Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Roger Stone: Believe DNC hack was inside job" video.

  1. nhoJJohnJohnGroovy You don't seem to have a clue about your own nation's history and be unbelievably naive to booth. This guy, Stone, is speaking the clear, unadulterated truth! It gives me some hope for the future. I actually didn't think anyone dared tell the truth anymore. I also agree with him on Manafort, although I'm not so sure he'll stand up to the pressure as well as Stone.
    4
  2. MetteC5 I read the silly document in full and would say this to spare others the effort: No! It doesn't "contain irrefutable evidence" unless you're biased to the extent of paranoia. It's a low level and very primitive attempt to get Wheeler some more money for a job not done. It's long winded, rambling and incoherent and shouldn't by rights get "the case" before a judge, not the least because the complaint fails to state with clarity what "the case" is supposed to be. Moreover it certainly does nothing to diminish the suspicion that the murder of Seth Rich was indeed a contract hit.
    1
  3. nhoJJohnJohnGroovy Exactly! Of course you wouldn't even have a clue of the importance of historical context when evaluating politics. If you did, your naive views would crumble rather fast, I suspect.
    1
  4. Free Thinker? More like Brainwashed Sheep going "ba-aaah" ✋🏼😎
    1
  5. MetteC5 OMG! It's just a silly complaint drafted by low level advocates! It's very naive and heavily biased! It's also long winded and incompetent! The judge will in all likelihood say the same, though of course somewhat more politely. It's silly of you to post a link to something so inconsequential. What's your interest in the matter? Mine is to get enough people alerted to the overwhelming corruption and abuse of power in deep state that our politicians be compelled to do something effective against it, before a free republic is transmuted into a totalitarian tyranny, run exclusively by the 1‰ of Banksters and Money Vampires. How about you, now? What's your motive, agenda, connection or driving force?
    1
  6. John Al Niel Amen!
    1
  7. MetteC5 I didn't find any such "evidence". Partial quotes from email without their context can at best provide implicati, not evidence. Anywuptidoo, you can't be impartial if you're so firmly against Trump. He was the choice at the election, period! I like very much how he circumnavigate the MSM and cannot agree that he lies. He exaggerates, businessmen do, but is generally refreshingly outspoken and to my knowledge right on the button on most important subjects. I may not care so much for his style on other matters, but OMG America dodged a bullet by rejecting Hillary. Sadly I fear that the maverick is by now already corrupted, too and won't succeed in draining the swamp. My personal litmus test on his valor remains Pizzagate. If he blows the elite paedophile network wide open and ensures that even the highest ranking networkers get their full punishment, he's okay by me. If not, well... Then he's just ono more overinflated ego causing pain and sorrow to the world... If small children aren't safe in a society, what is the state good for? Seth Rich was a contract kill. The evidence has long since convinced me. The amount of convenient "suicides" among insider critics and potential or factual whistleblowers has risen out of control under ohbummer. Comey was derelict in his duties to not prosecute Hillary for treason and don't mention Loretta Lynch or Wasserman. But we may agree it's highly problematic that Session isn't moving on those?
    1
  8. MetteC5 I also notice MSM busily slamming Malia Zimmerman as being "notorious for questionable coverage of conspiracy stories". Well, I don't know her from Eva, but I'll say this: 1. If by conspiracy theories the MSM are referring to 9/11 and Pizzagate that doesn't mean much once the truth spreads beyond a certain level. 2. Just because Wheeler is suing Fox for misquotes, doesn't mean it's true either. Wheeler is certainly a questionable person with a ragged CV mostly out for money. He may easily have been bribed and even supported financially in seeking restitution through the courts. It must be considered. A nonbiased view must encompass both possibilities, in so much as the president certainly is the target for an unprecedented MSM slander campaign much akin to a witch hunt - and invariably on strangely flimsy grounds - churning out with disproportionate and one eyed MSM support to Mueller's inappropriate investigation 24/7/365. How can a former FBI director, who completely failed to properly investigate 9/11, be entrusted to see through his close friend, Comey's lies? Sooner or later the truth prevails, since the truth is very closely interwoven with sustainable life, whereas lies are always consuming more energy than they can produce, imploding upon themselves.
    1
  9. MetteC5 Thanks for the advice, but I already did and always do. Perhaps you shouldn't attempt to school me, I may have you at a disadvantage. But it's good advice, so please, do take your own advice, and then - if you really want to apply and develop your discernment - train yourself for years to always do the following 5 things: 1. Note and formulate clearly the available pros of a matter with detached neutrality 2. With the the cons, do the same Now comes the hard part: 3. Note and formulate clearly the emotional base for your habitual propensity to either like or dislike the pros 4. With the cons, do the same 5. Based on all these factors, formulate a clear, unambiguous conclusion and embrace that this is actually what you believe to be the truth of the matter - right now. When you have done this for some years and developed a self-acceptance on par with or better than Nietzsche (and in contrast to him preserved your sanity) you may reach a degree of discernment that allows you to see right through the incredible amount of noise people make whenever they talk and know what's true... A little later in life you may even discover that you always knew truth and realize, like I did, that we're born with the ability to recognize truth and that doubt was something we had to acquire by learning... Nice to have met you. Be well...
    1
  10. MetteC5 Okay, I see. I wasted my time on you. You're perhaps too mean and narrow minded to understand. And no, Nietzsche is no idol of mine - which you'd know if you had the mental capacity to retain everything I wrote.
    1