Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Truth about Atacama Alien skeleton | Garry Nolan and Lex Fridman" video.

  1. 3:40 Well, I don’t know: Fauci hasn’t lost his yet… I feel uneasy listening to professor Noland, because he seems as biased for the human solution as he accuses others to be for alien one. His role should be that of the unbiased, calm scholar laying out all the factors which made him conclude this was a malformed human with a hitherto unseen number of non-random mutations (according to the expert, who "wrote the book", according to professor Noland himself). But that’s not what happens. Instead, with eyes shifting constantly, he skipped the basis for concluding 'human' and skipped right to a much weaker argument, namely: "Is there any way in hell this anomaly could be the result of a series of mutations?" His expert didn’t say yes or no, but he did say that he "had never seen anything similar"! So then professor Noland, contrary to all objective principles, directed his students to attempt to see of it was possible to match some of the genetic anomalies to loci related to bone and joint formation. Now why would he do that, and not continue to map everything to determine whether the fossil was human or not? That, ladies and whatever, is as biased as it gets! Noland would never allow his institute to conclude that the fossil couldn’t be determined to be human with a significant certainty!
    1