Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Graham challenges whistleblower to appear before Senate Judiciary" video.

  1. OMG! Biden is on record laughing and bragging how he used his power over funding to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating his son! Get up to speed, Sen. Graham!
    27
  2. Mark Kilian Good one! Democrats are adventurous people – although not very inventive. Normally the adventuresome will try anything once, but democrats restrict themselves to try anything over and over and over and...
    4
  3. Marco Polo Oh, boy. You democrats really are blinded by hate/fear. Didn't it occur to any of you that this might be a trap? That the strangely second hand "whistleblower" (who's probably just a dumb leaker) was deliberately misinformed and enticed to carry false info? That's a time honored was to burn leakers, haven't you noticed? You're blind to the strategic brilliance of Trump still, even though you've watched him outmaneuver every attack leveled at him since his candidacy and come out winning – and unscathed. That's how I know you'll lose, lose and lose again. You cannot match an opponent, you disrespect, unless you're far superior. And none of you even come close to being his equal. I hear Biden is leading the polls. Doesn't that tell you how weak the other candidates are?
    3
  4. Jessica "... not releasing to complaint to appropriate parties"??? Can't make head or tail of that sentence. Did you perhaps mean "compliance"? Anyway... Thanks so much for "educating" me on the purpose of primaries. But it's all nonsense, because the MSM are bringing these idiotic polls every time, although everybody knows they don't predict anything. Well, actually they might predict who's not getting nominated, since no candidate with the early lead has ever gone on to be nominated... And another thing: Name recognition, yes, I've heard the explanation a thousand times if one, but really! If you're that ignorant and lazy about your candidates, why bother giving out a name at all? Why even answer the phone?
    2
  5. Jessica Your sentence still doesn't make sense. It is as I said. Neither Trump nor Hillary had an early lead. Yes, people are lazy or ignorant if they don't know at least the names of their party's candidates – and for naming a favorite based on name recognition alone. I don't know how you reached the conclusion that I didn't learn anything from this conversation, but you're right. There was nothing for me to learn, so naturally I didn't...
    2
  6. TheVeryhumble Agreed. Truth matters. But why do you believe Trump is finished? That sounds more like poor judgement to me.
    2
  7. Brenda Seigler Exactly, but Dems don't care. Mueller's team was flawed. The composition was grotesque. The duration was ridiculous. The FISA application was illegal. Mueller's last speech was attempted character assassination and he should've been prosecuted for breach of trust in the OSI. His appearance before the committee was a farce of incompetence. His job isn't to exonerate anyone or speak to anyone's possible guilt. It's to recommend prosecution or not, period! And now Nadler is abusing the judiciary committee for obstruction while the house speaker is supporting impeachment based on a report she hasn't seen. It's fraud, dishonesty and incompetence. Every experienced representative knows full well there's no grounds for impeachment. And still Nadler is using the resources of the judiciary, presumably trying desperately to give naive voters a focus, seeing that the field of democratic candidates is ridiculously incompetent and doesn't stand a chance against Trump...
    2
  8. Jessica No, it is not true, you just making things up. How could Hillary be pulling 70% when Sanders started ahead of her. Clarification comes too late. I lost respect and interest.
    2
  9. Heywood Jabuzoff What? Where did you find that surprising and unique information?
    1
  10. White Tiger I believe it's SDNY – without the U? And that one of the few mistakes Trump has made was to have Preet Bharara fired.
    1