Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Bloomberg Television" channel.

  1. Sure, let's pretend Putin cares...
    20
  2. Like in "let's pretend Joe has a chance"?
    20
  3. "Biden says"... Well, there's a thief calling for ethics...
    19
  4. It's true! They really are crazy. Especially Schiff. I suspect he's clinically certifiable...
    13
  5. The impeachment is a circus. Nobody believes anything can come of it. If it impacts markets at all, is the usual hysteria and of no consequence.
    10
  6. Take control back to elected government. Repo the FED!
    8
  7. A steal by fraud isn't a victory...
    8
  8. It's time for you medications and your nap, grandpa!
    7
  9. So the speedy impeachment is postponed again? Very peculiar conduct, raising the legitimate question: Are all democrats insane? 😂😂😂
    5
  10. joselo 3112 Sounds like a plan. Any job offers from the Rothschilds yet?
    4
  11. Sure let the employees pay with their pensions for miserable management (paid to the tune of 50,000$ per month) – and don't you dare touch management benefits, are you insane?
    4
  12.  @sekereterra  You're insanely stupid...
    4
  13. Boy Wonderbk He had no mind to lose...
    4
  14. He keeps his cool and he speaks the truth!
    3
  15. Stan Buczak What?! Yates and Comey were long overdue for getting pinkslipped! That can't in the least affect the "investigation" into the "Russian meddling" - a fairy tale meant to deflect from the rampant DC corruption without any merit and substance which would have died silently if not for MSM pushing and pushing it, btw. But if any real investigation is in fact meant to go forward on "the Russian hacking" it will do so unhampered by Comey being fired, because it will be driven by the senate committee and an FBI returning to doing its real job - investigation - not meddling in politics!
    3
  16. This is a planned fraud — again. How else would Biden counts go up in the night in states he clearly lost, with not a single vote for Trump counted? How can one voting machine, which was barely used by anyone suddenly produce 130,000 votes for Biden? Many of these democratic ballot handlers need to go behind bars, and if their crimes can't be corrected, there must be a reelection ...
    3
  17. Camille Lake Whatever do you mean, "randomly fires"? Both Yates and Comey were long overdue for firing. They both blatantly abused their entrusted powers to meddle in politics, Yates by unmasking and leaking and Comey by failing to indicte Hillary. Comey is weasely and clever, though, while yates is just naive and delusional. But Comey tried to play both horses, thereby failing both the country and the bureau by not doing his entrusted job. Of course Hillary should have been indicted, wtf? People of lesser standing have been jailed for years for much less and she certainly knew the law and her obligations. Comey laid out the devastating evidence against her - but failed to prosecute. Had it been any Joe or Jane, they'd been prosecuted "also for their own protection" as the frase goes, because remember, a court case may also redeem the accused! No, no, no! The only reason Hillary wasn't prosecuted was that a court case would have stopped the election dead in its tracks.
    2
  18. Excuse me! How is Twitter supposed to discern the truth about Covid? This is blatant, unlawful censorship on social platforms! The MSM are constantly pushing a completely false, fearmongering narrative on a virus much less dangerous than the H1N1 Swineflu pandemic in 2009 where testing was stopped quickly, in "order to not unnecessarily alarm the public", no lockdowns and no masks were deployed. The current fatality rate doesn't even reach the level of an average flu season, fps! This is an orchestrated attempt by MSM to tank the election for the president, and an attempt by Fauci and Gates to profit hugely on unnecessary vaccines, they invested heavily in. But why am I telling you? Aren't you the entity supposed to investigate and analyse? Try reporting what Oxford Research Center for Disease and Vaccines has published about these vaccines...
    2
  19. Jeff Noe Which the deep hum from windmills is actually suspected of doing. You'll be able to find several clinical studies indicating this if you look it up, genius...
    2
  20. Jeff Noe Nope, sheep! Trump is slightly dyslexic, but, as science have long recognized, that doesn't mean you're stupid. And there is no climate crisis. All the various predictions since the fifties have failed miserably as Tony Heller so aptly proves daily on his channel. It's the climate model which has one or more basic flaws, rendering it useless. You're such a typical numb-nut sheep, trusting every agenda put forward by the collusion between MSM and the DNC without checking facts and without understanding any of it. You're just parroting talking points, you poor, brainwashed sucker...
    2
  21. Jeff Noe I don't care about Trump as a person. On the abstract, he's dealt a raw, unfair deal. If there's something really wrong about him, why couldn't you silly dreamer-democrats get him on substance? If there's nothing really wrong with him, deal with his politics. They are what I care about, and they're excellent – visionary even – and highly effective – and he executes them with incredible stamina and energy without getting distracted by all the disgustingly rude and arrogant slander he must suffer from lowlife dimbulbs in MSM such as don lemon, cooper and cuomo. And everyone in the herd of gullible sheeple forget about the huge risks they're taking. Should they succeed in removing Trump, everything does not just snap back to old times! Too much has happened already. Too much corruption has been exposed. Nobody but fools trust MSM to report facts and the democrats are the laughing stock of the world, they're so clumsy, ineffective and lie so hotly, it's an entire climate catastrophe in itself...
    2
  22. Well, the WHO was complicit in delaying the counter-action...
    2
  23. I don't lend any credibility to the claim that the stress test of banks achive anything whatsoever! It's simply a misdirection, no more, no less.
    1
  24. danielgarrison91 I don't lie, wtf?
    1
  25. Becca K God, you're so brainwashed it's pathetic!
    1
  26. danielgarrison91 You number show only the confirmed cases and very little testing was done then compared to Covid, despite the glaring fact that the Swineflu was dangerous to working age adults and children while Covid isn't! Yes, testing was stopped by the WHO after critique as I mentioned. The global mortality rate therefore had to be estimated in followup-studies and couldn't be determined with any certainty, but the Swineflu did make young adults very sick in some cases and killed far more younger than elderly people. Covid hasn't killed anyone below the age of 65 who wasn't already chronically immunodeficient, despite reports to the contrary in MSM. Their pet case embarrassingly turned out to not even have been infected... So the death rate for Covid as currently estimated is 0.04% while the estimate for Swineflu ended up at 0.02% thus being far more dangerous because it primarily hit the young and working adults. The current mishandling of elderly sick, putting them in nursing homes with the most vulnerable segment, more than doubled the death rate in those states and countries who did this. No general lockdowns were recommended anywhere during the Swineflu. Instead parents were asked to keep symptomatic children home for a certain period. Businesses weren't harmed. Local variations prompted a few school to close for a short period – but on their own behest. No economic disaster was triggered. No fools wore silly, useless masks. Would you now suggest we make a big hubbub out of every flu season? Your numbers are chosen to deliberately give a false picture. Mine are true.
    1
  27. danielgarrison91 Conspicuous how you feel the need to be derogatory. Already told you the reason for this low number.
    1
  28. danielgarrison91 You actually wrote "schools did shit down for periods of time" ... Yes, told you already.
    1
  29. danielgarrison91 I already know the difference, button...
    1
  30. I wonder how CNN will spin this towards impeachment.
    1
  31. Jeff Noe Sheeple probably label everything slightly demanding "stupid". I might be a bit sad if any of my peers ever called me stupid, but they never do. They say I expect to much of people. And they're wrong. Positive expectations works well. But your superficial evaluation wouldn't matter to anyone with a bit of smarts... Wouldn't you like to stop regurgitating others digested narratives and develop knowledge you trust?
    1
  32. Jeff Noe 96% of contemporary scientists thought Einstein was wrong. It just means that mediocrity never could fathom developing new knowledge.
    1
  33. Stop speculating and look to Sweden!
    1
  34. You can stop your alarmist nonsense! This pandemic will end up killing fewer people than an average flu season, period!
    1
  35. So they basically just kill some more people to cover up who ordered the heinous murder on a journalist?
    1
  36. Beta...
    1
  37. Trump is simply calling Schiff's bluff. There is no whistleblower, just a big, seditionist cabal with one more member's name now published – presumably some CIA agent with megalomania, thinking like the dimbulbs at CNN and Chris Wallace that they somehow know better than Trump. In general, those who think so are educated mediocrities, thinking that because they can form relatively correct sentences, they must be smarter than Trump. How the illusion of smartness gives them the right to be rude, defamatory or even slanderous I'll never know, but it doesn't matter. Trump is resilient and plenty smart. His results will silence those who doesn't get it. His campaign skills will silence those who do, but pretend otherwise – the professional liars of the Washington swamp...
    1
  38. The vaccines work?! Please ask this »expert« how he came to this conclusion!
    1
  39. OzarkoBlam That's a relief! I thought they were having a total breakdown...
    1
  40. Topping China? Provided China reported the actual numbers, but who can believe they do?
    1
  41. Yeah, yeah, it's all true, i saw it on Bloomberg... wait... Well, they also said the FBI was investigating... no, wait, that was also Bloomberg. Who btw said nothing about the FBI investigating Maxine Waters for instigating riots (the blood has flown in our streets before, it can happen again) or Kamala "the riots won't stop if Trump is elected, they shouldn't, we won't stop..."
    1
  42. Why Wallace the Wuss? He's such a biased weakling...
    1
  43. Wray of course says what knows – that the matter in the title is under investigation. Have you somehow become allergic to the truth? Bloody time wasting clicbatery got to go!
    1
  44. So... Congress Oversight handles hearsay as cause for impeachment... Nadler, Schiff and Pelosi need to be removed from positions of power. They're incompetent and they aren't looking out for the country.
    1
  45. The EU is totally wrong in this approach. It's frankly insane to allow corporate censorship just to pander to some rather immature sensitivities. The laws and the enforcement of the laws must suffice. The national intelligence must deal with the monitoring of complaints and suspicions of terrorism. The court must deal with character defamation and the community of users can deal with the tone! Do not presume to treat citizens, who pay everything the state does through taxes, as infants to be pampered! No more snooping, no more infringements of citizens free speech. It's most likely the politicians themselves, who can't bear criticism. But they need it – very, very badly!
    1
  46. What's she waving that hand around for? Pence isn't. Split brain syndrome or alcoholic's remorse?
    1
  47. Tixe 100 source?
    1
  48. AlanChavezDawg Source? There're also sasquatches on YT...
    1
  49. Tyler Mitzner Yes I have and yes I am..
    1
  50. Tyler Mitzner Well, Schiff may have lied so much he lost all ability to discern reality from fiction somewhere along his career. And you, why do you ask questions, if you don't accept answers? What's all the hatred here really about? All I ever said was Schiff is a lying scumbag. Isn't that fairly obvious? Then I ventured to speculate that given the razor thin edge he walks and the reckless choices he makes, he may actually have reached a point of mental breakdown, where he can't discern reality. It's called a reactive psychosis. If I'm right, he may recover fully, but won't be able to take up where he left off. He'll be completely astounded by his own former words and actions. It may apper easy to lie, but living on lies carries a heavy price. But why should this bother you? Are you in some kind of trouble?
    1
  51. Are you seriously voting for Biden?
    1
  52. What a bunch of losers... "Hope over fear" is so lame, it's pathetic. The fear is probably real, but hoping is not a political solution. On the contrary, it's an admission of bewilderment. So I guess it's honest at least. Well, I don't like democrats when they're lying, cheating, smearing, dreaming or projecting, but it turns out I don't even like them when they're trying to be honest. Maybe that's because I don't see what feeble losers, who has nothing but hope to offer their voters, are doing trying to govern! Just look at the chaos in the big cities, they've governed for decades! No! When you've got nothing but vague ideas and hope, it's time to be practical: Go get another job. One you can handle. Oh, and Pocahontas? Voters don't want "deep, structural changes"! That's you, wanting to change the constitution to benefit yourself! Voters want honest, competent grownups in senate and congress and an end to corruption, censorship and your incessant lying!
    1
  53. It's not Cuomo's prerogative to regulate against the constitution. Stop the scamdemic hype immediately!
    1
  54. No, it didn't! Nowhere near that insane number, scumbags! There's a significant number of false positives with these tests, and as soon as authorities begin testing asymptomatic people, the results become meaningless. Please stop the rampant fearmongering!
    1
  55. Trump should sue this lying idiot for calling him corrupt. There's huge corruption in Washington both sides of the isle, sure, but where's her proof of Trump even being part of that clique?
    1
  56. Trump looks fine. Please don't claim "treatment" when no such plan is known. All we have is a positive test, which means nothing, if the president has no symptoms...
    1
  57. How is it that everybody and his dog know the name of the fake whistleblower, yet mentioning his name is supposed to be illegal? Sounds to me like typical Schiffty double talk and dreary democrat hypocrisy...
    1
  58. No, that's right, Joe! Trump doesn't "steal elections". He has no such need. But I bet you're gonna try your ugliest to do exactly what you accuse Trump of — and fail...
    1
  59. 1:50 So! Mueller is still lying! What "sophisticated methods" is he referring to? Neither Podesta's email service nor Hillary's private servers had any protection at all. Podesta's password was "password" and Hillary had no shielding or encryption whatsoever! Assange, who has never posted false information on Wikileaks, clearly stated that the emails were not obtained from any Russian source and most of us have good cause to suspect they were provided by Seth Rich. Mueller may not know how easily his lie can be disproved, but the data analysis showed that data transmission from the DNC servers were consistent with that of a data stick, but far too fast for any existing, transatlantic service! Why do these people keep lying about everything? It's so disgusting! Mueller is a tool, and he's not very bright.
    1
  60. These were the highlights?
    1