Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "Trump and Clinton Responded Very Differently to Impeachment Acquittal" video.

  1. Yeah, huge difference, naturally. Bill Clinton, was foolish enough to perjure himself on the Lewinsky matter, but the Starr case was even more disproportionate than the Mueller case in costs as well as in inappropriate leaking. Bill was in my view rightly acquitted, but on his trial there were at least some real meat on the bones – hugely worsened by Bill's own perjury. In Trump's case Mueller found nothing and Schiff had no grounds for impeachment. So of course the reactions are very different... I went back and refreshed the impeachment of Bill Clinton. It gave me the impression that the democrats, among other motives, were also out for payback and used the same sleazy tactics that Ken Star had applied. But they never stood a chance. They abused entrusted powers too much, lied and exaggerated too much – and their obedient MSM made it worse by being incredibly partisan.
    2
  2. Metal Gear Apparently so... But unfortunately Avenatti seems to be away on holidays in the shade...
    1
  3. leicanoct Marriage to whom?
    1
  4. Sean Profit No, I didn't edit it out, only removed the superfluous repetition at the end. And I disagree, of course: Insofar as the essentials are concerned, Mueller found nothing. It's also not correct that he had a dual purpose, as clearly evidenced by his total lack of investigation into the Greek connection, the attempted entrapment, the FISA fraud and the very fact that Steele actually did "collude" with Russian contacts – and was paid to do so by Hillary. No! Mueller was on a Witchhunt and produced nothing. Entrapment was attempted and may have repercussions in court yet. Neither Hillary nor Comey are in the clear, despite the protection against FOIA attempted by even the present DOJ – because Judicial Watch was granted discovery on Hillary in court. The FISC was exposed for being just as dangerous as many senators feared and may be abolished all together – oh and Brennan and Clapper aren't home safe, either. The Russia fairytale was so ridiculously overblown and speculative – and it's in the report, too: No influence was deemed to have succeed in influencing the election, period! All the rest of this ill advised, sordid affair is idle, partisan noises of no consequence. But the fraudulent impeachment may have dire political consequences for Schiff, Nadler, Schumer and Pelosi – and good riddance if it does...
    1
  5. Sean Profit You're very long winded and formalistic. This seems to preclude you from getting the essence of things – in this case both about the sham processes attempted against Trump and of what I said. Had I wanted to deny that the report came in two parts, I would likely have said so. You're welcome to go back and read what I actually said and try to figure out why I said it. But you're not on safe ground assuming that you know anything of importance about this entire, three years long charade that I haven't already heard or read. So being that I deem you a bit rude and slow witted, you'll forgive me if I don't seem terribly interested in continuing this discussion? Bye...
    1
  6. Sean Profit No, deal, benvenutti! The report pretended to have a dual purpose, but had only one – as became all too clear when Mueller held his little, ill conceived eulogy on himself (without taking questions!) The sole purpose, camouflaged behind a formalistic superfluity of words and chapters, was to, at the very least, smear Trump – having failed to uncover anything noteworthy. The Russian interference was insufficiently documented, relying heavily on what was allegedly by the Intelligence Community. At the disastrous congressional hearing, Mueller revealed lack of even superficial knowledge of key foreign players. This showed everyone with a minimum of perception, that the Russia nonsense was a pretext, not a matter of true concern! That's it, all the rest is wishful thinking, incoherent nonsense (such as comes out of CNN every hour) and vindictive pettiness. When, in your estimate, did Mueller's team realize they wouldn't be able to make a case against Trump? Why, in your opinion, did Mueller continue so far beyond that point in time, that he had to be told to wrap it up by his supervisor?
    1