Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Washington Post" channel.

  1. So now the incredibly silly democrats has somehow taken ownership of El Paso and would exclude the president from addressing people there? Are they going insane?
    26
  2. The high road? As in Hillary's "they go low, we go high"? 😄😄😄
    19
  3. Taylor Who?
    9
  4. You seem somewhat hectic and monoptic, WaPo. Afraid President Trump will dismantle the child sex trafficing you defended so energetically?
    6
  5. It gets me every time how stupid, harch and primitive politicians sound when they think the public can't hear them. But I guess to get better leaders we must better our own consciousness of priorities and perhaps our ideals? Sad then how heavily the big moneygrabbers and deep state invest in dumbing down the public by misinformation, subliminal programming, pacifying entertainment and their latest fad, censorship by algorithms...
    6
  6. At least WaPo has the motto right, Democracy Dies in Darkness, but how about the paper's motivations?
    5
  7. WaPo seems not to have fully realized that Hillary is certifiable? Oh, I forgot, WaPo is determined to maintain the illusion that Pizzagate is a hoax. Yeah, well, in that precarious situation, better side with the chronic liar, I guess... Please notify me if WaPo ever gets around to addressing the actual evidence in Pizzagate - should it occur inside of the coming decades.
    5
  8. Of course she's a suspect! Who are we kidding?
    5
  9. Pilots fighting the MCAS because they didn't understand or weren't taught properly was the cause of both crashes...
    4
  10. WaPo, the gatekeeper for James Alefantis, talks norms, ethics and the law...
    4
  11. They're tired of waiting for AG Sessions to grow up!
    4
  12. KaosReigns Yes, and isn't that so eerily strange - how that never make the news on MSM?
    3
  13. The FBI can't stand watching all the childtrafficking in DC while being barred from doing anything about it, so they'd very much like to move to a better neighborhood... (Not sarcasm)
    3
  14. OMG this is bad! Why do American politicians always end up hypocrites? This is but McCarthyism all over again. Instead of taking control of the Banksters without a nation, they fake this charade. What Russia may or may not have done amounts to nothing and they know it! Russia could've spend trillions trying to affect Americans and it still wouldn't have mattered the least. Has anybody even noticed these alledged ads? Only thing I notice during election was RT, which I frankly found heavily slanted, naive, primitive and outright ridiculous. I fear the real agenda is censorship of social media - just like in Russia and China and Saudi Arabia. Because of rampant corruption and abuse of public funds, they now strive to obtain the same control over social media as they got over the press. And the only reason this becomes so evident just now is the establishment's shivering fear of a maverick president, loyal to his people and not in the pocket of any money laundering Clintonite foundation... This is the land of the free becoming a totalitarian state! Very sad.
    3
  15. This is just another molehill made mountain. Russian infiltrators are everywhere and has been since the sixties - in every European country, even one as small as Denmark. In the early seventies a mole nearly became director of MI5 in GB. But with Trump it's not even a "matter" - as Hitlery preferred to say - unless the Russians succeded in gaining some leverage or foothold. All this inane RussianMussianMumbleJumble is transgressing into politically weaponized paranoia and it's disgusting to watch WaPo sink so low.
    3
  16. Yeah, I just heard the same story on CNN. Nice synchronicity you've got going there, MSM! Although... CNN didn't say anything about sources either. So is it even true or simply part of the attempt to further the ongoing silent coupe d'état? Will the White House force another retraction - come to be buried in a byline so devoted sheeple won't have to notice? I think it's another fakery in the saga of disgruntled deep staters, but even if it was true, Trump would still be well inside his constitutional rights. In case it is true, I think he should have gone with his own, usually very precise intuition. The Mueller investigation is a fraud. It can never go anywhere legally, simply because it was based on an illegal FISA warrent and an illegal leak by Comey the Lying Weasel. Fruit of the poisoned tree principle. Sessions should of course be fired for not starting his own investigation into the illegally subversive Mueller team and ignoring Judicial Watch's request for the budget and scope. Heck, Sessions shouldn't have accepted the position as AG in the first place knowing that he'd have to recuse himself from being in any way effective in draining the sewer! He knew this was the president's policy going in. He set his personal ambition over the ability to serve his president which puts him in with the rest of the corruption running rampant...
    3
  17. The notion of banning the president is ludicrous. I hope he'll abolish all social platforms attempting political censorship by revoking their tax reductions and prosecutorial shields. Free speech on social platforms is the people's only hope to combat MSM disinformation.
    3
  18. Dems clamoring for tax-funded aid to their sinking ships. Nothing new! Vote them out!
    3
  19. Dreamsters...
    3
  20. The harassment slush fund, yeah! But explain again, why should taxpayers pay for this dweebs transgressions? Oh, and btw, why is the rape slush fund exempt from FOIA? Please, honorable members, NO pun intended, explain, explain, explain what's wrong with you all.
    3
  21. Is WaPo somehow supposed to be IN the loop? 😄😄😄😂😂😂😊😊🙄🙄
    2
  22. Didn't you get the memo, WaPo? 😂😂😂 It's not a smoking gun and it not a bombshell. No. It's a nuclear bomb under the the FBI directors, the DNC and fake MSM like you. Don't let these liars fool you, people. Read the memo yourselves: https://www.scribd.com/document/370599093/FISA-memo-Full-text or get a comprehensive rundown here: https://youtu.be/1IKnPEW6PfA
    2
  23. Occasionella...
    2
  24. Is wapo holding the view that Jordan was an abuser, now? The title seems deliberately ambiguous.
    2
  25. Their embarrassment center must be turned completely to "off"...
    2
  26. Wonder where WaPo hid it's intense interest in private emails when it was Hillary used them for illegal bribes and criminal traffic as Secretary of State! Oh, I forgot, double standards, yes, yes... Well double standards aren't twice as beneficial as one - like say professional reporting, fx... Oh, and let's just close our eyes and ears to the huge difference between a sporadic use based on convenience and without classified material and Hillary's intentional circumventions of basic security instructions for profit. Yes, I know Comey said there was no "intent" (as if that would even matter in the courtroom) but he knew about the revealing email where she states that "despite security admonition, I'm still using my blackberry..." I say no, WaPo! Stop pretending to be a newspaper. You've become a totalitarian propaganda machine. It's too obvious.
    2
  27. The Nadler chaired committee is where truth goes to die and be buried – without a headstone...
    2
  28. Well, I've seen WaPo protect rich, influential childabusers from exposure, so I probably shouldn't be surprised they label a threatening mob "protesters" – completely without specifying what these insane terrorists are supposed to be protesting.
    2
  29. Killa Watt Yes! I thought exactly the same. They would teach and guide us? They're the ones who never learn! They're behaving like toddlers, one minute complaining that Trump is too unpredictable, the next lamenting that he repeats former mistakes? I doesn't make sense.
    2
  30. Reminds me of third world reactions, this storming of idols. Usually not a sign of much awareness, more of a primitive mob reaction without purpose...
    2
  31. Pierre Odendaal No, Pizzagate isn't fake at all. It's the buried scandal of this century. Read the documents provided by Wikileaks and private investigators and get real.
    2
  32. Wuhuuu, WaPo! Something, something, Russia mumble, grumble... And the lawyers stopped talking, so let's fill in the blanks and hope Mueller doesn't hang himself in omissions...
    2
  33. Yeah, WaPo! Democracy dies in darkness, but it doesn't do so well on lies, slantings, innuendo nor censorship either. So! Where's your investigation on Pizzagate, fx? Not your denials, but a real investigation! And: Have you remembered to report on Wasserman's strange choice to keep the IT supporter with the crazy salary accused of fraud who's now been arrested trying to flee the country to Pakistan - where his smuggling wife already is? And she took all her possessions with showing no intention to return to the states? How's your reporting on these matters, WaPo? Too busy pushing the new leftist narrative called "Trump Team Turmoil" to care for the whole picture? Are your masters well satisfied with your accomplishments so far? Is the silent coupe d'etat against the maverick who can't be controlled by deep state, the Clinton News Network and all the rest of MSM put together progressing satisfactory? Or are you crashing and burning?
    1
  34. Leo Maybe if he didn't have to deal with so much nonsense from leftist fake MSM like CNN, MSNBC, WaPo and NYT and all the democratic RussianMussianMumbleJumble he could do more?
    1
  35. Or WaPo could perhaps for a second nurse the hypothesis that President Trump means what he says and does what he promised - and has a great heart for America and Americans to booth... This assumption tends to put an entirely different perspective on almost everything happening in politics now - and happens to be the one I go by. But I understand, WaPo. Having made an art form of slanted, misleading and dumbifying half truths and completely evading the essence of power-abuse since 2000, it must be really challenging to asume honestly can still be found, right?
    1
  36. Changes are coming! President Trump is the most prominent vessel for them but the trend is the same globally. So! Is or isn't USA going to continue as a world dominant superpower? People both in and outside the US are divided on this issue. Which trend constitutes the majority trend? What are the realistic scenarios and the probable outcome? So far it seems the American voters are no longer willing to shoulder this heavy burden, so if our claim of real democratic western constitutions is to remain believable, the answer is already in - and all the naysayers are in fact attempting to resist a global change already decided by the people of the nation in question! I view changes as the very foundation of reality and find the illusion of unchanging power, control and alliances detrimental and belonging to the past. The arguments against changes may all seem rational enough - until you realize that they're all based on the past and the experiences obtained by the choices made then ... I contend that humanity as a whole now stands on the threshold of transition from tangential, linear thinking (leading in all possible directions) to a much more conscious awareness seeking answers that will jive with better understanding of cosmic laws for life and matter. The waning linear thinking depends solely on the fundamental "point of view" - buried of course in layers of culture - but nonetheless detectable by calm resolve. It depends on the identity of the individual, the group, the nation or even the international institutions and being linear, it can take the mind anywhere while everyone is absurdly claming to be right ! The conscious awareness recognizes this endless, potentially violent division inherent in the linear approach and is constantly seeking the right time for the appropriate change - not based on past assumptions or old habits alone - but also on the evermore clear (and constantly changing) perception of what constitutes "true" reality. That's why I find that 1) the political partisanship has to be surmounted by a quest for truth and 2) a new neutrality be attempted by the MSM joining the people in seeking transparency - partly in order to combat corruption of our politicians - but also to allow voters to make the informed choices which are after all the beating heart of democracies of any kind.
    1
  37. ki0ng Address the points I made if you want to debate me, please. Or don't you get it yet?
    1
  38. This is news to you, WaPo? Oh, dear...
    1
  39. Turnips Will Never Hurt You Well, you at least didn't hurt me 😉
    1
  40. This lawsuit by CNN is a non-starter – and it's ridiculous as well. Nobody, public or private, should have to endure Acosta's obnoxious, slow witted yelling – and since CNN really is fake news, detrimental to the nation and its people, why on earth should they get to decide who's to report from the White House press room? This is certainly not an issue of the amendment, but a matter of disruptive disrespect for the presidency! Why do reporters delude themselves they're some kind of untouchable elite? Have they looked at their confidence ratings lately? Ban Acosta permanently from coming within a thousand yards of the president, he's toxic!
    1
  41. Beta...
    1
  42. Travis James Don't care what MSM think they "have to do". Politics isn't a game for entertainment. If it's disingenuous, corruption soon takes over. We've seen this all over the world and all through history. The elected representatives need do whatever it takes to uproot this evil for good. And the MSM needs to stop believing they have any right to misguide people. They're playing with fire and their spiritual age is below three! If they don't cease and desist, they'll burn.
    1
  43. Doesn't matter, fake impeachment, going nowhere. Anything else?
    1
  44. Over the years I've seen many cases of miscarriage of justice which were only rectified many years later. Every one of these involved black men. I cannot remember one single incident where similar injustice were done to a white man. We have a bad case of unconscious bias or worse screwing up our justice systems.
    1
  45. cough pillbox Well, I just honestly couldn't remember. I also do believe the statistics will show a disproportionate number of blacks subjected to such miscarriages. Are you going to deny that? But of course there's bound to be incidents of all ethnicities, even white. What unconscious bias are you accusing me of having?
    1
  46. Dr. Jones No, I knew most of that, but what's it got to do with anything? Bias works both ways and blacks can be prejudiced against blacks as well. And what're you so riled up for? I expressed my – possibly biased opinion – in the hope of some informative feedback and debate. Cough pillbox gave me Alan Northrop and Craig Coley. If I've ever known, I've completely forgotten, so I looked them up and learned about Harthorne's bill of compensation, fx...
    1
  47. Dr. Jones Okay, but I wasn't out to take issue with anyone! What's your problem-toe?
    1
  48. Dr. Jones No! That's definitely not what I said. Why can't you just be fair and precise? I said I couldn't remember – there's a difference, you know.
    1
  49. Dr. Jones Fine, and thanks for your information.
    1
  50. Why should walmart be open and not others?
    1