Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Donald Trump Jr. had secret communications with WikiLeaks" video.
-
12
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
fallspeed Yes, it's a sober article which, unlike this slanted version from Abc, carefully avoiding drawing any legal conclusions - and it's also old news.
But your point is perhaps then that Wikileaks colluded with the Trump campaign to smear Hillary? Or to counterbalance the completely one sided 24/7 Trump bashing plus fake polls put out by almost all mainstream media during campaign?
Or is your point that Wikileaks wanted to do everything possible to keep Hillary from office? If so, I'll just say this: So what? Wikileaks deals in facts. That's what interests me.
And this is still nothing compared to the fake, payed dossier. Opposition research, politicians seem to label it amongst themselves...
And if Wikileaks contributed to expose what a monster Hillary is and what vile creep ran her campaign, meaning the Pedestas, sorry, Podestas, then bless them. What a bullet we dodged there.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Majik0715 Of course they met with Russians, that was never the issue exept in the minds of some dimbulb news anchors. That isn't illegal, either, get a grip. You can easily find the congressional hearings on the matter, even on YouTube, and if you listen you'll find out that the issue was what was discussed! - of course!
Has everybody gone nuts from watching tv? When was meeting Russian representatives at receptions and summit meetings ever illegal? It's annoying, childish nonsense, all of it, and I just can't believe how many have given up on thinking for themselves.
You're just parroting the inane, fragmented nonsense spewed by mainstream media. Look for contexts, patters and connections and think a little until things make sense, please!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
fallspeed Yeah, well, you might have to wait some time, then, because you're not answering my questions and I don't take orders from you, whoever you are. But just to mention a few: It claims to know the Podesta emails were "stolen" from the DNC server? Hiw so? FBI never saw the servers? Seth Rich, also omitted, might have leaked those as part of his attempt to stop voter fraud or they might, more likely, have been leaked from an resident agency. It also speaks of key personnel "leaving the Trump campaign" at various times, omitting to say who was actually let go by Trump himself.
1
-
fallspeed No, no, you're clearly the expert. All I'm saying is that I don't trust NSA or any "experts" from the "intelligence community" as you like to label yourselves. Comey the Weasel perjured himself before congress. Clapper is so busy asscovering, he publicly stated two days ago that Trump was so narcissistic, it was a security risk!
Compared to say Hillary's completely clueless self absorbed behavior, that's a hilarious, but also treasonous statement, completely out of his venue or competence to even mention, and he'll be fired for it, I suspect.
Now as for me, I look for patterns, timing and who benefits. And I must be doing well, because I've been right 10 for 10 so far, so we'll see. Perhaps Manafort is screwed. Can't tell. Don't care.
But what this comes down to is a substantial renovation and budget cuts for the intelligence community all together, mainly because people have become aware that you lot do not respect the constitution and the election process.
Essentially you've in some aspects gone rouge and become both too autonomous and too political for your own good and you'll likely see the houses come to their senses or people become very hard to handle, is my prediction.
But in this specific context you're too happy straining at the gnats to even notice the camels. It also doesn't speak well of your discernment that you conclude anything about what knowledge I demonstrate. So far I've only expressed my evaluations. Theres a difference, don't you know?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Toni Hill Deep state are those authorities with dark budgets that neither congress, senate nor the president can investigate. Right now a war is raging within deep state between two fractions, where one maintain the pledge to serve the elected, constitutional government - and by implication the people, while the other hold the view that governments come and go, but national security is their business and doesn't lend itself to scrutiny by such transient blabber-mouths as are politicians. This is evidenced by the increasing billions of dollars unaccounted for primarily by NSA and MIS.
These black operations took off during the Irak invasion, which needed 9/11 to create voter accept and black operatives to maintain the clandestine operations in the Middle East, maintaining instability under the guise of "peace missions".
Conspiracy theories has been given a negative connotation by the same media who folded to deep state control and censorship and therefore couldn't hope to create any meaningful and whole picture out of all the random tidbits they were allowed to report on, but aren't but attempts to find the patterns behind the mess reported daily.
This social effort by private citizens in combination with increasing censorship made journalists move from reporting towards speculation and here we are: All interested parties yelling - not unlike you - that "we know best" - without attempting to share information or investigate?
Nothing new, really. This always happened when regimes lost the people's trust and confidence by empty promises, censorship, panoptic surveillance and lies sprouting lies as lies need coverups...
1
-
1
-
1