man trying to make a living fleecing gullible rubes not to mention convicted criminal and stalker of Astronauts.
    1
  2073. Trump claimed (without credible evidence) that he won the 2020 election and he has perpetuated that lie to this day. Why? What for?
    1
  2074. You took photos of yourself taking a sh!t? That’s weird.
    1
  2075. Woooo….we’re so ,,scurred”
    1
  2076.  @cholieandresa  So of the thousand Gods worshipped, which one created you?
    1
  2077.  @cholieandresa  ok? Which one?
    1
  2078. Perspective and wide angle lens can make shadows appear to be going in different directions. But if you change your perspective, e.g., view them from above, they will be parallel. Think of railroad tracks. They appear to converge in the distance but are in fact parallel.
    1
  2079. Right, right. Let’s all listen to a bunch of nobodies in the comments section instead of the scientific consensus.
    1
  2080. I am and I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news but choosing not to get your jabs doesn’t make you special and it doesn’t mean you’re smarter than the entire medical industry. Do better. Learn.
    1
  2081. Proof?
    1
  2082.  @christinalw19  No, I didn’t. Sort comments by “newest first” and then scroll down to find your thread. All comments are there.
    1
  2083.  @christinalw19  So in the movie they don’t get away with the deception but Apollo did, six times?
    1
  2084. “"they lost steering" but yet it was steered right into the pylon?” If they lost steering then it drifted into the pylons. When I was a commercial diver we were called to inspect a Russian cargo ship that lost steering while try to exit the Chesapeake Bay. They had to drop anchor to stop the ship. When I jumped in to inspect the ship I immediately reported the the rudder was completely missing! Yes! A rudder approximately 20 feet tall was GONE! It was a free hanging rudder meaning it was connected by a large single piece of rudder stock. Evidently it had dropped out from the ship while underway. Crazy! “BUT iy will always be seen as an freak accident because the investigators will find the truth and then cover it up so they can money launder with the money that will be thrown around to build the bridge again.” Oh boy….here we go.
    1
  2085. Which moon landing was faked? There were six.
    1
  2086. Wrong.
    1
  2087. Which one? There were six.
    1
  2088. Look up “Deep Space Network” and also “Unified S-band”.
    1
  2089. Wrong video, dummy.
    1
  2090. Were you constipated?
    1
  2091. Not truth.
    1
  2092. Only to get the ship docked and underway when leaving dock. Once the ship is on its own power the tugs leave.
    1
  2093. I don’t know about it being required. It’s a preemptive pardon in case Trump tries to fabricate evidence against him.
    1
  2094. Trump and some of the politicians in his party needs to stop claiming he won the 2020 election.
    1
  2095. Not truth.
    1
  2096. What does that make you?
    1
  2097. I'll take that as a NO.  @avelee8.21.7BC 
    1
  2098. Bart Sibrel is NOT a flat earther 😂
    1
  2099. Good movie
    1
  2100. All governments lie but the moon landings are factual history that no government on the face of this planet disputes.
    1
  2101. Live footage of you being born? No? You must be a bot then.
    1
  2102. "Who funds NASA?" Congress.
    1
  2103.  @Del-Canada  Indeed.
    1
  2104. She’s an opportunist, grifter and Trump sycophant.
    1
  2105. Gore conceded. Clinton conceded. Wtf are you even talking about?
    1
  2106.  @MMAVoodoo  Prove it with actual substantial evidence.
    1
  2107. Real. Try gettin’ a job.
    1
  2108. Say that again about the horizon. It made no sense.
    1
  2109. No, you said “hundreds of thousands of kilometers”. Are you saying the horizon is hundreds of thousands of kilometers away? Please clarify.
    1
  2110.  @DragonsLord76  The true horizon is 2.4 km away from an observer. The local horizon can be 200~300 meters away or even closer. You simply don’t understand what you’re seeing in the photos. A large shallow crater or rises and hollows can mimic the appearance of the true horizon when in fact it is not.
    1
  2111. Yes, Apollo crews walked into shallow craters with low angle walls. Many photographs show the local horizon which can be the anything from the rim a shallow crater to rises and hollows, hills and mountains. Stomping your feet and crying, “Nuh- Uh!” is not a valid argument.  @DragonsLord76 
    1
  2112. So you believe the earth is flat?
    1
  2113. 🤦‍♂
    1
  2114. Prove they’re lying.
    1
  2115. @alltimeklazzikz Why? You made the claim. Up to you to prove your claim, champ.
    1
  2116. @alltimeklazzikz That's not an opinon. It's a bold assertion. An opinon would be like, "I don't think they're being honest". You made an assertion so let's see your evidence that proves they're lying. I'll wait.
    1
  2117. @alltimeklazzikz It's my turn? You have done anything yet, champ. You speak as if there was only one moon landing. Shows how numpty you are.
    1
  2118. @alltimeklazzikz The landing was NOT broadcast live, turnip-brains. The FIRST STEPS onto the surface of the moon by Neil Armstrong WAS broadcast live. What? Are you going to say that broadcasting from the moon is impossible?
    1
  2119. @alltimeklazzikz Because nobody has been back to the moon since 1972. Use your brain much? Durrrrrrrrrr…..
    1
  2120. @alltimeklazzikz Time delays don’t make it impossible. Time delays happen when you watch the evening news. Sorry but you’re going to have to do better than just make bold assertions without evidence.
    1
  2121. @alltimeklazzikz Ok, so you have no evidence that time delays make it impossible. Thank you.
    1
  2122.  @andrewworth7574  Hmm, I wonder if anything has changed within the video itself?
    1
  2123. Apollo 17 was the last livestream, not Apollo 11. Nobody set up and operated the camera. The live TV camera was stowed in an external compartment that hinged open to reveal the camera. It was already pre-aimed at the ladder.
    1
  2124. Proof?
    1
  2125. Frustrated. Not defeated. He wasn’t running for President.
    1
  2126.  @gdaqian  Frustrated, as tens of millions of other Americans are.
    1
  2127. False. Reported as MISINFORMATION.
    1
  2128. If stars had shown up in the Apollo photos along with a properly exposed lunar landscape then that would be a dead giveaway they were faked.
    1
  2129. Except Trump still won’t concede the 2020 election. If he’s such a great leader why did he create and perpetuate a massive lie?
    1
  2130.  @NemoElohemi  Lmao! He doesn’t believe he won. He pretends he did and so do his followers. It’s called willful ignorance.
    1
  2131.  @NemoElohemi Belief has nothing to do with it.
    1
  2132. Seek psychiatric treatment 😂
    1
  2133. Why do you keep asking the question on every fkng video? Next will be… ,aNd ThE tElEmEtReY dAtA eXiTs WhEre??”
    1
  2134.  @nunyabiz1780 <— Flat earther ran from his own thread like a lil bish! Ahahahahahaha…😂
    1
  2135.  @rockethead7  😂
    1
  2136. Well said 👍
    1
  2137. “Flat earthers still believing us landed on moon…” What?
    1
  2138. I’m STILL waiting on you to PROVE that 130 eyewitnesses were “paid off”. The burden of proof lies with the person making a claim. That would be your sorry @ss.  @spokiee2000 
    1
  2139. The usual amateur arguments long ago signed, sealed and filed under ‘DEBUNKED!’
    1
  2140. Prove they’re lying.
    1
  2141. Audio glitch. He said, “landing fraud”.
    1
  2142. Which Apollo landing site?
    1
  2143.  @aaronbarlow4376  “The moon is definitely hollow and artificial though” Please explain.
    1
  2144.  @aaronbarlow4376  Entertaining video but can you point to a sciencfic consensus that supports this theory? I can't find a single one.
    1
  2145.  @aaronbarlow4376  Science is done by research, experimentation, and the evaluation of evidence, which allows theories to be tested, refined, or refuted over time. Consensus is critical as it ensures that findings are robust, reproducible, and accepted by the brooader scientific community. So, no scientific consensus that the moon is hollow = the moon isn’t hollow.
    1
  2146.  @seanhewitt603  Look at you, spazzing out n sh!t 😂
    1
  2147. No, we haven’t. You’ve been duped by conspiracy theories.
    1
  2148. The Pentagon is not the most secure US building.
    1
  2149.  @Abundantlyfamous  "what was proven to be a lie?" Posted by @Critthought: "Claim: Sibrel "accidentally" was sent footage from a little-accessed auxiliary archive. Fact: The footage was and is available to the general public, and was in fact sold in some gift shops. Lie Claim: The craft was in low-earth orbit. Fact: As Dave demonstrated, none of the footage comes close to matching footage actually from LEO. In addition, GreaterSapien has shown a complete breakdown of this, including the math involved as well as the actual uncut footage showing where Sibrel intentionally edited out parts that show his deception. Lie Claim: The camera was up against a circular window. Fact: The only circular window is in the hatch, which the camera was not against. Lie Claim: Shadows from a single light source are always parallel. Fact: There are literally hundreds of example showing this isn't true, and in fact, in Sibrel's own film where he tries to show that the shadows are parallel, when you take the very lines he drew and extend them out farther, they can be seen to not be. Lie. Claim: The Van Allen belts would have been deadly. Fact: Dr. James Van Allen, the man the belts are named after, stated categorically that this was false. In addition, data collected a decade prior to Apollo mapped the belts, and their intensity, allowing the safe passage. The Soviet's sent living samples to and from the Moon on Zond 5, and they survived without problems. Lie Claim: Armstrong nearly died using the lunar landing simulator 6 weeks before Apollo 11. Fact: He ejected on May 6, 1968, more than 14 months prior to Apollo 11. Lie Claim: They reversed the hatch the day before the Apollo 1 fire. Fact: This is probably the most ridiculous lie he told. Not only does Dave show that the hatch looked the way it did prior to that day, but the idea that it would even have been possible to reverse it overnight is beyond ludicrous; it's asinine. Lie"
    1
  2150. There’s no credible evidence to suggest there are deal Cosmonauts floating around the Earth in orbit. The soviet N1 rockets never even made it into orbit so how could there be Cosmonauts up there?
    1
  2151. How does it feel knowing you were wrong as f+ck? @jona1pail122 
    1
  2152.  @arthorse6835  Ok, you don’t like their demeanor. So what exactly are you skeptical of? In your opening post you don’t seem to be alluding to the idea that they didn’t actually land on the moon.
    1
  2153.  @arthorse6835 All of your comments are there. Sort comments by “newest first” and then scroll down to find your thread. All comments will be visible. YouTube didn’t draw lines through your words. YOU did. YouTube doesn’t put strike throughs in people’s sentences. Why are you being dishonest?
    1
  2154.  @arthorse6835  If you can't figure out how to find your own thread (started 10 days ago) then you really have no business alluding to the idea that the Apollo moon landings were faked.
    1
  2155.  @arthorse6835  Because you are being dishonest. Youtube doesn't put strike-throughs in people comments to censor them. They remove comments. And besides, strike-throughs don't censor anything if you can still read them. Right? Right. At any rate. Let's have a look at your ramblings. 1. It's true that the Apollo crews didn't reach escape velocity. Because...they didn't need to. After the TLI burn, the spacecraft was on a free trajectory towards the Moon. During this phase, the spacecraft coasted, gradually slowing down due to Earth's gravitational pull. However, the initial velocity was sufficient to carry it to the Moon's vicinity before it would have fallen back to Earth. As the spacecraft approached the Moon, the gravitational influence of the Moon started to become more significant. At a certain point, the spacecraft entered the Moon's sphere of influence, and the Moon's gravity began to dominate, pulling the spacecraft towards it. 2. The press had to video a projection screen because the video feed which was SSTV format needed to be converted to the standard NTSC format for consumer televisions. And because they lacked a computer that could convert the format in real time, they did it by the analog means of projection, with some loss of quality. 3. Earth's reflection in helmets isn't 4x larger than the sun? Why would it be??? I think you screwed that one up. 4. Lack of radio delay. False. The delay in only noticeable 1-way because the conversation is being recorded in Houston. So in other words, if the astronauts ask a question, Nixon is free to respond immediately after he hears the question. But if Nixon asks a question he must wait at least 2.6 seconds before expecting a reply. 5. My daughter drives thru a dead zone and has no signal. Well, NO KIDDING. A dead zone means there is no signal. Also, equating cellular service to the United S-band is ignorant. Does your cellphone have a 200 foot diameter satellite dish attached to it? 6. The total fuel capacity for the Saturn V rocket was over 2 million gallons. 7. The Lunar Module used silver-zinc batteries to power its systems, including the thermal control, environmental control, and other essential systems. These batteries were chosen for their high energy density and reliability. 8. Cooling. The Lunar Module maintained a cool and safe atmosphere for astronauts through a combination of thermal insulation, an Active Thermal Control System (ATCS), and an Environmental Control System (ECS). The thermal insulation minimized heat transfer from the external environment, while the ATCS used a water/glycol loop and a sublimator to dissipate heat by sublimating water in the vacuum of space. The ECS managed the cabin atmosphere by controlling oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, temperature, and humidity, using cabin fans, heat exchangers, and water evaporators. External radiators emitted excess heat into space, ensuring a comfortable environment inside the Lunar Module. 9. Elon Musk and Space X'. Starship is designed to be a fully reusable spacecraft capable of carrying large payloads and crews to various destinations, including the Moon and Mars. Its size and ambitious mission profiles mean it needs a substantial amount of fuel. SpaceX plans to use an in-orbit refueling strategy where multiple tanker versions of the Starship are launched to transfer fuel to the Starship destined for the Moon or Mars. This approach allows the spacecraft to carry more payload and less fuel initially, with subsequent launches dedicated to refueling it in Earth's orbit. Musk has indicated that it could take up to 8 launches to fully refuel a Starship in orbit, depending on the specifics of the mission, the efficiency of the refueling process, and the amount of fuel required. Each tanker launch would carry a significant amount of fuel to be transferred to the primary Starship. 10. Apollo 12 Lunar eclipse. WRONG! That was a SOLAR eclipse. 11. Alan Bean "not knowing" he passed through the VAB's. Seriously? Bart Sibrel did the interview. He is a charlatan, stalker and convicted criminal. Sibrel omits important context from that interview. Alan Bean was also on a Skylab mission (under the VAB's) so he was most likely talking about that. 12. TV camera accident. Really? You're going to assume they pointed the camera at the sun on purpose? Ask yourself why NASA would need to fake an accidental breaking of a TV camera? 13. They splashed down was hard and the camera broke loose and hit Alan Bean in the head. So???? Why is that a concern to you? 14. The horizon of any celestial body is calculated assuming the body is perfectly spherical. On the surface of the moon you have large shallow craters, rising slope and hollows. These feature represent the "apparent" horizon, not the "true" horizon. On the moon the true horizon is 1.5 miles. 15. Film, camera and paper notes were never subjected to 250 degree F heat. That is the GROUND temperature at Lunar NOON. The Apollo crews landed during Lunar morning when GROUND temps were much lower. 16. The return/rendevouz docking done manually. So? Your argument is based on incredulity.  17. China confirmed the Apollo landings. Look up Chang'e 2 18. No, Armstrong never gave anyone a moon rock. And, it’s not a NASA Moon rock. Everything points to a mistake or to a hoax orchestrated by two Dutch artists in 2006. NASA has never authenticated the “rock” (there are no documents tracing its origins), it’s far too big to be a donated lunar sample, and its background story is nonsensical. It was reportedly donated privately in 1969 to a retired prime minister instead of being given, as was customary, to a representative of the then-current Dutch government; it wasn’t put on public display as a Moon rock would have deserved; and real donated Moon rocks were encapsulated in transparent plastic, while this one is not. Next?
    1
  2156.  @arthorse6835  Point 3. "Therefore, the earth should appear 4x larger than the sun from the moon." What??? I think you meant to say the earth should appear 4x larger than the moon. It is. The size of the earth depicted in photos and videos depends on the focal length of the lens used and the distance from the earth. How does your not understand this prove the moon landings were faked? Point 10. "the earth moving across the sun is indeed a lunar eclipse" Wrong! The earth moving across and eclipsing the sun is a SOLAR ECLIPSE. "the solar is when the moon is in the middle of the sun and earth." A Solar Eclipse is when any celestial body (Earth, Moon, Mars, etc.) is between the Sun and the observer. "What was described was in fact a LUNAR eclipse." Wrong again. A lunar eclipse happens when the Moon is eclipsed by the earth. Point 11. "But I'm keeping in mind that if Bart can do it, so can NASA." LOL! All Bart did was cut of important context in his footage. There is no way NASA or any Hollywood studio can fake 1/6 gravity in a vacuum enviornment in continuous footage lasting hours. Point 12. "Alan Bean of A12 breaks the color video camera once on the moon," So? Accidents are prove of a fake moon landing? Really? All the other FIVE missions didn't break a camera. So...are you really going to make an accident a point of contention? "a roll of film is left behind" The roll of film was jammed inside the camera. It was left behind because that was protocol. All cameras and unnecessary equipment was left behind to save weight. They shot many rolls of film on the moon. One roll gets jammed and you think it was a conspiracy??? "Bean again drops another camera for live feed on the astronaut pick up in the ocean." Wrong! The camera breaks loose from its attachment point inside the Command Module when it splashes down in the ocean and it hits Alan Bean in the head. "You really have to ask me Why NASA would fake breaking a video camera if the moon landings were fake?" Uh, yeah. You're making this a useless point of contention. NASA has ALL the video from the other FIVE missions. So why would they need to fake accidents with cameras on Apollo 12? Point 14. "we see in the moon images nothing that remotely looks like anything close to a mile horizon." How do you know that? Did you study the images and measure the distance? How did you measure it? Did you assume you were looking at the ACTUAL horizon. How did you know you weren't looking at the LOCAL horizon such as the rim of shallow crater, a rising slope, top of a hill, etc.? "tho we know there is no cliff or craters, thanks to other pics that show the ground area around that part." Oh really? You've looking at the ENTIRE Apollo 12 photo archive? I doubt that. "The horizon calculations via the wikipedia link give the moon a 1.18 mile horizon, but you generously gave it 1.5 miles. Either way, the pics show nothing close to a mile." Again, how did you measure the distance just by looking at the photos? The true horizon of the moon (perfect sphere) is about 1.5 miles away. The horizon can also appear to be deceptively close because there is no atmospheric haze or other objects to judge distance. You need to explain how YOU calculated the distance using only your eyes. Point 17. "the Chinese scientist DID say that the LM docking rendevouz was 'unbelievable' because it was nearly impossible to do manually." Wrong. He was simply amazing. He didn't say it was impossible. The docking/redevouz was practiced during Gemini and early Apollo missions leading up to Apollo 11. Your argument is based on ignorance and incredulity. "Okaaaaay......." <---- Incredulity. Point 18. The petrified wood "moon rock" was NOT given by the crew of Apollo 11 as I've already explained in my last post. "It seems obvious you have a vested interest in vehemently defending the moon landings..." Is there something wrong with defending the truth?   "as well as persuading folks to fully believe them" Uh, what? Try typing that mess of words again. "But you can rest assured that your condescension is unconvincing and actually counterproductive." I really don't care if you're convinced or not. I proved facts for all your so-called "issues". The veracity of the achievements of the Apollo program doesn't depend on your belief or my ability to convince you. Modern history is what it is. Not what you think or pretend it should be. Deal with it.
    1
  2157.  @arthorse6835  “For someone who allegedly doesn't care about whether I accept the moon landings or not, you sure do seem to have a personal goal to sway my opinion and ridicule my position on the matter.” LOL! I’m not trying to sway you. I’m answering your “concerns” because you seem to understand very little of what you’re talking about. You're entitled to your opinions but not facts. The moon landings are factual history whether you accept them or not. Just like WWII actually happened whether you believe it or not. Facts don’t require belief. “and haven't even addressed the eclipse issue- just whether it is a lunar or SOLAR eclipse.” So you admit that you were wrong about the type of eclipse that occurred? Because the way you’ve been talking, you don’t seem to understand the difference. The eclipse was not visible from earth. Solar and Lunar eclipses are normally viewed from the Earth, not floating in space or standing on the moon. This is why you won’t find historical data on a solar eclipse event during the Apollo 12 mission. “They lied. They showed an astronomy event on TV that could not have happened in Nov '69.” They didn’t lie. You just don’t know what you’re talking about because you’re ignorant. Again, eclipse predictions are made with the idea that you are viewing it from EARTH. If you were standing on moon during the solar eclipse back in April you wouldn’t actually see the eclipse because you’re standing on the very thing causing the eclipse. Use some critical thinking. You won’t find the Apollo 12 solar eclipse in any historical records because it’s not an event that was visible from Earth! But it was visible briefly for Apollo 12 because of their position on the return trip. “You also did not even mention the contradiction over the moon's temperatures and your silly assertion about lunar morning/dawn and how cool it was at that time.” What contradiction? All Apollo missions landed during Lunar morning when the sun’s angle is low. If you’re standing on the moon you’d have 14 earth days of sunlight followed by 14 days of darkness. Those high temperatures on the moon refer to GROUND temperatures when the sun is directly overhead. "The supposed 1/6 gravity on the moon looks way too much like Earth gravity video footage." Supposed 1/6 gravity? LOL! How much gravity does the moon really have? "Collection bags are dropped and they appear to fall the same rate as if here on earth." Except they don't. "It is very fake looking- but not as fake as the lift off of Apollo17 from the moon complete with sparklers" Do you even know what's causing the sparkles? If you don't then why would assume it must be fake? The color TV camera used on the Moon actually had a black-and-white sensor with a color wheel. The colored filters on this wheel rotated rapidly in front of the camera's sensor so as to generate a sequence of monochrome images filtered in red, green and yellow. These filtered images were then blended and processed electronically on Earth to reconstitute the original colors of the scene. This system was sturdy and lightweight, but it had a drawback that if an object flashed rapidly in front of the camera it was caught by only one of the colored filters, acquiring a false coloring in the electronic processing. Now you know. ""and a perfectly timed pan up and zoom." Because they learned from mistakes made while trying to capture Apollo's 15 and 16 departure. "You've spent a lot of wasted time on just me." Yes, I have. We agree on that. "Maybe you should focus on the many, many other folks watching and posting on YT videos that also doubt the integrity of these events." I do. That's how I found you. "They doubt NASA, and the federal govt- rightly so." Doesn't matter. They're just as ignorant as you. " I'm just one little soul in a sea of many skeptics." No, you're not a skeptic. You're a flat out denier. A skeptic is open to reasoned debate and evidence. Everything I've told you can be verified but you refuse to fact check anything I've said because you've already made up your mind. "But with so many others now doubting this incredibly historic and monumental acheivement as evidenced by their posts on YT," Lmao! What evidence have any of your dullards ever posted?? All I ever see from so-called skeptics like you are arguments based on ignorance and incredulity. "That is the saddest part of all....." No, the saddest part is when people like you have the mindset, "I don't understand it therefore it must be fake!"
    1
  2158.  @arthorse6835  "Seems like I'm in the majority and that makes me sad- truly. Americans no longer trust or believe their own govt or media." You're absolutely right. It's truly sad that a bunch of self-styled experts, whom you claim to be a part of, think they know more than the literal millions of credentialed engineers, scientists, physicists, astronomers, professional photographers, cinematographers, doctors, pilots, and astronauts who have no problem with the achievements of the Apollo program. But according to you, they all must be lying or have been too ignorant over the last half-century to have spotted a hoax not once but six times. Here's a fun fact for you: there isn't a single government on this planet that disputes the moon landings. And that includes countries that hate the USA. Let that sink in.
    1
  2159.  @arthorse6835  “BUT the Color wheel for the A17 take off explanation came off to me as 10th grade level creative BS.” Facts don’t care about your ignorance and feelings.
    1
  2160. ⁠ @arthorse6835 Oh my goodness! My name change must mean the six Apollo moon landings were faked! You’ve got nothing to say about my previous two posts except make childish accusations that I’m a Bot? Do you even know what a Bot is?
    1
  2161.  @JLFrost  How did it feel to get completely OWNED by mooneyes and mfitz? 🤣
    1
  2162.  @JLFrost  “How T.F. does questioning a terrorist attack with a dozen discrepancies…” Questioning is much different than asserting unfounded lies and spreading misinformation. Your premise is incorrect. You aren’t “questioning” anything. You’re just lying. Deal with your issues. Do better, learn.
    1
  2163.  @JLFrost  “How does it feel to be with the herd, sheep?” Now this is quaint. A sheep calling others a sheep. 😂 Tell us all about how you think you can change history with ZERO actual substantial evidence. Baaa…Baaa
    1
  2164.  @JLFrost  “Show me the real evidence, princess.” Fallacy! The burden of proof lies with person making a claim and is not upon anyone else to disprove. Besides, you were already given the facts which prove American 77 struck the Pentagon by mfitz in his first reply.
    1
  2165.  @JLFrost  “Go find the frontal photos and you'll see everything I named in the path.” I already have. American 77 took out 5 light poles and struck a diesel generator on its way in which is consistent with its flight path. You’re looking at the photos taken from a distance with high magnification lenses which compresses the depth of field (foreground to background) and in turn makes objects like highway signs and high mast lights that are far away appear to be very close to the impact zone. So in other words you don’t understand how perspective and photography works.
    1
  2166.  @JLFrost  Hah! You called me a sheep first. I simply pointed out the irony in that.
    1
  2167. Reported as misinformation. Enjoy your 24-hour ban.
    1
  2168. Apollo's 12, 14-17 made it back to the moon.
    1
  2169. 🙄
    1
  2170. Please elaborate.
    1
  2171. Reported as disinformation.
    1
  2172. Oh, ffs! This was hardly a "Gotcha Moment". She knows he's not a f--- General. This was just another blatant refusal to question because he's knows the answer is, YES.
    1
  2173. Looks like you don’t.
    1
  2174. BOT —— > @shillhunter
    1
  2175. Notice how you’re making a definitive claim while at the same time admitting ignorance (asking questions)?
    1
  2176. Troll
    1
  2177. Well, the LRO is a NASA satellite so naturally they don’t believe it.
    1
  2178.  @BlueWillow1209  Gut feelings can be wrong. That’s common sense.
    1
  2179.  @BillMartin-h2g  “Try to lie harder, next time.” Try to use some common sense, wise guy. Walz simply misspoke but Trump d!ck lovers like you want to turn it into a sh!t show.
    1
  2180. Confessions aren’t conclusive proof. Even legitimate ones.
    1
  2181.  @StripedCheeseBread  Everywhere is the center of the Universe. How? Because every observer no matter where you are can only see so far out in every direction.
    1
  2182.  @StripedCheeseBread  Heliocentrism has nothing to do with the fact that every place is the center of the universe.
    1
  2183.  @Peter-wp5vb  “Let me guess, you’re liberal, supporting Harris?” Let me guess. You’re supporting Trump, a proven liar?
    1
  2184. She knows he’s lying but this is how she chose to pursue her career – by giving grifters a platform for the sake of likes, subs and comments.
    1
  2185. Why?
    1
  2186. Proof?
    1
  2187. You should delete this thread now that you’ve been completely OWNED.
    1
  2188.  @benjamynn1989  Ok, fine. Keep your ignorance on public display. The world needs to laugh a little more anyway.
    1
  2189.  @benjamynn1989  “No one cares about you bro.” Well, you managed to get that one right but everything you said before was factually incorrect as you were made aware of. Care to address that?
    1
  2190. Get over it dude.
    1
  2191. Ah yes. TDS, a meme created to gaslight and stop conversation.
    1
  2192.  @Daneiladams555 What?
    1
  2193.  @Daneiladams555  Well then, all you have to do is provide credible evidence that PROVES Trump won the 2020 election and I’ll stop trolling.
    1
  2194. You’re a liar just like Trump. In 2020 Harris did not explicitly say he would support Biden regardless of any election cheating. Instead, his comments were focused on the importance of removing Trump from office due to his negative impact on the country.
    1
  2195. Owens is a moon landing believer, dummy.
    1
  2196. Doubt that.
    1
  2197. 0:05 and 1:32
    1
  2198. The people who voted for Trump couldn’t care less about honor and integrity, decency and respect. The man fabricated a massive lie about winning 2020, shoved it down throats of every American, created death, destruction and chaos because of it and has perpetuated that lie ever since. All because he wasn’t man enough to admit defeat. It boggles the mind how 52% of voters want him back in office.
    1
  2199. Fracture critical by design.
    1
  2200.  @Not_Gibbo  <— Dude got his @ss handed to himself in his own thread! Now that embarrassing, folks 😂
    1
  2201.  @collegephysicsforeveryone7744  Who won the 2020 election? C’mon, don't be scared.
    1
  2202. “The United States, which has always fantasized about dominating the earth” Where did you come up with that wild idea?
    1
  2203. Uh, no.
    1
  2204. I thought they were a satanic organization?
    1
  2205. 🤦‍♂
    1
  2206.  @mdreiger  They used Hasselblad medium format cameras. Proof can be found in the Apollo photo archive.
    1
  2207.  @mdreiger  AS17-134-20384 Is an example.
    1
  2208. It was a landslide in the electoral college. Not the popular vote.
    1
  2209.  @LukeAnderson101  In the electoral college, yes.  1.5% more votes in the popular vote isn’t a landslide.
    1
  2210.  @LukeAnderson101  “Early election coverage described Trump’s victory as a landslide. But whether you go by the Electoral College vote or the popular vote, it was anything but. The 312 Electoral College votes that Trump won are just six more than Joe Biden won in 2020, twenty less than Barack Obama won in 2012, and fifty-three less than Obama won in 2008. Trump’s Electoral College performance pales in comparison to Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s landslide victory in 1936 (523 electoral votes), Lyndon Johnson’s in 1964 (486), Richard Nixon’s in 1972 (520), or Ronald Reagan’s in 1984 (525). In terms of the popular vote, more people voted for someone not named Trump for president than voted for Trump in 2024, and his margin of victory over Harris was 1.5 percentage points. That is the fifth smallest margin of victory in the thirty-two presidential races held since 1900.” Landslide? Not really.
    1
  2211. 🤦‍♂
    1
  2212. What does that make you?
    1
  2213. I guess that’s God’s fault then since he’s in control of everything.
    1
  2214. She knows she’s lying. She just wants to take advantage of disinformation wave that has swept the world. It’s all about the $$$
    1
  2215. ❓
    1
  2216.  @Anna-Gunilla1792  What exactly do you not agree with?
    1
  2217.  @Anna-Gunilla1792  What are you talking about? The ascent stage of the Lunar Module only carried two people. The third man stayed in the command module in a orbit around the moon. Of course the ascent stage had rock fuel. It's got a rocket engine, right? That means it has a fuel supply too. LOL! Different atmospheres? Where? The moon's atmosphere is essentially a vaccum just like space.
    1
  2218.  @Anna-Gunilla1792  Are you more convinced by the "arguments" presented in this video? For example - When Sibrel claimed he was drugged and kidnapped by the CIA but then he escaped? Do you buy that?
    1
  2219.  @Anna-Gunilla1792  Your skepticism over the take off from the moon has zero to do with his claim he was drugged and kidnapped by the CIA.
    1
  2220. “ESPECIALLY IN 1968 WHERE TECHNOLOGY WAS SOOO OBSOLITE!!!” Technology in 1968 was obsolete compared to what??
    1
  2221.  @rammalammadingdong1  Buzz was trolling you.
    1
  2222. Planes came from the outside.
    1
  2223. You forgot to bring evidence.
    1
  2224. Prove it or SHTFU.
    1
  2225. But the Apollo moon landings are factual history.
    1
  2226. Stop spreading lies.
    1
  2227.  @thecensoredpatriot  Yeah, made up facts.
    1
  2228.  @ruthhelms-qc8pj  Of course we all trust your Grandmother's word over the literal MILLIONS of engineers and physicists worldwide who have no problem whatsoever with the accomplishments of Apollo.
    1
  2229.  @WiiFan-1300  Flat earth is just a dumb scam invented by con men who MAKE A LIVING off gullible rubes like you. What’s wrong with you that you can’t figure that out?
    1
  2230. lol…scroll down.
    1
  2231. Prove it or SHTFU.
    1
  2232.  @BelleVanJaardewijk  “fake” Which part?? That other hoaxtard, @Agent_86, is now claiming they did go to the moon, ”It's not that they didn't go to the moon”
    1
  2233. Belief is for the weak minded.
    1
  2234. Brahma is a fraud and lie.
    1
  2235. “A government spokesman at a briefing shortly after 9/11 stated that some witnesses saw an airliner, and some saw a small commuter plane and others didn't see it but heard a small plane.” So, no witnesses saw or heard a cruise missile. Thank you for ruling that out 😉 @aimurphy7196 
    1
  2236. I get the feeling it’s another one of Jason’s sock accounts.  @MFitz12 
    1
  2237. Remotely controlled TV camera mounted to either a tripod or the LRV.
    1
  2238.  @Ray20499 Correct.
    1
  2239. Let’s wait for the investigation to get that answer.
    1
  2240. Oh boy. Here we go.
    1
  2241. 1. There is 2. We have high definition photos of the flags on the moon. 3. No, they didn't. 4. You mean the puns, quips, jokes and outright laughter? 5. Thanks to the Unified S-band and Deep Space Network 6. Nope. NASA never did that. 7. They did is six times more and landed on five of them (Apollo 13 aborted) 8. Please, elaborate
    1
  2242. Lock YOU up for voting for a sociopath.
    1
  2243.  @911insidejob-md  A fact is a statement that can be objectively verified as true through evidence or observation, independent of personal beliefs or opinions. Its validity is grounded in empirical data, logical consistency, or reproducible outcomes.
    1
  2244. Preemptive pardon. In case Trump uses his cronies to fabricate evidence to prosecute Schiff.
    1
  2245. @ No, he did not.
    1
  2246. “Asking for a friend” No. You’re asking for yourself to avoid ridicule and embarrassment. Deal with your issues.
    1
  2247.  @dusty2774  “as everyone else knows, is obvious sarcasm!” I’m not so sure about that with the GROWING number of Hoaxtards®on YouTube.
    1
  2248. Thanks for your opinion.
    1
  2249. Nah, they’re not bots. They’re all Trump sheep and ,,Yo bro” dudes.
    1
  2250. It’s traditional to address ships as “she”.
    1
  2251. Bad day?
    1
  2252. 😂👌
    1
  2253. I hear literally no one saying that
    1
  2254. Most of the old people I know have more tech than me. Apple Watch, iPhone, streaming services, etc..Me? Just an iPhone and still rockin’ cable TV 😊 @oxxnarrdflame8865 
    1
  2255. What's so great about it?
    1
  2256. Did.
    1
  2257. Well, aren’t you gullible asf.
    1
  2258.  @geoffbirchall7552  True because we don’t have a rocket that’s ready to launch TODAY. But we did in 1969 to 1972.
    1
  2259.  @BigMikeObama-q7y  Wikipedia lets anyone edit, including you. So if it's spreading lies about the moon landings, clearly the only thing missing is your heroic intervention.
    1
  2260. Why is that funny?
    1
  2261. *1969 Who said anything about it being easy?
    1
  2262. ❌
    1
  2263. Please elaborate.
    1
  2264.  @betacuck3145  So you admit Trump lied about winning the 2020 election. Thank you.
    1
  2265. What does belief have to do with it?
    1
  2266.  @Awarebynature  Facts aren’t based on belief. Facts are based on credible evidence. You believe the moon missions were faked because you lack the evidence to show it.
    1
  2267. There are no Gods. Get over it.
    1
  2268.  @jovitamoore-s5r  You guys are so pathetic. You desperately want the moon landings to be fake that you’ll pretend to see things like, “evasive and distancing language”. When are you ever going to find actual evidence that disproves these historical events? Like, why can’t you provide facts that disprove the photos for example? It’s always “body language” and “glum astronauts”. “Did he ever explain what he meant?” Does it really matter? You’ve already made up your mind about what he meant. Right? I mean, be honest with yourself. You didn’t understand his message, therefore he must be admitting guilt. Right?
    1
  2269. They already have. Just scroll down.
    1
  2270. Flat earther
    1
  2271. Sorry to disabuse you of your religious beliefs but we know the earth is a slowly rotating terrestrial spheroid. Just because you are incapable of understanding this fact or willfully refuse to learn so doesn't make it our problem. Some questions for you that are used every day in the real world. Can you answer them? What is the relationship between longitude and distance when traveling east or west parallel to the equator? If you know the answer then you know the earth is a spheroid. If you don't then you are not qualified to comment on the shape of the earth. Describe the development and function of a gyrocompass. If you can then you know the earth is a slowly rotating terrestrial spheroid and gravity is a fact. If you can't then you are not qualified to comment on the shape of the earth, it's movement or gravity.
    1
  2272. BOT —— >  @shillhunter4380 
    1
  2273. Why would they? They allow all kinds of disinformation.
    1
  2274. Poe’s law.
    1
  2275. We never stopped, dumdum. FFS!
    1
  2276. “Stay woke y’all” Go back to sleep, dim dim.
    1
  2277.  @tday2870  “sadly that’s not how it works hun, trust me.” You’re absolutely right! It works by providing actual substantial, history-changing evidence backed up by sound logic and reputable sources which I’m willing to bet you can’t provide.
    1
  2278.  @tday2870  “evidence for what? Being aware the government lies to the public?“ No, evidence for the erroneous claim you made in your initial post. Your desperate deflections in the form of ignorance, feelings and personal incredulity is not enough to change history. Try again? 😊
    1
  2279. It’s traditional.
    1
  2280. Why did you put quotes around space?
    1
  2281. So did Trump in 2020.
    1
  2282. And how would you know?
    1
  2283. The LRO took photos of the landing sites back in 2009.
    1
  2284. Not to mention the millions of engineers, scientists, physicists, astronomers, cinematographers, pro-photographers and doctors worldwide who have never had a problem with the six manned moon landings.
    1
  2285. He’s totally lying. Has been for years. Owens is just an opportunist making $$$ off riding the disinformation wave that has swept the world.
    1
  2286. Prove it, smart guy.
    1
  2287.  @Chitov646ckmych  Seek psychiatric treatment
    1
  2288. 4:33
    1
  2289.  @craigmaloneyofficial  “It's hard to pinpoint why something is off but it is.” Did you not read the quote in my first post?
    1
  2290. Then obviously the reason we haven’t been back is not about tech advances.
    1
  2291. 🤦‍♂
    1
  2292. ❓
    1
  2293. 1) 5:25 Low gravity. They move slower. 2) The moon dust leaves no lingering cloud which proves they’re in a vacuum.  3) They’re not on a beach. 4) Seems to fall at the same rate as the astronauts to me.
    1
  2294.  @TimothyTakemoto  The height achieved depends on the velocity and trajectory of the particles when they are kicked up. This velocity is determined by the force applied and not just gravity. Also...a proper comparison would need to account for the differences in the physical properties of lunar soil (regolith) and terrestrial soil. Lastly, the footage looks nothing like slow-motion. In the Apollo 17 footage for example, while the astronauts are slow at walking and hopping they frequently make quick arm and hand movements.
    1
  2295.  @TimothyTakemoto  The Moon has approximately 6 times less gravity than Earth, not 36 times less.
    1
  2296. Derp!
    1
  2297. Don't beat your wife today just because some ancient pedophile claimed that the angel Gabriel claimed that God said so:  "But those wives from whom you fear arrogance - first advise them; then if they persist, forsake them in bed; and finally, strike them" Quran 4:34. Muhammad "married `Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old" Sunna bukhari 63/122 Really? The God of the universe gives me advice on wife-beating by sending an angel to tell a pedophile in a cave?
    1
  2298. Ok.
    1
  2299. Disinformation gets you reported, champ.
    1
  2300. That's an old quote. Before Artemis was developed.
    1
  2301.  @joeycarbone3754  Don’t be a dur da durrrrrr..
    1
  2302. That Mark Twain quote perfectly explains why there’s a growing number of flat-earthers, moon landing deniers, anti-vaxxers and 9/11 Hoaxtards. 😉
    1
  2303.  @YouTubeSucks_1  Exactly.
    1
  2304. Firstly, Donald Trump's inauguration took place on January 20, 2017, not 2016. Secondly, there is no credible evidence that the protests were "paid for" or orchestrated by Democratic leadership. While various activist organizations, such as those involved in the Women's March, may have received support from grassroots donors, the idea that the protests were financially backed by Democrats at large is a conspiracy theory without basis.
    1
  2305. Oh ffs! There’s no evidence that the earth is flat with a magical dome above and no gravity.
    1
  2306.  @PricklyPineapplesProductions  In terms of the breadth and variety of evidence, both fields are exceptionally well-supported. If you're asking about the type of proof or evidence, they are different but both are extensively validated through experimentation, observation, and application in their respective contexts.
    1
  2307. Reported you for disinformation.
    1
  2308.  @JMa-cg1ks You wouldn’t know anything about truth. All you do is deny with ZERO evidence.
    1
  2309.  @pelocitdarney5718  Thank you 👍
    1
  2310. @IDontBuyIt50 “its common knowledge on the Moon…” Really? Are there people on the moon right now? My god…think before you type.
    1
  2311. @IDontBuyIt50 You sound like one of those deluded flat-wits. Is that what you are? 😂
    1
  2312. Thanks for your opinion.
    1
  2313. “I was there dickhead” And what did you see? @QuantumBojanglement 
    1
  2314. Blah blah blah
    1
  2315.  @DODCIAworksforUK  Your IP address has been captured and your posts are now being forwarded through the relevant US Government channels. Ref.S093391
    1
  2316. Stuttered? Where?
    1
  2317. What’s wrong with hating Trump?
    1
  2318. They tried to escape.
    1
  2319. Just sane people.
    1
  2320. Crowd was laughing at him. They laughed after he spoke. Not after her. Your simpleton brain can't figure that out?
    1
  2321.  @kairoperu1587  The Bible explicitly says not to swear an oath. Ever! Matthew 5:34-37 (NIV) This includes the Bible.
    1
  2322. Ok. I hope you get over it.
    1
  2323. Found the flat-earth !diot, folks
    1
  2324. Who won the 2020 election?
    1
  2325. 🤦‍♂
    1
  2326. ❓
    1
  2327. We did. Nine times. Landed on six of those occasions. Deal with it.
    1
  2328. Yes, things tend to move when you touch them. Oops.
    1
  2329. What about it?  @bruhat_patra 
    1
  2330.  @MobySmith-e9z  Ok? And?
    1
  2331.  @MobySmith-e9z  No. What are you? A flat earther?
    1
  2332. How would it float? It’s in a vacuum.
    1
  2333. Proof?
    1
  2334.  @viciouscycle-thenoise6630  That argument assumes we tried and failed to go beyond 1/1000th of the distance to the Moon. But there's an important distinction between lacking the ability to do something and simply choosing not to. We've already sent self-landing robotic missions to Mars, so the idea of sending humans isn't far-fetched, even if we had never been to the Moon at all.
    1
  2335. Proof?
    1
  2336. Proof?
    1
  2337. Nope.
    1
  2338. Well said 👏
    1
  2339. Wrong about politics? Doesn’t everyone have their own views?
    1
  2340. Trump’s a pathological liar. Biden isn’t. He’s just old.
    1
  2341. Unfortunately, that’s how she makes a living.
    1
  2342. The skill it would take to do what? Pull it off? All the skill in the world wouldn’t matter if what you said about planes coming apart was true. So why are you lying?
    1
  2343. 🤦‍♂
    1
  2344. All governments are deceitful. But that doesn't necessarily provide evidence or support for the specific claim that the moon landing was faked. Each claim or argument should be evaluated on its own merits, and generalizations about the behavior of governments should not substitute for specific evidence related to the moon landing.
    1
  2345. Don’t know. Don’t care.  @LeftyRighty123 
    1
  2346. Facts don’t care about belief.
    1
  2347. Almost half of the voters share his pain.
    1
  2348. No it veered towards the pillar after losing power.
    1
  2349. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  2350.  @CunningDingus  “Yeah, I actually was alive at the time, and there was no delay.” The delay is only noticed on one side of the conversation because it’s being recorded in Houston.
    1
  2351. Who won the 2020 election?
    1
  2352.  @RenoLaringo  Oh sorry. I thought you were a flat-wit.
    1
  2353.  @RenoLaringo  I only had 2 boosters. Did just fine. What's the matter? You scared of needles?
    1
  2354.  @RenoLaringo  By the way. Refusing to get your jabs doesn’t mean you’re special and it certainly doesn’t mean you’re smarter than the entire scientific community. The ones who pretend otherwise are the real sheep.
    1
  2355.  @RenoLaringo  We're not looking for the mentally handicapped to respect us. We're just here to laugh and ridcule. Keep blabbering so we can keep laughing, champ. LOL! LOL! LOL!
    1
  2356. Which government?
    1
  2357. Turns out though, Ben was wrong about his predictions of who Trump would appoint.
    1
  2358.  @RodneyDempsey-o8w  “if he is not guilty of anything then he should not have taken the pardon.” Republicans have all three branches of government. Schiff wouldn’t stand a chance at trial. That’s why he took it.
    1
  2359.  @johnhageman8232  "There isnt enough paper to list all this scum has done against the American people" That's Trump for ya.
    1
  2360.  @GoranM-c4p  It's a preemptive pardon. Biden is out. So if Trump's loyalists have the power to falsely convict members of the January 6th committee then the pardon would keep them out of prison.
    1
  2361.  @RodneyDempsey-o8w  What happened to Trump?
    1
  2362.  @richardmitchell7918  Because Trump can’t be trusted. Remember, republicans have all three branches of government. They could make up any evidence against Schiff as they please.
    1
  2363.  @chriskeene241  Ok? We’ll see.
    1
  2364.  @Corey_Otis88  Thanks for your opinion.
    1
  2365.  @Corey_Otis88  Just wondering your thoughts. Who won the 2020 election?
    1
  2366.  @benfinesilver2250  Thanks for your opinion.
    1
  2367.  @Saliem02  No, Biden pardoned him because of the current situation. Look at how much power your daddy Trump has now. All three branches of government plus the Supreme Court. They could literally make up any evidence they wanted against Schiff.
    1
  2368.  @jacquelinevanaswegen4846  “he's as guilty as the day is long” Of what? Where’s your evidence?
    1
  2369.  @totaltrol  “Only guilty people get pardons. Simple” Ok? Now, what was he guilty of and where is your evidence?
    1
  2370. Sure. But can you first explain how a twice impeached president, convicted felon, sex offender and compulsive liar is allowed to become president?
    1
  2371. Why did the thread started post and run??? Where are you, Levi?
    1
  2372. @ Worse than the Senate exonerating Trump on two impeachments?
    1
  2373. @ What?
    1
  2374.  @1st_Powder_Puff  Railroad Trump? Lmao! Why are you defending a proven lair?
    1
  2375.  @jonfriends2988  They don’t unless Trump is about to take office.
    1
  2376.  @DelaLee-wt6px  Why?
    1
  2377.  @GoranM-c4p  "because it's the right thing to do." Right thing to do? Please explain. "Why did Biden pardon his son ?" Ask Biden.
    1
  2378.  @volshebny  First of all, Trump has zero integrity. Let’s not pretend like he does. Secondly, Schiff initially opposed the Pardon but Biden insisted. Why? Remember, Biden is no longer in office. Trump is there now and has all three branches of government and he’s suggested the idea of using the FBI to go after the January 6th committee members. Trump can’t be trusted. That’s why Schiff has been preemptively pardoned. Now let me ask you. Why would 1,500 people who committed crimes by assaulting police officers, breaching/entering the capitol and committing vandalism on Federal property accept a pardon when they know they were wrong?
    1
  2379.  @joshuawynne4415  He’s a Senator not an ambassador.
    1
  2380. What technological improvements?
    1
  2381. Sorry, I don’t understand the question. No, I’m not here everyday.  @patrikpass2962 
    1
  2382. Prove it.
    1
  2383. Well duh! Apollo astronauts were gone for no longer 10 days. Astronauts on the ISS are there for MONTHS.
    1
  2384. Also the Apollo crews being on the moon weren’t weightless the entire time.
    1
  2385. Because he knows the guy is full of sh!t.
    1
  2386. Excellent post 👏
    1
  2387. She looked like a featherweight in there.
    1
  2388. Your logical fallacy is: Personal Incredulity. “It asserts that a proposition must be false because it contradicts one's personal expectations or beliefs, or is difficult to imagine.”
    1
  2389. *1969
    1
  2390.  @sheeba7846  So if the toilet had worked, the vending machine had worked the the VR rides had worked you'd accept all six of the moon missions without question? Doubt it.
    1
  2391.  @sheeba7846  You started this thread. You don’t like questions?
    1
  2392. ❓
    1
  2393.  @jumbroni6014  Yes, I did. Care to enlighten?
    1
  2394.  @jumbroni6014  No. guess I overlooked it.
    1
  2395. ❓
    1
  2396. Go away, Flurf.
    1
  2397. 4:28 Flat earther...FULL STOP
    1
  2398. No. It wasn’t a drawbridge.
    1
  2399.  @T-wi3mq1jw6h  The design of the bridge wasn’t the problem.
    1
  2400. 🥱
    1
  2401. 🤦‍♂
    1
  2402. Bu..bu..but i’M TiReD oF pAyInG $5 fOr A lOaF oF bReAd 😭 Trump’s gonna fix that….
    1
  2403. Durt da durrrrrrr….
    1
  2404. Because it’s the first US craft to land in over 50 years.
    1
  2405. "as it could be a potential target." How so? The terrorist's plan was set in place months before the attack.
    1
  2406. If you believe there’s a firmament then you can’t also believe what this man is saying.
    1
  2407. Thanks for your opinion.
    1
  2408. Maybe turn off YT notifications? Ever think of that? Derp?  @honestreview2129 
    1
  2409. Meanwhile, NASA is 100% certain you are delusional.
    1
  2410. 🙄 😂
    1
  2411.  @chp9450  Probably but we still landed on the moon and China doesn’t dispute that.
    1
  2412. Tugboats are only used to get a ship underway. After that the ship is on its own.
    1
  2413. What? There was nothing wrong with the bridge.
    1
  2414. 👍
    1
  2415. Watch the video.
    1
  2416.  @yvettakollega5791  And what did you conclude?
    1
  2417.  @yvettakollega5791  You’re not making any sense.
    1
  2418.  @yvettakollega5791  “see my initial comment” Ok. Did you watch the video?
    1
  2419. Reported as DISINFORMATION.
    1
  2420.  @jacobkubacki2719  So then provide credible evidence that Bush knew it was got to happen or $hut tf up.
    1
  2421. You STILL haven't provided DIRECT evidence that Bush knew the attacks were going to happen. Why? All you've done is talk about your military service, your personal feelings, incredulity, paranoia and made red-herring fallacies. By the way, they didn't lose $2.3 trillion dollars. Rumsfeld said in press release that the Pentagon can't track $2.3 trillion worth of spending due to antiquated accounting systems. Use some common sense - If the government wanted to steal money then they wouldn't publicly announce the $2.3 trillion worth in accounting errors and make people skeptical. They'd just keep quiet.  @jacobkubacki2719 
    1
  2422. Seek psychiatric treatment  @jacobkubacki2719 
    1
  2423. I’d LOVE to see your evidence for your BS claims.
    1
  2424.  @TheGiftOfYahwehSMMOKE ”let’s see yours” Absolutely! Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photosu available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  2425. What?
    1
  2426. Yeah and they pay their workers a bowl of rice per day too.
    1
  2427.  @jmc5335  He’s been on Rogan before.
    1
  2428.  @bgarri57  The petrified wood rock wasn’t certified or given by NASA. It way too big to be a donated sample and it’s not encased in plastic as all other donated samples are.
    1
  2429.  @bgarri57  “Sure.. Well, they modified them in labs.” Where’s your proof that rocks were modified in labs to resemble moon rocks in order to deceive the world?
    1
  2430.  @bgarri57  “Doesn’t matter” Oh ok. So you’ve given up on the petrified wood/moon rock argument and are now going with different shadow lengths?
    1
  2431. No 😂
    1
  2432. Just in case you didn’t know, Bart Sibrel isn’t a flat earther so you can’t use him to validate your false pizza earth fantasy world.
    1
  2433.  @Jim-n1t  And what problem is that?
    1
  2434. ❓
    1
  2435. Another “one and done” troll post.
    1
  2436. “Answer...Stars would have given the game away.” Wrong answer. We don’t see stars in the Apollo photography because the camera is set to record a daylight exposure. If they wanted to see stars in the photos/video they would have to intentionally overexpose the image. “Buzz Aldrin was asked the question..Did you see any stars? His reply..."I didn't see any"” Wrong again. Collins said that not Aldrin and he was referring to stars in the solar corona; a piece of dialogue that conspiritards intentionally leave out. “He wasn't lying as the Apollo "Missions" were conducted on a film set.” Nope. There’s no credible evidence it was a film set. The only way to convincingly film astronauts in1/6g in a vacuum environment is on the moon. “Stanley Kubrick's "A Space Odyssey. 2001"” Ok? And? Do better. Learn.   @ulrichsherry7092 
    1
  2437. “There’s hundreds of videos from dozens of angles of the twin towers.” Does that really need to explained? I guess so. When WTC-1 was hit it got everyone’s attention. Cameras came out and people started filming. But almost all of the videos are of WTC-2 for obvious reasons. In Washington nothing happened prior to the Pentagon getting hit so naturally nobody is around filming.
    1
  2438. Looks sort of pentagonal in shape like a reflection from a 5-bladed lens diaphragm.
    1
  2439. $$$$$$$$
    1
  2440. Because of the lower gravity.
    1
  2441. Which movie?
    1
  2442.  @gloomystardust  You misunderstood the last sentence. The key word here is “if”.
    1
  2443. The fact that you used ‘Moon Landing’ in the singular suggests that you had no clue there were five more landings up until 1972. Do you actually believe that NASA faked nine moon missions, six of them being landings and the rest of the world was just too stup!d to notice?
    1
  2444. Flat earther.
    1
  2445. Proof?
    1
  2446. The Russians did influence the 2016 election. That was proven.
    1
  2447. Technology is racist? 😂
    1
  2448. Thanks for your meaningless opinion.
    1
  2449. “Makes you think they were aiming on something specific” Does the word “derp” echo inside your head ?
    1
  2450. So?
    1
  2451. Yeah…okay 😂
    1
  2452. Proof?
    1
  2453. That’s right.
    1
  2454. And your point?
    1
  2455.  @syashadeed7552  Excuse for what, wise guy? I guess you lack the common sense to understand that audible cues for the benefit of the viewer can be added to videos.
    1
  2456.  @michaelbartlett6864 “Story of my life” Do better. Learn.
    1
  2457.  @michaelbartlett6864  Don’t care that others disagree. It was obviously added in to make a clumsy moment more entertaining. Like I said before, the sound is missing in another video of the same footage.
    1
  2458. Nope.
    1
  2459. Prove it or go home.
    1
  2460.  @shof9550  “do some research” Lmfao! It’s been just 4 days since the accident you already done more research than the NTSB, Baltimore port authority, US Coast Guard and ABS combined all from your basement. Yeah, ok.
    1
  2461.  @shof9550  ,,dah gubbermint is hiding dah troof” You’re so right! We should have sent flat-earthers and moon landing deniers to do the investigation. 🙄
    1
  2462. Shadow banning refers to comments that are only visible to the person who left them.
    1
  2463. Proof?
    1
  2464. Bush set up a mic’d podium from the school.
    1
  2465. Except he lied about his “facts” https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=48_RRRe2BiairlbV
    1
  2466. I’d love to see your evidence against the Apollo moon landings.
    1
  2467. What’s unusual about that? Not everyone hits the like button on videos. I rarely do.
    1
  2468. Notice how you’re making a definitive claim while at the same time admitting ignorance (asking a question)? Do better. Learn.
    1
  2469. Ed Fendell.
    1
  2470. What does that make you?
    1
  2471. Lmao! Did you just upvote your own comment?
    1
  2472. Now that’s a religion I would embrace.
    1
  2473. Yeah, okay.
    1
  2474. So you could read their minds?
    1
  2475.  @remy1993  🙄
    1
  2476. “Why 50 years ago, human can land on the moon, didn't they check the availability of water those time?” Because that wasn’t the mission objective. The purpose of the first moon landing was to beat the Soviets and claim superiority.
    1
  2477.  @IzzyPro16  What?
    1
  2478. What?
    1
  2479.  @jmc5335  Oh it’s you again. The guy who ran for hills when asked who won the 2020 election. At any rate, if Sam agreed with Trump’s politics then he would voted for him. But the fact is, he voted for K. Harris and even donated money to her campaign.
    1
  2480.  @jmc5335  If that were true then he would have voted for Trump. Yes, willful ignorance is the worst kind hence the tens of millions of voters who KNOW trump is a pathological liar yet they supported him anyway.
    1
  2481.  @jmc5335  No. Sam does not agree with Trump's politics in terms of the methods of governance that enable him to achieve what he wants. Honor and Integrity are more important to Sam than anything else.
    1
  2482.  @jmc5335  So what? As I said, everyone agrees on the issues Trump campaigned about. The point I’m making is that Sam doesn’t agree with his politics in terms of governance like you and tens of millions of other people do.
    1
  2483.  @jmc5335  “Sam Harris didn't say that during Trump's campaign.” Because he didn’t need to. It’s already implied through his disdain for Trump. “It's a pity you continue to misrepresent Sam Harris here.” Thanks for your opinion. “What does a "better economy" mean to you?” Who won the 2020 election?
    1
  2484.  @jmc5335  "You claimed he didn't say he shared most of Trump's politics and now you claim he said it during Trump's campaign." When I say that Sam didn't share Trump's politics I mean in the context of Trump's governance. The direct quote you provided from Sam ("I probably agree with most of Trump's politics in fact") which is based on campaign details, didn't come into the conversation until five comments ago. I was not aware of Sam's quote until you brought it up but it doesn't change the fact of what I was referring to. "You claimed that everyone agrees a better economy is required but you can't define what that is to you. Very disappointing again." It's not that I can't it's because my opinion on the economy isn't relevant to this specific argument. "I say disappointing, but if Sam Harris is your hero, then vapid statements not rooted in reality are to be expected." And if he's not my hero? "Sam Harris agreeing with most of Trump's politics is implied through his disdain for him?" No, that's not what I said. Me: "The point I’m making is that Sam doesn’t agree with his politics in terms of governance like you and tens of millions of other people do." You: "Sam Harris didn't say that during Trump's campaign." Me: "Because he didn’t need to. It’s already implied through his disdain for Trump." Summary: Sam doesn't like how Trump governs and he doesn't need to directly say say so either because it's implied in his dislike for the man. "Biden won in 2020." Congratulations. You're the first to answer that. "What does a better economy mean to you?" A better ecoomy to me means what it means to most people. One with sustainable growth, low unemployment and rising standards of living for the majority of people. Stable inflation, fair wages, increased economic opportunities. An economy that benefits both individuals and society as a whole.
    1
  2485. Yes, he did. Do you agree that you didn't bring up Sam's direct quote until just recently?
    1
  2486. @ You were referring to that quote that I didn’t know Sam made and you assumed that I understood the complete context of the quote itself. This goes alway back to the other thread you abandoned. Think twice before you go around starting dumpster fires.
    1
  2487.  @jmc5335  I made my argument based on your indirect quote and lack of context. So, there was no apparent reason to ask. You also had the opportunity to quote him directly early on and explain the context. Looking back at your initial comment to me in the other thread, it had nothing to do with my reply to the OP anyway.
    1
  2488. The whole debate can be summed up like this - Trump is a proven liar, election denier and convicted criminal. Why on earth would anyone support him? Does honor and integrity not matter to anyone anymore?
    1
  2489. Reported you for misinformation.
    1
  2490. Crowd was laughing at him, not her.
    1
  2491. Well, aren’t you gullible asf.
    1
  2492. 🤦‍♂️
    1
  2493. Sorry, kid but real life spaceships don’t look like Star Wars.
    1
  2494.  @JaredLester-zo4cs  No, you said, “right, this looks real”. So you don’t believe it’s real. I read your kind of comment every day. So why don’t you stop being a hypocrite and explain your reasoning why you have doubts.
    1
  2495. Same in the US.
    1
  2496. Why didn’t “God” protect kids in mass school shootings?
    1
  2497. There are no winners in debates like this. Each man prefers a different candidate. Simple as that.
    1
  2498. Does your cellphone have a 200’ diameter satellite dish attached to it? Probably not. Does your phone put out the same power as the Unified S-band? Probably not. Does your service provider have towers in the dead areas you experience? Probably not. Does your cellphone have “line of sight” communication with the towers? Not always. A-Durrrrrr
    1
  2499. Planes came from the outside.
    1
  2500. ???
    1
  2501. 😂😂🤣
    1
  2502. @Christopher W Hodges Why did you delete your troll thread? 🤣
    1
  2503. Wrong. Right NOW humans can only go to low earth orbit. But that doesn’t mean humans have NEVER been beyond low earth orbit in the past. Nice try 😉
    1
  2504. A B757.
    1
  2505. You must be talking about your hero, Trump.
    1
  2506.  @robymaru03  “try asking Gemini, Copilot or ChatGPT question about the moon landing” Ok, here’s what ChatGPT had to say when asked for 10 key pieces of evidence for the Apollo moon landings. 1. **Moon rocks**: The Apollo missions brought back over 800 pounds of lunar rocks, which have unique properties not found on Earth. 2. **Lunar module debris**: The Apollo landing sites have remnants of the lunar modules, which have been identified through high-resolution lunar imaging. 3. **Retroreflectors**: Apollo 11, 14, and 15 missions placed retroreflectors on the Moon, still used today to measure the distance between Earth and the Moon. 4. **Photos and videos**: Thousands of photographs and hours of video footage were taken during the missions, showing the astronauts on the Moon's surface and various activities. 5. **Tracking data**: Thousands of ground-based and satellite tracking stations followed the Apollo spacecraft's trajectory, confirming their path to the Moon. 6. **Seismic data**: Instruments left by Apollo astronauts recorded moonquakes, providing evidence of seismic activity on the Moon's surface. 7. **Third-party verification**: Observatories and space agencies around the world, including the Soviet Union, tracked the Apollo missions and confirmed their authenticity. 8. **Apollo mission telemetry**: Data transmitted by Apollo spacecraft, including telemetry information, was received and analyzed by NASA and independent entities. 9. **Footprints and rover tracks**: Photographs from lunar orbiters show preserved astronaut footprints and rover tracks left on the lunar surface. 10. **Scientific experiments**: The experiments conducted by the astronauts, such as soil analysis and solar wind collection, provided valuable scientific data that contributed to our understanding of the Moon. 😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣
    1
  2507. I can’t stand animal abuse.
    1
  2508. Yeah, but if your goal is to convince the entire world then it’s easier to actually go to the moon.
    1
  2509. Derp?
    1
  2510. Lmao! What else you got?
    1
  2511. I think you mean Trump.
    1
  2512. Oh wowwww.. You found the word 'lie' in the word 'believe'...must be a cunspuracee!!!
    1
  2513. Only Trump has TDS.
    1
  2514. The buybull was wrong.
    1
  2515. Proof?
    1
  2516. Then why do Hoaxtards always claim that only Americans believe it?
    1
  2517. Ah yes, TDS. A meme designed to gaslight and stop conversation.
    1
  2518. Stay in school, Charlie.
    1
  2519. Moon.
    1
  2520.  @freedomdove  $ibrel said they were in low earth orbit so that means he’s not a flat earther.
    1
  2521. Republicans that say Trump lost the 2020 election are full of crap?
    1
  2522. Radio controlled devices were invented in the 1890’s.
    1
  2523. Yes, your post is ridiculous.
    1
  2524. Why reject the pardon? Republicans are in control of all three branches of government. So if charges are brought on Schiff they could literally make up any evidence they wanted against him and he’d be screwed.
    1
  2525. Which one?
    1
  2526. Troll
    1
  2527. There are no experts here in the comments. Just “I don’t understand how this happened therefore conspiracy” derp-heads.
    1
  2528. Sam is confused because 51% of the vote put a proven liar, convicted felon and sex offender back in office because they believe that trusting a President who campaigned on identity politics (not solely) would be somehow be worse for the country than a man who was previously impeached twice and who was called “a disgrace” by our own 4-star Generals.
    1
  2529.  @Daneiladams555 Feel free to provide credible evidence that unequivocally proves Trump won the 2020 election. I’ll wait.
    1
  2530. Prove it.
    1
  2531. The only person with TDS is Trump himself.
    1
  2532. Sh!t happens 💁🏼‍♂
    1
  2533. And what?
    1
  2534. Why?
    1
  2535.  @jasminaogrady7470  Lol…there’s plenty of information out already to make an informed decision.
    1
  2536. ⚠FLAT EARTH IDIOT ALERT⚠
    1
  2537. At least you acknowledge it was an airliner.
    1
  2538. ⚠FLAT EARTH ID!OT ALERT⚠ ☝
    1
  2539.  @shillhunter4380 Oops! You just got reported again.
    1
  2540. Yes, your education is that.
    1
  2541. *You're Prove it, little one  @cheforyourpartyprivatehire9765  🙂
    1
  2542.  @everadocisneros2528  “Everyone knows that’s how democrats work.” So you just assume that anyone who attacks your point of view is a democrat? 🤦‍♂You sound insecure.
    1
  2543. 😂😂😂
    1
  2544. "Calling it like it is" is not about patriotism. It's about what's sensible. White supports Trump which makes him unpatriotic.
    1
  2545. Ah yes, TDS. A meme designed to gaslight and stop conversation.
    1
  2546.  @BrianRosborough  "not to mention it only hurts democrats and left leaning people who now believe Adolf2.0" Sam Harris has stated he doesn't believe Trump is an Adolf because Trump has no ideology. Trump only wants money and fame. He's a wannabe Adolf at best. "instead of knowing more than half the country just voted in someone who is actually a great President" Lmao! Trump was an awful president. He mismanaged covid—19 which contributed to the highest infection and mortality rate per capita than any other country. He lied about winning the 2020 election. He pressured state officials to 'find him votes' in order to change the outcome. After that failed he inspired a mob to attack the Capitol and stop the certification. He continues to claim to this day that he won in 2020. He's made disparaging comments about veterans and women. He's told 30,000+ verified lies since taking office. He's a twice impeached president. He's a convicted felon on 34 counts and convicted sex offender and he completely divided the country during his term. Is that your idea of a great President?
    1
  2547. *52 years. Because of the high cost.
    1
  2548. Voters need to understand that Presidents don’t control the price of bread, eggs, milk and gas. Voters were told it was Biden’s fault but they were just misinformed and swayed by stereotypes. “I’m tired of paying $5 for a loaf of bread!”…but when you turn on the news and you see airports FILLED with people going to their favorite destinations when holidays come around.
    1
  2549. False.
    1
  2550. So molested Boy Scouts is your evidence that 9/11 was an inside job?
    1
  2551.  @slavaukraine963 How is he lucky? He spent nearly 3.5 Billion in the initial purchase. He also spent billions rebuilding the WTC site. So, he didn’t make jack sh!t off the attacks. Also, missing a work day isn’t proof of a conspiracy.
    1
  2552.  @slavaukraine963 You still haven’t provided the evidence that Silverstein’s business practices proved 9/11 was an inside job. Why not?
    1
  2553.  @slavaukraine963 Btw, 2.3 trillions of dollars was never missing the day before 9/11. Rumsfeld said in a speech at the Pentagon that the Department of Defense was unable to account for $2.3 trillion in transactions. The funds were not money physically lost or stolen; they were discrepancies in the accounting system. You’re using amateur arguments that were debunked nearly 23 years ago.
    1
  2554. No, not misplaced. Rumsfeld clearly said they couldn’t account for 2.3 trillion in spending due to antiquated accounting systems. Unaccounted spending or inefficient use of funds have still occurred in subsequent years following 9/11. Why hasn’t the government flown more planes into the Pentagon if it continues to happen?
    1
  2555. So let’s review. You’ve FAILED to prove direct evidence that Silverstein’s business decisions are PROOF that 9/11 was an inside job and you’ve FAILED to prove direct evidence that unaccountable spending is PROOF that 9/11 was an inside job. Well done 👍
    1
  2556.  @slavaukraine963 Got anymore deliberately off-topic evasive derails that you want to use?
    1
  2557. It is off-topic. Notice how instead of providing DIRECT EVIDENCE for your original claim you just keep deflecting? And notice how you’re making spurious characterizations about me instead of proving your claim?  Do better. Learn.  @slavaukraine963 
    1
  2558. Lmao! How many times are trolls like you going to use that comment? I hear that one at least twice a day. In debates about the shape of the earth, the moon landings, vaccines, 9/11, etc. You should really stop using “ur a bot and govt. shill” as an excuse for your inability to prove your claims. It just makes you look pathetic.  @Buck19999 
    1
  2559. Do you believe Capricorn 1 would have convinced the world had they released the footage as a real event instead of as a fictional movie?
    1
  2560. @londonbabe2467 "What I will do is try and find various sources and videos I’ve found on the net" We look forward to seeing it.
    1
  2561. “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    1
  2562. The Mueller report confirmed that Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election through hacking and releasing Democratic Party emails and using social media to influence voters. The Russian government was also involved in trying to influence American politics through these efforts.
    1
  2563. What would you say to him?
    1
  2564. The media’s early treatment of the Hunter Biden laptop story and the related investigations was criticized by some as biased or slow, the idea of "collusion" remains a contentious claim, and there is no clear evidence of a coordinated effort to suppress the investigation. The issue involves complex factors, including media skepticism, political polarization, and the handling of potentially sensitive or unverified information.
    1
  2565. “The flag is one I think at one point they were dancing around on the moon.” No, it movesbecause the astronauts were adjusting it. And when you let go things tend to keep moving until they come to a rest. “Wow! If their suit broke or ripped they've been dead” Ok? Is that supposed to be proof they didn’t go? “how would you get that Moon buggy into that moon module” It folded up. What? You think human beings can get to the moon but can’t figure out how to make a folding buggy? 😂 “impossible this is almost that's compared today.” What? 🤔
    1
  2566. Which troll video did you watch that told you to come here and type that?
    1
  2567. The only person with TDS is Trump himself.
    1
  2568. But the density of the atmosphere is very low at those temperatures.
    1
  2569. Where’s your proof?
    1
  2570.  @anacletogeranciopancracio.2465  Why are you fixated on my anus?
    1
  2571. Hah! You wish.
    1
  2572. Why?
    1
  2573. Yes, because it was a stupid answer.
    1
  2574. Reported as MISINFORMATION.
    1
  2575. And?
    1
  2576.  @CathyLopez-t3h  Already have. Flat earth is just a dumb scam invented by con men who making a LIVING fleecing the gullible.
    1
  2577.  @CathyLopez-t3h  <— Got owned 😂
    1
  2578.  @CathyLopez-t3h  The spherical shape of the earth was proven over 2000 years ago. Tell me. What map do flurfs use for long distance navigation?
    1
  2579.  @CathyLopez-t3h  So you answered my question with a question. Ok, I’ll play along. There are no “flat earth” maps. Pilots know the earth is a slowly rotating terrestrial spheroid. Pilots only need to maintain a level flight. Level means perpendicular to the force of gravity. It doesn’t mean flat. They don’t need to a deliberately dip the nose. Gravity keeps the plane from flying off into space. No, the horizon doesn’t rise to eye-level. Not even on a “flat” earth. I have seen the effects of curvature. Lay down on a beach and watch the sunset. When the sun dips below the horizon, quickly stand up and you will see the sun again. Welcome to ball earth.
    1
  2580.  @CathyLopez-t3h  They’re not being deleted. It’s a glitch. Sort comments by “newest first” and then scroll down to find your thread. All comments will then be visible. Do research? Lmao! Flat Earth is just a dumb scam put on YT by con men who make A LIVING fleecing gullible people like you. What’s wrong with you that you can’t figure that out?  Long distance navigation is based on the spherical earth. And guess what? The maritime and aviation industries don’t hire people who believe the earth is flat. Why? Because shipping companies aren’t interested in their ships getting lost or arriving at the wrong destinations or running the ships aground and losing BILLIONS of dollars worth of cargo not to mention the potential loss of life. Same thing frothed aviation industry. This is common sense.
    1
  2581. Ah yes, another lie told to make the sane people of this world act like they’re hiding ,,da troof”
    1
  2582. That’s the best evidence I’ve ever heard!
    1
  2583. You agree with known liars? https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=EQHFGj-hQsJj3uaH
    1
  2584. “but why would he cut it? ” In order to fabricate a conspiracy theory and making money off his YT videos by duping gullible rubes.  “I find it hard to believe that we went to the moon in the sixties” Do you have good reasons for believing that besides your distrust in government? “I know the government is highly incompetent, they lie constantly…” All government lie. But here’s a known fact. No foreign government on the face of the earth disputes any of the six manned moon landings including countries that hate our guts. Not a single one. “The government also recently basically created a plot to kidnap the gov. Of Michigan” Sounds like you’ve been indulging in some conspiracy theory nincompoopery yourself. Even if that were absolutely true it STILL doesn’t disprove the moon landings. “I think it’s reasonable to be skeptical of anything the government claims.” Absolutely. Which is why we should rely on credible evidence. The moon landings wouldn’t have been possible without the help of numerous governments and space agencies throughout the world. And if you’re going to claim that they were all in on the hoax then you’ll have to provide credible evidence for that as well.  J8726 
    1
  2585.  @ernanswaz <—— 🤡
    1
  2586.  @StePPasAreUsTV  <— Dude got shut tf down and ran like a lil bish 🤣
    1
  2587.  @nooneofconsequence1251  “he admits that neither Biden nor Harris actually campaigned on trans BS.” He did say that but he is also blaming dems for losing. I guess the K. Harris campaign didn’t want to challenge the misinformation coming from the right regarding identity politics because they were afraid it would make them look biased to the LGBTQ community?
    1
  2588. You’re disgusting.
    1
  2589.  @roberttassone7676  Yes, she is a dummy.
    1
  2590.  @thestarisalie  “my comments keep getting shadow banned by google” No, they’re not. Sort comments by “newest first” then scroll down to find this thread. YT has a glitch. If you navigate to a thread via the notifications bell, that thread will appear at top but it will have missing replies. Sorting comments by newest first fixes this. The only drawback is that you might have to scroll down a lot if the thread is old.
    1
  2591. Says the 19-year old still putting teeth under his pillow.
    1
  2592. Your government doesn’t dispute the six Apollo moon landings. Let that sink in.
    1
  2593. Ok. We still went to the moon nine times and landed on six of those occasions.
    1
  2594. Which other moon landing? There were six.
    1
  2595. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  2596. Flat earth idiot.
    1
  2597. “Can someone please help me understand wtf actually happened here?” Yes. You’re a total mor0n. That’s all you need to know.
    1
  2598. He's deliberately being provocative. I don't think he deserves a helpful comment. @MFitz12 
    1
  2599. Those devices don’t emit ionizing radiation.
    1
  2600. Nobody lied, dummy. Schiff was basing his claims on the available evidence at the time.
    1
  2601. You got the second part right.
    1
  2602. It still landed.
    1
  2603. The SLS flew to the moon in November 2022. It was called Artemis 1.
    1
  2604. Hmmm, I wonder why cellphones struggle in mountains 🤔
    1
  2605. Why?
    1
  2606. No, it was Kubrick but he insisted filming on location. NASA agreed.
    1
  2607. Yeah, okay 😂
    1
  2608. Because it wasn’t designed to carry people, liar.
    1
  2609.  @jespernielsen9320  “But they didnt, they never were out, never will be able to.” So then prove it. Or SHTFU.
    1
  2610.  @jespernielsen9320  Notice how you never proved it and decided instead to SHTFU? Thank you.
    1
  2611. Of course you believe it’s cap. You think space is fake you deluded flurf.
    1
  2612. Proof or SHTFU!
    1
  2613.  @shillhunter4380  <—— ⚠FLAT EARTH ID!OT ALERT⚠
    1
  2614. You forgot to bring evidence.
    1
  2615.  @KimSenior  And look at you. A 13-year old account with 253 subscribers and you STILL have no evidence. Now that’s embarrassing.
    1
  2616. Hah! Nothing but 🦗 🦗🦗  @KimSenior 
    1
  2617. In other words you can’t find any actual evidence so you resort to non sequitur fallacies.
    1
  2618. I watched the interview, wise guy. If the truth is really on $ibrel’s side why did he lie about his evidence? https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=UFeceiiDIb77jJhi  @weswelk6014 
    1
  2619.  @sarc992  All you have to do is go to Wikipedia and change if the article if you believe it’s wrong. Anyone can edit the information. So why haven’t you done it yet?
    1
  2620.  @sarc992  I read them. Just a pathetic excuse.
    1
  2621.  @sarc992  You're a moon landing denier, correct? So then stop making pathetic excuses and take your "evidence" and update the wiki page on the moon landings and set the record straight.
    1
  2622.  @sarc992  If you dismiss Wiki outright without engaging with the evidence it presents on the Apollo moon landings, that says more about your unwillingness to think critically than about its credibility. If you have actual evidence to challenge its content, you have every opportunity to correct it—yet you choose not to. Instead, you hide behind vague insinuations and conspiratorial rhetoric, refusing to engage in meaningful discourse. That’s not skepticism; that’s intellectual cowardice.
    1
  2623.  @sarc992  If Wikipedia had no connection to reality, it wouldn’t be one of the most widely used and scrutinized knowledge sources in the world. The fact that 'people like me'—or anyone, for that matter—can edit it is precisely why misinformation doesn’t last long. If you believe in an 'organized narrative,' prove it with evidence instead of relying on vague insinuations and conspiratorial deflections.
    1
  2624.  @sarc992  Ah yes, the moment someone calls out a moon-derp on their nonsense, they're suddenly "triggered"—a convenient label to shut down discussion. Or perhaps, just a bit of projection on your end?
    1
  2625.  @sarc992  I’m not going to entertain your deliberately off-topic evasive derail. You posted on an Apollo 11 video. You’re obviously uncomfortable with the Wikipedia banner under a video about factual history. That’s a YOU problem. Modern history is what it is. Not what you think it is or wish it could be.
    1
  2626.  @sarc992  No. My conclusions on the history of Apollo are based on the mountain of credible evidence that supports them. Whenever you see a Wikipedia disclaimer, you know the subject is a popular one with reality denying conspiracy derps like yourself who all flunked out of kindergarten and now try to lash out at the world for their own failings as human beings.
    1
  2627. @Truthinabottle Prove it.
    1
  2628. @Truthinabottle Ok, so still no proof. Thanks.
    1
  2629.  @sarc992  <--- Retard
    1
  2630. Downvoted 👎
    1
  2631. Proof or go home. 😊
    1
  2632. What’s your point? Nuclear energy technology has been around since the fifties. Long before they landed on the moon.
    1
  2633. Nope. Next?
    1
  2634.  @Goseph_Joebbels  As I said in the beginning - Next?
    1
  2635. But they did have the technology.
    1
  2636. Wow…you may want to delete this thread 😂😂😂
    1
  2637. What does that say about her opponent?
    1
  2638. The moon.
    1
  2639.  @dwightaaron3113  Ok? And? Like I said, the election was legally valid. despite the foreign interference prior to the election. Clinton also conceded unlike Trump who continues to this day to claim he won 2020.
    1
  2640. There here.
    1
  2641.  Micha_mg  70 years? It’s been less than 52 years. Congress cut funding is your answer. No money = no moon landings.
    1
  2642. What generation are you?
    1
  2643.  @rz2559  So your claim is they found something on the last mission (Apollo 17) that scared them from going back?
    1
  2644.  @rz2559  Declassified footage? Ok, got a link or something?
    1
  2645. What seems to be the problem?
    1
  2646.  @desihay22  Prove it.
    1
  2647. Liar 😂
    1
  2648.  @paolorossi8470  Oh….no’s…me so scurred 🫣
    1
  2649. Correct, it was a plane going that low and straight.
    1
  2650. ❓
    1
  2651. Proof? No? Then shut tf up.
    1
  2652. Wow! Almost every comment is some gooberhead graduate of YouTube University crying “FAKE!!!”
    1
  2653. More like - “Stup!d happens”  @hughesey009 
    1
  2654. Please, just go away.
    1
  2655. Wrong. We didn’t know it had tipped over when this video was posted.
    1
  2656.  @ShpirtSvensson-rm1gr  Call it what you want. If you're too young to know about Apollo 13 then you might feel mislead.
    1
  2657. The veracity of the Apollo landings doesn’t depend on your belief.
    1
  2658. Found another flat earth id!ot.
    1
  2659.  @godswill2260  Gut feelings, willful ignorance and personal incredulity doesn’t disprove the six Apollo moon landings. Keep trying though, champ 😉
    1
  2660.  @godswill2260  “nobody asked you chump” I asked God in a prayer if the moon landings were real and he said yes. So now what, champ? Are you going to call God a liar?
    1
  2661.  @godswill2260  “neither does your opinion prove they went.” That’s right. My opinion doesn’t mean sh!t. But the facts do. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  2662. 🤦‍♂
    1
  2663. So in other words you got dumber over the years. 😊
    1
  2664. Try actually following Jesus! "Sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven" (Matt. 19:21, Luke 18:2), and "Any of you who does not give up everything he has cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14:33).  But Christian hypocrites respond, "F— you, Jesus!"
    1
  2665. LOL! The only thing she proved was her commitment to spreading disinformation.
    1
  2666. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦‍♂
    1
  2667. Take a photo of the moon at night with your phone. You won’t see stars in the photo.
    1
  2668. I have.  @Escapecheesebot 
    1
  2669. WOW is right cause you swallowed these lies without hesitation. Sad!
    1
  2670. Reported your post as misinformation 😊
    1
  2671.  @DixxyV  Notice how you never replied? 😂
    1
  2672.  @DixxyV  My apologies. That was friendly fire. Thought you were someone else.
    1
  2673. ❓
    1
  2674. The point he’s making is that the right have pretended like the left campaigned a lot about identity politics. The left obviously didn’t campaign heavily on I.P. but they also didn’t disavow it either.
    1
  2675. Not an issue because the moon has gravity.
    1
  2676.  @thecensoredpatriot Timestamp?
    1
  2677. Source: “Trust me bro”
    1
  2678.  @3AmThoughtts  1. Yes, there is footage 2. The most secure building in the US Bullion Depository.
    1
  2679.  @3AmThoughtts  Ok? Your point?
    1
  2680. The 16mm footage is much clearer.
    1
  2681.  @ApolloKid1961  Which nobody at home got to see because it wasn’t compatible with NTSC TV sets. Correct?
    1
  2682.  @ApolloKid1961  I’ll check them out 👍
    1
  2683. It’s in the video.
    1
  2684. Wtf are you blabbering about? 😂
    1
  2685. Proof?
    1
  2686. What does that make you?
    1
  2687. ???
    1
  2688. Conspiracy theories are fun. Aren’t they?
    1
  2689. What does that make you?
    1
  2690. Another non-answer. Just like Hegseth.
    1
  2691. Why is her question stupid? Don’t you think we ought to know the intentions of our political leaders?
    1
  2692.  @Lauraaaaa719  https://youtu.be/03x2MC3wv5Q?feature=shared
    1
  2693.  @cameronbartlett6593  So in other words you fell for all the usual conspiracy theory bs. Well done 👍
    1
  2694. No actual evidence was provided in this troll video, champ.
    1
  2695. Reported as DISINFORMATION.
    1
  2696.  @Forester78  Then why do they lose their balance and fall so much? He drops a bag at the beginning. Does the bag have a wire too?
    1
  2697.  @rodneywalden5358  Can’t post pictures in comments. Look up “LRO Apollo landing site photo”
    1
  2698. Why?
    1
  2699.  @rahrjiyanin8072  Innocent until proven guilty, yes.
    1
  2700. Where’s the video of you being born?
    1
  2701.  @Backinthedase  So then you’re fake. You’re a BOT.
    1
  2702. Sounds like you’ve got a hard-on for Trump.
    1
  2703.  @kelvyquayo  Who is your comment directed to?
    1
  2704.  @jillbear904  “only ideological slogans.” He’s taking about you.
    1
  2705.  @jillbear904  Then he’s mistaken. I’m not a moon landing denier so there nothing to debate. You however brought up politics in your opening comment, praised a proven liar and convicted felon and talked about, “draining the swamp” the referenced ideological slogan.
    1
  2706.  @jillbear904  "You do realize that the Moon landing required the government, right?" The Moon landings (note use of plural) required the participation of several governments, not just the US.  "I simply pointed out that Trump is the first president we've had in decades that wants to invest in space exploration" No, Trump is not the first president we've had in decades to invest in space. That's obvious. "YOU brought your own politics into it, I was talking about our government." Says the hypocrite who brought up the political slogan, "drain the swamp" and praises Trump for exposing alleged corruption all while ignoring the fact that the man himself is the embodiment of corruption.
    1
  2707.  @kelvyquayo  Thanks for your opinion.
    1
  2708. 😂
    1
  2709. C'mon. Don't be embarrassed to admit you're a flurf. Embrace your delusions! @1957rayn 
    1
  2710.  @personalemail620  Here’s what the man who discovered the Van Allen Belts had to say. Quote: "The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." - Dr. James A. Van Allen
    1
  2711. What? 😂
    1
  2712. What?
    1
  2713. Prove it. I’m willing to bet you can’t with actual substantial, history-changing evidence backed up by sound logic and reputable sources. If you do respond, which is a big if, it will likely be with a desperate deflection on the form of ignorance, feelings, or fallacious logic (maybe all three).
    1
  2714. No, the question came near the end.
    1
  2715. Wrong.
    1
  2716. So then they are outnumbered .
    1
  2717.  @markriding1267  Betty Grissom did not explicitly claim that NASA murdered her husband.
    1
  2718. “With the technology we have today” Such as?
    1
  2719. “alright 100+ comments” That doesn’t make him wrong.  @inky3 
    1
  2720. “38 comments 2 month old account wild ” That doesn’t make him wrong either.  @inky3 
    1
  2721. I love it when derp-heads like you immediately check the other persons account to see when it was created. Like that is really going to give your argument any credibility. 😂 @inky3 
    1
  2722.  @inky3  That STILL doesn’t make him wrong.
    1
  2723.  @inky3 No I didn’t. Sort comments by “newest first” and then scroll down to find your thread. It’s there.
    1
  2724.  @SonoUnSomaroNoVax  👍
    1
  2725.  @tmsods2874  I found this info on a chat forum: ”The pressurized cabin web thickness was specified as thin as "0.015 to 0.025" inches thick. About every 3-4 inches the thickness increased to "0.055 to 0.065" inches, centered on ribs of 0.812 inches depth, 0.04 inches wide. The cabin floor was 2" thick honeycomb.” My estimation of 0.25” was way off! And just for reference, Reynolds Wrap Aluminum Kitchen Foil varies in thickness from 0.00064-0.00137 inches as you progress from the standard product to the extra heavy product. Edit: these thicknesses apply only to the ascent stage of the Lunar Module.
    1
  2726. Why not?
    1
  2727. Good thing facts don’t rely on belief then.
    1
  2728. Proof?
    1
  2729. Apparently not.
    1
  2730.  @czarcastic1458  “Clearly” would mean we can clearly see cables, ropes, strings, etc. We can’t.
    1
  2731.  @czarcastic1458  ❓
    1
  2732. Loaded question.
    1
  2733. Kash Patel's response appears to be an attempt to downplay his level of involvement. While reports indicate that he co-produced and promoted the song, during this confirmation hearing, he is seemingly trying to distance himself by claiming he did not have direct involvement in its production. He’s not denying that he helped facilitate or support the project in some capacity just that he didn’t have hands-on involvement in the actual recording or musical creation process. At any rate, he is still part of the we. His phrasing is often used in political discourse to create ambiguity about one's role in a controversial matter. His denial likely aims to avoid deeper scrutiny regarding his association with individuals convicted for their roles in the January 6th attack.
    1
  2734. Nope. Next?
    1
  2735. No. Just your education.
    1
  2736. “I am a civil engineer” Wait a minute. “mickmuffin”?  Sure you don’t work the drive thru at McDonald’s? 😂 @mickmuffin4345 
    1
  2737. “Man hasn't been to the moon yet.” False. 24 men have been to the moon and 12 of them have walked on it.
    1
  2738.  @colinm610  More specifically, we haven’t had a ride since 1972 But in 2026ish we will again. Artemis III.
    1
  2739.  @colinm610  “NASA admitted they are trying to find a way through them a few years ago on a doco” Actually, they were talking specifically about testing new generation technology that will be used for the Artemis program. Part of this testing is sending unmanned craft through the VAB’s.
    1
  2740. Watched what exactly?
    1
  2741.  @Brenda-l7d1r  The landing itself wasn’t televised. Only the first steps onto the surface of the moon by Armstrong was.
    1
  2742.  @Brenda-l7d1r  if you’re going to lie then at least know exactly what you’re lying about.
    1
  2743.  @Brenda-l7d1r  Yep, that’s what you’re doing.
    1
  2744. Sounds personal.
    1
  2745. Artemis III will be the next human landing.
    1
  2746. Buried him on what? You don't have to be a great speaker to govern. That's Sam's point.
    1
  2747. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  2748. 🤦‍♂
    1
  2749. Aldrin is a Korean War veteran who put his life on the line. He made the first selfie in space when $ibrel was still in diapers.  He punched $ibrel because he called him a COWARD. You do the math.
    1
  2750. What resources?
    1
  2751. David Weiss is a flat earther. 🤡
    1
  2752. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    1
  2753. 😂👌
    1
  2754. Watch the other video, “Apollo 11 Press Conference Full Mission”
    1
  2755. Proof?
    1
  2756. In other words, you respect proven liars.
    1
  2757. @ Do you have proof that ALL presidents have lied? Better yet, how many incumbent presidents have blatantly lied about winning an election and have sustained that lie to this day?
    1
  2758. Because they saw your picture 😂
    1
  2759. And that the guest lied about his evidence.
    1
  2760. Why?
    1
  2761. Did happen. Get over it.
    1
  2762.  @rickreid8572  Yes way.
    1
  2763.  @rickreid8572  The veracity of the Apollo moon landings doesn’t depend on your acceptance, belief or opinion.
    1
  2764.  @rickreid8572  "But you have no idea whether or not they happened, only what you see on TV." Nonsense. Just as we trust historical records and scientific evidence for events we didn't witness firsthand, the moon landings are supported by a vast array of verifiable data, including physical moon samples, photographs, telemetry data, and testimonies from thousands of experts involved in the mission. "My opinion is equally, if not more valid than yours." Again, my opinion doesn't matter. Your opinion doesn't matter. Facts are all that matter. "In my opinion, it didn't happen." Then you should have said that in your opening post instead of making a forceful assertion and refusing to back it up.
    1
  2765. Flat earth is a dumb scam put on YouTube by con-men who make money off dullards like you. What’s wrong with you that you can’t figure that out?
    1
  2766. Did you get a tax refund last year?
    1
  2767. We sent men to the moon NINE times and landed on SIX of those occasions.
    1
  2768.  @MyTarkovClips  Yep. Unfortunately there are many viruses for which there is no cure yet.
    1
  2769. You don’t have to be there. If you knowingly took part in a collective effort then YOU are included in WE.
    1
  2770.  @WinstonBachan  If five people planned to rob a bank but one of them waited down the street to pick up the other 4 after stealing the money, the guy who waited for them was part of the collective effort and was part of the “we”. Mr Patel wants to pretend like he’s the guy who waited for the other four guys. Dude wants to play word games. Very childish.
    1
  2771. Wow, so many Trump @ss-eaters in this thread. Holy cow…
    1
  2772. @ The claim of a "hoax" often refers to the debate over whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, but the interference itself was a real and verified event.
    1
  2773. So what. The investigation won’t go well for Patel.
    1
  2774. Why are you adjusting for inflation? The actual cost was 25 billion for the entire program which includes six landings.
    1
  2775. ?
    1
  2776.  @CHarris1066  Oh, ok.
    1
  2777. “but don’t you think new technology would help close the gap on the investment needed” You haven’t heard of the Artemis program?  @DippyB189 
    1
  2778. Finally someone who gets it. Thank you!
    1
  2779. “None talking about how Trump and the Right has essentially broken…” How is that Sam’s fault?
    1
  2780. No. Being mixed race means someone is mixed race. Identity politics refers to political movements or ideologies that prioritize the interests and experiences of specific social groups, such as race, gender, or sexual orientation, often in response to perceived oppression or marginalization.
    1
  2781. No, not because he’s Jewish but because he’s entitled to his opinion.
    1
  2782. Proof?
    1
  2783. But he’s right. It doesn’t matter what one pilot says. Pilots and non-pilots all have access to the same evidence and facts.  Do better. Learn.  @Baker69 
    1
  2784. ❓
    1
  2785. WOW! You just got STEAMROLLED by randyschissler.  @Thought_Criminal_13 
    1
  2786. They exist. Look for them yourself.
    1
  2787. Nah, people have been regurgitating these lies for decades. This video is nothing new and nobody is in danger of being harmed for claiming the Apollo landings were faked.
    1
  2788. Wrong.
    1
  2789. 🙄 😂
    1
  2790. In other words you got duped by a grifter.
    1
  2791.  @stigmichaelsomsrilundin8255  Yeah that Lunar crater on the right is wayyyyy smaller than Lunar Sedan Crater in Nevada. Nice try pal 😂
    1
  2792.  @stigmichaelsomsrilundin8255  Yes I did take altitude into account. Look at the remains of the Lunar module and compare its size to that of the crater on the right. The crater on the right wayyy smaller than the crater in Nevada. Sorry but your “evidence” didn’t work.
    1
  2793.  @stigmichaelsomsrilundin8255  Sedan crater is way bigger than that crater to the right of the Lunar Module. There is no comparison. You’re grasping at straws.
    1
  2794. What’s wrong with hating Trump? He was an awful president. He mismanaged covid—19 which contributed to the highest infection and mortality rate per capita than any other country. He lied about winning the 2020 election. He pressured state officials to 'find him votes' in order to change the outcome. After that failed he inspired a mob to attack the Capitol and stop the certification. He continues to claim to this day that he won in 2020. He's made disparaging comments about veterans and women. He's told 30,000+ verified lies since taking office in 2016. He's a twice impeached president. He's a convicted felon on 34 counts and convicted sex offender and he completely divided the country during his term.
    1
  2795. 1000 cameras? You're kind of stupid, aren't you?
    1
  2796. Where does she mention that?
    1
  2797. True. Flat earth is not what they’re saying it is.
    1
  2798.  @kieronbadenhorst5911  1. Presidents don’t control the price of groceries and rent. 2. Kamala Harris didn’t center her campaign around LGBTQ.
    1
  2799. Yes! And as a bonus he hates Trump.
    1
  2800. See the truth about what?
    1
  2801. Had help from NASA. “Chandrayaan-1 was India's first deep space mission. Among its suite of instruments, it carried NASA's Moon Minerology Mapper (M3), an imaging spectrometer helped confirm the discovery of water locked in minerals on the Moon.“
    1
  2802. Just the rocket. The lander is from Intuitive Machines (IM)
    1
  2803.  @artsonigaming  “That makes moon landing NOT REAL.” 🤦‍♂ So by your logic, I’ve never been to Peru because I stopped going 12 years ago.
    1
  2804. Prove it.
    1
  2805.  @Comezehere  Ah, the “nudge”. You dullards are ssoo desperate to find evidence it’s pathetic.
    1
  2806.  @Comezehere They went back six times landing on five of them. Apollo 13 aborted.
    1
  2807.  @Comezehere Notice how avoided my follow up questions. Classic.
    1
  2808.  @Comezehere  “sure they went back five more times. Sure they did.” What I find hilarious is, you thought there was just the one landing which is typical of most deniers. And when I informed you that they did go back and land five more times, you double down with, “Nuh-Uh!!!” like a child. So how many times do they need to go back before you’re satisfied?
    1
  2809.  @Comezehere  “the meteors wouldve broken through their suits or one of the other missions suits at some point or the landers.” Why? Because you say so? 😂 “There are no Star pictures anywhere from behind the moon while in orbit of the dark side.” Ok? So? That doesn’t prove they didn’t land on the moon. “And they look nervous as hell in this video.” No, they don’t. Again, their behavior is consistent with professional pilots talking in clear and concise language at a speed in which journalists can keep up with. You r3tards always bring up the lamest “evidence”. How about finding some REAL evidence for a change?
    1
  2810.  @Comezehere  “because if they are size of a grain of dust and are traveling at 20000 mph and there’s no atmosphere to burn them up they are like tiny little bullets. That’s why.” Ok, smart guy. Did that happen? Show me your evidence that they would have been struck by micro-meteors. So far, the best you can come up with is, “Something bad could have happened therefore fake!” “your a brainwashed sheep. You keep believing in the fantasy if it helps you and your boyfriend get to sleep every night” Says the dullard who regurgitates the same lame debunked arguments because someone in a moon hoax troll video told him to. Baaa baaa
    1
  2811.  @Comezehere  Are you talking to the thread starter now??
    1
  2812.  @rammalammadingdong1  "they knew what happened to the apollo 1 people" Yes, they knew what happened. They died in a terrible accident. What's your point?
    1
  2813. Nothing but lies. Sounds travel through solids you know. That sound then gets picked up by the mic in the helmets. Armstrong’s accident was on May 8, 1968 over a year before the moon landing, not 6 months. You’re no engineer. You’re a professional liar. Your post has been reported.
    1
  2814.  @therealdallas4lyfe  Your comment has been reported for stup!dity.
    1
  2815.  @RealCandaceO  And thank you, Candace for giving proven liars a platform to promote their agenda!
    1
  2816.  @julibrown6984  Your ignorance is incredible.
    1
  2817. "This was more than likely a missile" Except it wasn't. Were you under the impression that we haven't figured out what hit the Pentagon on that day?
    1
  2818.  @Darlene-r8d Hi, Jason. Just released from the mental hospital again? Any thoughts on my profile pic?
    1
  2819. Why do you believe no plane debris were found at the site?  @Spiderman84-q6h 
    1
  2820. What about it?
    1
  2821. No, radiation in the Van Allen Bels doesn’t cook you 😂
    1
  2822. Those temps refer to the ground temperature at lunar noon. They went during lunar morning.
    1
  2823.  @tonynoaa The moon has sunrise and sunset just like earth, fo0l. Think before you make id!otic comments.
    1
  2824.  @shillhunter4380  Oops! Seems you’ve once again missed the glaring hypocrisy of your projection. Do better, learn.
    1
  2825. The only person with TDS is Trump himself.
    1
  2826. Proof?
    1
  2827. Liar
    1
  2828. Ok flat-earther. Whatever you say.
    1
  2829. Why?
    1
  2830.  @kaecake9575  Yup
    1
  2831.  @kaecake9575  C’mon dude. Even Trump isn’t that stup!d. Time to grow up.
    1
  2832. And the video clearly states it’s a SIMULATION. Derp?
    1
  2833. You are stup!d. You thought they were trying to pass off a simulation as actual video. 😂 @zeeder2630 
    1
  2834.  @user-JK101  She doesn’t care about that video. She knows the moon landings happened just like Bart does. These two people are only interested in making $$$ off promoting disinformation.
    1
  2835. You must be referring toTrump.
    1
  2836. Kash Patel's response appears to be an attempt to downplay his level of involvement. While reports indicate that he co-produced and promoted the song, during this confirmation hearing, he is seemingly trying to distance himself by claiming he did not have direct involvement in its production. He’s not denying that he helped facilitate or support the project in some capacity just that he didn’t have hands-on involvement in the actual recording or musical creation process. At any rate, he is still part of the we. His phrasing is often used in political discourse to create ambiguity about one's role in a controversial matter. His denial likely aims to avoid deeper scrutiny regarding his association with individuals convicted for their roles in the January 6th attack.
    1
  2837. Which guy?
    1
  2838. Hello?
    1
  2839. Not a missile like the other hoaxtards claim?
    1
  2840.  @Darlene-r8d  Great. Now all you need is credible evidence for this drone missile.
    1
  2841.  @Darlene-r8d  Deflection noted 😉
    1
  2842. What TF are you babbling about? 😂
    1
  2843. ❓
    1
  2844. Kubrick insisted filming be done on location. NASA agreed.
    1
  2845. Your post has been reported for disinformation.
    1
  2846. Why do younger generations have to wait for boomers to die out before questioning the Apollo moon landings?
    1
  2847. And clearly stated in the video - SIMULATION.  Sorry but you didn’t discover anything.
    1
  2848. How many prominent cinematographers and film makers have come forward claiming the landings were faked over the last half century? I’ll help you out… None
    1
  2849. What?
    1
  2850. What does that have to do with cellphones?
    1
  2851. Prove? No? Why tf not?
    1
  2852.  @StlSinger  "So far their proof is simulated cgi and actors." No, that is not their proof. They used a simulation (CGI) because there was no realtime camera attached to the lander. The Apollo moon landings used simulations too. Your incredulity is not a valid argument.
    1
  2853. We still went to the moon nine times, landing on six of those occasions.
    1
  2854. Your post has been reported as MISINFORMATION. Enjoy your 24-hour ban.
    1
  2855. So then why aren’t there dinosaurs walking around today?
    1
  2856. This one has a camera too.
    1
  2857. The only person with TDS is Trump himself.
    1
  2858. Arguments based on ignorance and incredulity are meaningless.
    1
  2859. “Bart was extremely convincing” Except he lied about his evidence. https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=zgOhyE9sixUhbqNn
    1
  2860. Which God?
    1
  2861. Does CNN cover for Trump and his cronies?
    1
  2862. Go back to sleep, troll.
    1
  2863. lol...
    1
  2864. I agree with your wife.
    1
  2865. You must be talking about your education.
    1
  2866. Pelosi did not have direct control over the National Guard’s deployment on the Capitol grounds. The decision to call in the National Guard rested more with the Capitol Police and the Department of Defense, including officials like the Capitol Police Chief, the Secretary of Defense, and the President. In the days leading up to January 6, Pelosi and other congressional leaders were briefed on security preparations, but it wasn’t Pelosi's decision alone to approve or reject the National Guard's involvement. Reports show that the Pentagon, for example, initially hesitated to approve the request for National Guard troops from the Capitol Police, citing concerns about militarizing the situation. Eventually, National Guard troops were deployed, but by then, the situation had already escalated with rioters breaching the Capitol.
    1
  2867. Yes, it means the person who uploaded this video is being deceptive.
    1
  2868. Being a Freemason doesn’t mean you’re a liar and that worship satan.
    1
  2869. 0:05 and 1:32.
    1
  2870. “Cut to this video where the site of impact is no more than 20/30 feet” Seriously ? 😂 @tabrezshaikh7705 
    1
  2871. Tell that to the NTSB.
    1
  2872. Kash Patel's response appears to be an attempt to downplay his level of involvement. While reports indicate that he co-produced and promoted the song, during this confirmation hearing, he is seemingly trying to distance himself by claiming he did not have direct involvement in its production. He’s not denying that he helped facilitate or support the project in some capacity just that he didn’t have hands-on involvement in the actual recording or musical creation process. At any rate, he is still part of the we. His phrasing is often used in political discourse to create ambiguity about one's role in a controversial matter. His denial likely aims to avoid deeper scrutiny regarding his association with individuals convicted for their roles in the January 6th attack.
    1
  2873. It’s traditional.
    1
  2874.  @Chitov646ckmych  Proof?
    1
  2875. 😂👌
    1
  2876.  @shillhunter4380 Why do you allow Bots (computer algorithms FFS!) to consistently kick your human @ss in the comments of these videos? Aren’t you ever embarrassed? Lmfao!
    1
  2877.  @shillhunter4380 When have you not upvoted your own comment you turnip-brained halfwit?
    1
  2878. No.
    1
  2879. Wrong.
    1
  2880.  @JoeCaudle-v6y  Exactly. Trump won the 2016 election in the electoral college but still maintains that he also won the popular vote if you subtract all the “illegal” votes. I’m just surprised he hasn’t claimed any fraud in the 2024 election.
    1
  2881. But he never said we didn’t land on the moon.
    1
  2882. Just because we don’t have the necessary equipment to put humans on the moon today doesn’t mean we never did in the past. We also can’t take supersonic flights across the Atlantic on the Concorde anymore. Does that mean those flights never happened?  @tedx4263 
    1
  2883. You thought wrong.
    1
  2884. "the elites know we are really dumb" At least you have to courage to admit it 😂
    1
  2885. What’s that going to prove?
    1
  2886. Oops! You forgot to bring evidence!
    1
  2887.  @RollingThunder5880  Why do you derp -heads keep accusing everyone of being Mfitz? Is it because of your insecurities and your inability to deal with defeat?
    1
  2888.  @Liquoricilicious  Refusing to get your jabs doesn’t make you special and it doesn’t mean you’re smarter than the entire scientific and medical communities.
    1
  2889. Problem?
    1
  2890. There’s 10,000+ cameras pointed at the Pentagon?
    1
  2891. Prove it.
    1
  2892. Says the high school dropout workin’ the drive thru at Mc’Donalds.
    1
  2893. That's great! So you retired early and now all you do sit around spreading disinformation. Well done👍  @cricket-bg4tz 
    1
  2894. Jealous of what? That you allow yourself to be easily duped by con-men peddling lies? You’re kind of stup!d aren’t you?  @cricket-bg4tz 
    1
  2895. Because the moon has gravity. Derp?
    1
  2896.  @DarkPa1adin  “gravity on the moon should be much lesser than 9.8m/s² and therefore it should have a softer landing and a higher jump” Moon gravity is 1.6m/² and they are obviously landing softer and jumping higher.
    1
  2897.  @DarkPa1adin Looks slower to me. Btw, you’re the first moon landing denier who claims the footage looks the same speed as on would on earth. Most deniers say that if you speed up the footage up by 1.5x then it matches what we would see on earth.
    1
  2898. Hopefully you’ve learned a little about how not to fall for dumb conspiracy theories.
    1
  2899. Because Trump can’t be trusted.
    1
  2900. Tugs are only used to get the ship underway. The ship didn’t need them after it was making way.
    1
  2901. No, they didn’t 😂 You’re just a gullible twerp regurgitating lies.
    1
  2902. I'm about sick and tired of seeing your face pop-up in my recommendations. "Don't recommend channel" < --- CLICK!
    1
  2903. Why are you still around?
    1
  2904. Are you kidding me? She’s a ditz.
    1
  2905. Why is the idea of that funny?
    1
  2906. Waiting for you for answer.
    1
  2907. Why are they falling so much if they are suspended by a wire? Where’s the wire? Can’t see it.
    1
  2908.  @itsamazeofmirrors  Yeah, they were walking sideways on the moon. SMH…
    1
  2909. 😂👌
    1
  2910. Prove it or shut tf up 😊
    1
  2911.  @michaeltaylor2631  Tell us all about how you think you can change history with zero actual substantial evidence.
    1
  2912.  @michaeltaylor2631  Still waiting for that history-changing evidence. What is taking so long?
    1
  2913. Nobody finds it odd except you.
    1
  2914. So in other words you voted for a proven liar.
    1
  2915. “More proof” The first post isn’t proof and neither is yours. What you spewed is nothing more than an argument based solely on incredulity.  “The people are awakening to the lies.” You need to wake up to your own ignorance and learn what actual proof is. ​ @zynnertime1 ​
    1
  2916. Got any more hypocritical projections to mask your astounding ignorance and intellectual deficiencies? @shillhunter4380 
    1
  2917. Hoaxers tend to be republiCUNTS.
    1
  2918. Some people are too dumb to realize that.
    1
  2919.  @syashadeed7552 Reported you for DISINFORMATION. Enjoy your 24-hour ban 😊
    1
  2920. But to be fair, Space X hasn’t attempted a moon mission yet.
    1
  2921. There will be in a couple years.
    1
  2922. No. It’s just that this autonomous lander didn’t bring a live TV camera with it.
    1
  2923. No, dumdum. Apollo 13 didn’t get to land. Watch the f–g video.
    1
  2924. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photosu available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  2925. https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=p6O1ec4CHOlB-AiP
    1
  2926. You forgot to bring proof.
    1
  2927.  @hg13589  Ok.
    1
  2928. What makes you think people on the left aren’t religious?
    1
  2929.  @rlawrence9838  Oh ok. Have you personally met every person on the left?
    1
  2930. That’s literally tens of millions of people just in the US. That’s quite an accomplishment.
    1
  2931.  @rlawrence9838  I noticed the sarcasm. But, you still stand behind your bold assertion that people on the left are non-religious. A silly statement.
    1
  2932. @ Are you sure?
    1
  2933. Everyone was laughing at him, not her.
    1
  2934.  @iborg7301  Did she ask him if he was a General?
    1
  2935.  @iborg7301  Correct. So then why not give a yes or no answer?
    1
  2936.  @iborg7301  Again, she didn’t ask him if he was a General. So for you to say it was funnier to remind her that he’s not a General doesn’t make sense. Why are you dullards pretending otherwise? She’s asking if he will hold himself to the same standard given the fact he believes Generals shouldn’t work for military contractors for a period of 10 years after retiring. His strawman response clearly means he doesn’t have the guts to say no.
    1
  2937.  @tbet1879  Maybe you should read them.
    1
  2938. ​ @iborg7301  Asking a man who will be in charge of Generals if he will follow the same ethical precedent set by ex-military Generals isn't an unreasonable question. Can you provide a strong rationale for why the question is unreasonable?
    1
  2939.  @iborg7301  Translation: “I can’t come up with a rational explanation of why the question was unreasonable so I’ll just deflect with a few red-herrings sprinkled with some colorful emojis.”
    1
  2940.  @pokemoncatcher2566  A shower, a job and a girlfriend and you soon forget you were ever a silly flatwit. 😉
    1
  2941.  @arsonistWDC  <— Aww, a flatwit sprinting to the defense of his fellow flatwit. How adorable
    1
  2942. *Buybull 😉
    1
  2943. Flat earther................................⬆
    1
  2944.  @kareemsalessi  <— Flat earth !diot alert ⚠️
    1
  2945.  @gives_bad_advice Absolutely. Thanks 👍
    1
  2946. “Excellent detailed explanation.” But ultimately a lie. https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=Sk-C-3ElPm27ei2P
    1
  2947.  @occhamite  They’ll complain that NASA didn’t film it in 8k resolution. “Oh, it’s only 4k….FAKE!”
    1
  2948. Reported as disinformation.
    1
  2949. You just called yourself a real p+ssy 😂 @mickmuffin4345 
    1
  2950.  @kaecake9575  “You're right, Russia and China using Google Ai to prove moon landing is fake.” Russia and China confirmed the moon landings (note use of plural) long before AI was a thing. Btw, AI flagged ONE photo due to, “discrepancies in contrast”. Uhm…that literally means nothing. Putin didn’t look impressed either.
    1
  2951.  @TheKkpop1  “US gave the Dutch museum a piece of rock from the moon tested to be petrified wood.” Wrong. Everything points to a mistake or to a hoax orchestrated by two Dutch artists in 2006. NASA has never authenticated the “rock” (there are no documents tracing its origins), it’s far too big to be a donated lunar sample, and its background story is nonsensical. It was reportedly donated privately in 1969 to a retired prime minister instead of being given, as was customary, to a representative of the then-current Dutch government; it wasn’t put on public display as a Moon rock would have deserved; and real donated Moon rocks were encapsulated in transparent plastic, while this one is not.
    1
  2952. And you?
    1
  2953. That's why nobody can ever get a vacant stall anymore because everyone's stays on the their damn phones.
    1
  2954. Yeah, they found dirt and rocks.
    1
  2955. It wasn't the slam dunk you thought it was.
    1
  2956. How did you come up with 50 yards?
    1
  2957. Thanks for your uninformed opinion.
    1
  2958. BDS is real too. Drive around any rural county here North Carolina and you’ll see people who are proudly flying “F – Biden” flags high in their front yards.
    1
  2959. You think a video is required in order to prove everything that happens in life? LOL! You’d make a sh!tty lawyer.  @zil0484 
    1
  2960.  @tommycoates1978  Again, lack of video is not proof it didn’t land. And why would a video convince you anyway? We have video footage of the Apollo crew’s landing on the moon and plenty of people deny those.
    1
  2961. Troll reported. Enjoy your 24 hr. ban.
    1
  2962. Looks like it was added in for effect. That sound is missing from the “Jack Schmitt on the moon” video.
    1
  2963.  @Globeisahoax <— has a raging hate boner for Biden.
    1
  2964.  @laneyljk  “However, the impact on radio signals largely depends on the frequency of the signals and the specific location and intensity of the Van Allen belts at the time of transmission. Satellite designers and engineers often take these factors into account to minimize interference when planning communication systems.” Thanks for providing evidence that radio signals can pass through the Van Allen Belts! 😂Seriously though …you should have left that part out in your reply if want to insist it wasn’t possible 😂😂😂
    1
  2965. “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    1
  2966.  @Jeff-dx2cm  What??? I just got through saying Sam didn’t make excuses for Dems losing.
    1
  2967. Ok? They still went to the moon.
    1
  2968.  @Ahtnagarp  The Apollo moon landings are supported by a mountain of evidence. Belief is not required.
    1
  2969. Yeah, Flat earthers and Moon landing deniers use the same excuse.
    1
  2970. Why? I’m not in a hurry.
    1
  2971. Still thinking about it??
    1
  2972. Ever thought of using Google?
    1
  2973. A 5th grader would crush Dubay.
    1
  2974. So what does that prove?
    1
  2975. Still no answer. I guess that proves nothing then.
    1
  2976. “while you know you can fall and tear up your space suit and die?” Yes and you can fall and break your leg while riding a bike.
    1
  2977. What a vivid imagination you have.
    1
  2978. This was several weeks after the mission. All the celebrating was already finished.
    1
  2979. Prove it, @sswipe.
    1
  2980. Prove it, smart guy.
    1
  2981. He discredited himself https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=KseGva-MC9O0-3AR
    1
  2982. Yes. Six times.
    1
  2983. What are you talking about? I found it easy without going to his channel.
    1
  2984.  @rockethito  So then NOW that you’ve found it, bookmark it or hit the thumbs up to save it to you liked videos. Problem solved.
    1
  2985. The gravity is very low and their centers of mass are higher due to the PLSS backpack.
    1
  2986. Quote: “Conspiracy theorists and ordinary doubters often mention the press conference held by the Apollo 11 astronauts after returning from the Moon, noting how their expressions are once again gloomy and seem to betray unease. The astronauts utter their words very slowly, with an almost flat tone, as if they were speaking grudgingly. This, it is claimed, is evidence that they are lying uncomfortably. Actually, if you watch the entire press conference (Figure 9.1-7) instead of just its first few minutes, it becomes evident that the three astronauts gradually relax and become more at ease while still choosing their words very carefully. There are many moments of laughter, smiles and outright jokes despite the pressure of it being their first press conference after their historic trip. Here’s an example from 37:53 in the video of Figure 9.1-8: In other words, the gloomy still image shown by conspiracy theorists has been intentionally selected to give the wrong impression that the astronauts were deeply uneasy. Figure 9.1-9 is a different still from that same press conference: all three astronauts are smiling. Figure 9.1-10 is a sampling of some of the quips and jokes that the Apollo 11 astronauts made during the press conference. Nevertheless, it has to be noted that almost all the Apollo astronauts were test pilots, unaccustomed to the glare of the media spotlight and trained, like all pilots when they have to report on their flight, to speak clearly and precisely, measuring their words. They were also tired not only from the trip to the Moon but also from the subsequent quarantine. They acknowledge their limited media skills even in this post-flight press conference when the discuss the Goodwill Tour that will take them around the world, visiting kings and presidents of many countries. There’s also another practical aspect to be considered when watching this 1969 press conference with today’s eyes: in those days, portable recorders were rare (only one can be glimpsed in the huge crowd of reporters in the video) and therefore journalists had to write down, sometimes in shorthand, what the astronauts said. The official recording of the event would be released only after it had been duplicated, and this would have taken hours with the analog systems of the period, whereas reporters had to go to press as soon as possible. Accordingly, the astronauts spoke very clearly and slowly to allow everyone to transcribe correctly and also to choose their words very carefully, since they were quite aware of the great historical importance and of the political sensitivity of everything they said. They were, after all, the first human beings in all of mankind’s history to go to the Moon and back. Moreover, if Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins had instead been at perfect ease and as cheerful as talk show hosts, moon hoax believers would probably argue that this would prove that they were actors.“ — Moonhoaxdebunked
    1
  2987. Indeed.
    1
  2988.  @Jasalexander-vv2uw  Answered by the person above me.
    1
  2989. It’s the first American spacecraft on the south pole. Stay informed.
    1
  2990. Which moon hoax troll video told you to come here and say that?
    1
  2991.  @rammalammadingdong1  Wrong on all counts. Stop regurgitating what you heard in a moon hoax troll video.
    1
  2992. It was probably added in. There another video with that sound missing.
    1
  2993. Schiff didn’t lie about anything, dude. The Mueller Report did not find clear evidence of criminal conspiracy or "collusion" between Trump and Russia, but it did document significant Russian interference in the election and various efforts by Trump’s campaign team to engage with Russian officials.
    1
  2994. Where do you get your news from? Marjorie Taylor Greene and Alex Jones? 😂
    1
  2995. ❓
    1
  2996.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork  Find a school bus Monday morning, bruh 😂
    1
  2997.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork  They have schools for “special” kids like you during the summer too. Make sure you get on that bus. 😂
    1
  2998.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork  Oh my god…I humiliated you. I’m sorry 😂
    1
  2999.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork  The only problem with letting you joke sit is that people won’t be laughing with you, sport. They’ll be laughing at you. 🤣
    1
  3000.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork What amazes me is not only do you insist on putting your ignorance on public display but you also posted your photo to go with it. That’s brave 😂
    1
  3001.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork  What’s the matter with you, sport? You never heard of summer school? They have those for r3tards too. Now, don’t you forget to catch that bus on Monday, mmmkay? 🤣
    1
  3002.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork  What?? You just downed another glazed shaft? Sounds personal 🫢
    1
  3003.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork  “bro you must be a kid… you came out of nowhere with a go to school joke and haven’t said anything of substance just wasting my time” The other 2 guys already schooled your @ss, sport. I’m just here to point at you and lmfao. 🤣 You’re just another deluded FLAWIT who doesn’t understand the simple concept of an analogy. You’re so f— hopeless that it’s incredible.
    1
  3004.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork  “the best thing you have said is go to school” And that is honestly the best advice you will ever get from anyone in this dumpster fire thread of yours. I suggest you take you.
    1
  3005.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork  <—— Cluster "B" type: Grandiose Narcissist personality disorder. Craves attention. Needs to feel ‘special’. Weird sense of importance and self-entitlement. Thinks it’s very knowledgeable but constantly displaying ignorance. Dunning Kruger effect on full display. Should seek help dealing with me*ntal health issues.
    1
  3006.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork  You are LIVING PROOF that the “No Child Left Behind Act” was a waste of taxpayer money. Thanks in advance.
    1
  3007.  @themarlawnpodcastnetwork  "hmmm why would someone come and say a non funny joke about me needing to go to school but don’t state the reason or challenge one of my points directly…?" I already told you, @sswipe. I’m just here to point at you and lmfao. You can't understand the concept of a simple analogy. But then again, you are a deluded FLATWIT so it really doesn't matter. Correct? Also, I wasn't making a joke when I said you need to find a school bus on Monday. That was serious advice you need to take.
    1
  3008. Yeah, he’s a good guy who blatantly lied about winning in 2020. Respect.
    1
  3009. 🤦‍♂
    1
  3010. Because we chose not to go back. Simple as that.
    1
  3011. Wrong.
    1
  3012.  @Iamnyka29  We‘re struggling to go to the moon again?? Who exactly has attempted and failed since the last moon landing?
    1
  3013. Who?
    1
  3014. I agree with your wife.
    1
  3015. Ok. Thanks for proving that you’re just silly little troll.
    1
  3016. Answer this. If technology got worse over the last half-century how is it we can 3D print at all? Or how is it we can buy self driving cars? Or how is it I can instantly communicate with reality denying trolls like you in the interest which didn’t exist then? @LeftyRighty123 
    1
  3017. If I’m pathetic that doesn’t say much for you. Does it.  And why on earth would you assume space technology went backwards just because we chose not to return to the moon?  @LeftyRighty123 
    1
  3018. Sure, ok pal 😂
    1
  3019. No, he lied about his evidence. https://youtu.be/jghYBAI3i6o?si=p6O1ec4CHOlB-AiP
    1
  3020. ❓
    1
  3021. Sorry to disabuse you of your religious beliefs but we know the earth is a slowly rotating terrestrial spheroid. Just because you are incapable of understanding this fact or willfully refuse to learn so doesn't make it our problem. Some questions for you that are used every day in the real world. Can you answer them? What is the relationship between longitude and distance when traveling east or west parallel to the equator? If you know the answer then you know the earth is a spheroid. If you don't then you are not qualified to comment on the shape of the earth. Describe the development and function of a gyrocompass. If you can then you know the earth is a slowly rotating terrestrial spheroid and gravity is a fact. If you can't then you are not qualified to comment on the shape of the earth, it's movement or gravity.
    1
  3022. Oh boy…here we go 🤦‍♂
    1
  3023. Why?
    1
  3024. ❓
    1
  3025. What would make going to the moon in 1969 impossible? Facts only please.  @calstanke6170 
    1
  3026.  @calstanke6170 Still thinking about it?
    1
  3027. Nope. Next?
    1
  3028.  @meganmariah6889  LOL! You might to consider looking at the mountain of evidence that supports the moon landings before listing to grifters and opportunists. 😊👍👋
    1
  3029. 🤦‍♂
    1
  3030. Seek psychiatric treatment.
    1
  3031. Meanwhile, Patel sits there and pretends like the word “me” doesn’t include himself. Schiff called him out on his childish bs.
    1
  3032. False. The Hebrew word "נָשָׂא" (pronounced "nasa") means "lifted" or "raised."
    1
  3033. I’m sorry but your Grandmother’s gut feeling didn’t supersede the mountain of evidence that supports the Apollo landings.
    1
  3034. Trump got 49.9% of the popular vote.
    1
  3035. “They’ve never conquered the radiation issue of the Van Allen Belt” The man who discovered the belts, Dr. James Van Allen, disagrees with you.  Quote: "The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." - James A. Van Allen
    1
  3036. There was no missile.
    1
  3037.  @hysteriaw3094  Wooooow. You got devoured in your own thread! 😂
    1
  3038. So you don’t care that Trump continues to lie about winning the 2020 election?
    1
  3039. Timestamp?
    1
  3040. It is dummy.
    1
  3041.  @virgiliustancu9293  Evidence?
    1
  3042. They went back FIVE times more. So, again. Where’s your evidence? @virgiliustancu9293 
    1
  3043. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photosu available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  3044. The six Apollo moon landings are factual history backed by a mountain of evidence. Only the shamefully educated, abysmally ignorant, hopelessly delusional and mentally ill believe otherwise.
    1
  3045. Nope. Next?
    1
  3046. What could he have done about that?
    1
  3047. Always be prepared.
    1
  3048. Unable to steer the ship.
    1
  3049. A hypothesis is different from a scientific theory.
    1
  3050. Which god?
    1
  3051. No.
    1
  3052. Aldrin is one of my heroes. Too bad he’s misinformed about Trump.
    1
  3053. Proof or shut tf up.
    1
  3054. How’s not having Polio workin’ out for ya so far?
    1
  3055.  @takeittothelordinprayer  Your I.P. Has been captured and your posts are now being forwarded to the relevant US Government authorities. Ref.S09442
    1
  3056. They aren’t walking faster. Are you blind??
    1
  3057. What tf are you babbling about? 😂
    1
  3058.  @Dragoon-yg7fi  So, republicans are having a cow over the Biden pardon?
    1
  3059. Did a YouTube video tell you that?
    1
  3060.  @arocien  Tell us more how your ,,common sense” supersedes the tens of millions of credentialed aerospace engineers, physicists, scientists, geologists and doctors who have NO PROBLEM with the achievements of Apollo.
    1
  3061.  @arocien  What?
    1
  3062. It started out ok but then you got really dumb.
    1
  3063. Notice how you’re making a definitive claim while at the same time admitting ignorance (asking questions)? Do better. Learn.
    1
  3064. It’s been omitted by the uploader. There’s another video that shows it: Apollo 11 press conference full mission.
    1
  3065.  @robymaru03  “key technology went missing, records went missing,” The technology didn’t go missing. It was decommissioned. None of the records are missing. “the only thing I found are blurry photos and videos” 😂 Then someone must have only shown you only the blurry ones. There are over 8,000 photos in the Apollo photo archive. Many, many, many of them are tack-sharp. “and trust me bro” Oh, of course…I trust you, bro 😂 “most video on moonlanding on youtube have no comment section” There are thousands of videos. Have you looked at them all? “and many Nasa scientist claiming they've never left low earth orbit.” False. Provide a citation where a NASA scientist said that. I’ll wait.
    1
  3066.  @BerryMike-d9v  What?
    1
  3067. Be honest with yourself. Even if real photos and videos were available you’d still call them fake.
    1
  3068. Did you even notice how ignorant you are about this IM-1 mission? “now that someone went “back”…..” It was unmanned lander, turnip-brains. Do better. Learn.  @vasili-zaitsev 
    1
  3069. Ah, so you’re a moon hoaxtard too? Wonderful.  @Generalkatos 
    1
  3070. Tugboats are only used to get a ship underway. After that the ship is in its own.
    1
  3071. Proof?
    1
  3072.  @narajuna  Do you have a better explanation for their behavior besides your “gut feelings”?
    1
  3073.  @narajuna  So you don’t have a better explanation for their behavior in this video?
    1
  3074. Relax. It’s just a figure of speech.
    1
  3075. TDS. A meme created to stop conversation.
    1
  3076. What’s wrong with hating Trump?
    1
  3077.  @FLmetalhead  And what is that?
    1
  3078.  @FLmetalhead  “Not to mention if I say it my comment will be deleted.” Oh c’mon dude Go for it!
    1
  3079.  @FLmetalhead You see. Nobody deleted your post. All good.
    1
  3080. Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
    1
  3081. They’re mostly flat earthers.
    1
  3082. We don't care that you don't believe it.
    1
  3083. Except it’s not a lie.
    1
  3084. Get over it, dude.
    1
  3085. That’s a lie but at least you agree it was a plane.
    1
  3086.  @jasonyambor3272  Why would you expect to see stars when the film speed was a SLOW 140 ASA and the shutter speed was FIXED at 1/250”???
    1
  3087. Where’s your brain?
    1