Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. I’m not even in the states, and I’ve realized this since 2002. The treatment of Trump made the malpractice of the intelligence community glaringly obvious to the world, yet no comprehensive steps were taken. Then this system of corruption proceeded to steal his re-election, as I predicted it would, and nothing was done. Trump was America's last chance to remain a land of the free, but you blew it. Now it’s too late. Tuckers »We’re not gonna stand for that« is empty bravado. You will, because there’s zilch you can do about it. The state within the state controls the government. 🚧
    1
  2. Here what true authorities say about the Mueller fraud: https://youtu.be/WgDLxGRn07w 14:49
    1
  3. The money-vampires want sheople, not people…
    1
  4. I think Shep is moving to CNN. Seems he didn't "speak for all of Fox" when he tried to question the White House's right to bar a yelling brat from meetings...
    1
  5. What's with the silly masks?
    1
  6. Will Px I know! And what would be your little, mean point? I never claimed deep state and fraud was exclusively liberal. Did Raving Madcow inspire your questions? Did she show you some old tax returns and roll her eyes, trying to look crafty?
    1
  7. Will Px Excuse me... Save Trump from what, now? More unfounded allegations and childish, panicked nonsense cooked up but The Nice Pedestas and Facediving Hillary? How's that working so far for you?
    1
  8. Will Px Are you still at it? The dossier was used to illegally unmask Trump and his campaign, thereby illegally weaponizing the secret services politically. The base for Mueller's charade was the Russian Fairytale. So to summarize: The foundation for the special prosecutor was non existent and Mueller's "team" has produced nada, zilch, zip and nothing. I'm sorry, but you've been mislead by MSM so irresponsible they might get the broadcasting permission revoked...
    1
  9. Will Px How dense are you? MSM isn't MSNBC fgs!
    1
  10. Hold up one minute there, Tucker! Where's the evidence that one single American citizen was swayed by anything any Russian did or said? Have you all gone mad? You can't seriously think America should block foreign input at all? Democracies don't work under totalitarian regimes! Remember East Germany? Why is everybody rooting for one kind of censorship or another? It's insanity!
    1
  11. Bolton sounds like teenager trying to get revenge. What an idiot!
    1
  12. It's like The Emperor's New Clothes by H. C. Andersen! How can anyone "debunk" the spy in the Trump campaign. There was a spy planted from the FBI inside the campaign. The rest is just semantics. Stop the insane nonsense already! Wtf?
    1
  13. So, Sessions! Step up or move out!
    1
  14. Worried, you ask? They should already have been prosecuted for attempting a coupe d'état! Instead of quietly investigating their half baked suspicious as professionals, the IC conspired to leak groundless defamation and hurt whoever they could around Trump. They should be deeply worried now that Barr seems to finally be moving, but by rights they should already have been sentenced for treason.
    1
  15. Like Manafort or not, and I tend to dislike his vibe myself, the way he's been treated is beyond the pale and should be cause for a lawsuit against mueller all by itself!
    1
  16. Title should be women, not woman, thought...
    1
  17. Linsey Turncoat is as effective combatting corruption as Barr was investigating...
    1
  18. 3:00 Spicer just told her what's factual: Acosta wasn't asking any kind of question, he was rudely correcting the president for having a different view on the caravan, but she's just moseying on calling a rude statement a question. Does all reporters live in some kind of weird delusion? She tries to skip past the very essence of the debate. Why? Acosta could've just asked: "Why do you choose to call the caravan an invasion?" – but he didn't do that and CNN never does ask open question on behalf of the viewers, they invariably try to control what can possibly be answered. That's simply not reporting. It's political attempts at manipulation.
    1
  19. When media regularly "fall short" of some alleged standard, of which I see no evidence, it must be safe to say they're so heavily biased as to be fake news! They're apparently adhering to the principle that told enough times, any lie gets some semblance to the truth. And the truth seems to be their most abhorred enemy.
    1
  20. Whaaaaat? That's a bit weaker than I expected from Ingraham! Ohbummer has no legacy. Sock puppets don't get to have legacies. He's scared now that the criminals within administration and the services are being interrogated. He abused unmasking, slander, leaking, coercion and spying on a presidential candidate. He was behind the incredible fake entrapment of Flynn. He incited McCabe and Strzok to thwart the law and department rules. Obama is an evil, spineless and pathetic fraud, no use denying it anymore...
    1
  21. Democrats seem eerily clueless...
    1
  22. Seem the objective was to create an economic crisis.
    1
  23. All licenses to lie needs to be revoked. For media, politicians, police interrogators, public servants. No more lies!
    1
  24. Excellent executive action, Trump! 8 more years! (because democrats wasted the first 4)
    1
  25. jay west Don't see why his size would matter to anyone. Still must pack quite a punch sice RP had his lungs bruised and six ribs broken...
    1
  26. Nj Rh Chi?
    1
  27. God has stricken the arrogant democrats with insane stupidity...
    1
  28. Berry Tharp Maybe so, but Mexico City seems to function normally, hospitals included...
    1
  29. Frank Costello When? Three days ago I watched him saying the exact opposite?
    1
  30. The Haunting Hour Probably not, if you're a democrat...
    1
  31. darryl podczervinski Sure, so did Abc, Vice, Watter, but that's just opinionating – in the case of CNN used mainly for Trumpbashing and fearmongering, now that the impeachment fell flat and the climate change wouldn't obey the predictions. What I want is actual reporting, but perhaps you haven't experienced it? It contains observed facts presented with levelheaded neutrally and has become very rare in news media. I was hoping that the seriousness of the uncommon flu would remind a few reporters of their profession...
    1
  32. Kris S Don't know what you mean. I never play the blame game. And I'm thankfully not responsible for the entire thread, only my own comments.
    1
  33. Ancient Link Your first, saying that "the infection rate is quite low down here".
    1
  34. OMG, enough with the MSM pushing fairytales to regain their monopoly on news from social media by way of - insanely - censorship! I don't care how much nonsense the Russians spew. Can't stand to listen to RT for ten whole seconds! It doesn't and can't change anything. Don't treat users as children. We won't be nannied by MSM nor the State, wtf? This inane McCarthyism is a regression and it is far more dangerous than any foreign propaganda could ever be. Oh, and btw, where's the documentation of the "siege by nefarious forces"? Do you have anything to present? Are you afraid that if you showed us what you're jammering about, you'd be laughed out of a job? What is this incredible nonsense? Have you all gone mad in MSM?
    1
  35. Ran through William Barr's cv on Wikipedia. He may be of use to Trump – if he can take orders! If not, he'll turn out to be just one more temp imo...
    1
  36. So basically the usual democrat nonsense, hearsay, rumors and slander...
    1
  37. Jon B That's either a complete misunderstanding or a deliberate democratic projection. Those three abused their entrusted powers to falsely accuse the president in a futile attempt to avoid losing the next election. There's no grounds for impeachment just as there was no grounds for a special counsel. The FISC had to be defrauded to get it, and the unverified nonsense cooked up by Steele had to be used along with entrapment attempts – which didn't work either... I don't know where you get authoritarianism out of that. What I would suggest is that the seditious cabal be held to account and the constitution upheld.
    1
  38. Dam ury You mean "if", right? I'm not sure anything needs to be done. They'll probably be punished by the voters anyway, just as fakestream media are being punished by voters already. What will you do if Biden becomes president? 😂😂😂
    1
  39. Jon B And who're the "we", John B? You and the voices in your head?
    1
  40. Dam ury. You're probably right about the republicans, both there's more than one way to skin a weasel...
    1
  41. Dam ury Naturally, but you see, I was inadvertently thinking of Comey. 😉 Which reminds me that Epstein was clearly garroted from behind with great force and the FBI doesn't seem to be going after those who ordered the contract assassination... That seems to say a lot about the elite America of today imo...
    1
  42. Jon B So, you're the spokesman? Nah... They abused special counsel, the FISC, attempted impeachment without proper cause for starters. The spiel about majorities is nonsensical. The electorate is there as an institution to balance between rural and municipal states. America is a federation, remember?
    1
  43. Jon B Oh, you'd lose that wager. I know the mindset. It's just not rational and certainly not fair. The FISC was fraudulently abused and the incredible waste of resources by Mueller were fruits of the poisoned tree, hence illegal. There weren't presented one single witness who could confirm and of Schiffty's allegations in the preliminaries to the insanity silly impeachment. Only hearsay and speculation all the way through. That why the impeachment is groundless and that's why it unconstitutional to attempt it. Democrats don't get to just change the electorate because they have most of their voters among the "deplorables" in the cities. As I said, democrats are deluded by their own false narrative, their overblown egos and their own representatives, who hasn't got a clue about running a nation – as evidenced by the grotesque conditions everywhere they have the local majority. Now go back and note what questions of mine you omitted to answer. You might conceivably learn something about your own mindset. Until now you've lived your entire life without knowing yourself. Trust me, I can tell...
    1
  44. Jon B Why would I keep answering someone who doesn't answer me in good faith? Your character is that of a democrat. You clearly think it alright to cheat and lie if it serves you perceived or deluded purposes. If you had a conscience, you'd recognize that all I said was true. I have no more time for you.
    1
  45. Hey Tucker! Please tell us which companies are now lobbying furiously against Gaetz!
    1
  46. The corrupt house members are irrational from fear by now. They know Trump will win the election... Drain the swamp and prosecute the scumbags!
    1
  47. I will never believe the evaluation of someone who combines such a gleeful grin with dire predictions and on top of that look like a teachers pet, happy to deliver his performance... What a doodlard... Apart from that: Take out Kim et co and spare the Korean people...
    1
  48. Nonamearisto I really don't think "image problem" quite covers what Hollyweird has got. Festering rot would come closer...
    1
  49. Hey, Senate? Don't listen to Fauci. He was invested in the experimental transfer of pathological viruses across species which was banned in The States and he transferred grant moneys to the Wuhan laboratory, which continued the banned experiments! He and Bill Gates are heavily invested in vaccine enterprises. They can't be trusted.
    1
  50. Well, the dems are probably showing their true nature. Hardly surprising, but starting to get dangerous. And I say again: Both democratic bureaucrats and MSM are crossing the line and action might have to be taken to stop MSM choreographing and inciting public violence.
    1