Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
But Comey the weasel took the advice and only mentioned it when trying to cover his own asahhh, backside, didn't investigate, didn't record interrogation, didn't prosecute, didn't protect evidence but all the time pretended to be doing so!
It's hard to imagine a more detrimental leadership in the most entrusted law enforcement agency. That kind of moral negligence seeps down through all the levels and causes evaporation of morals and motivation, slowly rendering the entire organization perverted.
Comey's fraud is more detrimental than the mere inaction and dereliction of duty would have been - it is the abuse of one of the most entrusted public offices to actively cover up treason, bribery, corruption, threatening, destruction of evidence and reckless abuse of power. And all through this the msm tryed to smear Trump for firing this sorry, false, morally bankrupt, perjured excuse for a director, remember? And the oversight committee did nothing but talk?
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
I just heard Mueller's strange public address and here's my take:
He decided (on his own, he said) to tell everyone that the investigation is over, his office is closed and that his appearance before judicial oversight would not provide anything beyond his report.
Any access to further work products was not for his office to decide (Barr and the president decides)! All well and good. He also said that everyone (meaning even Trump) is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Okay! Fine.
But then he went completely off the rails, implying that even if sufficient evidence of criminal collusion between Russia and "anyone from the Trump campaign" had existed, it was "beyond the scope of his office (special prosecutor) to indict the president."
That's an illegal and completely nonsensical statement!
This statement would land mr. Mueller before a judge immediately, if I was the president! It's a grotesque smear, implying that "we believe he did it, but were prevented from prosecuting!"
And that's a lie! Nobody can prevent the special prosecutor from prosecuting anyone! That's the hole idea behind the institution...
Mueller also maintained that "there had been numerous, highly sophisticated intrusions from the Russians into various election systems and email systems" and stated directly that "these Russian spies, posing as Americans (?) had provided Hillary's emails to Wikileaks."
That's simply not true, either!
Assange, who has never given out false evidence, clearly stated that they had obtained them from an American source, and that this had cost Seth Rich his life. Assange would not confirm or deny that Seth Rich was the actual source, because they never give sources, but he nevertheless maintained that the leak had cost Seth his life.
This is all moving from the twilight zone into pure insanity. Mueller's gave two completely incompatible statements:
1. My report says everything I have to say
2. I still believe the president colluded with the Russians to fix the election.
The douchbag can't have it both ways! That's insanity right there for you.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
Well, I definitely don't believe Yates didn't know!
At best she was smart enough to ensure some deniability, but I doubt even that's the case, because she was included in the little aside with Obama!
She'd also have to be unbelievably incompetent and outright stupid to not know, and would have had to deliberately avoid asking, because she would have been informed, had she asked. She was after all needed to co-sign the FISA request.
Comey is guilty of many serious transgressions, but if Linsey with his slow moving "truth finding" thinks he can blame everything on Comey, he's sadly mistaken.
This was a seditious coup attempt and Comey wasn't the leader of the cabal. That was probably the person behind Obama's grooming by CIA, the one who holds the real birth certificate as an axe over Obama's head.
The insane number of unmaskings also points to a mastermind in CIA. Brennan is certainly reckless enough, but is he smart enough?
Mmmm... Who could it be?
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6