Comments by "RagaSHOT" (@RagaSHOT) on "SCOTUS 'gutted' case against Trump, legal experts conclude: 'MAJOR VICTORY'" video.

  1. You cultists should actuality read what the Supreme court said! You might not be so happy.... I do not join Part III–C, however, which holds that the Constitution limits the introduction of protected conduct as evidence in a criminal prosecution of a President, beyond the limits afforded by executive privilege. … The Constitution does not require blinding juries to the circumstances surrounding conduct for which Presidents can be held liable. … [E]xcluding from trial any mention of the official act connected to the bribe would hamstring the prosecution. To make sense of charges alleging a quid pro quo, the jury must be allowed to hear about both the quid and the quo, even if the quo, standing alone, could not be a basis for the President’s criminal liability.
    1
  2. Did what? Hurting your snowflake trumptard feelings? You're fing pathetic
    1
  3. Get help with your Obama derangement syndrome
    1