Comments by "ARK CON" (@arkcon714) on "Delta variant turfs US back-to-work plans as hospitals fill up with unvaccinated patients" video.

  1. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling evidence that masks stop or slow viruses and please explain the physics on how a cloth mask filters viruses on the way out but not on the way in
    11
  2. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling evidence that masks stop or slow viruses and please explain the physics on how a cloth mask filters viruses on the way out but not on the way in All those darn anti vaxxers in Isreal causing the worst wave ever.....oh wait, they have the most compliant population on earth and had a vaccine passport system since the vaccines came out But...but....but....but....the anti vaxers did it.....
    6
  3. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling evidence that masks stop or slow viruses and please explain the physics on how a cloth mask filters viruses on the way out but not on the way in
    5
  4. How do you know they are infected from unvaccinated people when we know the vaccinated carry the same viral load Show the science
    4
  5.  @stephenrobinson3301  oh I know, the guy is full of it. He gets triggered if someone likes other people comments too
    4
  6. Why isn't fauci in jail?
    4
  7. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling evidence that masks stop or slow viruses and please explain the physics on how a cloth mask filters viruses on the way out but not on the way in
    3
  8. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling evidence that masks stop or slow viruses and please explain the physics on how a cloth mask filters viruses on the way out but not on the way in
    3
  9. @Dee Richardz still waiting for even one piece of scientific evidence that masks stop or slow viruses! Remember in the other thread where you said why does the citation have to be about masks and viruses thus proving you don't knownthe point of a meta analysis? Hahahaahahahahaha
    3
  10. @Dee Richardz as for the rent free in the head let's not forget you keep responding after saying several times you weren't going to respond to me anymore Check mate kid! Hahaahahahaga
    3
  11. Background Containment of the COVID-19 pandemic requires evidence-based strategies to reduce transmission. Because COVID-19 can spread via respired droplets, many states have mandated mask use in public settings. Randomized control trials have not clearly demonstrated mask efficacy against respiratory viruses, and observational studies conflict on whether mask use predicts lower infection rates. We hypothesized that statewide mask mandates and mask use are associated with lower COVID-19 case growth rates in the United States. Methods We calculated total COVID-19 case growth and mask use for the continental United States with data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. We estimated post-mask mandate case growth in non-mandate states using median issuance dates of neighboring states with mandates. Results Case growth was not significantly different between mandate and non-mandate states at low or high transmission rates, and surges were equivocal. Mask use predicted lower case growth at low, but not high transmission rates. Growth rates were comparable between states in the first and last mask use quintiles adjusted for normalized total cases early in the pandemic and unadjusted after peak Fall-Winter infections. Mask use did not predict Summer 2020 case growth for non-Northeast states or Fall-Winter 2020 growth for all continental states. Conclusions Mask mandates and use are not associated with slower state-level COVID-19 spread during COVID-19 growth surges. Containment requires future research and implementation of existing efficacious strategies.
    3
  12. @Dee Richardz hahahahahahahahaha because that's what a meta analysis is! Hahahahahahahaha how is it possible? Again you throw dirt in your own face! Hahahahahaha That's what a meta analysis is! A collection of studies on the same subject! Hahahahahahahahahahahaha How is it possible for you to have such epic failures over and over again?
    3
  13. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling evidence that masks stop or slow viruses and please explain the physics on how a cloth mask filters viruses on the way out but not on the way in
    3
  14. Such absolute nonsense
    2
  15. @Dee Richardz why can't you post any evidence? All you can do is talk about your mythical evidence Whenever you are ready to "prove me wrong" I'll be waiting kid
    2
  16. @Dee Richardz hahahahahahahahahahaha it's hilarious the mental gymnastics routine you are trying to employ here. You can't make a definitive statement like masks stop viruses if you don't have any evidence of masks stopping viruses. Sure you can mention the clouds when talking about the sky but you can't say the clouds are made of marshmallows as a definitive statement and cite a study about hurricanes to prove it. This is the nonsensical line of thinking you are trying to pull off here. Why did they not include a single study on masks and viruses when dozens exist from multiple countries stretching back decades? Why not? Is it because every one says masks do nothing? You lost Dee, as you always do, you need to learn to accept reality
    2
  17. @Dee Richardz it's less deadly then the original, we know that much
    2
  18.  @boghopper5463  Google university of Louisville study and you should find it
    2
  19.  @boghopper5463  do you have this list posted somewhere I can view it? I haven't kept a list and I'm going to make a few videos on this and would love to put it all in the description, the more the merrier
    2
  20. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling scientific evidence that masks stop or slow viruses
    2
  21. @Dee Richardz I won't admit I'm wrong because I'm not wrong. Why can't you admit you are wrong? Are the studies on masks and viruses? Yes or no? The answer is no, they are not Did I say the studies were not about masks and viruses? Yes or no? The answer is no, the studies were not on masks and viruses Okay can we move past this? You were wrong, I was right. The studies were not on masks AND viruses. Now to move on to your other nonsense does every study in a meta analysis have to be about the same thing? No the vast majority has to be, but shouldn't at least one of the cited studies be about masks and viruses? Why do they not list the dozens and dozens of studies from multiple countries around the world stretching back decades showing masks do not stop or slow viruses? Remember when I provided that NIH paper on bias in meta analysis? Explain how this is not the most biased piece of nonsense you have ever read? This is the poster child for biased nonsense. Even if they listed a few of the RCTs that show masks do not stop viruses and listed at least one showing they do at least you could pretend it's somewhat objective but they make "factual" statements saying masks help against community spread with zero evidence. We have piles of counter evidence showing they do not work, we have as much evidence as we have about anything really, very well established with multiple well structured RCTs from around the world all of which get similar results. You are here calling everyone anti science and can't find a single piece of scientific evidence that even remotely agrees with you in fact I use your own sources to destroy your narrative. I meta analysis certainly can make reference to viruses being airborne but need to include something about a mask stopping it or when you say a mask helps it is relevant. When you breath the air is escaping and the way areosoled viruses work isn't from being spit on, it's from micro particles that you exhale, these go right through cloth and medical masks and this is no secret. This is why no virologist on the planet would go into an infectious disease laboratory with a surgical mask. It's why hospitals set up low pressure environments for truly deadly diseases and wear a hasmat suit. It's incredible that you need this explained to you but yes a meta analysis on mask efficacy against corona needs to have at least one study that says masks stop viruses. They can't ignore the myriad of valid RCTs that show masks do not stop viruses, throw in studies about aerosolized viruses and say see, wear a mask. I'll give you another example. I can't show a study on how losing weight make you safer from covid (it does) and then say this proves you shouldn't wear a mask. I can't make it any easier then that for you
    2
  22.  @Puggalug  they are still undergoing human trials so by definition are experimental and no amount of "fact checking" will change that
    1
  23. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling evidence that masks stop or slow viruses and please explain the physics on how a cloth mask filters viruses on the way out but not on the way in
    1
  24. @Dee Richardz if you expect people to take you seriously please fully think out your messages before posting them and try not to use "lolz"
    1
  25.  @Puggalug  hahahahahahaha even your cut and paste clearly shows the vaccinated are spreading it at the same rate as unvaccinated How can you cut and paste that and not realize you just destroyed your own narrative?
    1
  26. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling evidence that masks stop or slow viruses and please explain the physics on how a cloth mask filters viruses on the way out but not on the way in
    1
  27. @Dee Richardz hahahahahahahaahahhaha I'm guessing you didn't read that "study" that isn't a study, it was contact tracing, playing a little fast and loose with the word study here aren't we CDC? Hahahahaha Well it shows the person in question went to work 2 days while being SYMPTOMATIC wow! Are you saying that when you actively have flu like symptoms you can spread that to others? Wow! Groundbreaking stuff here! Sure am glad the CDC put together this "study" to show us this! Can't wait for their water is wet study next! Hahahaha This is why I say you always throw dirt in your own face. All you did here is prove that if the CDC or MSM puts out anything and puts the word study on it you will but it hook line and sinker. Did you know this stuff happened all the time throughout the ages since the very first schools were created? It even happened before that in our ancient ancestors in non school settings, I know, mind BLOWN!
    1
  28. @Dee Richardz explain Isreal
    1
  29. @Dee Richardz it's pretty funny that you say I dont listen to facts when you have yet to post a single fact Depends on the age group of course, if you want a specific age just ask but as for the entire population including children they have 84.4% that are fully....I mean double vaxxed Edit: that was the rate as of July 31st by the way, they are higher now
    1
  30. @Dee Richardz Israel has become the Covid capital of the world despite leading the charge on vaccines, in a clear warning sign that Britain, the US and other highly-immunised nations are still vulnerable to another wave. Stats compiled by Oxford University-backed research team Our World in Data shows there were a record 1,892 Covid cases per million people in Israel on Wednesday — nearly 0.2 per cent of the entire population in a single day. That was significantly higher than second worst-hit Mongolia, where the rate was 1,119 per million, and double the figures for Kosovo (980), Georgia (976) and Montenegro (909), which rounded out the top five. The figure only looks at one day’s worth of tests and Israel’s high rate is thought to have been driven up by a huge testing push ahead of schools reopening there. But the country has consistently reported some of the highest infection rates in the world since mid-August amid an unprecedented third wave, despite being one of the most vaccinated nations in the world. For comparison, 522 people per million in the UK tested positive yesterday and the figure was closer to 595 in the US. It suggests protection gained from vaccines is starting to buckle in the face of the highly-transmissible Delta variant.
    1
  31. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling evidence that masks stop or slow viruses and please explain the physics on how a cloth mask filters viruses on the way out but not on the way in
    1
  32. @Dee Richardz hahahahagaha whatever helps you sleep at night bud. Why can't you ever provide proof for these big wins? Why is it that I can bring up the same few subjects on any video I see you on and all you do is talk about these mythical past victories? Prove me wrong right now by showing a single RCT that isn't from china that says masks do anything at all
    1
  33. @Dee Richardz I won't admit I'm wrong because I'm not wrong. Why can't you admit you are wrong? Are the studies on masks and viruses? Yes or no? The answer is no, they are not Did I say the studies were not about masks and viruses? Yes or no? The answer is no, the studies were not on masks and viruses and I soad they were not on masks and viruses Okay can we move past this? You were wrong, I was right. The studies were not on masks AND viruses. Now to move on to your other nonsense does every study in a meta analysis have to be about the same thing? No the vast majority does have to be, but shouldn't at least one of the cited studies be about masks and viruses? Why do they not list the dozens and dozens of studies from multiple countries around the world stretching back decades showing masks do not stop or slow viruses? Remember when I provided that NIH paper on bias in meta analysis? Explain how this is not the most biased piece of nonsense you have ever read? This is the poster child for biased nonsense. Even if they listed a few of the RCTs that show masks do not stop viruses and listed at least one showing they do at least you could pretend it's somewhat objective but they make "factual" statements saying masks help against community spread with zero evidence. We have piles of counter evidence showing they do not work, we have as much evidence as we have about anything really, very well established with multiple well structured RCTs from around the world all of which get similar results. You are here calling everyone anti science and can't find a single piece of scientific evidence that even remotely agrees with you in fact I use your own sources to destroy your narrative. I meta analysis certainly can make reference to viruses being airborne but need to include something about a mask stopping it or when you say a mask helps it is relevant. When you breath the air is escaping and the way areosoled viruses work isn't from being spit on, it's from micro particles that you exhale, these go right through cloth and medical masks and this is no secret. This is why no virologist on the planet would go into an infectious disease laboratory with a surgical mask. It's why hospitals set up low pressure environments for truly deadly diseases and wear a hasmat suit. It's incredible that you need this explained to you but yes a meta analysis on mask efficacy against corona needs to have at least one study that says masks stop viruses. They can't ignore the myriad of valid RCTs that show masks do not stop viruses, throw in studies about aerosolized viruses and say see, wear a mask. I'll give you another example. I can't show a study on how losing weight make you safer from covid (it does) and then say this proves you shouldn't wear a mask. I can't make it any easier then that for you
    1
  34.  @Puggalug  absolutely zero evidence the vaccines slows the spread at all. New data indicates up to 80% of people have immunity already
    1
  35. Tell you what as soon as you show me a single RCT that shows masks stop or slow viruses I'll smite you with facts yet again Question is are you going to come across one of puggalugs messages where he posted the "fact check" where it says vaccinated people spread the same viral load! Hahahahahaha Make sure when you come across that message you call puggalug a fibber too! Hahahahahahaha
    1
  36. @Dee Richardz show evidence of this
    1
  37. @Dee Richardz not opinion, actual evidence
    1
  38. @Dee Richardz why can you never show any evidence?
    1
  39. @Dee Richardz punch this into duck duck go and enjoy!!!! MAYO CLINIC GRAND ROUNDS: THE DELTA VARIANT Gregory Poland MD, Director of Mayo Vaccine Research Group, breaks it down with candor. Spoiler alert: It's bad. Really bad. Poor Dee
    1
  40.  @boghopper5463  name of study Mask mandate and use efficacy in state-level COVID-19 containment
    1
  41. @Dee Richardz hahahahaha hey Dee, did you see how I destroyed the nonsense you posted using said nonsense? Would you like me to post a few of the greatest hits from your latest Google ninja crusade? Results: A total of 3030 participants were randomly assigned to the recommendation to wear masks, and 2994 were assigned to control; 4862 completed the study. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%). The between-group difference was -0.3 percentage point (95% CI, -1.2 to 0.4 percentage point; P = 0.38) (odds ratio, 0.82 [CI, 0.54 to 1.23]; P = 0.33). Multiple imputation accounting for loss to follow-up yielded similar results. Although the difference observed was not statistically significant Remember these are your sources, not mine Results A total of 19 randomised controlled trials were included in this study – 8 in community settings, 6 in healthcare settings and 5 as source control. Most of these randomised controlled trials used different interventions and outcome measures. In the community, masks appeared to be effective with and without hand hygiene, and both together are more protective. Randomised controlled trials in health care workers showed that respirators, if worn continually during a shift, were effective but not if worn intermittently. Medical masks were not effective, and cloth masks even less effective.  Remember.....your sources Results We identified 172 studies for our systematic review from 16 countries across six continents (figure 1; appendix pp 6–14, 41–47). Studies were all observational in nature; no randomised trials were identified of any interventions that directly addressed the included study populations. Of the 172 studies, 66 focused on how far a virus can travel by comparing the association of different distances on virus transmission to people (appendix pp 42–44). Of these 66 studies, five were mechanistic, assessing viral RNA, virions, or both cultured from the environment of an infected patient (appendix p 45).
    1
  42. @Dee Richardz I can admit you are wrong ambecause I said as your cut and paste shows I said the were not about "masks AND viruses" which they were not champ I get you are upset I am wiping the floor with you all over youtube but these are the facts and facts don't care about your feelings. Are you so if I put up a study that saod the flu virus causes headaches would that be proof masks work or don't work? Would it Dee? Hahahahahaha of course it wouldn't be if you are trying to prove masks are either effective or ineffective at stopping viruses then yes you need to have the tests be about masks and viruses for this is how science works, it's called the scientific method you should probably look that up. I can recommend some reading to help, there are some great websites meant for kids that you can probably keep up with
    1
  43. @Dee Richardz I can admit you are wrong because I said as your cut and paste shows I said the were not about "masks AND viruses" which they were not champ I get you are upset I am wiping the floor with you all over youtube but these are the facts and facts don't care about your feelings. So if I put up a study that said the flu virus causes headaches would that be proof masks work or don't work? Would it Dee? Of course it wouldn't be if you are trying to prove masks are either effective or ineffective at stopping viruses then yes you need to have the tests be about masks and viruses for this is how science works, it's called the scientific method you should probably look that up.
    1
  44. @Dee Richardz I won't admit I'm wrong because I'm not wrong. Why can't you admit you are wrong? Are the studies on masks and viruses? Yes or no? The answer is no, they are not Did I say the studies were not about masks and viruses? Yes or no? The answer is no, the studies were not on masks and viruses Okay can we move past this? You were wrong, I was right. The studies were not on masks AND viruses. Now to move on to your other nonsense does every study in a meta analysis have to be about the same thing? No the vast majority has to be, but shouldn't at least one of the cited studies be about masks and viruses? Why do they not list the dozens and dozens of studies from multiple countries around the world stretching back decades showing masks do not stop or slow viruses? Remember when I provided that NIH paper on bias in meta analysis? Explain how this is not the most biased piece of nonsense you have ever read? This is the poster child for biased nonsense. Even if they listed a few of the RCTs that show masks do not stop viruses and listed at least one showing they do at least you could pretend it's somewhat objective but they make "factual" statements saying masks help against community spread with zero evidence. We have piles of counter evidence showing they do not work, we have as much evidence as we have about anything really, very well established with multiple well structured RCTs from around the world all of which get similar results. You are here calling everyone anti science and can't find a single piece of scientific evidence that even remotely agrees with you in fact I use your own sources to destroy your narrative. I meta analysis certainly can make reference to viruses being airborne but need to include something about a mask stopping it or when you say a mask helps it is relevant. When you breath the air is escaping and the way areosoled viruses work isn't from being spit on, it's from micro particles that you exhale, these go right through cloth and medical masks and this is no secret. This is why no virologist on the planet would go into an infectious disease laboratory with a surgical mask. It's why hospitals set up low pressure environments for truly deadly diseases and wear a hasmat suit. It's incredible that you need this explained to you but yes a meta analysis on mask efficacy against corona needs to have at least one study that says masks stop viruses. They can't ignore the myriad of valid RCTs that show masks do not stop viruses, throw in studies about aerosolized viruses and say see, wear a mask. I'll give you another example. I can't show a study on how losing weight make you safer from covid (it does) and then say this proves you shouldn't wear a mask. I can't make it any easier then that for you
    1
  45. @Dee Richardz poor Dee, owned again
    1
  46. @Dee Richardz the studies absolutely were not on masks and viruses, feel free to post any RCT on masks and viruses that says masks stop viruses We are all still waiting for something resembling scientific evidence
    1
  47. @Dee Richardz I know what a meta analysis is, you clearly do not. Wouldn't a meta analysis on the efficacy of face masks be more convincing if it included at least one study about masks and viruses?
    1
  48. @Dee Richardz hahahahahahaha I can't believe you brought up Obama again, shows how triggered you are. I said trump never stated a war but Obama did. This is a factual statement that you couldn't refute. You tried to say I said Obama declared war and Trump didn't. I pointed out how the united states hasn't declared war since 1942 and that has no bearing on anything anyways. Trump never started a war but Obama did. Many examples the most prominent being how he started a war with Libya without congressional approval and overthrow the government making the country far worse then it was before. You tried to say it was an intervention, I asked you what exactly they were intervening in and you ran away with your tail between your legs as you always do. Now lets hear your mental gymnastics routine
    1
  49. @Dee Richardz all we have to do is look on this thread and see how you can't answer direct question and shy away from everything Are you claiming Obama did not overthrow the government of Libya without congressional approval?
    1
  50. @Dee Richardz are you claiming that the immune system defeating viruses is a conspiracy theory? Hahahahahahaha
    1
  51.  @RahRan123  we are sewing absolutely no difference in ICUs then any other year nor any large jump in mortality rates. This virus is not deadly as viruses go and twice as many people die from medical malpractice in Canada then from covid so enough nonsense
    1
  52. @Dee Richardz hahahahahahahahahaha 1) who cares what a headline says, does the reporter choose what is a war or not? I also informed you how the united states hasn't "declared war" since 1942 so is it your position that the US hasn't been in a war since 1942 because they haven't officially "declared war" also only congress can "declare war" so you'll never find any headline anywhere saying a president "declared war" because that's not in the presidents power! Hahahahaha poor Dee 2) You haven't provided an RCT and clearly you don't know what an RCT is because what you posted was a meta analysis that didn't include a single study on masks and viruses but you can prove me wrong by posting it right now, I'll wait.... Nothing? Moving on... 3) yes, you praised Australia's response, still think they are doing a good job? Hahahahahaha poor Dee 4) I am the only one that was able to state vaccination rates and I showed you how in Isreal you are not fully vaxxed until you have 3 shots which is true and the point was Isreal had a higher vaccination rate then Sweden and they did and still do. These are facts and facts don't care about your feelings I never went silent, like every thread I find you on I own you and you just retreat into repeating debunked talking points like you did on the last thread So, in conclusion Obama did start a war in Libya, that is an undeniable fact, your only rebuttal was to say find a headline that says that which is of course nonsense for the president can't "declare war" and the US hasn't declared war since 1942 so according to your nonsense the US hasn't been in a war since 1942 You have yet to provide a single RCT and you'll prove that once again by not posting an RCT Yes, you praised Australia's pandemic response saying it wasn't taking away freedoms, still believe that? I proved to you that you are not fully vaccinated in Isreal unless you have 3 shots which you only response to was "well the global standard is 2 shots" Run back to your safe space before I smite you again with facts and logic
    1
  53. @Dee Richardz yet another thread you ran away from
    1
  54.  @erikberard3974  watch the Project Veritas videos, those are verified Pfizer scientists that worked on the vaccine admitting on undercover video it's really not effective and delta is really being driven by the vaccine wearing off while natural immunity is far superior I mean what else do you need? Seriously ask yourself that question. Who cares what they say in a press conference they are saying in private the vaccines don't work. That's what they are saying, why do you believe these pharmaceutical companies that are apparently constantly having training and seminars with all their employees to not reveal the truth (also admitted on the video) why are all of a sudden these very bad companies suddenly deserving of your undying loyalty? What would it take? What if we had video of fauci himself saying "I made it all up" what would be enough for you? If you are honest with yourself about this question, which you won't be, but of you were you'd realize that this is now your new religion. You have unquestioned loyalty to the state and pharmaceutical companies, no amount of people being caught on hidden tape will change your mind, no no, not you! You pledge allegiance to Pfizer and comrade Trudeau and all they say is just and holy. I fall to my knees oh great Pfizer that in 2009 settled the largest medical fraud case in history for billions of dollars, of great Pfizer that is making more money in profit then any company, oh Justin going surfing on his made up holiday, no matter, these people are deities you see that deserve our respec....nay, they deserve our worship for they are truly God's among men. In fauci's name amen Womp, womp
    1
  55. @Dee Richardz I cute that you are still pretending you've proven anything let alone me wrong but sure, post the same nonsense again and I'll smite you yet again
    1
  56. @Dee Richardz afraid to post it?
    1
  57. @Dee Richardz awe muffin, don't be scared. Repost it
    1
  58. @Dee Richardz I said trump never started a war and Obama did, this is a factual statement that is undeniable. You then tried to say Obama inherited problems from Bush, trump inherited even more turmoil in the middle east from Obama but still didn't start any new wars while Obama did, most famously with Libya where he attacked without congressional approval and overthrew the government, an insurrection of sorts. You then tried to backpeddle and say Obama gad some "interventions" I asked you what exactly were they intervening in with Libya and you ran away with your tail between your legs Now why won't you repost champ? What are you afraid of? Hahahahahahahaha
    1
  59. @Dee Richardz so you need a headline to tell you if something is real or not? Hahahahahaha, have you heard of benghazi? Do you ask for a headline knowing global doesn't let you post links as a defense mechanism to cope with getting owned? That's messed up
    1
  60. @Dee Richardz President Obama: Libya aftermath 'worst mistake' of presidency Published11 April 2016 US President Barack Obama has said failing to prepare for the aftermath of the ousting of Libyan leader Col Muammar Gaddafi was the worst mistake of his presidency. Run back to your safe space before I smite you again with facts and logic
    1
  61. @Dee Richardz hahahahahahahaha it most certainly does state Obama started a war and again what exactly were they intervening in? Hahahahahahaha how do you ever expect anyone to take you seriously when you make a claim like "look beyond the headline, it will tell you other countries that were involved" involved in what? Again what were they intervening in? Hahahahahahaha poor Dee I mean listen to yourself! Remember when you praised Australia's pandemic response? Still think they are doing it right? Hahahahahagaga Poor Dee, always getting owned!
    1
  62. @Dee Richardz hahahahahahahahahaha 1) who cares what a headline says, does the reporter choose what is a war or not? I also informed you how the united states hasn't "declared war" since 1942 so is it your position that the US hasn't been in a war since 1942 because they haven't officially "declared war" also only congress can "declare war" so you'll never find any headline anywhere saying a president "declared war" because that's not in the presidents power! Hahahahaha poor Dee 2) You haven't provided an RCT and clearly you don't know what an RCT is because what you posted was a meta analysis that didn't include a single study on masks and viruses but you can prove me wrong by posting it right now, I'll wait.... Nothing? Moving on... 3) yes, you praised Australia's response, still think they are doing a good job? Hahahahahaha poor Dee 4) I am the only one that was able to state vaccination rates and I showed you how in Isreal you are not fully vaxxed until you have 3 shots which is true and the point was Isreal had a higher vaccination rate then Sweden and they did and still do. These are facts and facts don't care about your feelings I never went silent, like every thread I find you on I own you and you just retreat into repeating debunked talking points like you did on the last thread So, in conclusion Obama did start a war in Libya, that is an undeniable fact, your only rebuttal was to say find a headline that says that which is of course nonsense for the president can't "declare war" and the US hasn't declared war since 1942 so according to your nonsense the US hasn't been in a war since 1942 You have yet to provide a single RCT and you'll prove that once again by not posting an RCT Yes, you praised Australia's pandemic response saying it wasn't taking away freedoms, still believe that? I proved to you that you are not fully vaccinated in Isreal unless you have 3 shots which you only response to was "well the global standard is 2 shots" Run back to your safe space before I smite you again with facts and logic
    1
  63. @Dee Richardz The Obama Administration Wrecked Libya for a Generation Such is the cost of America’s promiscuous war‐​making JANUARY 10, 2020 • COMMENTARY  ongoing destruction belongs to Hillary Clinton more than anyone else. It was she who pushed President Barack Obama to launch his splendid little war, backing the overthrow of Moammar Gaddafi in the name of protecting Libya’s civilians. When later asked about Gaddafi’s death, she cackled and exclaimed: “We came, we saw, he died.” Alas, his was not the last death in that conflict, which has flared anew, turning Libya into a real‐​life Game of Thrones. An artificial country already suffering from deep regional divisions, Libya has been further torn apart by political and religious differences. One commander fighting on behalf of the Government of National Accord (GNA), Salem Bin Ismail, told the BBC: “We have had chaos since 2011.” There you go little fella, CATO Institute
    1
  64. @Dee Richardz hahahahahahahahahaha so still no RCT??? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Okay well provide that whenever you are ready. What you are referring to is the nonsense meta analysis that didn't include any studies about masks and viruses and pointing that out shut you down really fast Hahahahahaha well it's like that in every country that's why all the stats say percentage of ELIGIBLE people for no country has mass immunized the young so again just nonsense The fact is that Isreal is one of the most vaccinated countries on earth and has one of the highest transmission rates and a higher rate of both transmission and vaccination in Isreal then Sweden and no amount of mental gymnastics will change that. It's fun watching you squirm, do you think anyone reading this will say, you got him Dee! You lost Dee, as you always do, you need to accept this reality
    1
  65. @Dee Richardz and why aren't you bringing up your opinion on Australia? Having a hard time trying to spin it?
    1
  66. @Dee Richardz hahahahahahahaha so you agree Australia's response is bad right? Hahahahahahah right? Still waiting in that RCT
    1
  67. @Dee Richardz I don't need to go through messages and post what you'll just either make excuses for or will just ignore like you do with every other fact I present you. I mean you asked for a headline, I provided one, you then said "that's commentary" so? All news is commentary now and how does it being commentary change thebfact that you asked for a headline and I provided it Either way you prove what I'm saying is true by your refusal to answer the question Is Australia's response a good one or not?
    1
  68. @Dee Richardz yes I did, and you won't answer proving me correct. Why won't you respond? Me posting a copy and paste doesn't actually "prove" anything watch I'll prove it 6 days ago Dee richards replied "I'm a shill for big pharma" See, I just made that up, which anyone can do in a cut and paste, you know as well as I do you defended Australia's pandemic response and you wont even now condemn it and that is proof Right now, condemn the Australian response or by default you support it Still waiting on that RCT
    1
  69. @Dee Richardz hahahahahaha it os gotcha evidence, they overthrew the Libyan government without congressional approval. That's what happened bud, never happner under Trump These are the facts and facts don't care about your feelings
    1
  70. @Dee Richardz hahahahahaha what you meant to say is your mental gymnastics routine isn't working yes I did, and you won't answer proving me correct. Why won't you respond? Me posting a copy and paste doesn't actually "prove" anything watch I'll prove it 6 days ago Dee richards replied "I'm a shill for big pharma" See, I just made that up, which anyone can do in a cut and paste, you know as well as I do you defended Australia's pandemic response and you wont even now condemn it and that is proof Right now, condemn the Australian response or by default you support it Still waiting on that RCT
    1
  71. @Dee Richardz I never backpeddled even a little bit on the Australia thing, I went at it directly. Anyone can make up and cut and paste, you do it all the time. How I have proven it correct is by the fact that you still won't condemn the response or even comment on it, proves my point completely. In order for me to backpeddle on it I would have had to say I will post your response but I never said that. You really seem to struggle with definitions champ
    1
  72. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling evidence that masks stop or slow viruses and please explain the physics on how a cloth mask filters viruses on the way out but not on the way in
    1
  73. @Dee Richardz The Obama Administration Wrecked Libya for a Generation Such is the cost of America’s promiscuous war‐​making JANUARY 10, 2020 • COMMENTARY  ongoing destruction belongs to Hillary Clinton more than anyone else. It was she who pushed President Barack Obama to launch his splendid little war, backing the overthrow of Moammar Gaddafi in the name of protecting Libya’s civilians. When later asked about Gaddafi’s death, she cackled and exclaimed: “We came, we saw, he died.” Alas, his was not the last death in that conflict, which has flared anew, turning Libya into a real‐​life Game of Thrones. An artificial country already suffering from deep regional divisions, Libya has been further torn apart by political and religious differences. One commander fighting on behalf of the Government of National Accord (GNA), Salem Bin Ismail, told the BBC: “We have had chaos since 2011.” Tell everyone how this isn't a headline because it's commentary! Hahahahahahahaahahahaha Poor Dee
    1
  74. @Dee Richardz still waiting in a single RCT and no, a meta analysis that doesn't mention masks and viruses doesn't count champ! Hahahahahaha
    1
  75. @Dee Richardz still waiting on anything resembling evidence that masks stop or slow viruses and please explain the physics on how a cloth mask filters viruses on the way out but not on the way in
    1
  76. @Dee Richardz still waiting champ Any RCT that says masks stop or slow viruses
    1
  77. @Dee Richardz I'm not setting the standard kid, the scientific method is Believe it or not in order to get evidence for a hypothesis you need to conduct tests that are relevant to the hypothesis Poor Dee, just keeps getting owned
    1