Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Scripps News" channel.

  1. What if any reason did the police give for removing Jill? Was there a riot brewing or is this merely more craziness?
    2
  2. Yep, the risk of 'suicide" rises exponentially and any meaningful evidence is bound to go missing whenever any high profile paedophiles are threatened by exposure... That's just fine. Don't blame the FBI or the DOJ. They're just trying to duck and hide when the elite flexes it muscles. And MSM? Well, they just great, right? But they too have to protect their masters or else...
    2
  3. Wasn't this yet another misleading news items? What was the main issue? What were his admitted mistakes? Did he change his attitude or merely his approach? Did I get any info or was I just fed some vague emotion aiming to pacify me and make me believe that even though Suckerberg, sorry Zuckerberg, caught heavy flack for his behavior, he's still an OK guy? I think this is deliberate, purchased misdirection attempting to leave a specific impression on my mind, but not giving me the necessary info to make up my own mind. I could probably easily find the key info, but do I really need the hassle? Wasn't that supposed to be the media's job to deliver this? Apparently no more, so I can safely conclude that to avoid misdirection and disinformation, I simply stop listening to the media and go directly to search out what interests me? Is this what the media are aiming at? Do I ask too many questions? Or too few? 😄🙄
    1
  4. Bury the lead, will you! Nice dress - not! Grrr...
    1
  5. So! This was perhaps the real purpose of the democrats last, irrational charade? And here I was thinking they'd had a total meltdown! But, no, they simply wanted the republican segment of judicial oversight to be prevented from seeing the unredacted report! Now, Newsy, you go find out why. Show some real journalism! What is it democrats have to fear from the parts that are classified, grand jury or private in the report? If I'm speculating, the grand jury parts might contain names and testimony exposing members of the anti-Trump cabale and the classified parts might expose the democratic henchmen within the services, how does that strike you?
    1