General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Hallands Menved
Fox News
comments
Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Fox News" channel.
Previous
6
Next
...
All
Kellucky69 How on eart did you reach that conclusion? Sessions partook in the threats to abuse the powers of his office against congress to postpone delivery of subpoenaed documents. That's not working with Trump. Neither is his stupid recusal or his weaknesses in reigning in Rosenstein, who's still working against transparency and refuses to comply with oversight and FOIA both. Sessions is swamp. He's also slow witted. He's gotta go, pronto!
3
Dismissal is the only reasonable response.
3
The fact that Comey and Strzok aren't in prison, sentenced for sedition is terrifying.
3
Marco Polo Oh, boy. You democrats really are blinded by hate/fear. Didn't it occur to any of you that this might be a trap? That the strangely second hand "whistleblower" (who's probably just a dumb leaker) was deliberately misinformed and enticed to carry false info? That's a time honored was to burn leakers, haven't you noticed? You're blind to the strategic brilliance of Trump still, even though you've watched him outmaneuver every attack leveled at him since his candidacy and come out winning β and unscathed. That's how I know you'll lose, lose and lose again. You cannot match an opponent, you disrespect, unless you're far superior. And none of you even come close to being his equal. I hear Biden is leading the polls. Doesn't that tell you how weak the other candidates are?
3
Joe Shaloom No, you need to stop your deluded nonsense ...
3
Smiles Oh, and btw: Why's your account so empty of content? Does this reflect the condition in your head? No, don't answer, I've already blocked you.
3
Yeah, a bit late in the game, though⦠I would like common sense to strike first and strike hard before the eerie fabric of lies, censorship and deceptions cause irreversible, cataclysmic damage!
3
Seems to me America is falling to piecesβ¦
3
Dems scared. Dems still hoping. Dems funny. ππΌππΌ
3
Jc Muhammad Well, it might be a little difficult to investigate Obama, when the CIA and the FBI are working against you, feverishly classifying all evidence not already destroyed. But have no concern. We'll get there. A storm is going to sweep out the desiccated mummies of the marooned swamp gang in Washington. They're already gasping, wiggling and writhing for lack of slimy pits to hide in...
3
4evermrez Get off the CNN-pipe, it's killing your brains!
3
Ah, the paid trolls have resurfaced! Last they were this active was when Washington elite would bury Pi<<gate. Must be really fearful of spygate blowing them out of the mud...
3
Yppengasse28 Yeah, nice β exept there'll be nothing to declassify on Trump, you numbnut!
3
77MsHelen JcMumblehead is a paid troll. He'll say anything. You can ignore him. In a week he's gone again.
3
Charles Cary The Washington establishment and IC leadership was scared shitless already when they found out Trump might run. They knew then as now he'll bring about changes that'll dry up their beloved swamp. Their apparently stupidity can't be real, how would they get safely across an intersection? The only thing that can explain their silliness is pure panic. Now Nadler has started fainting like Hillary. Let's see his medical records β and tax returns, why don't we?
3
The Cuomos are clearly both reckless and incompetent. Not a good thing, especially when mixed with the complete inability to embrace ones mistakes and learn from them...
3
brian champney Yes, Mueller is in a very precarious situation, himself being on the board which allowed the UraniumOne deal. The truth is not his friend and that's what the majority is requesting with increasing intensity. Trey Gowdy admitted just yesterday that he was one of "a very small and dwindling number of republicans who still supported Mueller's continuation".
3
Β Β I think you're confabulating, and Marxism hasn't earned a good reputation anywhere it was tried. But having no knowledge besides your leftist propaganda, you wouldn't know, of course...
3
John Breskind That's been officially proven false several times over β by Mueller, Horowitch and AG Barr, the first two heavily biased pro democrats and Barr still blocking JW on transparency. It's incredible anyone can still proffer this insane nonsense.
3
Midwest 639361 Yeah, mocking... Glad you explained that. Btw, how are you doing? How's everything working out for you? Changing carrier to become a comedian soon? Best of luck with that. Well, here's the hitch: I didn't call Obama gay, you just assumed so. And calling Trump gay? I somehow don't think it'll quite catch on - for some reason... Obama on the other hand, well, you only have to sketch the implication to get that reaction you just displayed. The glove seems to fit better on that hand. Anyway, I don't care a hoot for people's sexual preferences and that wasn't the point. My point would be that public perception doesn't allow for a seemingly gay president yet and that - among other issues - gave deep state a nice hold over him. I personally don't care if he is or isn't. He was a deep state puppet. So was Hillary. So was Bill and so was GWB. It's not really hard to spot once you decide to take an independent look outside of the illusions pushed by MSM...
3
When it was Hillary, it was just oppo research. With Trump β before any facts are know β it simply must be a crime. And where was the uproar when Biden abused his power to get a person, critical of his son, fired?
3
Does this idiot think he can talk Hillary's serial lying away and give Comey credibility?
3
RedBadge 11 No, it's not. It's just a very young nation with an abundance of good people and an infestation of greedy liars.
3
Big White Yes!
3
Freedom Lover π£
3
Ancient Link And btw, wasn't it your pride of fraudulent liars who wanter Avenatti for president and happily embraced Stormy Daniels' paid onslaught against the president? I don't know your background, but I can tell you ended up being too trashy to trash anyone and too ignorant to matter.
3
BETTY DICKMAN Paid by a lot of globalists probably, Soros, Chinese and Russian oligarchs, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers aso...
3
What hypocrisy! Let's see the same for all house members, governors and mayors, then!
3
"Yielding"?! No, the MSM are fighting with all they've got to preserve the illusion that there's someone home inside Biden, suitable to become president β which is of course absurd. They're lamely following orders from their corrupt CEO, who has completely abandoned journalistic professionalism. If you have any sense, why are you treating Biden as a viable candidate? He absolutely isn't, period! Let the democrats and their pet media perform the mind bending self delusional voodoo all on their lonesome selves. There's no sound reasons to lend credibility to absurd nonsense, is there?
3
The DNC is deeply corrupted and the various democratic talking heads are either liars or incredible deluded...
3
Factcheck this: ππΌ
3
Anthony Alvaros Slam dunk!
3
Anthony Alvaros Let them work...
3
shadowshifter7 You're a typical facts resistant democrat who just make things up as they go along, truth be damned...
3
1Juemadre No, the problem would be if Trump donated to Fox β or bought the entire station. Although I suspect Fox has some employees who wouldn't as easily be subdued into parroting puppets as seems to be the case with CNN, CBS, CBSN, Abc News β well all the rest of MSM, really... And fyi: Fox News β in glaring contrast to MSM β does not pretend to be unbiased! The station consistently admits to being of a mostly republican persuasion and the anchors are always open and direct when voicing their individual opinions. I think that's fine. But the MSM are pretending to dish out something under the guise of reporting which is premeditated, editorialized, one sided, vile and mean slandering!
3
It has come to the point where I become suspicious every single time investigation finds a little too much evidence a tad too conveniently at crime scenes. The dead shooter must have had exceptionally bad aim to only wound Scalise seriously... Or is what we see yet another ffop to hide the fact that Scalise was active and vocal about Pizzagate and needed taking out too - like the recent public prosecutor at hollywood beach, whose corpse was dumped not far from a judge's residence - one who also advocated more severe punishment for childmolesters no matter their positions...
2
I think the congress ought to investigate Comey plain and simple. He just doesn't fly right. His micro expressions are beyond disturbing, frightening really, and is there really any valid reason to trust him to continue as leader of the FBI? The mishandling of the Hillary case is monumental and caused extreme dissent inside the bureau with numerous resignations from section leaders, something which the press and congress seem to have already forgotten, and now, not three months later, he still picks and chooses which laws to uphold! Can somebody please explain why he "can't comment" on weather an investigation of inside leaks is ongoing, but happily can tell everybody and his dog that he's investigating Trump's allegations? Who does this freak think he is? The leader of USA? Fire his scrawny ass already and be done with this nonsense! It's becoming grotesque... And get rid of Cummings the shouting mumbletard in the process!
2
The decision made by DNC and DWS specifically are generally so stupid, messy and selfdestructive it completely defies all comprehension...
2
Twister PLUMP Thanks, and yes he is.
2
Seriously? What does these two buffoons think they're doing? Who do they think they're fooling?
2
Paul Robinson I know. You're right. I can't and won't stand for their clandestine censorship voodoo. It's great that you speak up! It's just sometimes I get so despondent, I have to vent.
2
j Freeman Choices may be more limited than we imagine?
2
The Pirate Nation Yes, exactly! Good one.
2
jx14aby The judges and the democrats are both above the law?
2
David Harrell Well, if there's going to be panoptic surveillance, let no CEOs, Board of Directors or politicians be exempt. It must, like the laws, be applied equally. So, yes, we don't need it. Those who would control us, need it. Having faith and being religious isn't quite the same. I find it to be self-evident that there is One Eternal Creator causing everything to be, but the various religions seems to quickly digress from awareness into greed for power and methods of suppression.
2
Geoff Gyro No, that's what your lead to believe by Schiff, but think for one second: 1. If it was true, the evidence would long since have been presented, but still, all we hear is rumors. 2. The minute any foreign leader heard, they demanded answers from their intelligence services. If there'd been anything to the nonsense, nobody would touch any dealings with Trump with a five yard pole. 3. Who benefited: America's enemies, deep state and the democrats. The very idea may even have originated with the Russian disinformation teams. It's insanely stupid to believe this nonsense. Sorry...
2
Electrology Now Yes, exactly. But their destructive strategy doesn't just arise from stupidity and occlusion, there's real bad faith and malice at play! They may believe, who can tell, that their control-freakery, constant lying and false promises are somehow necessary to rule, but having no self awareness and being violently opposed to criticism, they're wreaking havoc on nation and people far beyond their own understanding.
2
Fox gently sliding into the mind numbing propaganda machine that's MSM! Come on! The rioters, Antifa and BLM are leftist mobs, instigated, incited and cheered on by Maxime Waters, Kamala Harris, Sixways Schumer and Pelosi Sundae. Trump has done all he can to make democrat governors and mayors accept help from the national guard. Don't treat this as if there's any doubt who's to blame.
2
donna dixon That's fake news right there! πππΌπ
2
donna dixon Yes, your stereotypical "arguments" sure does you a lot of credit. You should probably not seek employment in any sector where creativity is needed, though, but cudos for the frequent use of "dumb". I take it you're very familiar with the condition? Russian bot my foot. Have you no discernment?
2
Previous
6
Next
...
All