Comments by "Carl Rees" (@1977Suspiria) on "Could a resurgent Marcus Rashford be the answer to Erik ten Hag's striker issue?" video.

  1. How can anybody have watched Rashford over the years & still be asking this question? His best position has always when LW, he has the required attributes for the wing role, he's never cut out as a striker. He does well there against a highline in games where United are set up to counter but he's never possessed the hold-up play, intricate passing or indeed the striker instincts to be dependable enough there full time. Martial is far more suited to it & will play there so long as he's fit. Last night again he was good from that favoured LW position so I don't know why you are even asking this question.
    238
  2.  @youwinlouw3815  💯
    3
  3.  @chrisfarquharson4203  Not really sure what you are on about. If Ten Hag saw Rashford as a No.9 then he'd be playing Rashford as a No.9 but when Martial is fit he plays him there. He knows like all the United fans that have a clue that Rashford is not the answer as a striker. And I already said he is effective against the top teams who push up & we can counter on, we all know his strengths, but he most certainly isn't & never will be primarily a striker.
    3
  4.  @ellk6009  Mate, you have a shocking lack of understanding of the game. Just exposing your ignorance here for all to see. 🤦‍♂️
    1
  5.  @chrisfarquharson4203  We aren't talking about Mbappe ffs & Mbappe is levels above Rashford. I still don't know what you are really talking about tbh.
    1
  6.  @chrisfarquharson4203  He can't play against the front line. HE IS NOT A STRIKER! What aren't YOU getting? Try watching a game once in a while.
    1
  7.  @machenry8727  There's just no hope for some people. You chat complete crap.
    1
  8.  @KL-ov8ek  Am I? 🙄 You believe that then.
    1