Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Al Jazeera English"
channel.
-
64
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
5
-
4
-
MSM are full of idiots. They're always trying to "overshadow" essentials with sensational nonsense and that, by association, goes for Al Jazeera as well. You're simply fundamentally wrong to pretend media slantings has to do with reality. It's just noise from the usual, derailed conglomerates, which fewer and fewer respect and trust as time rolls on.
If MSM doesn't get on the ball and shape up, they have no future. You all forgot about The Consumer and came to fancy yourselves History Makers paid by advertisers. Well, you're not history makers and ads need an audience... History is made by the people, for the people and by a very, very few great leaders, but still for the people.
Politicians suffer from the same hyper inflated egos as journalists. They too forgot who they serve. Well, I think you better get started on some recall, because you houses of cards are collapsing all over again.
Truth is a terrible, insurmountable foe and a great, protective friend to have.
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Kevin Skipper No, I have no need listening to egos quarrel to delude themselves they're right – with a heavily biased arbitration – especially since the debate/quarrel is entirely moot.
Only symbolic gestures will be made until the alleged problem perhaps becomes undeniable. That is just how politics works. I have my own evaluation and it's probably right as usual, but that doesn't matter either – not beyond a small group of friends and relatives who value my take on things.
I'm want to being right so early on about a whole slew of developments, I gradually lost the will to try to convince others and restricted myself to formulate a comprehensible outline in order to initiate awareness with those, who were ready and motivated for battle.
I also don't consider the sport of making predictions much more than adult infantilism – when it comes to public debates and politics. In real science, predicting can act as a test of validity of theory, of course, but in real life entirely different forces and conditions are at play.
One important dynamic often ignored is the feedback mechanism between the motive for – and the effect of – any prediction, which nevertheless quite often leads to the paradox of the best predictions nullifying themselves, leading to the possible later interpretation, that "we thought the problem serious, but our concern turned out to be exaggerated" ;)
How do we even know afterwards if some apparently sufficient measures were really necessary?
Scenarios we couldn't imagine might have played out (leading to conditions half would deem better, the other half worse) had we acted differently, but might in any case already have changed the future in ways nobody could foresee – even to such a degree as to change the number of available options later on.
And again people differ: Some prefer less options and a paved road – others are forever off-roaders looking for untried solutions...
2
-
2
-
Nuno magalhães Nope, the insanily Rich Moneysucking Vampires are never arrested, much less brought before a court. The evidence tends to disappear, witnesses comit spectacularly impossible suicides, jurors suddenly change their verdicts and so on.
So, no! As soon as transparency is lost - and our lawmakers are decreasing it steadily while holding brave speeches about its necessity - corruption flourish, and as soon as it reaches the underpaid, overworked and poorly educated police force you can forget about justice!
Our societies seem to have tipped over the point of no return. The insanely rich money vampires have become too powerful to be controlled. They've taken control of most mainstream media and thus control all the weak politicians, who fear bad press. And they of course also reward politicians who become their obedient puppets and sell out the people and our national riches - which they were meant to represent and protect.
Despite all this, the peoples are becoming aware of the rampant fraud globally, so some kind of confrontation seems inevitable, but neither political representatives nor MSM are on our side, and since the social media are becoming the only avenue for disclosure, you may expect heavy censorship being applied asap. Google har already begun and some CEOs have spoken publicly about how "fake news" may be "toned down" by "algorithmic inhibition"...
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Matt Molenda Yes, of course you and I and a dog named blue can figure out ways to conceal or maybe just tone down such a hobby. And his brother did say something about him having guns as a hobby, but seemed to think it was mainly handguns.
But the planning takes some coherence and doing. He can't have been a victim of an acute psychosis, because that would rob him of his planning ability and the ability to act normally, both. Even a high functioning paranoid schizophrenic would hardly posses the ability to keep the dissimulation going for years unless living reclused, like the una-bomber. If he was crazed by hatred and able to hide it from his girlfriend, it must have developed more acutely. Therefore there must be some trigger event in his recent past - or something really dark is behind this. Was he per chance terminally ill? Had he gambled his fortune away? Remember we're talking about a well functioning man, wealthy from his former employment...
Of the cases I recall, his most closely resembles Anders Bering Breivik, but he was an obsessed fanatic with a huge trail of revealing "manifestos" on the web and felt so right about his gruesome deed, that he had no intention of letting himself be killed. He still seems to think himself some kind of a misunderstood hero.
Nothing quite seems to fit here...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1