Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "This Is Who You Just Elected" video.

Adam Gordon I have trouble understanding why anyone is still even mentioning Hellary. She was a walking dead. Now she's politically dead - and was on life support politically for the last 3 years - and soon she'll be dead for good. What's there to talk about with her, I wonder. Or with Bill? Maybe Pedogate? Yeah, but thats a much deeper issue - or should I say higher? The manstream is calling it "fake news" completely without even attempting to investigate! There's tons of incriminating evidence. In Europe, given the same, all Alefantes business places, those with similar logos in the areas close to Podestas residence would have been raided and searched simultaneously and immediately. So the Washington police must be thoroughly corrupted. In the Saville case, GB, one suspect was direktor of MI5 - so before trial, evidence suddenly went missing. The only thing keeping child traffickers out of courtrooms and jails in America is the masonic brotherhoods and their henchmen in high places. They've got the vilest most unimaginable dirt on earth other - and a very, very firm grib on the lamestream presstitutes - but they've all got to go before anything decent can happen again in America.
2
James Bauer Sounds clever, but a conclusion landing on "either this or that" isn't really a conclusion, is it now? And even the premise is false, because reality is never ever about either or! The main attraction by Trump is that he probably will attempt to defend the nation. The main detraction by Hillary was that she most likely wouldn't. She's a globalist. He's a nationalist. She is in in bed with the media and the shadow powers in the big coverup of who screwed over the american middle class when the bubble of greed and insane speculation in the market burst. Trump isn't in anybody's pocket - yet...
1
Scott Siegal I don't think so. Trump isn't so much a racist as he's prejudiced . And he's openly critical, even suspicious of muslims. But maybe this is simply a new and necessary stance to take? If the rampant racism in America could be exchanged by more pragmatic views on social and religious dynamics, where all - race notwithstanding - must play on a level field, much would have been achieved. And fuck relations to China! Small nations can have very polite and even beneficial relations to China so long as they keep mum about Tibet and pollution, but nations China considers threats or serious competition, Japan, Russia, Australia and America can't have good relations with China. They simply never abide by international conventions - unless it's convenient to them. China, India, Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia really can't be trustet to act rationally - in westerners understanding of the concept...
1
gujogi bi Or a fool to limit your suspicions to muslims alone? Any society needs be alert and somewhat suspicious of aliens in great numbers. The American indians to their detriment were not. Islam is a religion, as are most others, conceived for conquest, but it's also a latecomer. Muslim countries haven't yet achived the division between State and Church (Mosque) which took place in Europe centennials ago. This ensures dictatorship with random, monomaniacal policies both internally and foreign. It also caused stagnation in the development of social freedom and responsibility and keeps women severely suppressed. But the islamophobia sprouted by the lamestream presstitutes is a deflection from graver matters at our doorstep: Government being taken out of the hands of elected politicians and secretly enforced by The Power Vampires by ways of Black Ops, key persons in entrusted positions and (perhaps worst and most dangerous) their control of media, metadata and data flow... Mostly by way of fear mongering, since any light on the subject or open debate would get their craziness laughed out of society in a heartbeat.
1
Shelby Longbottom This isn't at all unusual or strange in any way. G. A. D. is purely a mental disorder. It's not about fearfulness, it's about anxiety! Everyone with a vivid imagination combined with complete identification with the mind must by necessity experience some degree of relief when exposed to a threat they consider to be real. Soldiers with PTSD clamor to get back in the war zone for precisely the same reason. It's the uncertainties that allow for rampant speculations, which trigger the feelings of fear without focus or purpose that is called anxiety. Kierkegaard stated: Angst is the dreaming mind's fear of Nothing... Find yourself some videos by Eckhart Tolle. He may catalyze your complete healing and awakening from the dreams of daytime. I say "catalyze" because this is aa entirely individual development, which has already begun in you. He merely takes people to look over the edge where they expect an abyss but find a valley full of peace, joy and fruition of mind and body...
1
Shelby Longbottom Ok, what planet again?
1
James Bauer You have a two party system setup and of course you're right. It's a constitutional construction and thus amenable to any changes THAT CAN GO THROUGH THE SYSTEM. But a system cannot change itself. To change a system you need something more, something not subject to the rules of the system. That something is common awareness. When the common awarenes of systematic flaws becomes determined, the system may be changed. Would America be better of with no electoral voting? Who knows? In Denmark we don't have that. Our system isn't by design bipartisan. Yet our "Folketing", which constitutes both senate and congress, and consistent of many smallest and bigger parties, nevertheless tends towards a split in two groups much like yours. Personally I don't believe it very important how the system is set up as long as it's a well functioning democracy, amenable to changes by the people. But that can never be preserved unless the people are well informed. The greater the complexity, the greater the need for transparency. So the global trend where news media are bought by a few, insanely rich, who operate clandestinely and who also buy favors from and incur blackmail on the elect - who were meant to represent us, the people - isn't in any way healthy and can only pretend to transparency (thus degenerate towards censorship) and will always commit crimes and abuse against the people whenever we demand to know WHO we vote for, WHERE their visions are taking us and WHAT they're in reality doing.
1
Kane O But exactly the same as you accused the Trumpers for goes for you and for Hitlary, don't you see? You believe there something good about Hillary - even to the point of eliciting envy - and you somehow convinced yourself that she isn't dependent on corporate America! And btw what's wrong with doing business, producing items and selling commodities? But there's something seriously wrong with accepting donations from foreign interests, hiding it and using 90% for private affairs while calling it charity and taking the tax deduction as such. That's very, very corrupt, so corrupt in fact that we usually associate such behavior with banana republics and dictatorships. But that's exactly what Hillary did and why she had the need for her email servers to be private. She became criminally corrupt and her actions borders on outright treason on matters of security. Much can be said about Trump, but he isn't that type of a lying traitor. He may be greedy, but he isn't power-crazed. He may get there yet, who can tell, but so far he's working for America the best he knows how and taking advice from very skillful people. Also he can never compete with Hillary on the lying fields. She even surpassed Nixon who also became paranoid and power crazed... She was a pathological serial liar.
1
James Bauer Let it go for now and watch carefully what happens next...
1
A bit full of yourself much? Explaning the election, how? You couldn't even predict the outcome! Now you're ranting about who the people ACTUALLY elected? Come on, now. It's all water under the bridge. The people and the setup of the election system chose the two saddest candidates I know of. Both have huge issues, none is worthy. Some, who are very naive on the left, believe Hillary qualified, but she's really terribly corrupt. Some who are equally naive on the right believe Trump trustworthy, which he really isn't. You made a choice between pest and cholera and cholera was chosen - the lesser evil. Now the essential issue becomes this: Can the system be mended to heal the split running through the nation? One answer is that it certainly can't if you and everyone else keep dragging the past into the present, arguing like crazy and calling your opponents names, accusing them of stupidity, blindness and malice - thereby only disclosing the exact same flaws in yourselves. Common ground for future efforts must be found! Panic is never a good basis for problem solving. So calm down. Cool it. Get an overview you really trust. And for pity's sake: Find out what you want for the future as first priority. Then combine the common goals with the realistic possibilities. Get real! Together! You're drowning yourselves in mental games, illusions and self deceptions...
1
gujogi bi Leave a little space for wisdom. Don't act so clever. To conserve means to keep and protect something from damage, change, or waste. To progress means to move forward. To be conservative only means something, if given substance by informing what you wish to conserve. Likewise to be progressive only becomes meaningful if you say where you're going. To move forward or to stay both makes sense depending on circumstances. Your quarrels makes no sense. None of you are attempting to inform on the meaning or substance matter. Your simply attempting to prove yourselves right and the others wrong by spewing labels and nonsense. Move along. Take a breath. Ask yourself "what am I on about?" Then determine what's really taking place. And then find out why. You can do that on your own. Most can. But if you can't, you really shouldn't talk so much.
1
gujogi bi No! First you tell me if humanity has improved.
1
gujogi bi I'm trying to introduce some humanity into a mean, fruitless quarrel and I'm also trying to instruct you and others in ways of waking from the dreamings of daytime we sometimes call illusions. But perhaps I'm ill advised to attempt this? I don't know your age. You might still be very young and naturally immature. In that case forget about me. But if you do consider yourself grown up, read my comment attentively until you really understand what I'm saying. It can help you on the way to determine your own inner purpose and thus make your life meaningful.
1
gujogi bi Why would I lie? Do you? And I'm certainly not your "son".
1
gujogi bi Yeah, you're just mean - and you couldn't answer. Sorry you wasted my time.
1